Open Journal Systems

Conceptualising self-reflexive practice as transformational competence: Exploring relationships and relatedness in a fourth industrial revolution technological environment

Aden-Paul Flotman

Article ID: 2880
Vol 9, Issue 10, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 52 (Abstract) 30 (PDF)

Abstract

In the author’s exploration of the literature, little seems to be known regarding the potential value of self-reflexive practice in exploring the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) and its related phenomena. The thesis is presented in narrative format and based on personal experience and insights, supported by a non-systematic review of the literature on self-reflexive practice and the 4IR. This perspective argues that one of the most impactful transformational competences in the context of the 4IR, is arguably what is known as self-reflexive practice (SRP). Through this practice we elucidate our conscious and unconscious assumptions and orientations towards the 4IR and associated phenomena. The aim of this article was to highlight the importance of self-reflexive practice as a critical skill for navigating the complexities and challenges presented by the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In this article SRP is conceptualised as the critically informed stance of reflexive dialogue with the self, regarding conscious and unconscious realities. It is argued that the value of SRP lies in its capacity to a) foster critical thinking, b) manage paradoxes, dilemmas and complexities that are characteristic of the 4IR, and c) create psychological “containing spaces” for complexity, ambivalence, and ambiguity. Thus, reflexivity as a way of being, could help us reshape and reorient how we relate to the 4IR and enable practitioners to learn from experience (through deep reflection) about themselves, their work and the way they relate.

Keywords

Critical thinking; Fourth industrial revolution (4IR); Reflexivity; Relatedness; Self-reflexive practice

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Bersin, Deloitte Consulting LLP. Predictions for 2018: Embracing radical transparency 2018.

2. Global Human Capital Trends 2018 is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc.

3. Fisher P. All Companies Are Technology Companies Now. Thomson Reuters; 2018. [Google Scholar]

4. Ross P, Maynard K. Towards a 4th industrial revolution. Intelligent Buildings International 2021; 13(3): 159-161, DOI: 10.1080/17508975.2021.1873625

5. Schulze E. Everything you need to know about the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/16/fourth-industrial-revolution-explained-davos-2019.html. [Google Scholar]. (accessed on 07 December 2023).

6. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what It means, how to respond. World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]. (accessed on 10 December 2023).

7. Ferrari R. Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing 2015; 24: 230–235. https://doi:10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329

8. Lomas T, Froh JJ, Emmons RA, Mishra A, & Bono G. (2014). Gratitude interventions: a review and future agenda. In: The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Positive Psychological Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014; pp.1–19. https://doi:10.1002/9781118315927.ch1

9. Long S. Socio-analytic methods: discovering the hidden in organisations and social systems. London: Karnac; 2013.

10. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, & Pawson R. RAMSES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine 2014: 11(20), pp. 1-15. https://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/20.

11. Karsten van der Merwe K. Empowering accounting students to enhance the self-determination skills demanded by the fourth industrial revolution. South African Journal of Higher Education 2020; 34(2): 36-58. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3487

12. Oosthuizen RM. The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Algorithms: Industrial Psychologists in Future Workplaces. Frontiers Artificial Intelligence 2022; 5:913168. https://doi:10.3389/frai.2022.913168

13. World Economic Forum. 2018. The future of jobs report 2018. Switzerland: World Economic Forum

14. Cheng Y, Awan U, Ahmad S, Tan Z. How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 2021; 162, 120398. https://doi:1016/j.techfore.2020.120398

15. Gower P. Faculty of Humanities News. Psychology and the 4IR: Adaptability Will Be Key to Navigating the Future Career Space. University of Pretoria. 2018.

16. Chearavanont S. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/how-digitization-and-innovation-can-make-thepost-covid-world-a-betterplace/. (accessed on 06 December 2023).

17. Dorst WC, Hahn T, Knafla F, Loewen U, Rosen R. Umsetzungsstrategie Industrie 4.0 – Ergebnisbericht der Plattform Industrie 4.0. Bitkom Research GmbH 2015;

18. Moloi T, Mhlanga D. Key features of the fourth industrial revolution in South Africa’s basic education system. Journal of Management Information and Decision Science 2021; 4(5): 1-20.

19. Aliakbari M, Adibpour M. Reflective EFL education in Iran: existing situation and teachers’ perceived fundamental challenges. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 2018; 18: 1–16. https://doi:10.14689/ejer.2018.77.7

20. Choy SC, Oo, P. S. Reflective thinking and teaching practices: a precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom? Online Submission 2012; 5: 167–182.

