PDF

Published

2024-08-22

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 8 (2024): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Zhang, L. (2024). The association between CEOs’ foreign experiences and the digital transformation of Chinese firms. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2883

The association between CEOs’ foreign experiences and the digital transformation of Chinese firms

Li Zhang

International College, Krirk University, Bangkok 10220, Thailand


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2883


Keywords: CEOs' foreign experiences, digital transformation, firm financialization, pressure-resistant institutional investors, CEO duality

Abstract

Leveraging the upper echelons theory, this paper investigates how CEOs' foreign experiences influence the digital strategic transformation of Chinese firms. The findings suggest a positive correlation between CEOs' foreign experiences and digital transformation. The firm's financialization has a negative moderating effect, while CEO duality and the presence of pressure-resistant institutional investors offer positive moderation. Notably, while financialization dampens digital innovation, pressure-resistant investors counter managerial short-sightedness, thus favoring digital transformation. CEO duality, on the other hand, ensures decisive and swift decision-making. Further analysis differentiates the impact of foreign work experiences from learning experiences on transformation, with the former showing a more significant effect.

Interestingly, these effects predominantly apply to state-owned firms and those with fewer financing constraints. These insights extend the upper echelons theory, offering guidance on CEO selection and digital transformation strategies. In this study, the mean of CEOs' foreign experience and the data lagged by one period are selected as exogenous instrumental variables, and the two-stage least squares and PSM methods are utilized to deal with the endogeneity problem; meanwhile, the conclusions are still robust after the robustness test is conducted by adding control variables and carrying out one period ahead of the explanatory variables.

References

[1]. Kyriakou, H., Nickerson, J. V., & Sabnis, G. (2017). Knowledge reuse for customization: Metamodels in an open design community for 3D printing. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.17.

[2]. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesboeck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123–139.

[3]. Jackson, N. C. (2019). Managing for competency with innovation change in higher education: Examining the pitfalls and pivots of digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 761–772.

[4]. Shih, W. (2018).“Why high-tech commoditization is accelerating”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 59. (4), 52-58.

[5]. Xiao,M.X., & Jin,Z.L. (2007). “A study on the relationship between CEO tenure and firm performance”, Foreign Economics &Management, 8, 45-50,57.

[6]. Singh, A., & Hess, T. (2017). How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their firms. MIS Quart. Exec, 16(1), 1–17. https://aisle.aisnet.org/misqe/vol16/iss1/5

[7]. Hambrick, D. C .,& Mason,P.A. (1984) .Upper Echelons： The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review,9(2):193-206

[8]. Dokko, G.,Wilk, S L., &Rothbard, N. P.(2009) .Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organization Science,20(1):51-68.

[9]. Lin, C., Lin, P., Song, F. M., & Li, C. (2011). Managerial Incentives, CEO Characteristics, and corporate innovation in China's private sector. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2009.12.001

[10]. Yang, N., Chen, Y., & Li, A. (2019). Executive foreign experience, management autonomy, and corporate subsequent foreign M&A waiting time. International Trade Issues, (09), 161-174. doi:10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2019.09.012.

[11]. Cui,X.M.,Wang,J.Y., & Wang,M.(2021). Environmental Investment, CEO Foreign Experience, and Corporate Value: Appreciation or Impairment? -- Analysis from the perspective of imprinting theory. Audit and Economic Research (05),86-94.

[12]. Smith, K. H. (2005). Measuring innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, US, pp. 148–177. http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199264551.

[13]. Giannetti ,M., Liao, G., & Yu ,X. (2015)The brain gain of corporate boards: evidence from China. The Journal of Finance，70(4):1629-1682.

[14]. Zhang, J.W., &Tian, L.(2020). Research the relationship between equity incentives and the business performance of listed firms -- from the analysts' perspective. Nankai Economic Research, 215(05):173-186.

[15]. Du, Y., Zhang, H., & Chen, J. (2018). CEO foreign experience and corporate earnings management. Accounting Research, (02), 27-33.

[16]. Li, X., Feng, X., & Xu, C. (2021). The impact of CEO's foreign experience on the availability of venture capital for start-ups. Wuhan Finance, (01), 82-88.

[17]. Wang, Y. (2020). Returnee executives, corporate life cycle, and tax incentive behavior. Friend of Accounting, (15), 61-67.

[18]. Greve, P., Biemann, T. and Ruigrok, W. (2015), “Foreign executive appointments: a multilevel examination”, Journal of World Business, 50(4), 674-686.

