Published
2024-10-24
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Conceptualising self-reflexive practice as transformational competence: Exploring relationships and relatedness in a fourth industrial revolution technological environment
Aden-Paul Flotman
University of South Africa
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5663-7279
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.2880
Keywords: Critical thinking, Fourth industrial revolution (4IR), Reflexivity, Relatedness, Self-reflexive practice
Abstract
In the author’s exploration of the literature, little seems to be known regarding the potential value of self-reflexive practice in exploring the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) and its related phenomena. The thesis is presented in narrative format and based on personal experience and insights, supported by a non-systematic review of the literature on self-reflexive practice and the 4IR. This perspective argues that one of the most impactful transformational competences in the context of the 4IR, is arguably what is known as self-reflexive practice (SRP). Through this practice we elucidate our conscious and unconscious assumptions and orientations towards the 4IR and associated phenomena. The aim of this article was to highlight the importance of self-reflexive practice as a critical skill for navigating the complexities and challenges presented by the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In this article SRP is conceptualised as the critically informed stance of reflexive dialogue with the self, regarding conscious and unconscious realities. It is argued that the value of SRP lies in its capacity to a) foster critical thinking, b) manage paradoxes, dilemmas and complexities that are characteristic of the 4IR, and c) create psychological “containing spaces” for complexity, ambivalence, and ambiguity. Thus, reflexivity as a way of being, could help us reshape and reorient how we relate to the 4IR and enable practitioners to learn from experience (through deep reflection) about themselves, their work and the way they relate.Author Biography
Aden-Paul Flotman, University of South Africa
Department of Industrial and Organisational Psychology
Associate Professor
References
[1]. Bersin, Deloitte Consulting LLP. Predictions for 2018: Embracing radical transparency 2018.
[2]. Global Human Capital Trends 2018 is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Apple Inc.
[3]. Fisher P. All Companies Are Technology Companies Now. Thomson Reuters; 2018. [Google Scholar]
[4]. Ross P, Maynard K. Towards a 4th industrial revolution. Intelligent Buildings International 2021; 13(3): 159-161, DOI: 10.1080/17508975.2021.1873625
[5]. Schulze E. Everything you need to know about the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/16/fourth-industrial-revolution-explained-davos-2019.html. [Google Scholar]. (accessed on 07 December 2023).
[6]. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what It means, how to respond. World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]. (accessed on 10 December 2023).
[7]. Ferrari R. Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing 2015; 24: 230–235. https://doi:10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
[8]. Lomas T, Froh JJ, Emmons RA, Mishra A, & Bono G. (2014). Gratitude interventions: a review and future agenda. In: The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Positive Psychological Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014; pp.1–19. https://doi:10.1002/9781118315927.ch1
[9]. Long S. Socio-analytic methods: discovering the hidden in organisations and social systems. London: Karnac; 2013.
[10]. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, & Pawson R. RAMSES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine 2014: 11(20), pp. 1-15. https://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/20.
[11]. Karsten van der Merwe K. Empowering accounting students to enhance the self-determination skills demanded by the fourth industrial revolution. South African Journal of Higher Education 2020; 34(2): 36-58. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3487
[12]. Oosthuizen RM. The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Algorithms: Industrial Psychologists in Future Workplaces. Frontiers Artificial Intelligence 2022; 5:913168. https://doi:10.3389/frai.2022.913168
[13]. World Economic Forum. 2018. The future of jobs report 2018. Switzerland: World Economic Forum
[14]. Cheng Y, Awan U, Ahmad S, Tan Z. How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 2021; 162, 120398. https://doi:1016/j.techfore.2020.120398
[15]. Gower P. Faculty of Humanities News. Psychology and the 4IR: Adaptability Will Be Key to Navigating the Future Career Space. University of Pretoria. 2018.
[16]. Chearavanont S. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/how-digitization-and-innovation-can-make-thepost-covid-world-a-betterplace/. (accessed on 06 December 2023).
[17]. Dorst WC, Hahn T, Knafla F, Loewen U, Rosen R. Umsetzungsstrategie Industrie 4.0 – Ergebnisbericht der Plattform Industrie 4.0. Bitkom Research GmbH 2015;
[18]. Moloi T, Mhlanga D. Key features of the fourth industrial revolution in South Africa’s basic education system. Journal of Management Information and Decision Science 2021; 4(5): 1-20.
[19]. Aliakbari M, Adibpour M. Reflective EFL education in Iran: existing situation and teachers’ perceived fundamental challenges. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 2018; 18: 1–16. https://doi:10.14689/ejer.2018.77.7
[20]. Choy SC, Oo, P. S. Reflective thinking and teaching practices: a precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom? Online Submission 2012; 5: 167–182.
