Published
2024-09-13
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
The role of emotional intelligence on social entrepreneurial intention of university students: evidence from a lower-middle income country
Md. Abu Issa Gazi
Faculty of Business and Communication, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Fatima Khuku Mony
Department of Management Studies, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj 8100, Bangladesh
Md. Shamsul Arefin
Department of Management Studies, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj 8100, Bangladesh
Md. Sahidur Rahman
Department of Management, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, 4331, Bangladesh
Abdul Rahman bin S Senathirajah
Faculty of Business and Communication, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Md. Atikur Rahaman
School of Management, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, 332005, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2784
Keywords: Relationship management, social awareness, self-awareness, self-management, social entrepreneurial intention, sustainable growth
Abstract
Objective: The application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is employed to scrutinize how emotional intelligence relates to the intention for social entrepreneurship within the context of Bangladesh. Specifically, this study investigates whether relationship management, social awareness, self-awareness, and self-management components constituting emotional intelligence- affect the decision-making process towards embracing social entrepreneurship.
Research Design & Methods: In accordance with a quantitative methodology, a cohort of 400 freshmen from Bangladeshi universities, aged between 21 and 26, participated in responding to a structured questionnaire comprising 46 items. Data collection employed a systematic random sampling technique. Subsequently, for hypothesis assessment, the SmartPLS version 4 software facilitated consistent PLS-SEM algorithm and bootstrapping analyses.
Findings: According to survey findings, there is a strong positive association between the relevant variables. The results demonstrate that intentions of students to become social entrepreneurs were highly influenced by their levels of relationship management, social awareness, and self-management. However, it is observed that self-awareness did not significantly contribute to the inclination towards social entrepreneurship.
Implications & Recommendations: The findings of this study hold potential utility for academia and policymakers aiming to foster social entrepreneurship among university students. Succeeding research endeavors could enhance the understanding of social entrepreneurial intention by integrating contextual variables, thus providing a comprehensive perspective on the phenomenon.
Contribution & Value Added: This study examines entrepreneurial intention within a distinct entrepreneurial context, integrating the four dimensions of emotional intelligence into the realm of social entrepreneurship research.
References
[1]. Kickul, J., & Lyons, T.S. (2020). Understanding Social Entrepreneurship: The Relentless Pursuit of Mission in an Ever Changing World (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429270406
[2]. Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560063
[3]. Amanatidou, E., Tzekou, E.-E., & Gritzas, G. (2024). Successful Niche Building by Social Innovation in Social Economy Networks and the Potential for Societal Transformation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2021.1952478
[4]. Gonzalez-Ruiz, J. D., Marín-Rodríguez, N. J., & Weber, O. (2024). New insights on social finance research in the sustainable development context. Business Strategy & Development, 7(1), e342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.342
[5]. Müller, M., Vaseková, V., & Kročil, O. (2024). Entrepreneurial solutions to social problems: philosophy versus management as a guiding paradigm for social enterprise success. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2023-0174
[6]. Gazi, M. A. I., Miah, S., Masud, A. A., Hossain, A. I., & Rahman, M. K. (2023). Contribution of the Banking Sector to Entrepreneurial Development: Paradigm Interventions and Enterprise Proliferation. IJMS, 16(3), 647-665.
[7]. Odame, C., Pandey, M., & Pathak, P. (2020). Emotional Intelligence and Its Importance in Sustainable Development of Human Resources: A Conceptual Model. In S. Vanka, M. B. Rao, S. Singh, & M. R. Pulaparthi (Eds.), Sustainable Human Resource Management: Transforming Organizations, Societies and Environment (pp. 273–287). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5656-2_17
[8]. Singh, N., & Kovid, R. K. (2023). Women Entrepreneur’s Emotional Intelligence and Firm Performance: Mediating Role of Networking Competencies. FIIB Business Review, 23197145231184308. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145231184307
[9]. Zhang, W., & Adegbola, O. (2022). Emotional intelligence and public relations: An empirical review. Public Relations Review, 48(3), 102199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102199
[10]. Yan, J., Huang, T., & Xiao, Y. (2023). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurial education activity on entrepreneurial intention and behavior: role of behavioral entrepreneurial mindset. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(10), 26292-26307.
