Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    8478
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7622
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    5643
  • What makes you feel motivated? Examining Vroom's expectancy theory in the Tunisian banking sector
    5058
  • ‘Surviving factors’ of traditional markets—Study in Ternate City, North Maluku, Indonesia
    4518

Keywords

social intelligencework psychologygeneral well-beingstudent commitmentmediatingempathyhappiness educationpupilsinformationtechnologiesmedicalfood safetypreschool childrensadcbp neural networkdeansmeaninghopeisolation
Home > Archives > Vol. 9 No. 10 (2024): Published > Research Articles
ESP-2851

Published

2024-11-28

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2024): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Usep Suhud, Mamoon Allan, Wong Chee Hoo, Ye Jia, Penny Rahmawaty, Bayu Bagas Hapsoro, Manoch Prompanyo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Suhud, U., Allan, M., Hoo, W. C., Jia, Y., Rahmawaty, P., Hapsoro, B. B., & Prompanyo, M. (2024). The Boycott Dilemma: Analysing Indonesian Consumers’ Perceptions towards Russian Products. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.2851
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

The Boycott Dilemma: Analysing Indonesian Consumers' Perceptions towards Russian Products

Usep Suhud

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Mamoon Allan

Faculty of Archaeology and Tourism, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

Wong Chee Hoo

Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia

Ye Jia

Faculty of Liberal Arts, Shinawatra University, Thailand.

Penny Rahmawaty

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Bayu Bagas Hapsoro

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

Manoch Prompanyo

Faculty of Management, Shinawatra University, Thailand


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.2851


Keywords: Ukraine vs Russia, consumer behaviour, sustainable marketing, consumer animosity, consumer boycott


Abstract

The continuing geopolitical dispute between Ukraine and Russia has far-reaching ramifications that impact consumer behaviour on a planetary scale. This study will analyse the determinants that impact Indonesian consumers' intentions to boycott Russian products. An online survey was conducted in April 2022 to collect data, with a sample of 216 respondents selected using convenient sampling procedures. An exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modelling were employed to analyse the data. The results indicate that consumers' anger significantly impacts boycott attitudes, product judgment, and consumer punishment. However, the attitude of boycotting does not substantially affect the desire to boycott, which goes against what was predictable. In addition, although consumer punishment has a considerable effect on boycott intention, the influence of product judgment is not crucial. These findings contribute to the current body of knowledge in international marketing research, particularly on consumer boycotts.


References

[1]. L. Sun dan J.-W. Jun, “Effects of country animosity of angry Koreans on Japan: A focus on export regulation on Korea,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, hal. 961454, 2022.

[2]. A.-N. Abdul-Talib dan S.-A. Abdul-Latif, “Antecedents to willingness to boycotts among Malaysian Muslims,” in Emerging Research on Islamic Marketing and Tourism in the Global Economy, IGI Global, 2015, hal. 70–106.

[3]. C. M. Harmeling, P. Magnusson, dan N. Singh, “Beyond anger: A deeper look at consumer animosity,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 46, no. 6, hal. 676–693, 2015.

[4]. T. Bulakh, “Made in Ukraine: Consumer citizenship during EuroMaidan transformations,” in Identity and Nation Building in Everyday Post-Socialist Life, Routledge, 2017, hal. 73–90.

[5]. J. Park, H. Zourrig, dan K. El Hedhli, “The effects of country-image and animosity on Asian consumers’ responses to foreign brands,” Rev. Mark. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, hal. 121–138, Sep 2021, doi: 10.1515/roms-2020-0084.

[6]. S. Hoffmann, R. Mai, dan M. Smirnova, “Development and validation of a cross-nationally stable scale of consumer animosity,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, hal. 235–252, 2011.

[7]. A. Shoham, M. Davidow, J. G. Klein, dan A. Ruvio, “Animosity on the home front: The Intifada in Israel and its impact on consumer behavior,” J. Int. Mark., vol. 14, no. 3, hal. 92–114, 2006.

[8]. Y. Huang, I. Phau, dan C. Lin, “Consumer animosity, economic hardship, and normative influence: How do they affect consumers’ purchase intention?,” Eur. J. Mark., vol. 44, no. 7/8, hal. 909–937, 2010.

[9]. E. Song, “South korean consumers’ attitudes toward small business owners participating in the 2019 anti-japan boycott,” Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 5, Mei 2020, doi: 10.3390/SOCSCI9050074.

[10]. J. A. Areiza-Padilla, M. S. Moise, dan M. A. M. Puertas, “Breaking the barriers of animosity: innovation in business models as a positioning strategy,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 7, hal. e07545, 2021.