21. Cirocki A, Widodo HP. (2019). Reflective practice in English language teaching in Indonesia: shared practices from two teacher educators. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 2019; 7: 15–35. https://doi:10.30466/ijltr.2019.120734

22. Georgii-Hemming E, Johansson K, Moberg N. Reflection in higher music education: what, why, wherefore? Music Education Research 2020; 22: 245–256. https://doi:10.1080/14613808.2020.1766006

23. Helyer R. Learning through reflection: the critical role of reflection in work-based learning (WBL). Journal of Work-Applied Management 2015; 7(1); 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2015-003

24. Matthews P. Reflective practices: a means to teacher development. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology 2017; 3(1); 126-131.

25. Mohamed M, Rashid RA, Alqaryouti MH. Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022; 13:1008234. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234

26. Pillow W. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 2003; 16(2): 175-196. https://doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635

27. Reich Y. The principle of reflexive practice. Design Studies 2017; 3(4): 165-80. DOI: https://www.10.1017/dsj.2017.3

28. Fergusson L, van der Laan L, Baker S. Reflective practice and work-based research: a description of micro- and macro-reflective cycles. Reflective Practice 2019; https://10.1080/14623943.2019.1591945

29. Rennie DL. Qualitative analysis of client's experience of psychotherapy: The unfolding of reflexivity. In Toukmanian SG, Rennie DL (editors.); Sage focus editions, Vol. 143. Psychotherapy process research: Paradigmatic and narrative approaches (pp. 211–233). Sage Publications, Inc. 1992.

30. Nagata AL. Promoting self-reflexivity in intercultural education. Journal of Intercultural Communication 2004; 8: 139-167.

31. Archer M. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003

32. Ai A, Al-Shamrani S, Almufti A. Secondary school science teachers’ views about their reflective practices. Journal of Teaching and Educational Sustainability 2017; 19: 43–53. https://doi:10.1515/jtes-2017-0003

33. Engward H, Davis G. Being reflexive in qualitative grounded theory: discussion and application of a model of reflexivity. Leading Global Nursing research 2015; 71(7): 1530-1538

34. Olmos-Vega FM, Renée E, Stalmeijer Lara Varpio, Kahlke R. (2023) A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149, Medical Teacher 2023; 45(3): 241-251. https://doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

35. Flotman A-P. Work as meaningful and menacing phenomenon for South African middle managers during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of self-transcendence in cultivating meaning and wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology 2021; 12:650060. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650060

36. Schwandt T. Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2001.

37. Russell GM, Kelly NH. Research as interacting dialogic processes: implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 2002; 3(3):831.

38. Finlay L. (2002). Outing the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research 2002; 12(4):531–545.

39. Walsh R. The methods of reflexivity. Humanistic Psychology 2003; 31(4): 51–66.

40. Dowling M. Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse Research 2006; 13(3):7–21.

41. de Gooijer J. (2010). Diagnosing organisational work cultures: a socioanalytic approach. In: Long S, (editor). Socioanalytic Methods: Discovering the Hidden in Organisations and Social Systems. Karnac; 2013. pp. 237 – 246.

42. Gentles SJ, Jack SM, Nicholas DB, McKibbon K. A critical approach to reflexivity in grounded theory. The Qualitative Report 2014; 19(44):1–14.

43. Kuehner A, Ploder A, Langer PC. (2016). Introduction to the special issue. Qualitative Inquiry 2016; 22(9):699–704.

44. Finefter-Rosenbluh I. (2017). Incorporating perspective taking in reflexivity. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2017; 16(1):160940691770353.

45. Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology 2003; 37(3): 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002

46. Osterman KF, Kottkamp RB. Reflective practice for educators: Professional development to improve student learning. Thousand California: Corwin Press. 2004.

47. Haugseth JF, Smeplass E. (2022). The Greta Thunberg Effect: A Study of Norwegian Youth’s Reflexivity on Climate Change. Sociology 2022; 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221122416

48. Krantz J. Dilemmas of organizational change: a systems psychodynamic perspective - A republication. Karnac; 2010.

49. Levinson H. Consulting psychology. Washington, DC: APA; 2009.

50. Schein EH. Humble consulting. How to provide real help faster. New York, NY: Berrett-Koehler. 2016.

51. Long S, Harney M. (2013). The associative unconscious. In: Socioanalytic Methods: discovering the hidden in organisations and social systems Long S. (editor); 3 – 22. London: Routledge. 2013.

