Published
2024-08-26
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Achievement goal orientation and academic social comparison emotions in competitive learning environments: Latent profile analysis approach
Hyeryn Yu
Pukyong National University
Heejung Chun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2827
Keywords: Achievement goal orientation, social comparison, academic social comparison emotions, latent profile analysis, South Korean
Abstract
High school students often encounter competitive learning environments of which they can influence their achievement goal orientation and academic social comparison emotions. This study investigates potential patterns of achievement goal orientation and academic social comparison emotions among high school students in competitive learning environments. A total of 397 South Korean high school students participated in this study. Adopting the person-centered approach, latent profile analysis was employed, and the selected class model was validated by comparing grades and self-esteem across identified classes using the BCH method. This study identified six distinct classes of which three profiles (first, third, fourth classes) had similar configurations but different profile levels, which fit the features of multiple goals. The second and sixth classes presented elevated performance goals and contrast emotions. Lastly, the fifth class exhibited a separate configuration, which had elevated mastery-approach goals and assimilation emotions. Analysis of outcome measures revealed that classes with elevated performance goals showed low self-esteem despite relatively high academic grades. It revealed that in competitive learning environments, performance goals were found to co-occur with contrast emotions in academic social comparison, while mastery goals co-occurred with assimilation emotions. This implies that those who endorse mastery goals tend to see themselves as similar to the comparison target, while those who endorse performance goals tend to see themselves dissimilar to the comparison target. This finding warrants further exploration to understand the underlying mechanisms. This study recommends supporting mastery-approach goals in competitive learning environments.
References
[1]. Chun, H. J., Son, H. Y., & Woo, J. Y. (2019). Lived experiences of high school students for the “Naesin” grading as a norm-referenced evaluation. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 16(3), 401-431. https://doi.org/10.16983/kjsp.2019.16.3.401
[2]. Chun, H. (2024). Examining the pathways of social comparison and achievement goals to academic grades among South Korean high school students. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, DOI: 10.1080/21683603.2024.2328831
[3]. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
[4]. Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social Comparison in the Classroom: A Review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 828-879. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321210
[5]. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
[6]. Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538646
[7]. Smith, R. H. (2000). Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. In Suls, J., & Wheeler, L (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 173-200). MA: Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_10
[8]. Maehr, M. L. (1989). Thoughts about motivation. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions (Vol. 3, pp. 299-315). Orlando, FL: Academic.
[9]. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
[10]. Urdan, T., & Kaplan, A. (2020). The origins, evolution, and future directions of achievement goal theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101862
[11]. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A Conceptual History of the Achievement Goal Construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). Guilford Publications.
[12]. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
[13]. Nicholls, R. D., Knoll, J. H., Butler, M. G., Karam, S., & Lalande, M. (1989). Genetic imprinting suggested by maternal heterodisomy in nondeletion Prader-Willi syndrome. Nature, 342(6247), 281-285. https://doi.org/10.1038/342281a0
[14]. Ames, C. (1984). Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 478-487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.3.478
[15]. Roberts, R.W. (1992) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 595-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K
[16]. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(1), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
[17]. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
[18]. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
[19]. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(3), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
[20]. Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). Achievement goal orientations and subjective well-being: A person-centred analysis. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.003
[21]. Wormington, S. V., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2017). A new look at multiple goal pursuit: The promise of a person-centered approach. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 407-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9358-2
[22]. Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: testing multiple goal models. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(5), 706-722. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.706
[23]. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of educational research, 65(3), 245-281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
[24]. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational psychologist, 33(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1
[25]. Pastor DA, Barron KE, Miller BJ, & Davis SL (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 8-47.
[26]. Kim, Y. M., Lee, S. Y., & Jang, Y. J., (2011). A typology of achievement goal orientation profiles among middle-school students and its relation to learning strategies. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 18(5), 191-217.
[27]. Jang, L. Y., & Liu, W. C. (2012). 2× 2 Achievement goals and achievement emotions: a cluster analysis of students' motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0066-5
[28]. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
[29]. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
[30]. Zuckerman, M., & O'Loughlin, R. E. (2006). Self-enhancement by social comparison: A prospective Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(6), 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205286111
[31]. Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L., Suls, J. (2018). A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 177-197. doi: 10.1037/bul0000127.
[32]. Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
[33]. Mussweiler, T., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2002). I know you are, but what am I? Self-evaluative consequences of judging in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.19
[34]. Liu, J., Li, C., Carcioppolo, N., & North, M. (2016). Do our Facebook friends make us feel worse? A study of social comparison and emotion. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 619-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12090
[35]. Park, S. Y., & Baek, Y. M. (2018). Two faces of social comparison on Facebook: The interplay between social comparison orientation, emotions, and psychological well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.028
[36]. Buunk, B. P., Kuyper, H., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2005). Affective response to social comparison in the classroom. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2703_4
[37]. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of educational Psychology, 101(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013383
[38]. Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23(3), 359-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9155-x
[39]. Bounoua, L., Cury, F., Regner, I., Huguet, P., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). Motivated use of information about others: Linking the 2×2 achievement goal model to social comparison propensities and processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 626-641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02027.x
[40]. Régner, I., Escribe, C., & Dupeyrat, C. (2007). Evidence of social comparison in mastery goals in natural academic settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.575
[41]. Clifford, M. M. (1984). Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529286
[42]. Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648.
[43]. Lim, K. (2012). Development and validation of the Korean version of 3x2 academic achievement goal orientation scale for adolescents [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Ewha Womans University.
[44]. Chun, H. J. (2022). The Development and Initial Validation of the Scale for the Social Comparison-based Emotions with Academic Achievement. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(1), 535-561.
[45]. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[46]. Jeon, B. J. (1974). Research on the assessment of self-esteem. Yonsei University Graduate School Journal, 11(1), 107-130.
[47]. Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001
[48]. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(3), 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
[49]. Nylund-Gibson, K., & Choi, A. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
[50]. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882-891.
[51]. Weden, M. M., & Zabin, L. S. (2005). Gender and Ethnic Differences in the Co-occurrence of Adolescent Risk Behaviors. Ethnicity & Health, 10(3), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850500115744
[52]. Turner, J. C., Thorpe, P. K., & Meyer, D. K. (1998). Students' reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of educational Psychology, 90(4), 758-771. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.758
[53]. Shin, H. S., & Yun. S. K. (2015). Middle School Students’ Academic and Psychological Adjustment Among Achievement Goal Orientation Profiles. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 12(3), 271-293.
[54]. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of educational psychology, 94(3), 562-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562
[55]. Lee, M. H. (2020). Exploring different patterns in adolescents’ multiple goal profiles depending on achievement goal scales in mathematics. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 34(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2020.34.1.04
[56]. Law W., Elliot A. J., Murayama K. (2012). Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 806-819. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002717