[11]. T. Thi, P. Nguyen, dan A. Van Nguyen, “Consumer psychology about animosity and ethnocentrism on judgment and reluctance to buy foreign-made products,” vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 3690–3708, 2021.

[12]. C. Jin dan Y. Hua Cui, “시각예술제품에 대한 소비자 자민족중심주의와 적대감 관련 연구: 한국 제품에 대한 중국 소비자의 반응 김성 · 최유화 * † 중국 연변대학교 미술대학 부교수 · 중국 연변대학교 미술대학 부교수 A study of consumer ethnocentrism and animosity about visual arts products: Response of Chinese consumers to Korean products,” J. Korea Fash. Costume Des. Assoc., vol. 22, no. 4, hal. 79–91, 2020, doi: 10.30751/kfcda.2020.22.4.79.

[13]. U. Suhud, “The impact of consumer animosity on purchase unwillingness in a boycott of Sari Roti,” Binus Bus. Rev., vol. 9, no. 2, hal. 87–94, 2018, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/BBR/article/view/4060

[14]. S. Barutçu, E. Sarıtaş, dan D. Ünal Adıgüzel, “Attitudes towards the foreign products from animosity, boycott and ethnocentrism perspectives: The case of Turkish students,” 2016.

[15]. P. Verma, “Animosity leads to boycott and subsequent reluctance to buy: evidence from Sino Indian disputes,” Rev. Int. Bus. Strateg., vol. 32, no. 3, hal. 368–386, 2022, doi: 10.1108/RIBS-07-2020-0075.

[16]. S. Ishak, K. Khalid, dan N. Sulaiman, “Influencing consumer boycott: between sympathy and pragmatic,” J. Islam. Mark., vol. 9, no. 1, hal. 19–35, 2018.

[17]. J. Xie, H. J. Choo, dan H. K. Lee, “Effects of consumer animosity on boycotts: the role of cognitive-affective evaluations and xenocentrism,” J. Fash. Mark. Manag. An Int. J., 2023.

[18]. M. H. Altintas, B. F. Kurtulmusoglu, H. R. Kaufmann, S. Kilic, dan T. Harcar, “Consumer boycotts of foreign products: A metric model,” Amfiteatru Econ., vol. 15, no. 34, hal. 485–504, 2013.

[19]. V. Abraham, “Does consumer animosity impact purchase involvement? An empirical investigation,” Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, 2013.

[20]. S. Tian, “Buy or boycott? An examination of mediated consumer animosity effects on purchase intentions,” University of Alabama Libraries, 2010.

[21]. D. Davlembayeva, D. Marikyan, dan E. Slade, “Identifying current themes and important future research directions in the field of consumer animosity,” in Academy of Marketing Science World Marketing Congress, Springer, 2024, hal. 42–55.

[22]. M. S. Balatbat et al., “Check out or call out: Attitude-driven boycott intention in the fashion industry,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Appl. Bus. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 10, hal. 3653–3673, 2023.

[23]. H. S. Khraim, “Exploring factors affecting consumers’ intentions to boycott French products in Jordan,” Malaysian J. Consum. Fam. Econ., vol. 28, hal. 355–377, 2022.

[24]. S. Y. Salma dan H. M. Aji, “What drives Muslims to boycott French brands? The moderating role of brand judgement and counterargument,” J. Islam. Mark., vol. ahead-of-p, no. ahead-of-print, hal. ahead-of-print, 2022.

[25]. M. Tao, E. Lahuerta-Otero, F. Alam, J. S. Aldehayyat, M. R. Farooqi, dan P. Zhuoqun, “Do religiosity and ethnocentrism influence Indian consumers’ unwillingness to buy halal-made products? The role of animosity toward halal products,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2022.

[26]. M. Rose, G. M. Rose, dan A. Shoham, “The impact of consumer animosity on attitudes towards foreign goods: A study of Jewish and Arab Israelis,” J. Consum. Mark., vol. 26, no. 5, hal. 330–339, 2009.

[27]. V. Abraham dan A. Reitman, “Item-generation in Consumer Animosity Research,” Middle-East J. Sci. Res., vol. 21, no. 3, hal. 464–471, 2014.

[28]. S. Ben Mrad, T. F. Mangleburg, dan M. R. Mullen, “Do consumers forgive? A study of animosity in the MENA region,” J. Int. Consum. Mark., vol. 26, no. 2, hal. 153–166, 2014.

[29]. C. Kim, X. Yan, J. Kim, S. Terasaki, dan H. Furukawa, “Effect of consumer animosity on boycott campaigns in a cross-cultural context: Does consumer affinity matter?,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 69, no. September, hal. 103123, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103123.