[19]. Bauweraerts, J., Colot, O., (2018). Exploring top management team composition in private family firms. Int. Adv. Econ. Res. 24 (3), 283–284

[20]. Li, Y., Cui, L., (2018). The influence of the top management team on Chinese Firms' FDI ambidexterity. Manag. Organ. Rev. 14 (3), 513–542.

[21]. Yoon, W., Kim, S.J., Song, J., (2015). Top management team characteristics and organizational creativity. Rev. Manag. Sci. 10 (4), 757–779.

[22]. Jaswadi, J., Purnomo, H. and Sumiadji, S. (2022), “Financial statement fraud in Indonesia: a longitudinal study of financial misstatement in the pre-and post-establishment of financial services authority”, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.

[23]. Mukherjee, D., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D. and Goyal, K. (2022), “Mapping five decades of international business and management research on India: a bibliometric analysis and future directions”, Journal of Business Research, 145,864-89.

[24]. Bužavait˙e, M.; Šˇceulovs, D.; Korsakien˙e, R. (2019)Theoretical approach to the internationalization of SMEs: Future research prospects based on bibliometric analysis. Entrepreneurship Sustain. Issues 6, 1297–1311.

[25]. Li,H.M.,Long,K.J.,&Wu,F.(2021). Heterogeneous institutional investors and firm digital transformation. Financial BBS, 26 (11): 37-46 + 56. DOI: 10.16529 / j.carol carroll nki. 11-4613 / f 2021.11.005.

[26]. Schmid, S. and Mitterreiter, S. (2020), “International top managers on corporate boards: dissimilarity and tenure”, Management International Review, 60(5), 787-825.

[27]. Lee, J. H., & Roberts, M. J. (2015). International returnees as outside directors: A catalyst for strategic adaptation under institutional pressure. International Business Review, 24(4), 594–604.

[28]. Cumming, D. J., Duan, T., Hou, W., & Rees, B. (2016). Do returnee CEOs transfer institutions? Evidence from newly public Chinese entrepreneurial firms. Available at SSRN.https://ssrn.com/abstract=2780680.

[29]. Chen, P. L., Tan, D., & Jean, R. J. (2016). Foreign knowledge acquisition through inter-firm collaboration and recruitment: Implications for domestic growth of emerging market firms. International Business Review, 25(1), 221–232.

[30]. Cao, H. M., Ding, X.Y & Cheng,S.(2020).CEO Foreign experience and corporate performance: from the perspective of property rights heterogeneity. Friends of Accounting (22),89-95.

[31]. Slater. D.J.,&Heather. D.F.,(2009).CEO international assignment experience and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics,89(3):473- 489.

[32]. Dai, Y.H., & Kong, D.M. (2017). Whether Foreign experience of senior executives can improve firm investment efficiency. Journal of World Economy,(1): 168-191.

[33]. Babin, R., & Grant, K. A. (2019). How do CIOs become CEOs? Journal of Global Information Management, 27(4), 1–15.

[34]. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst 28, 118–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

[35]. Axel, H., Heinz, T .W., Daniel B., &Tim, W. (2021)Digital innovation: Review and novel perspective, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 30.

[36]. Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., &Song, M., (2017). Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World. MIS Quarterly 41 (1), 223–238.

[37]. Olsen, T.L. &Tomlin, B. (2020).“Industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges for operations management”, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 22 (1), 113-122.

[38]. Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927.

[39]. Kache, F.,& Seuring, S. (2017). “Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37 (1), 10-36.

[40]. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.

[41]. Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges, and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), Article 103773.

[42]. Gregory, G. D., Ngo, L. V., & Karavdic, M. (2019). Developing e-commerce marketing capabilities and efficiencies for enhanced performance in business-to-business export ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 146–157.

[43]. You, K., Dal Bianco, S., Lin, Z., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2019) .Bridging technology divide to improve business environment: Insights from African nations. Journal of Business Research, 97, 268–280.

[44]. Dao, T. T., & Yang, C. (2019). Impact of interactive service on international customers' behavior intentions regarding local tourism services in Vietnam: The mediating effects of pleasant arousal and memory. International Journal of Business & Information, 14(1), 145–167 https://10.0.26.46/ijbi.201903_14(1).0006.

[45]. Li, H., Long, H., & Wu, F. (2021). Heterogeneous institutional investors and corporate digital transformation. Financial Forum, (11), 37-46+56. doi:10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2021.11.005.

[46]. Dutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., & Singh, R. K. (2020). Digital transformation priorities of India’s discrete manufacturing SMEs — A conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0. Competitiveness Review, 30(3), 289–314.

[47]. Saarikko, T., Westergren, W. H., & Blomquist, T. (2020). Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm. Business Horizons, 63(6), 825–839.