[11]. Haugh, H. (2005). A research agenda for social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610580000703
[12]. Teasdale, S. (2010). How Can Social Enterprise Address Disadvantage? Evidence from an Inner City Community. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495141003601278
[13]. Thompson, J., & Doherty, B. (2006). The diverse world of social enterprise. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290610660643
[14]. Chell, E., Nicolopoulou, K., & Karataş-Özkan, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship and enterprise: International and innovation perspectives. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(6), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.488396
[15]. Koe Hwee Nga, J., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The Influence of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors on Social Entrepreneurship Start Up Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0358-8
[16]. Qiu, W., Zhang, J., Wu, H., Irfan, M., & Ahmad, M. (2021). The role of innovation investment and institutional quality on green total factor productivity: Evidence from 46 countries along the “Belt and Road”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-15.
[17]. Mayer, J., Roberts, R., & Barsade, S. (2008). Human Abilities: Emotional Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychol- ogy, 59, 507-536.
[18]. O'Boyle, E. H., Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J. M., Hawver, T. H., & Story, P. A. (2011). The relation between emo- tional intelligence and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 788- 818.
[19]. Ahmetoglu, G., Leutner, F. & Chamorro, P.T. (2011). EQ-nomics: Understanding the relationship between individual differences in trait emotional intelligence and entrepreneurship. Personality and individual differences, 51(8), 1028-1033.
[20]. Gazi, M. A. I., Nahiduzzaman, Md., Harymawan, I., Masud, A. A., & Dhar, B. K. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on Financial Performance and Profitability of Banking Sector in Special Reference to Private Commercial Banks: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainability, 14(10), 6260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106260
[21]. Kidwell, B., Hardesty, D. M., Murtha, B. R., & Sheng, S. (2011). Emotional intelligence in marketing exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 75: 78–95.
[22]. Krueger, N. F. (2017). Entrepreneurial Intentions Are Dead: Long Live Entrepreneurial Intentions. In M. Brännback & A. L. Carsrud (Eds.), Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind: Inside the Black Box: An Expanded Edition (pp. 13–34). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45544-0_2
[23]. Yıldırım, N., Çakır, Ö., & Aşkun, O. B. (2016). Ready to Dare? A Case Study on the Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business and Engineering Students in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 277–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.138
[24]. Chell, E. (2007). Social Enterprise and Entrepreneurship: Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal, 25, 5-23.
[25]. Kuratko, D.K. (2007). Corporate Entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 151–203.
[26]. Krueger, N. (1993). The Impact of Prior Entrepreneurial Exposure on Perceptions of New Venture Feasibility and Desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 18 (1): 15–30.
[27]. Krueger Jr, N.F., Reilly, M.D. & Carsrud, A.L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of business venturing, 15 (5-6), 411-432.
[28]. Tiwari, P., Bhat, A.K. & Tikoria, J. (2017). The role of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy on social entrepre- neurial attitudes and social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 165- 185.
[29]. Rauch, A. & Frese, M. (2007). Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners' personality traits, business creation, and success. European Jour- nal of work and organizational psychology, 16(4), 353-385.
[30]. Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[31]. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
[32]. Alferaih A (2022) Starting a new business? Assessing university intentions towards digital entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia. Int J Inf Manag Data Insights 2:100087. https:// doi. org/ 10.1016/j. jjimei. 2022. 100087
[33]. Paliwal M, Rajak BK, Kumar V, Singh S (2022) Assessing the role of creativity and motivation to measure entrepreneurial education and entrepreneurial intention. Int J Educ Manag 36:854–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2021-0178
[34]. Wang M, Soetanto D, Cai J, Munir H (2022) Scientist or entrepreneur? Identity centrality, university entrepreneurial mission, and academic entrepreneurial intention. J Technol Transf 47:119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09845-6
[35]. Liao YK, Nguyen VHA, Chi HK, Nguyen HH (2022) Unraveling the direct and indirect effects of entrepreneurial education and mindset on entrepreneurial intention: the moderating role of entrepreneurial passion. Glob Bus Organ Excell 41:23–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22151
[36]. Mukhtar S, Wardana LW, Wibowo A, Narmaditya BS (2021) Does entrepreneurship education and culture promote students’ entrepreneurial intention? The mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset. Cogent Educ 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1918849
[37]. Jiatong W, Murad M, Bajun F, Tufail MS, Mirza F, Rafiq M (2021) Impact of entrepreneurial education, mindset, and creativity on entrepreneurial intention: mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Front Psychol 12:3366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724440
[38]. Kusumojanto DD, Wibowo A, Kustiandi J, Narmaditya BS (2021) Do entrepreneurship education and environment promote students’ entrepreneurial intention? The role of entrepreneurial attitude. Cogent Educ 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1948660
[39]. Tiwari, P., Bhat, A. K., Tikoria, J., & Saha, K. (2019). Exploring the factors responsible in predicting entrepreneurial intention among nascent entrepreneurs. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(1), 1-18.