[30]. M. S. Albayati, N. K. N. Mat, A. S. Musaibah, H. S. Aldhaafri, dan E. M. Almatari, “Participate in boycott activities toward Danish products from the perspective of Muslim consumer,” Am. J. Econ. Spec. issue, hal. 120–124, 2012.

[31]. F. T. Faza, Y. P. Timur, dan S. Rusgianto, “You’ve Over the Line! Muslim Consumers are Resistant to Opposite Brand Values,” Shirkah J. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 3, hal. 219–238, 2022.

[32]. G. G. Mosley dan D. K. Amponsah, “The Effect of Consumer Animosity and Ethnocentrism on Product Evaluations and Willingness to Buy: An Example from Ghana,” 2009, Citeseer.

[33]. C. Hong dan C. Li, “Will consumers silence themselves when brands speak up about sociopolitical issues? Applying the spiral of silence theory to consumer boycott and buycott behaviors,” J. nonprofit public Sect. Mark., vol. 33, no. 2, hal. 193–211, 2021.

[34]. S. Scheidler dan L. M. Edinger-Schons, “Partners in crime? The impact of consumers’ culpability for corporate social irresponsibility on their boycott attitude,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 109, hal. 607–620, 2020.

[35]. B. Palacios-Florencio, M. Á. Revilla-Camacho, D. Garzón, dan C. Prado-Román, “Explaining the boycott behavior: A conceptual model proposal and validation,” J. Consum. Behav., vol. 20, no. 5, hal. 1313–1325, Sep 2021, doi: 10.1002/cb.1937.

[36]. S. Hoffmann, I. Balderjahn, B. Seegebarth, R. Mai, dan M. Peyer, “Under which conditions are consumers ready to boycott or buycott? The roles of hedonism and simplicity,” Mei 2018, Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.004.

[37]. B. J. Ali, “Impact of consumer animosity, boycott participation, boycott motivation, and product judgment on purchase readiness or aversion of Kurdish consumers in Iraq,” J. Consum. Aff., vol. 55, no. 2, hal. 504–523, 2021, doi: 10.1111/joca.12350.

[38]. C. Hong dan C. Li, “To support or to boycott: a public segmentation model in corporate social advocacy,” J. Public Relations Res., vol. 32, no. 5–6, hal. 160–177, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2020.1848841.

[39]. D. Fernandes, “Politics at the mall: The moral foundations of boycotts,” J. Public Policy Mark., vol. 39, no. 4, hal. 494–513, Okt 2020, doi: 10.1177/0743915620943178.

[40]. D. Abdelwahab, N. H. Jiménez, S. San-Martín, dan J. Prodanova, “Between love and boycott: a story of dual origin brands,” Spanish J. Mark. - ESIC, vol. 24, no. 3, hal. 377–402, Des 2020, doi: 10.1108/SJME-12-2019-0105.

[41]. U. Suhud dan M. Allan, “The impact of animosity, brand image, consumer boycott, and product judgment on made-in-China covid-19 vaccination intention,” Health Mark. Q., vol. 38, no. 2021, hal. 1–18, Okt 2021, doi: 10.1080/07359683.2021.1987010.

[42]. J. G. Klein, A. John, dan N. C. Smith, “Exploring motivations for participation in a consumer boycott,” Cent. Mark. Work. Pap., no. 01–701, 2001.

[43]. F. Mirza, S. Ashraf, dan H. B. Jahangir, “The impact of religiously motivated consumer boycotts on product judgment, brand image and loyalty,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, hal. 384–402, 2020.

[44]. I. Abosag dan M. F. Farah, “The influence of religiously motivated consumer boycotts on brand image, loyalty and product judgment,” Eur. J. Mark., vol. 48, no. 11/12, hal. 2262–2283, 2014.

[45]. S. Riptiono, A. Irma Anggraeni, A. Suroso, dan S. Nur Azizah, “Intention to purchase local food products among Indonesian young consumers,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 8, no. 4, hal. 1285–1294, Sep 2020, doi: 10.18510/hssr.2020.84121.

[46]. M. Prince, L. Kwak, dan A. Josiassen, “Does the Netherlands-based consumer disidentification model work in the US?,” 2023.

[47]. J. Jessen dan C. A. Wijayanti, “The factors influencing the willingness to buy Korean noodles with moderating variable of domestic product judgement,” J. Glob. Bus. Manag. Rev., vol. 4, no. 2, hal. 9, Des 2022, doi: 10.37253/jgbmr.v4i2.6833.