[48]. Artemenko, E.(2020). The Roles of Top Management in Digital Transformation. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 940, 12-14.

[49]. Magnusson, J., Khisro, J., Bj¨orses, M., &Ivarsson, A.(2020). Closeness and distance: configurational practices for digital ambidexterity in the public sector. Transform. Government: People Process Policy.

[50]. He. Y., Yu .W. L., &Yang. M. Z. (2019).CEO compound career experience, corporate risk-taking, and corporate value. Chinese Industrial Economy,9:155-173.

[51]. Chen,J.,Sharma,P.,Z,han,W.,&Liu,L. (2019). Demystifying the impact of CEO transformational leadership on firm performance: Interactive roles of exploratory innovation and environmental uncertainty. J. Bus. Res, 96, 85–96.

[52]. Bai, W., Kao, P., & Wu, J. (2021). Returnee entrepreneurs and the performance implications of Political and business relationships under institutional uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 128, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.014.

[53]. Yuan, R., and W. Wen. (2018). Managerial foreign experience and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance 48:752–70. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.015.

[54]. Krippner, G. R. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwi008

[55]. Davis, L. E. (2018). Financialization and the non-financial corporation: An investigation of firm-level investment behavior in the United States. Metroeconomica, 69(1), 270–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ meca.12179.

[56]. Demir, F. (2009) “Financial Liberalization, Private Investment, and Portfolio Choice: Financialisation of Real Sectors in Emerging Markets.” Journal of Development Economics, 88 (2), 314–324.

[57]. Zhong, Y.X., & Lin, L. (2019). Financialization, life cycle, and persistent innovation: An empirical research based on the industrial difference. Journal of Finance and Economics, 45(08), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2019.08.003

[58]. Khan, H. U. R., Khidmat, W. B., & Awan, S. (2020). Board diversity, financial flexibility, and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Eurasian Business Review, 11(2), 303–326. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s40821-020-00171-9

[59]. Xu, X.,&Xuan, C.(2021).A study on the motivation of financialization in emerging markets: The case of Chinese nonfinancial corporations. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 72, 606–623.

[60]. Zheng,J.X., Jiang .D .,&Yong. C . W(2022) Does financialization of nonfinancial corporations promote the persistence of innovation: evidence from Ashare listed manufacturing corporations in China.Eurasian Business Review12:229–250 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-021-00193-x

[61]. Rabinovich, J. (2019). The financialization of the non-financial corporation. A critique of the financial turn of accumulation hypothesis.Metroeconomica, 70(4), 738–775.

[62]. Jibril, H., Kaltenbrunner, A., & Kesidou, E. (2018). Financialisation and Innovation in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Brazil. Leeds University Business School Working Paper, 18–09. https:// doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188021.

[63]. Hein, E., & Dodig, N. (2015).“Finance-Dominated Capitalism, Distribution, Growth, and Crisis: Long-run Tendencies.” In E. Hein, D. Detzer, and N. Dodig (eds.), The Demise of Finance-dominated Capitalism: Explaining the Financial and Economic Crises. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 54–114.

[64]. Wu, Z. (2022). Using machine learning approach to evaluate the excessive financialization risks of trading enterprises. Computational Economics, 59(4), 1607-1625.

[65]. Zhang, D., Ma, S., & Pan, X.(2019).Institutional investors, controlling shareholders and CEO pay-performance relationship: evidence from China, Accounting and Finance, https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12580

[66]. Zhang, F., Wei, L.,Yang, J.,&Zhu, L. (2018).Roles of Relationships between Large Shareholders and Managers in Radical Innovation: A Stewardship Theory Perspective. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 35, 88–105.

[67]. Rong, Z., Wu, X., & Boeing, P. (2017). The effect of institutional ownership on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Research Policy, 46(9), 1533–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.013

[68]. Agha, M., & Hossain, M. M. (2022). Are board monitoring and CEO incentives substitutes for each other? Evidence from Australian market reaction to acquisition announcements. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, Article 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRFA.2022.102042

[69]. Gupta, N.; Mahakud, J.(2021) CEO characteristics and bank performance: Evidence from India. Manag. Audit. J, 35, 1057–1093.

[70]. Klepek, M., & Bauerova, R. (2020). Why do retail customers hesitate to shop for grocery shopping online? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(6), 1444–1462. https://doi. org/10.3846/tede.2020.13970

[71]. Barszczewski, J. (2021). Creativity as neoliberal self-governance. Creativity Studies, 14(2), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.12311

[72]. Khan, I.; Wang, M. (2021)Evaluating Corporate Performance and Bank Productivity in China: The Moderating Role of Independent Directors. Sustainability, 13, 3193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13063193

[73]. Michael. A. and Phyu P.A.A(2018)Board characteristics And the likelihood of business model innovation adoption: evidence from the smart home industry, International Journal of Innovation Management. 22, (1),28.

