Open Journal Systems

Discourse analysis on academic integrity generative AI: Perspectives from science and mathematics students in higher education

Aldrex A. Barrientos, Mercibelle A. Del Mundo, Hermie V. Inoferio, Mardiya A. Adjid, Hilda B. Hajan, Myrna M. Ullong, Devie Ruth S. Alih, Benjamar P. Abdulmajid, Marcelino M. Espartero

Article ID: 2927
Vol 9, Issue 9, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 154 (Abstract) 78 (PDF)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly influenced the current educational system, offering various benefits to teachers and students. However, the integration of AI in education also poses challenges, particularly in maintaining academic integrity. This study investigates the perspectives of 24 science and mathematics students on the impact of Generative AI (GAI) on academic integrity, a core principle in higher education. Using an exploratory design, the findings reveal a dual perspective: GAI can enhance learning and research by providing advanced tools and resources, yet it also risks undermining ethical standards if misused. The study highlights the importance of balancing technological advancements with the maintenance of academic integrity, emphasizing the need for responsible AI usage and the development of policies to mitigate potential negative impacts. Further research is needed to explore the impact of GAI on academic integrity across different disciplines and educational contexts.


Keywords

academic integrity; artificial intelligence; science; mathematics; higher education

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 433-460.

2. Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays - Should professors worry? Nature.

3. Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Cooke, F. L., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., Dey, P. K., Guest, D., Knoblich, A. J., Malik, A., Paauwe, J., Papagiannidis, S., Patel, C., Pereira, V., Ren, S.,. (2023). Human Resource Management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and Research Dimensions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 606-659.

4. Sun, D., Boudouaia, A., Zhu, C., & Li, Y. (2024). Would ChatGPT-facilitated programming mode impact college students' programming behaviors, performances, and perceptions? An empirical study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

5. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Agyemang, M., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environment.

6. Yusuf, A., & Tambuwal, I. N. (2018). Integrating educational technology in teaching: Current perceptions and practices in Sokoto State Nigeria. Arab Journal of Quality in Education, 7-16.

7. Rawas, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education. Education and Information Technologies.

8. Chu, H., Tu, Y., & Yang, K. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22-42.

9. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology, 22.

10. Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the UnIted States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-in-the-Loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100068.

11. de la Torre-Lopez, J., Ramirez, A., & Romero, J. R. (2023). Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature. Computing, 2171-2194.

12. Parycek, P., Schmid, V., & Novak, A. S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation in administrative procedures: Potentials, limitations, and framework conditions. Journal of Knowledge Economy.

13. Kelly, S. M. (2023). ChatGPT passes exams from law and business schools. Retrieved from CNN Business: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/26/tech/chatgpt-passes-exams/index.html

14. Purtill, J. (2023). ChatGPT appears to pass medical school exams. Retrieved from ABC News: https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-01-12/chatgpt-generative-ai-program-passes-us-medical-licensing-exams/101840938

15. Ipek, Z. H., Gozum, A. C., Papadakis, S., & Kallogianakis, M. (2023). Educational applications of the ChatGPT AI system: A systematic review research. Educational Process: International Journal, 26-55.

16. Chan, C. K. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

17. Strzelecki, A. (2023). Students' acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative Higher Education.

18. Vincent, J. (2023). Top AI conference bans use of ChatGPT and AI language tools to write academic papers. Retrieved from The Verge: https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/5/23540291/chatgpt-ai-writing-tool-banned-writing-academic-icml-paper

19. Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 31-40.

20. Duhaylungsod, A. V., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). ChatGPT and other AI users: Innovative and creative utilitarian value and mindset shift. Journal of Namibian Studies, 4367-4378.

21. Tolman, S. (2017). Academic Dishonesty in Online Courses: Considerations for Graduate Preparatory Programs in Higher Education. College Student Journal, 579-584.

22. Crittenden, V. L.., Hanna, R. C., & Peterson, R. A. (2009). The cheating culture: A global social phenomenon. Business Horizons, 337-346.

23. Ellis, A. R., & Slade, E. (2023). A New Era of Learning: Considerations for ChatGPT as a Tool to Enhance Statistics and Data Science Education. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 1-10.

24. Roman, A. G. (2018). Minimizing plagiarism incidence in research writing in one state university in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 27-33.

25. Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltynek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., & Washington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text.

26. Wach, K., Doung, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaite, R., Korzynski, P., Maruzek, G., & Ziemba, E. (2023). The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7-24.

27. Gallent-Torres, C., Zapata-Gonzalez, A., & Ortego-Hernando, J. L. (2023). The impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence in higher education: a focus on ethics and academic integrity. RELIEVE.

28. Bandura, A. (2014). Social-cognitive theory. In An introduction to theories of personality (pp. 341-360). Psychology Press.

29. Chavez, J. V (2023). Assessing Online Academic Integrity and Humanized Teaching in Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 19(1), 9-17. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sduhs

30. Lievens, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education: tool or trickery? Education and New Developments, 645-647.

31. Lancaster, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence, text Generation tools and ChatGPT - does digital watermarking offer a solution? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2-14.

32. Guerrero-Dib, J. G., Portales, L., & Gallego, D. (2023). Academic Integrity as a Way to Promote Workplace Ethical Behaviour. Academic Integrity in the Social Sciences: Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice, 165-183.

33. Calaro, M. F., Vicente, M. B., Chavez, J. V., Reyes, M. J. D., Delantar, S., Jorolan, A., & Torres, J. (2023). Marketing campaigns leading to the purchase of accommodation products: A content analysis. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 4221-4236.

34. Chavez, J. V (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of the English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals.

35. Chavez, J. V., & Del Prado, R. T. (2023). Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 55-71.

36. Chavez, J. V. (2021). Bilingual parents' dispositions: Precursor to developing the English language teaching curriculum. Psychology and Education, 161-166.

37. Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environmental and Social Psychology.

38. Galloway, A. (2005). Non-Probability Sampling. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 859-864.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2927
(154 Abstract Views, 78 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Aldrex A. Barrientos, Mercibelle A. Del Mundo, Hermie V. Inoferio, Mardiya A. Adjid, Hilda B. Hajan, Myrna M. Ullong, Devie Ruth S. Alih, Benjamar P. Abdulmajid, Marcelino M. Espartero

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.