Stress levels of science teachers when delivering distance education instruction in a state college during the COVID-19 pandemic
Vol 9, Issue 9, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 25 (Abstract) 22 (PDF)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically reshaped education worldwide, compelling institutions to rapidly adopt distance education models. Among those most affected are science educators, who face unique challenges in transitioning traditional classroom instruction to virtual platforms. Understanding the stressors experienced by science teachers during this shift is crucial not only for their well-being but also for the effectiveness of educational delivery. This study aims to investigate the stress levels and sources of stress experienced by science teachers at Zamboanga State College of Marine Sciences and Technology (ZSCMST) during the shift to distance education. The specific objectives were to determine the overall stress levels, identify the least stressful pre-identified causes of stress, compare the significance of different categories of stressors, and develop an intervention program based on the findings. A descriptive comparative research design with a quantitative approach was used, involving a purposive sample of 45 science teachers. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, which included sections on demographic information, perceived stress levels, and specific stressors related to professional skills, technical skills, work-home conflict, and support systems. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA. The results indicated that science teachers experienced moderate to high levels of stress, with professional and technical skills being the most prominent stressors. Support systems, although somewhat helpful, still contributed to the overall stress levels. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to alleviate these stressors, such as professional development programs, enhanced support systems, and policies addressing work-home conflict. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of addressing the specific stressors identified to improve the well-being of science teachers and the effectiveness of distance education. Further research is recommended to develop and evaluate interventions aimed at reducing teacher stress, enhancing teaching effectiveness, and understanding the long-term impact of these interventions in digital environments.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Panchal, N., Kamal, R., Orgera, K., Cox, C., Garfield, R., Hamel, L., & Chidambaram, P. (2020). The implications of COVID-19 for mental health and substance use. Kaiser family foundation, 21. https://pameladwilson.com/wp-content/uploads/4_5-2021-The-Implications-of-COVID-19-for-Mental-Health-and-Substance-Use-_-KFF-1.pdf
2. Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and Teachers’ somatic burden, stress, and emotional exhaustion: examining the role of principal leadership and workplace buoyancy. AERA Open, 7, 2332858420986187. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986187
3. Chavez, J. V. (2020). Academic and health insecurities of indigent students during pandemic: Study on adaptive strategies under learning constraints. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 16(3), 74-81. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sduhs/article/view/268146
4. Quezada, R. L., Talbot, C., & Quezada-Parker, K. B. (2020). From bricks and mortar to remote teaching: A teacher education program ‘s response to COVID-19. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 472-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1801330
5. Alea, L. A., Fabrea, M. F., Roldan, R. D. A., & Farooqi, A. Z. (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 awareness, distance learning education experiences and perceptions towards institutional readiness and challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.8
6. Akinboye, J. O., Akinboye, D. O., & Adeyemo, D. A. (2002). Coping with stress in life and workplace. Ibadan: Stirling-Horden Publishers. 2002
7. Gillespie, N. A., Walsh, M. H. W. A., Winefield, A. H., Dua, J., & Stough, C. (2001). Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work & stress, 15(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370117944
8. Boyd, N. G., Lewin, J. E., & Sager, J. K. (2009). A model of stress and coping and their influence on individual and organizational outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.03.010
9. Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational review, 53(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120033628
10. Chavez, J. V. (2023). Assessing online academic integrity and humanized teaching in Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 19(1), 9-17. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sduhs/article/view/268335
11. Willett, J., Brown, C., & Danzy-Bussell, L. A. (2019). An exploratory study: Faculty perceptions of online learning in undergraduate sport management programs. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 25, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100206
12. Klapproth, F., Federkeil, L., Heinschke, F., & Jungmann, T. (2020). Teachers’ experiences of stress and their coping strategies during COVID-19 induced distance teaching. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 444-452. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1282769
13. Petrakova, A. V., Kanonire, T. N., Kulikova, A. A., & Orel, E. A. (2021). Characteristics of Teacher Stress during Distance Learning Imposed by the COVID19 Pandemic. Вопросы образования, (1 (eng)). DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-93-114
14. Marek, M. W., Chew, C. S., & Wu, W. C. V. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 19(1), 40-60. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3
15. Cantrell, M. A. (2011). Demystifying the research process: Understanding a descriptive comparative research design. Pediatric Nursing, 37(4), 188. https://www.proquest.com/openview/ef559977720e1df10082783c9b9daa9f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=47659
16. Ceneciro, C. C., Estoque, M. R., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). Analysis of debate skills to the learners’ confidence and anxiety in the use of the English language in academic engagements. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 4544-4569. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.2812
17. Shahid, A., Wilkinson, K., Marcu, S., & Shapiro, C. M. (2011). Perceived stress questionnaire (PSQ). In STOP, THAT and One Hundred Other Sleep Scales (pp. 273-274). Springer, New York, NY.
18. Çoklar, A. N., Efilti, E., & Sahin, L. (2017). Defining Teachers' Technostress Levels: A Scale Development. Online Submission, 8(21), 28-41. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579062
19. Singh, R. N., & Hurley, D. (2017). The effectiveness of teaching and learning process in online education as perceived by university faculty and instructional technology professionals. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 6(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v6.n1.19528
20. Ansley, B. M., Houchins, D. E., Varjas, K., Roach, A., Patterson, D., & Hendrick, R. (2021). The impact of an online stress intervention on burnout and teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103251. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103251
21. Yang, Y., & Cornelius, L. F. (2004). Students' perceptions towards the quality of online education: A qualitative approach. Association for Educational Communications and Technology. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485012.pdf
22. Scanlon, P. M. (2003). Student online plagiarism: how do we respond? College Teaching, 51(4), 161-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596432
23. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2916
(25 Abstract Views, 22 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aldrin Rey C. Quisay, Micah Ezra C. Aquino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.