Published
2024-08-26
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Public employment services and rural NEETs aged 25-29: A case study from the South-West Region in Bulgaria
Vladislava Lendzhova
Department of Sociology SWU “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Valentina Milenkova
Department of Sociology SWU “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria and Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria
Albena Nakova
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria
Emilia Chengelova
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2730
Keywords: Bulgaria, labour market, vulnerable youths, NEET, PES
Abstract
Background: The concept of youth not in education, training, and employment (NEET) is a relatively new popular concept. Its popularity is largely due to the fact that it takes into consideration different vulnerabilities such as unemployment and early school leaving, which are common among young people. The complexity of labour markets due to digitalization and globalisation has led to increased vulnerability for young people, particularly those aged 25-29. Bulgarian social policy often overlooks this group, who entered the labour market after the 2008 financial crisis, leading to unemployment or unstable employment. Our study aims to contribute to the successful integration of NEETs aged 25-29 into the labour market through increasing knowledge of relevant employment initiatives that have been implemented in Bulgaria. Specifically, it focuses on how these services are provided to young people living in rural areas. The main research question guiding this study is: “How can Public Employment Services (PES) effectively address youth unemployment and support vulnerable youths and rural NEETs in Bulgaria?”
Research methodology: The methodology is based on qualitative information gathered from public employment offices in rural areas and a survey of national PES offices in the country. We combined qualitative data thematic analysis with its quantitative examination (e.g. descriptive and reliability statistics; correspondence analysis) to identify similarity/difference patterns among studied cases.
Conclusions: A key conclusion from our study concerning NEETs (especially those with vulnerable backgrounds) is that many young people in the country might not have trust in public institutions such as the PES. They often need face-to-face personal contact with a person who can speak in a more informal manner. This is why cooperation with other service providers is fundamental.
References
[1]. Bauder, H.. Culture in the labor market: segmentation theory and perspectives of place. Progress in human geography, 2001, 25(1), pp. 37-52.
[2]. McTier, A., & McGregor, A. Influence of work–welfare cycling and labour market segmentation on employment histories of young long-term unemployed. Work, Employment and Society, 2018, 32(1), pp. 20-37.
[3]. National Youth Strategy 2010–2020, Bulgaria
[4]. Caliendo, M., & Schmidl, R. Youth unemployment and active lab432or market policies in Europe. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2016, 5(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-016-0057-x
[5]. Simões, F. School to work transition in the resilience and recovery facility framework: Youth oriented active labour market policies under Pillar 6. European Parliament, 2022 https://www.europarl.europa. eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/699552/IPOL_STU(2022)699552_ www.track-in.eu 30
[6]. Mazzocchi, P., Agahi, O., Beilmann, M., Bettencourt, L., Brazienė, R., Edisherashvili, N., Keranova, D., Marta, E., Milenkova, V., O’Higgins, N., Pizzolante, F., Prieto-Flores, Ò., Rocca, A., Rodrigues, R., Rosa, M., Simões, F., & Yurukov, B.Subjective Well Being of Rural NEETs and Employability: A Study of Non Urban Youths in Spain, Italy, and Portugal. Politics and Governance, 2024, 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/ pag.7415
[7]. Petrescu, C., Voicu, B., Heinz-Fischer, C., & Tosun, J. Conceiving of and politically responding to NEETs in Europe: a scoping review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2024, 11(1), 1-13.
[8]. Goodsell, C. T. Looking once again at human service bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics, 1981, 43(3), pp.763-778.
[9]. Andersson, C., Hallin, A., & Ivory, C. Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: Confi guring work during automation in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 2022, 39(1), Article 101662. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662
[10]. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development, 2006 pp. 793– 828). John Wiley & Sons.
[11]. Ribeiro, A., Lendzhova, V., Vyšniauskienė, S., Ferreira, T., Sousa, J., Roque, I., Kõiv, K., Saks, K., Agahi, O., Prieto Flores, Ò., & O’Higgins, N. Public Employment Services’ Responses to the Pandemic: Examples from Portugal, Bulgaria, and Lithuania. Politics and Governance, 2024, 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7437
[12]. Simões, F., & Marta, E.Public Employment Services and Vulnerable Youth in the EU: The Case of Rural NEETs. Politics and Governance, 2024, 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7432
[13]. ILO Global employment trends for youth 2022: investing in transforming futures for young people. International Labour Office, 2022, https:// www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_853321/lang--en/index.htm
[14]. Desiere, S., & Struyven, L. Using artifi cial intelligence to classify jobseekers: The accuracy equity trade off (SPSW Working Paper No. CeSO/SPSW/2020-01). Centre for Sociological Research, 2020, https://soc. kuleuven. be/ceso/respond/working papers/2020/spsw 2020 01
[15]. Questionário de Suporte Social Institucional na Saúde (QSSIS) Development and analysis of the psychometric qualities of the Institutional Social Support in Health Questionnaire. Laboratório de Psicologia, 2007, 5(1), 17-32.
[16]. Pemberton, S.Tackling the NEET generation and the ability of policy to generate a ‘NEET’solution—evidence from the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2008, 26(1), 243-259.;
[17]. Macdonald, R., Shildrick, T., & Furlong, A. In search of ‘intergenerational cultures of worklessness’: Hunting the Yeti and shooting zombies. Work, Employment & Society,2014, 28(6), 963-977
[18]. European Commission. (2021). The role of Public Employment Services (PES) in supporting the inclusion of vulnerable groups in the labour market: Policy brief. 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8298&furtherPubs=yes
[19]. European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop). Skills forecast: Bulgaria. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021.
[20]. Bauder, H.. Culture in the labor market: segmentation theory and perspectives of place. Progress in human geography, 2001, 25(1), pp. 37-52.
[21]. Kancheva, D., & Dimitrova, R. Challenges and opportunities for youth employment in rural areas of Bulgaria. Sociological Problems, 2019, 1(2), 45-57.