[40]. Robbins, S. & Hunsaker, P. (2014). Training in Interpersonal Skills: TIPS for Managing People at Work. Pearson Higher Education.
[41]. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
[42]. Liñán, F., Urbano, D. & Guerrero, M. (2011). Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: Start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(3-4), 187-215.
[43]. Linan, F. & Rodríguez‐Cohard, J.C. (2015). Assessing the stability of graduates’ entrepreneurial intention and exploring its predictive capacity. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 28(1), 77-98.
[44]. Mair, J., Robinson, J., & Hockerts, K. (2006). Social entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave MacMillan
[45]. Zeyen, A., Beckmann, M., Mueller, S., Dees, J. G., Khanin, D., Krueger, N., ... & Zacharakis, A. (2013). Social entre- preneurship and broader theories: Shedding new light on the 'Bigger Picture'. Journal of Social Entre- preneurship, 4(1), 88-107.
[46]. Salovey, P. & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9(3), 185–211.
[47]. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York, NY, England.
[48]. Mayer, J. D. & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? Emotional development and emotional intelli- gence: Educational implications, 3, 31.
[49]. Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A Strategic Framework for Customer Relationship Management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.167
[50]. Zablah, A. R., Bellenger, D. N., & Johnston, W. J. (2004). An evaluation of divergent perspectives on customer relationship management: Towards a common understanding of an emerging phenomenon. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(6), 475–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.01.006
[51]. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
[52]. Tasa, K., Sears, G. J., & Schat, A. C. H. (2011). Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross-level moderating role of collective efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.680
[53]. Changming, Y., Hongfang, G. & Lalin, J. (2001). Comparing ARP of IPv4 with neighbor discovery protocol of IPv6.
[54]. Humphrey, R.H. (2013). The benefits of emotional intelligence and empathy to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneur- ship Research Journal, 3(3), 287-294.
[55]. Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human Empathy Through the Lens of Social Neuroscience. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL, 6, 280363. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.221
[56]. Denham, S. A. (2006). Social-Emotional Competence as Support for School Readiness: What Is It and How Do We Assess It? Early Education and Development, 17(1), 57–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1701_4
[57]. Rochat, P. (2003). Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00081-3
[58]. Scheick, D. M. (2011). Developing Self-Aware Mindfulness to Manage Countertransference in the Nurse-Client Relationship: An Evaluation and Developmental Study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 27(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.10.005
[59]. Woiceshyn, J. (2009). Lessons from “Good Minds”: How CEOs Use Intuition, Analysis and Guiding Principles to Make Strategic Decisions. Long Range Planning, 42(3), 298–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.05.002
[60]. Waddock Sandra and Steckler, E. (2013). Wisdom, Spirituality, Social Entrepreneurs, and Self-Sustaining Practices: What Can We Learn from Difference Makers? In J. Neal (Ed.), Handbook of Faith and Spirituality in the Workplace: Emerging Research and Practice (pp. 285–301). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5233-1_18
[61]. Yitshaki, R., & Kropp, F. (2016). Motivations and Opportunity Recognition of Social Entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 546–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12157
[62]. Bennett, T. (2007) (ed). Self-Management Academic Tip Sheet. Edith Cowan University.
[63]. Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. (2003). Beyond social capital: the role of entrepreneurs’ social competence in their financial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00069-0
[64]. Markman, G. D., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Person–entrepreneurship fit: why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00018-4
[65]. Yang, R., Meyskens, M., Zheng, C. & Hu, L. (2015) Social entrepreneurial intentions: China versus the USA-is there a difference? Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 16 (4), 253–267.
[66]. Ringle, C., Da Silva, D., & Bido, D. (2015). Structural equation modeling with the SmartPLS. Bido, D., da Silva, D., & Ringle, C.(2014). Structural Equation Modeling with the Smartpls. Brazilian Journal Of Marketing, 13(2).
