Open Journal Systems

The determinants of purchase decision towards among generation z via tiktok for health products of small and medium entrepreneurs

Kim Yew Lim, Sew Teng Yuen, Owee Kowang Tan, Phung Thai Minh Trang, Tippawan Lertatthakornkit, Poh Kiong Tee

Article ID: 2688
Vol 9, Issue 8, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 84 (Abstract) 42 (PDF)

Abstract

The widespread use of social media platforms, such as TikTok has caused a drastic change in the way that consumers behave in the modern world. During this change, TikTok has become a significant influencer, influencing the thoughts and tastes of a wide range of people. This study aims to examine the relationships between social media engagement,  health awareness, perceived price fairness and the purchase intention on healthcare products via Tik Tok in Malaysia. This study employs survey questionnaire via the use of convenience sampling techniques to collect data and SPSS for Data Analysis. This  study comprises of 385 sample sizes. The results show a significant relationship between social media engagement, health awareness, price fairness and the purchase intention on healthcare products via Tik Tok. From theoretical implication aspect, this research provided empirical support for the hypothesis that there are predictive links between health awareness, price fairness, social media engagement, with the purchase intention. While from practical aspect, the results of the study have important significance for the healthcare products of small and medium entrepreneurs’ future business growth.


Keywords

purchase intention, social media engagement, health awareness, price fairness

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Chandrasekaran, S., Thiruvenkadam, T. & Subrahmanian, M., 2019. Impact of Online Learning on Teenagers Buying Behaviour. The Online Journal of Distance Education & e-Learning, 7(2), p.89.

2. Voramontri, D. and Klieb, L., 2019. Impact of social media on consumer behaviour. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 11(3), pp.209-233.

3. Panwar, D., Anand, S., Ali, F. and Singal, K., 2019. Consumer decision making process models and their applications to market strategy. International Management Review, 15(1), pp.36-44.

4. Huang, B., Juaneda, C., Sénécal, S. and Léger, P.M., 2021. “Now You See Me”: the attention-grabbing effect of product similarity and proximity in online shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 54(1), pp.1-10.

5. Qu, J., Zhang, Y., Tang, W., Cheng, W., Zhang, Y. & Bu, L., 2023. Developing a virtual reality healthcare product based on data-driven concepts: A case study. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 57, p.102118.

6. Chaerudin, S.M. & Syafarudin, A., 2021. The effect of product quality, service quality, price on product purchasing decisions on consumer satisfaction. Ilomata International Journal of Tax & Accounting, 2(1), pp.61-70.

7. Pahwa, B. and Gupta, M., 2019. A study of factors influencing the purchase decision of health insurance policies using AHP approach. Compusoft, 8(7), pp.3285-3293.

8. Pangalila, M.C. & Aprilianty, F., 2022. The Impact of TikTok Fashion Haul Videos Towards Generation Z's Purchase Decision in Indonesia. International Journal of Business & Technology Management, 4(3), pp.391-401.

9. Anwar, T., 2023. The Effect Of Promotion In Tiktok Shop On Purchase Decisions By Students In Medan. Russian Law Journal, 11(4).

10. Tram, N., 2022. The impact of TikTok influencer marketing on consumer behavior: A Study of Influencer Marketing on TikTok affecting Consumer Behavior among Generation Z.

11. Jena, R.K., 2020. Measuring the impact of business management Student's attitude towards entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, p.106275.

12. Trunfio, M. & Rossi, S., 2021. Conceptualising & measuring social media engagement: A systematic literature review. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2021, pp.267-292.

13. Seymour, J., 2018. The impact of public health awareness campaigns on the awareness & quality of palliative care. Journal of palliative medicine, 21(S1), pp.S-30.

14. De Vere Hunt, I. & Linos, E., 2022. Social Media for Public Health: Framework for Social Media–Based Public Health Campaigns. Journal of medical internet research, 24(12), p.e42179.

15. Rodrigues, R.I., Lopes, P. and Varela, M., 2021. Factors affecting impulse buying behavior of consumers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, p.697080.

16. Kujur, F. and Singh, S., 2020. Visual communication and consumer-brand relationship on social networking sites-uses & gratifications theory perspective. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 15(1), pp.30-47.

17. Allender, W.J., Liaukonyte, J., Nasser, S. and Richards, T.J., 2021. Price fairness and strategic obfuscation. Marketing Science, 40(1), pp.122-146.

18. Nagy, C.J., 2018. Influential factors on consumer purchase intentions: Cases of instant noodle products in the Hungarian market. Journal of Eastern European & Central Asian Research, 5(2).

19. Xiao, L., Guo, F., Yu, F. & Liu, S., 2019. The effects of online shopping context cues on consumers’ purchase intention for cross-border E-Commerce sustainability. Sustainability, 11(10), p.2777.

20. Espadoto, M., Martins, R.M., Kerren, A., Hirata, N.S. & Telea, A.C., 2019. Toward a quantitative survey of dimension reduction techniques. IEEE transactions on visualization & computer graphics, 27(3), pp.2153-2173.

21. Huovila, A., Bosch, P. and Airaksinen, M., 2019. Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when?. Cities, 89, pp.141-153.

22. Stratton, S.J., 2021. Population research: convenience sampling strategies. Prehospital & disaster Medicine, 36(4), pp.373-374.

23. Krosnick, J.A., 2018. Questionnaire design. The Palgrave h&book of survey research, pp.439-455.

24. Jebb, A.T., Ng, V. & Tay, L., 2021. A review of key Likert scale development advances: 1995–2019. Frontiers in psychology, 12, p.637547.

25. Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2016) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach.7th Edition, Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.

26. Wider W, Tanucan JCM, Lin J, Jiang L and Udang LN (2023). Who makes a better university adjustment wingman: Parents or friends? PLoS ONE ,18(12): e0294658.

27. Fei, Z., Rasli, A., Kowang, T. O., Fei, G. C., & Koh, H. P. (2023). Journey to the south: A case study of a Chinese PhD student in a Malaysian university. Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN, 2252(8822), 8822.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2688
(84 Abstract Views, 42 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Lim Kim Yew, Yuen Sew Teng, Tan Owee Kowang, Phung Thai Minh Trang, Tippawan Lertatthakornkit, Tee Poh Kiong

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.