PDF

Published

2024-08-26

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 8 (2024): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

YAO, C., Ismail, A., & Azman, N. A. (2024). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating effects of resource slack. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2720

Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating effects of resource slack

Cuihong YAO

Department of International Business, School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

Alisha Ismail

Universiti Utara Malaysia

Noor Azura Azman

Universiti Utara Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2720


Keywords: CEP, board gender diversity, slack resources, resource base theory, internal environment

Abstract

The board of directors, as the decision-making body of internal environmental governance, has an undeniable impact on corporate environmental performance (CEP). With the continuous improvement of women's status and the increasing emphasis on gender equality in society, the topic of the impact of board gender diversity on CEP has received more attention. The foundation of the study is built around the Resource Base Theory, which explores the impact of board gender diversity on CEP and constructs a research model of slack resources regulating board gender diversity and CEP. The study focuses on industrial enterprises in Guangdong Province, China, and uses the Partial Least Squares (PLS) structural equation model to analyze 478 collected enterprise data. Slack Resources is divided into absorbed slack and unabsorbed slack, and their moderating effects are tested separately. The research findings indicated that female directors have a significant positive impact on CEP, while the unabsorbed slack enhances the positive impact of female directors on CEP; in the same vein, the moderating effect of absorbed slack is not significant. The research findings suggest that it is necessary to determine which types of slack resources and female directors are being considered when discussing the impact of board gender diversity on CEP.

Author Biography

Cuihong YAO, Department of International Business, School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

 Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology 

 Associate Professor 

References

[1]. Rabia. T., Ba. W.H., & Wang. L.(2023). Digital transformation， green supply chain, and corporate environmental performance. Soft Science,37 (10),14-25.

[2]. Yu. W, & Guo. X. Y. (2023). Research on the impact of gender diversity of board on corporate green innovation. Soft Science,37 (1),52-57.

[3]. Hunter L., Hatch A., & Johnson A. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly 85(3): 677–694.

[4]. Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society and Natural Resources, 19(9), 771-789.

[5]. Post C., Rahman N., & Rubow E. (2011). Green governance: boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society 50,189–223.

[6]. Webb E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance 8: 255–277.

[7]. Husted, B. W., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220-227.

[8]. Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299-317.

[9]. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2(4), 169-187.

[10]. Daniel, F., Lohrke, F.T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner Jr, R. A. (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 565-574.

[11]. Eagly AH., & Carli LL. (2007). Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

[12]. Adams RB, &Funk P. (2009). Beyond the glass ceiling: does gender matter? Management Science 58: 219–235.

[13]. Fondas N., & Sassalos S. (2000). A different voice in the boardroom: how the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus 12: 13–22.

[14]. Brown D.H., Brown D.L., & Anastasopoulos V.(2002). Women on Boards: Not Just the Right Thing… but the ‘Bright’ Thing. Conference Board of Canada: Ottawa.

[15]. Al-Jaifi, H. A., Al-Qadasi, A. A., & Al-Rassas, A. H. (2023). Board diversity effects on environmental performance and the moderating effect of board independence: evidence from the Asia-Pacific region. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2210349.

[16]. Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A. A., & Iqbal, U. (2020). Are women eco‐friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3146-3161.

[17]. Burkhardt, K., Nguyen, P., & Poincelot, E. (2020). Agents of change: Women in top management and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1591-1604.

[18]. Provasi, R., & Harasheh, M. (2021). Gender diversity and corporate performance: Emphasis on sustainability performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 127-137.

[19]. Naveed, K., Voinea, C. L., Ali, Z., Rauf, F., & Fratostiteanu, C. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social performance in different industry groups: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(6), 3142.

[20]. Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. B., & Tansik, D. A. (1988). Antecedents of Organizational Slack. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 601–614.

[21]. Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk-taking in organizational decision-making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 562-585.

[22]. Lin, J. Y. (2017). Knowledge creation through joint venture investments: The contingent role of organizational slack. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 46, 1-25.

[23]. Bowen, F. E. (2002). Organizational slack and corporate greening: Broadening the debate. British Journal of Management, 13(4), 305-316.

[24]. Du, Y., Kim, P. H., Fourne, S. P., & Wang, X. (2022). In times of plenty: Slack resources, R&D investment, and entrepreneurial firms in challenging institutional environments. Journal of Business Research, 145, 360-376.

[25]. Lu, L. H., & Huang, Y. F. (2019). Manufacturing strategy, organizational slack, and the formation of interfirm linkages. Chinese Management Studies, 13(1), 70-92.