[48]. T. N. R. Tengku Jasmi, S. N. Syed Mukhiar, dan N. A. A Rahman, “The impact of consumer racism, ethnocentrism and animosity among races in Malaysia,” Asian People J., vol. 5, no. 2, hal. 99–114, Okt 2022, doi: 10.37231/apj.2022.5.2.429.

[49]. F. Yifeng dan H. Bin Yaacob, “Ethnocentrism, animosity, knowledge and country of origin on purchase of Jingdezhen blue-andwWhite ceramic,” South Asian J. Soc. Sci. Humanit., vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 313–338, Feb 2024, doi: 10.48165/sajssh.2024.5117.

[50]. Y. Feng, X. Xia, X. Yin, L. Wang, dan Z. Zhang, “Pricing and coordination of remanufacturing supply chain with government participation considering consumers’ preferences and quality of recycled products,” Complexity, vol. 2022, 2022.

[51]. C. Valor, P. Antonetti, dan G. Zasuwa, “Corporate social irresponsibility and consumer punishment: A systematic review and research agenda,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 144, hal. 1218–1233, 2022.

[52]. S. Kamalul Ariffin, N. Q. Ihsannuddin, dan A. M. Abdul Mohsin, “The influence of attitude functions on Muslim consumer attitude towards social media advertising: a case of bubble tea,” J. Islam. Mark., vol. 13, no. 11, hal. 2308–2330, 2022.

[53]. G. R. Foxall, J. M. Oliveira-Castro, dan R. Porto, “Consumer behavior analysis and the marketing firm: measures of performance,” J. Organ. Behav. Manage., vol. 41, no. 2, hal. 97–123, 2021.

[54]. Z. Zhou dan C. Dong, “Matching words with actions: Understanding the effects of CSA stance-action consistency on negative consumer responses,” Corp. Commun. An Int. J., vol. 27, no. 1, hal. 167–187, 2022.

[55]. K. Gamma, R. Mai, C. Cometta, dan M. Loock, “Engaging customers in demand response programs: The role of reward and punishment in customer adoption in Switzerland,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 74, hal. 101927, 2021.

[56]. C. Kim dan A. Kinoshita, “Do you punish or forgive socially responsible companies? A cross-country analysis of boycott campaigns,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 71, hal. 103232, 2023.

[57]. C. Ruppel dan S. Einwiller, “Pleasant hostility: Disidentified consumers’ emotional and behavioral reactions to a brand crisis,” J. Consum. Behav., vol. 20, no. 1, hal. 186–200, 2021.

[58]. J. Kang, T. Slaten, dan W. J. Choi, “Felt betrayed or resisted? The impact of pre‐crisis corporate social responsibility reputation on post‐crisis consumer reactions and retaliatory behavioral intentions,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, hal. 511–524, 2021.

[59]. A. Kritikos dan F. Bolle, “Punishment as a public good. When should monopolists care about a consumer boycott?,” J. Econ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 3, hal. 355–372, 2004.

[60]. H. Hino dan I. D. Nebenzahl, “Applying information integration theory to the study of boycott–spillover to linked regions,” Qual. Quant., vol. 55, no. 5, hal. 1889–1915, 2021.

[61]. G. Balabanis, “Surrogate boycotts against multinational corporations: consumers’ choice of boycott targets,” Br. J. Manag., vol. 24, no. 4, hal. 515–531, 2013.

[62]. K. Braunsberger dan B. Buckler, “What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 64, no. 1, hal. 96–102, 2011.

[63]. A. Delistavrou, A. Krystallis, dan I. Tilikidou, “Consumers’ decision to boycott ‘unethical’ products: the role of materialism/post materialism,” Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag., vol. 48, no. 10, hal. 1121–1138, 2020.

[64]. L. Tam dan S. Kim, “What is the power of balancing power? Exploring perceived discrepancy in relational power and its effects,” Int. J. Commun., vol. 15, hal. 320–342, 2021.

[65]. K. Schermelleh-Engel, H. Moosbrugger, dan H. Müller, “Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures,” Methods Psychol. Res. Online, vol. 8, no. 2, hal. 23–74, 2003.

[66]. B. G. Tabachnick, L. S. Fidell, dan J. B. Ullman, Using multivariate statistics, vol. 5. Pearson Boston, MA, 2007.

[67]. L. Hu dan P. M. Bentler, “Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications,” in Evaluating model fit, R. H. Hoyle, Ed., London: Sage, 1995, Evaluating, hal. 76–99.

[68]. L. Hu dan P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J., vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 1–55, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com