52. Mayer C-H, Oosthuizen RM. Unconscious system-psychodynamics within a German 4IR engineering company in South Africa. Frontiers in Psychology 2022; 13:926245. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926245

53. Mersky R, Sievers B. Social photo-matrix and social dream-drawing. Stamenova K, Hinshelwood RD. (editors); Methods of research into the unconscious: Applying psychoanalytic ideas to social science, pp.145–168. Routledge; 2019.

54. Brunner LD, Nutkevitch A Sher M. Group relations conferences. Reviewing and exploring theory, design, role-taking and application. London: Karnac; 2006.

55. Krantz J. Work culture analysis and reflective space. In: Long S. (editor); Socioanalytic Methods: Discovering the Hidden in Organisations and Social Systems. London: Karnac; 2013. pp. 23 – 46

56. Bion WR. Container and contained. In: Colman AD, Geller MH. (editors). Group relations reader 2, AK Rice Institute; 1985. pp. 127–134.

57. Kersten A. Organizing for powerlessness: a critical perspective on psychodynamics and dysfunctionality. Journal of Organizational Change Management 2001; 14(5), 452–467.

58. Mero U. The neurotic behaviour of organisations. London: GIC Press; 2008.

59. Rosenfeld H. A clinical approach to the psychoanalytic theory of the life and death instincts: an investigation into the aggressive aspects of narcissism. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 1971; 52: 169–77.

60. Armstrong D. Organisation in the mind. The Tavistock Clinic Series. London: Karnac; 2005.

61. Bridger H. Foreword. In G. Amado & A. Ambrose (Eds), The transitional approach to change (pp. xi–xiv). Karnac Books. 2001.

62. Winnicott DW. Playing and Reality. London: Routledge. 1971.

63. Lamb S, Maire, Q, Doecke E. Key skills for the 21st century: An evidence-based review. Future Frontiers analytical report. CIRES: Melbourne; 2017.

64. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-2119734. (accessed on 4 January 2024).

65. Barmeyer C, Mayer C-H. Positive intercultural management in the fourth industrial revolution: managing cultural otherness through a paradigm shift. International Review of Psychiatry 2020; 32 (7-8): 638-650. https://doi:10.1080/09540261.2019.1699033

66. Pyrko I, Dörfler V, Eden C. Thinking together: what makes communities of practice work? Human Relations 2017; 70(4): 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716661040

67. Bergold J, Thomas S. Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research 2012; 191–222.

68. Probst B. The Eye Regards Itself: Benefits and Challenges of Reflexivity in Qualitative Social Work Research. Social Work Research 2015: 19(1): 37-48. https://dx.doi:10.1093/swr/svu028

69. Geldenhuys, D.J. A conceptual analysis of the use of systems-psychodynamics as an organisation development intervention: A neuroscientific perspective. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde 2022; 48(0), a1940. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1940

70. Lee E, Rasmussen B. Psychoanalysis, Socioanalysis, and Social Work:Psychodynamic Contributions to Understanding Diversity, Power, and Institutions in Social Work Practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 88(3), 253–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2019.1686873

71. Winnicott DW. Playing and reality. London: Tavistock/Routledge. 1971.

72. Brenner GH. Building "Negative Capability" to Unlock Hidden Potential. Psychology Today 2015: Accessed online 21 July 2024: https://www.psychologytoday.com/za/blog/experimentations/202110/building-negative-capability-to-unlock-hidden-potential

73. Neely-Prado A, van Elk M, Navarrete G, Hola F & Huepe D. Social Adaptation in Context: The Differential Role of Religiosity and Self-Esteem in Vulnerable vs. Non-vulnerable Populations – A Registered Report Study. Front. Psychol. 2021: 2:519623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.519623

74. Molloy L, Ronnie L.C. Mindset shifts for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Insights from the life insurance sector. SA Journal of Human Resource Management/SA Tydskrif vir Menslikehulpbronbestuur, 2021; 19(0), a1543. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1543

75. Krishnannair A, Krishnannair S. Learning environments in higher education: their adaptability to the 4th industrial revolution and the “social transformation” discourse. South African Journal of Higher Education 2021; 35(3): 65‒82. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/35-3-4098


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.2880
(52 Abstract Views, 30 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Aden-Paul Flotman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.