[26]. Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51,147–164.

[27]. Tan, J. and Peng, M.W. (2003), “Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy”, Strategic Management Journal,24(13),1249-1263.

[28]. Huang, Y. F., & Chen, C. J. (2010). The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation. Technovation, 30(7-8), 420-428.

[29]. Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685-702.

[30]. Bourgeois,L.J.(1981).On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review,35(1),1-7.

[31]. Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481-517.

[32]. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concerns. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322-348.

[33]. Smith, A., & Rogers, V. (2000). Ethics-related responses to specific situation vignettes: Evidence of gender-based differences and occupational socialization. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 73-85.

[34]. Liao,Z., & Long, S. (2018). CEOs' regulatory focus, slack resources, and firms' environmental innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 981-990.

[35]. Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495-511.

[36]. Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2013). A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), 136-169.

[37]. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465-480.

[38]. Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48-58.

[39]. Hillman, A.J., Cannella Jr, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747-763.

[40]. Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological review, 109(3), 573.

[41]. Miller T, & Triana MdC. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies 46: 755.

[42]. Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., & Zhou, G. (2018). Promoting firms’ energy-saving behavior: The role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack. Energy Policy, 115, 230–238.

[43]. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[44]. Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhou, G. (2014). Determinants of employee electricity saving: the role of social benefits, personal benefits and organizational electricity saving climate.Clean. Prod. 66, 280–287.

[45]. Tenenhaus, M., V.E. Vinzi, Y.-M. Chatelin, & C. Lauro. (2005). “PLS path modeling,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48,159–205.

[46]. Junquera, B., Brío,J .Á.,& Fernández, E.(2012). Clients’ involvement in environmental issues and organizational performance in businesses: an empirical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 288-298.

[47]. Mazzi, A., Mason, C., Mason, M., ∧ Scipioni, A. (2012). Is it possible to compare environmental performance indicators reported by public administrations? Results from an Italian survey. Ecological Indicators, 23, 653-659.

[48]. Sibel, Yildiz, Cankaya, & Bulent Sezen. (2019).Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1),98-121.

[49]. Latan, H. Chiappetta, J., Lopes, S. J., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz,, M. (2018). Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management's commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 297-306.

[50]. Chien, M.K. (2014).The impact of Green Supply chain management practices on sustainable organizational performance. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Protection, 1(1): 12-23.

[51]. Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 241–262.

[52]. Cabeza-García,L.,Fernández-Gago,R.,&Nieto, M. (2017). Do Board Gender Diversity and Director Typology Impact CSR Reporting? European Management Review,15(4),559-575.

[53]. Wang, C., Luo, B., Liu, Y. & Wei, Z. (2016), “The impact of executives’ perceptions of environmental threats and organizational slack on innovation strategies”, Nankai Business Review International, 7(2),216-230.

[54]. Cronbach, L.J.(1951). “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests,” Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

[55]. Nunnally, J.C. & I.H. Bernstein. (1994).Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.

[56]. Werts, C. E., R. L. Linn, & K.G. Jöreskog. (1974). “Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25–33.

[57]. Fornell, C., & D.F. Larcker.(1981). "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

[58]. Chin, W.W.(1998). “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling,” In Modern Methods for Business Research, Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, I295–1336.

[59]. Huber, F., A. Herrmann, M. Frederik, J. Vogel, & K. Vollhardt.(1981). Kausalmodellierung mit Partial Least Squares—Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, Wiesbaden: Gabler.

[60]. Kyaw, K., Treepongkaruna, S., & Jiraporn, P. (2022). Board gender diversity and environmental emissions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 2871-2881.

[61]. Wernerfelt,B.A.(1984).Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal,5(2):171-180.

[62]. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

[63]. Pareek, R., Sahu, T. N., & Gupta, A. (2023). Gender diversity and corporate sustainability performance: empirical evidence from India. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 20(1), 140-153.

[64]. Al-Shaer, H. & Zaman, M. (2016). “Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality”, Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 12(3), 210-222.

[65]. Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2014), “The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance”. Journal of Business Ethics, 132 (01), 1-19.

[66]. Jizi, M., Nehme, R., & Melhem, C. (2022). Board gender diversity and firms' social engagement in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 41(2), 186-206.

[67]. Freeman, S. J., & Cameron, K. S. (1993). Organizational downsizing - a convergence and reorientation framework. Organization Science, 4(1), 10–29.

[68]. Fisher, S. R., & White, M. A. (2000). Downsizing in a learning organization: Are there hidden costs? Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 244–251.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com