[67]. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
[68]. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Treating Unobserved Heterogeneity in PLS-SEM: A Multi-method Approach. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications (pp. 197–217). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_9
[69]. Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
[70]. Pallant, J. F. (2000). Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Perceived Control of Internal States. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(2), 308–337. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_10
[71]. Dirgiatmo, Y. (2023). Testing The Discriminant Validity and Heterotrait–Monotrait Ratio of Correlation (HTMT): A Case in Indonesian SMEs. In W. A. Barnett & B. S. Sergi (Eds.), Macroeconomic Risk and Growth in the Southeast Asian Countries: Insight from Indonesia (Vol. 33A, pp. 157–170). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-03862023000033A011
[72]. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
[73]. Lei, P.-W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Practical Considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x
[74]. Padilla-Meléndez, A., Fernández-Gámez, M. A., & Molina-Gómez, J. (2014). Feeling the risks: effects of the development of emotional competences with outdoor training on the entrepreneurial intent of university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(4), 861–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0310-y
[75]. Rechberg, I. D. W. (2020). Emotional intelligence and knowledge management: A necessary link? Knowledge and Process Management, 27(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1625
[76]. Secundo, G., De Carlo, E., Madaro, A., Maruccio, G., Signore, F., & Ingusci, E. (2019). The Impact of Career Insight in the Relation with Social Networks and Career Self-Management: Preliminary Evidences from the Italian Contamination Lab. Sustainability, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215996
[77]. Wheeler, J. V, Carr, A. S., Cady, S. H., & Schumacher, L. (2020). Self-management and work performance: an exploratory cross-cultural study. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 20(4), 510–533. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.108922
[78]. Yela Aránega, A., Del Val Núñez, M. T., & Castaño Sánchez, R. (2020). Mindfulness as an intrapreneurship tool for improving the working environment and self-awareness. Journal of Business Research, 115, 186–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.022
[79]. Hockerts, K. (2018). The Effect of Experiential Social Entrepreneurship Education on Intention Formation in Students. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1498377
[80]. Bonesso, S., Gerli, F., Pizzi, C., & Cortellazzo, L. (2018). Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Role of Prior Learning Experiences and Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Competencies. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(S1), 215–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12399
[81]. García-Morales, V. J., Martín-Rojas, R., & Garde-Sánchez, R. (2020). How to Encourage Social Entrepreneurship Action? Using Web 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04216-6
[82]. Huerta, M. V, Carberry, A. R., Pipe, T., & McKenna, A. F. (2021). Inner engineering: Evaluating the utility of mindfulness training to cultivate intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies among first-year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(3), 636–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20407
[83]. Lim, D. T. ., Goh, K. W. ., Sim, Y. W. ., Mokhtar, K. ., & Thinagar, S. . (2023). Estimation of stock market index volatility using the GARCH model: Causality between stock indices. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 13(3), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v13i3.4738
[84]. Gimbert, B. G., Miller, D., Herman, E., Breedlove, M., & Molina, C. E. (2021). Social Emotional Learning in Schools: The Importance of Educator Competence. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 18(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751211014920
[85]. Stillman, S. B., Stillman, P., Martinez, L., Freedman, J., Jensen, A. L., & Leet, C. (2018). Strengthening social emotional learning with student, teacher, and schoolwide assessments. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 71–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.07.010
[86]. Weissberg, R. P., & Cascarino, J. (2013). Academic Learning + Social-Emotional Learning = National Priority. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500203
[87]. Winter, S. M., & Kelley, M. F. (2008). Forty Years of School Readiness Research: What Have We Learned? Childhood Education, 84(5), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2008.10523022
[88]. Maniriho, A. (2024). Satisfaction and academic performance of undergraduate economics students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2326707. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2326707
[89]. Bruin, A., Roy, M. J., Grant, S., & Lewis, K. V. (2022). Advancing a Contextualized, Community-Centric Understanding of Social Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Business & Society, 62(5), 1069–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221121820
[90]. Khurana, I., & Dutta, D. K. (2021). From latent to emergent entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: The role of entrepreneurial learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120694
[91]. Rocha, A., Brown, R., & Mawson, S. (2021). Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 50(9), 104317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104317
[92]. Scott, S., Hughes, M., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2022). Towards a network-based view of effective entrepreneurial ecosystems. Review of Managerial Science, 16(1), 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00440-5
[93]. Hägg, G., & Jones, C. (2021). Educating towards the prudent entrepreneurial self – an educational journey including agency and social awareness to handle the unknown. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(9), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2020-0668
[94]. Gazi, M.A.I., Nahiduzzaman, M., Shaturaev, J., Dhar, B.K., & Halim, M.A. (2022). Dynamic Nexus between macroeconomic factors and CO2 emissions: Evidence from oil producing countries. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:1005814. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1005814
[95]. Gazi, M. A. I., Miah, S., Al Masud, A., Hossain, A. I., & Rahman, M. (2023). Contribution of the Banking Sector to Entrepreneurial Development: Paradigm Interventions and Enterprise Proliferation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal of Management Studies), 16(3), 647-665. doi: 10.22059/ijms.2022.338747.674962
[96]. Reza, M. S., Gazi, M. A. I., & Doula, A. (2014). Socioeconomic impacts of women entrepreneurs in Bangladesh: Challenges and anticipations. World Vision Journal, 13(1), 38-57.