[21]. Cirocki A, Widodo HP. (2019). Reflective practice in English language teaching in Indonesia: shared practices from two teacher educators. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 2019; 7: 15–35. https://doi:10.30466/ijltr.2019.120734
[22]. Georgii-Hemming E, Johansson K, Moberg N. Reflection in higher music education: what, why, wherefore? Music Education Research 2020; 22: 245–256. https://doi:10.1080/14613808.2020.1766006
[23]. Helyer R. Learning through reflection: the critical role of reflection in work-based learning (WBL). Journal of Work-Applied Management 2015; 7(1); 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2015-003
[24]. Matthews P. Reflective practices: a means to teacher development. Asia Pacific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology 2017; 3(1); 126-131.
[25]. Mohamed M, Rashid RA, Alqaryouti MH. Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022; 13:1008234. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234
[26]. Pillow W. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 2003; 16(2): 175-196. https://doi:10.1080/0951839032000060635
[27]. Reich Y. The principle of reflexive practice. Design Studies 2017; 3(4): 165-80. DOI: https://www.10.1017/dsj.2017.3
[28]. Fergusson L, van der Laan L, Baker S. Reflective practice and work-based research: a description of micro- and macro-reflective cycles. Reflective Practice 2019; https://10.1080/14623943.2019.1591945
[29]. Rennie DL. Qualitative analysis of client's experience of psychotherapy: The unfolding of reflexivity. In Toukmanian SG, Rennie DL (editors.); Sage focus editions, Vol. 143. Psychotherapy process research: Paradigmatic and narrative approaches (pp. 211–233). Sage Publications, Inc. 1992.
[30]. Nagata AL. Promoting self-reflexivity in intercultural education. Journal of Intercultural Communication 2004; 8: 139-167.
[31]. Archer M. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003
[32]. Ai A, Al-Shamrani S, Almufti A. Secondary school science teachers’ views about their reflective practices. Journal of Teaching and Educational Sustainability 2017; 19: 43–53. https://doi:10.1515/jtes-2017-0003
[33]. Engward H, Davis G. Being reflexive in qualitative grounded theory: discussion and application of a model of reflexivity. Leading Global Nursing research 2015; 71(7): 1530-1538
[34]. Olmos-Vega FM, Renée E, Stalmeijer Lara Varpio, Kahlke R. (2023) A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149, Medical Teacher 2023; 45(3): 241-251. https://doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
[35]. Flotman A-P. Work as meaningful and menacing phenomenon for South African middle managers during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of self-transcendence in cultivating meaning and wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology 2021; 12:650060. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650060
[36]. Schwandt T. Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2001.
[37]. Russell GM, Kelly NH. Research as interacting dialogic processes: implications for reflexivity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 2002; 3(3):831.
[38]. Finlay L. (2002). Outing the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research 2002; 12(4):531–545.
[39]. Walsh R. The methods of reflexivity. Humanistic Psychology 2003; 31(4): 51–66.
[40]. Dowling M. Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse Research 2006; 13(3):7–21.
[41]. de Gooijer J. (2010). Diagnosing organisational work cultures: a socioanalytic approach. In: Long S, (editor). Socioanalytic Methods: Discovering the Hidden in Organisations and Social Systems. Karnac; 2013. pp. 237 – 246.
[42]. Gentles SJ, Jack SM, Nicholas DB, McKibbon K. A critical approach to reflexivity in grounded theory. The Qualitative Report 2014; 19(44):1–14.
[43]. Kuehner A, Ploder A, Langer PC. (2016). Introduction to the special issue. Qualitative Inquiry 2016; 22(9):699–704.
[44]. Finefter-Rosenbluh I. (2017). Incorporating perspective taking in reflexivity. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2017; 16(1):160940691770353.
[45]. Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology 2003; 37(3): 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002
[46]. Osterman KF, Kottkamp RB. Reflective practice for educators: Professional development to improve student learning. Thousand California: Corwin Press. 2004.
[47]. Haugseth JF, Smeplass E. (2022). The Greta Thunberg Effect: A Study of Norwegian Youth’s Reflexivity on Climate Change. Sociology 2022; 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221122416
[48]. Krantz J. Dilemmas of organizational change: a systems psychodynamic perspective - A republication. Karnac; 2010.
[49]. Levinson H. Consulting psychology. Washington, DC: APA; 2009.
[50]. Schein EH. Humble consulting. How to provide real help faster. New York, NY: Berrett-Koehler. 2016.
