Open Journal Systems

Dynamics of research motivation: A retrospective analysis of outstanding master’s students

Xiaobin Ren, Boyuan Li, Lin Wang

Article ID: 2783
Vol 9, Issue 8, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 127 (Abstract) 0 (Untitled) 61 (PDF)

Abstract

To explore the characteristics of research motivation changes of outstanding master’s students and the factors influencing these changes, this study employed retrospective drawing and semi-structured in-depth interviews as data collection methods and surveyed five master’s students who received the honor of outstanding graduates at university level. Thematic analysis was used to process the interview data. The results demonstrated that the research motivation of outstanding master’s students exhibited nonlinear dynamics, self-organization, interindividual variability, and ergodicity. Thematic analysis revealed that factors causing changes in their research motivation include teachers’ influence, research team atmosphere, physical and mental factors, research outcomes, and subjective norms. These findings offer a new perspective for understanding the research motivation of master’s students and can provide decision-making references for improving graduate education.


Keywords

complex dynamic systems theory; master’s students; retrospective charting; research motivation

Full Text:

Untitled PDF



References

1. Ommering BW, Van Blankenstein FM, Van Diepen M, Dekker FW. Academic success experiences: promoting research motivation and Self-Efficacy beliefs among medical students. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2021; 33(4): 423-433.

2. Xie K, Vongkulluksn VW, Cheng S-L, Jiang Z. Examining high-school students motivation change through a person-centered approach. Journal of Educational Psychology 2022; 114(1): 89-107. doi: 10.1037/edu0000507

3. Zhang J-H, Pang S-Q, Ge L, et al. Research ability and research motivation of postgraduate nursing students in traditional Chinese medicine colleges. Nursing Open 2022; 9(1): 408-417. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1079

4. Ommering BWC, Wijnen-Meijer M, Dolmans DHJM, et al. Promoting positive perceptions of and motivation for research among undergraduate medical students to stimulate future research involvement: a grounded theory study. BMC Medical Education 2020; 20(1): 204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02112-6

5. Doulani A, Hossaini M. What are the factors affecting the participation of postgraduate students in research processes? From motivational variables to demographic variables. Library Hi Tech 2023: doi: 10.1108/LHT-12-2022-0560

6. Zhao C, Huang F. Understanding Chinese master students’ research literacy: The roles of autonomous motivation and controlled motivation. Learning and Motivation 2024; 86: 101984. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2024.101984

7. Ren X, Zhou F. College EFL teachers’ demotivation to conduct research: A dynamic and ecological view. Original Research. Frontiers in Psychology 2023; 13: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1071502

8. Stupnisky RH, BrckaLorenz A, Laird TFN. How does faculty research motivation type relate to success? A test of self-determination theory. International Journal of Educational Research 2019; 98: 25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.007

9. Stupnisky RH, Larivière V, Hall NC, Omojiba O. Predicting research productivity in STEM faculty: The role of self-determined motivation. Research in Higher Education 2023; 64(4): 598-621. doi: 10.1007/s11162-022-09718-3

10. Zhou T, Law R, Lee PC. “What motivates me?” Motivation to conduct research of academics in teaching-oriented universities in China. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 2022; 31: 100392. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100392

11. Rahimi M, Yousofi N, Moradkhani S. How research is conceived and practised in higher education? Assumptions of Masters/doctoral students and instructors. Research Papers in Education 2021; 36(1): 1-26. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2019.1615119

12. Chan L, Dörnyei Z, Henry A. Learner archetypes and signature dynamics in the language classroom: A retrodictive qualitative modelling approach to studying L2 motivation in Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning. Multilingual Matters; 2014. pp. 238-259.

13. Chang J-C, Wu Y-T, Ye J-N. A study of graduate students’ achievement motivation, active learning, and active confidence based on relevant research. Original Research. Frontiers in Psychology 2022; 13: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915770

14. Nghia TLH. Vietnamese students’ learning motivations for master’s programmes: implications for curriculum development and pedagogical practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education 2019; 43(8): 1021-1037. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2018.1444742

15. Wang X, Sun F, Wang Q, Li X. Motivation and affordance: a study of graduate students majoring in translation in China. In: Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education; 2022; pp. 1010889.