[74]. Hsu, S., Lin, S.W., Chen, W.P., et al., (2021). CEO duality, information costs, and firm performance. N. Am. J. Econ. Finance 55, 101011.

[75]. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.

[76]. He.F.,&Liu,H.X.(2019).Evaluation of the performance improvement effect of digital transformation of real firms from the digital economy perspective. Reform, (4): 137-148.

[77]. Qi. H.J., Cao. X.Q.,&Liu.Y.X.(2020). The impact of the digital economy on corporate governance from the perspective of information asymmetry and managers' irrational behavior. Reform, (4): 50-64.

[78]. Wu, F., Hu, H.Z., Lin, H.Y., &Ren., X.Y.(2021). Firm digital transformation and capital market performance: Empirical evidence from stock liquidity. Management World,37(07):130-144+10.

[79]. Ling Runze, Ailing, & Li,B.(2021). Can supply chain finance improve a firm's innovation level? Finance research, 47 (02): 64-78. The DOI: 10.16538 / j.carol carroll nki jfe. 20200816.201.

[80]. Lin, C., &Zhang, S.C. (2019). International diversification, CEO foreign experience, and stock price crash risk: empirical evidence based on GEM listed firms. Journal of Nanjing Audit University,16(06):61-71.

[81]. Denis, D. J. (2009) Siblkov V. Financial constraints, investment, and the value of cash holdings.The review of financial studies, 23 (1): 247－269．

[82]. Du, Y., Xie, J., &Chen J.Y.(2019). The Financial background of the CEO and the financialization of real firms. China's industrial economy, (5): 136-154. The DOI: 10.19581 / j.carol carroll nki ciejournal.

[83]. Heyden, M.L.M., Reimer, M., Van Doorn, S., (2017). Innovating beyond the horizon: CEO career horizon, top management composition, and R&D intensity. Hum. Resour. Manag. 56, 205–224.

[84]. Hanelt, A., Firk, S., Hildebrandt, B., Kolbe, L.M., (2021). Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 30, 3–26.

[85]. Diller, M., Asen, M. and Spath, T. (2020), “The effects of personality traits on digital transformation: evidence from German tax consulting”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 37,1-16, 100455.

[86]. Aghion, P., J. V. Reenen., & Zingales. L. (2013). Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review 103 (1): 277–304. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.1.277

[87]. Granger, C. W. J. (1991). Modeling economic series: Readings in econometric methodology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

[88]. Jiang, F., Cai, W.,Wang, X.,& Zhu,B. (2018). Multiple large shareholders and corporate investment: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance 50 (3):66–83. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.02.001.

[89]. Lai, S.M., & Liu. C.L. (2018). Management characteristics and corporate investment efficiency. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 25 (3–4):295–312.doi:10.1080/16081625.2016.1266270

[90]. Liu, F. C., Mo, J. X., & Ma, R. K. (2017). The impact of TMT foreign background on firm innovation performance. Management Review, 29(7), 135–147. in Chinese

[91]. Zhong, X., Chen, W., & Lin, Y. (2018). CEO characteristics, internationalization speed, and corporate performance. China Science and Technology Forum, (09), 141-147. DOI:10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2018.09.022.

[92]. Xia .H.(2019). An empirical test of the influence of executives' foreign background on firms' inefficient investment. Statistics and Decision Making,16:184-188.

[93]. Meng. X.Z., Zhang. J.R., &Bai. X.L.(2018). The relationship between the career experience, tenure of external CEO, and corporate business strategy change. Management Review,8:168-181.

[94]. Duchin, R. (2010). Cash holdings and corporate diversification. The Journal of Finance 65 (3), 955–992.

[95]. Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., Boland Jr.,& R.J., (2016). Digital Product Innovation Within Four Classes of Innovation Networks. Information. Syst. J. 26 (1), 47–75.

[96]. Arlott, A., Henike, T., & Hölzle, K. (2019). Digital Entrepreneurship and Value Beyond: Why to Not Purely Play Online. In R. Baierl, J. Behrens & A. Brem, Digital Entrepreneurship: Interfaces Between Digital Technologies and Entrepreneurship (1- 22). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20138-8_1

[97]. Sebastian, I. M., Moloney, K. G., Ross, J. W., Fonstad, N. O., Beath, C.,&Mocker, M. (2017). How big old firms navigate digital transformation. MIS Q. Exec. 16, 197–213. doi: 10.4324/9780429286797-6



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com