[51]. Long S, Harney M. (2013). The associative unconscious. In: Socioanalytic Methods: discovering the hidden in organisations and social systems Long S. (editor); 3 – 22. London: Routledge. 2013.
[52]. Mayer C-H, Oosthuizen RM. Unconscious system-psychodynamics within a German 4IR engineering company in South Africa. Frontiers in Psychology 2022; 13:926245. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926245
[53]. Mersky R, Sievers B. Social photo-matrix and social dream-drawing. Stamenova K, Hinshelwood RD. (editors); Methods of research into the unconscious: Applying psychoanalytic ideas to social science, pp.145–168. Routledge; 2019.
[54]. Brunner LD, Nutkevitch A Sher M. Group relations conferences. Reviewing and exploring theory, design, role-taking and application. London: Karnac; 2006.
[55]. Krantz J. Work culture analysis and reflective space. In: Long S. (editor); Socioanalytic Methods: Discovering the Hidden in Organisations and Social Systems. London: Karnac; 2013. pp. 23 – 46
[56]. Bion WR. Container and contained. In: Colman AD, Geller MH. (editors). Group relations reader 2, AK Rice Institute; 1985. pp. 127–134.
[57]. Kersten A. Organizing for powerlessness: a critical perspective on psychodynamics and dysfunctionality. Journal of Organizational Change Management 2001; 14(5), 452–467.
[58]. Mero U. The neurotic behaviour of organisations. London: GIC Press; 2008.
[59]. Rosenfeld H. A clinical approach to the psychoanalytic theory of the life and death instincts: an investigation into the aggressive aspects of narcissism. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 1971; 52: 169–77.
[60]. Armstrong D. Organisation in the mind. The Tavistock Clinic Series. London: Karnac; 2005.
[61]. Bridger H. Foreword. In G. Amado & A. Ambrose (Eds), The transitional approach to change (pp. xi–xiv). Karnac Books. 2001.
[62]. Winnicott DW. Playing and Reality. London: Routledge. 1971.
[63]. Lamb S, Maire, Q, Doecke E. Key skills for the 21st century: An evidence-based review. Future Frontiers analytical report. CIRES: Melbourne; 2017.
[64]. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-2119734. (accessed on 4 January 2024).
[65]. Barmeyer C, Mayer C-H. Positive intercultural management in the fourth industrial revolution: managing cultural otherness through a paradigm shift. International Review of Psychiatry 2020; 32 (7-8): 638-650. https://doi:10.1080/09540261.2019.1699033
[66]. Pyrko I, Dörfler V, Eden C. Thinking together: what makes communities of practice work? Human Relations 2017; 70(4): 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716661040
[67]. Bergold J, Thomas S. Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research 2012; 191–222.
[68]. Probst B. The Eye Regards Itself: Benefits and Challenges of Reflexivity in Qualitative Social Work Research. Social Work Research 2015: 19(1): 37-48. https://dx.doi:10.1093/swr/svu028
[69]. Geldenhuys, D.J. A conceptual analysis of the use of systems-psychodynamics as an organisation development intervention: A neuroscientific perspective. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde 2022; 48(0), a1940. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1940
[70]. Lee E, Rasmussen B. Psychoanalysis, Socioanalysis, and Social Work:Psychodynamic Contributions to Understanding Diversity, Power, and Institutions in Social Work Practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 88(3), 253–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2019.1686873
[71]. Winnicott DW. Playing and reality. London: Tavistock/Routledge. 1971.
[72]. Brenner GH. Building "Negative Capability" to Unlock Hidden Potential. Psychology Today 2015: Accessed online 21 July 2024: https://www.psychologytoday.com/za/blog/experimentations/202110/building-negative-capability-to-unlock-hidden-potential
[73]. Neely-Prado A, van Elk M, Navarrete G, Hola F & Huepe D. Social Adaptation in Context: The Differential Role of Religiosity and Self-Esteem in Vulnerable vs. Non-vulnerable Populations – A Registered Report Study. Front. Psychol. 2021: 2:519623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.519623
[74]. Molloy L, Ronnie L.C. Mindset shifts for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Insights from the life insurance sector. SA Journal of Human Resource Management/SA Tydskrif vir Menslikehulpbronbestuur, 2021; 19(0), a1543. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1543
[75]. Krishnannair A, Krishnannair S. Learning environments in higher education: their adaptability to the 4th industrial revolution and the “social transformation” discourse. South African Journal of Higher Education 2021; 35(3): 65‒82. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/35-3-4098