16. Bartram B. Using questionnaires in Practical Research Methods in Education. Routledge; 2019. pp. 1-11.

17. Larsen-Freeman D. Complex dynamic systems theory: A webinar with Diane Larsen-Freeman. Language Teaching 2023; 56(3): 402-419. doi: 10.1017/S0261444822000362

18. Kaplan A, Garner JK. Steps for applying the complex dynamical systems approach in educational research: A guide for the perplexed scholar. The Journal of Experimental Education 2020; 88(3): 486-502. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2020.1745738

19. Garner JK, Kaplan A. A complex dynamic systems approach to the design and evaluation of teacher professional development. Professional Development in Education 2021; 47(2-3): 289-314. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2021.1879231

20. Larsen-Freeman D. Ten ‘lessons’ from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. Motivational dynamics in language learning 2015: 11-19.

21. Foote R. Mathematics and complex systems. Science 2007; 318(5849): 410-412. doi: 10.1126/science.1141754

22. Rusk RD, Vella-Brodrick DA, Waters L. A complex dynamic systems approach to lasting positive change: The Synergistic Change Model. The Journal of Positive Psychology 2018; 13(4): 406-418. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1291853

23. De Bot K, Lowie W, Verspoor M. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2007; 10(1): 7-21. doi: 10.1017/S1366728906002732

24. Fogal GG. Second language writing from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Teaching 2022; 55(2): 193-210. doi: 10.1017/S0261444821000410

25. Yamaoka K. Analysis of Japanese remedial English learners’ motivational trajectories from a complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Journal of AsiaTEFL 2019; 16: 801-816. doi: 10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.3.801

26. Papi M, Hiver P. Language learning motivation as a complex dynamic system: A global perspective of truth, control, and value. The Modern Language Journal 2020; 104(1): 209-232. doi: 10.1111/modl.12624

27. Vu T, Magis-Weinberg L, Jansen BRJ, et al. Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: A literature review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review 2022; 34(1): 39-71. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7

28. Stratton SJ. Population research: Convenience sampling strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 2021; 36(4): 373-374. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649

29. Jung SK. Demotivating and remotivating factors in learning English: A case of low level college students. English teaching 2011; 66(2):

30. Wang S, Littlewood W. Exploring students’ demotivation and remotivation in learning English. System 2021; 103: 102617. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102617

31. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis in APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association; 2012. pp. 57-71.

32. Naeem M, Ozuem W, Howell K, Ranfagni S. Demystification and actualisation of data saturation in qualitative research through thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2024; 23: doi: 10.1177/16094069241229777

33. Yuan R, Sun P, Teng L. Understanding language teachers' motivations towards research. Tesol Quarterly 2016; 50(1): 220-234.

34. Larsen-Freeman D. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied linguistics 2006; 27(4): 590-619.

35. Lowie WM, Verspoor MH. Individual differences and the ergodicity problem. Language Learning 2019; 69: 184-206.

36. Carless D, Winstone N. Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education 2023; 28(1): 150-163. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372

37. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher 2009; 38(5): 365-379. doi: 10.3102/0013189x09339057

38. Uyen DP, Nhu NTH, Nghi DD, et al. Optimal pedagogical strategies in research methodology: Insights from student experiences. Environment and Social Psychology 2024; 9(4):

39. Burgess A, Haq I, Bleasel J, et al. Team-based learning (TBL): a community of practice. BMC Medical Education 2019; 19(1): 369. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1795-4

40. Maslow AH. Motivation and personality. Harpers; 1954.

41. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 2000; 55(1): 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

42. Kwiek M. The prestige economy of higher education journals: a quantitative approach. Higher Education 2021; 81(3): 493-519. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00553-y

43. Belcher DD. Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007; 16(1): 1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.12.001

44. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 1982; 37(2): 122-147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

45. Ommering BWC, van Blankenstein FM, van Diepen M, Dekker FW. Academic success experiences: promoting research motivation and Self-Efficacy beliefs among medical students. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2021; 33(4): 423-433. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1877713

46. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior in Action control: From cognition to behavior. Springer; 1985. pp. 11-39.

47. Förster J, Liberman N, Higgins ET. Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005; 41(3): 220-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.009


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2783
(127 Abstract Views, 0 Untitled Downloads61 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Xiaobin Ren, Boyuan Li, Lin Wang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.