Published
2024-08-21
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Broadening influence: scale development for subjective norms across extended social groups in green purchasing
Wibowo Setyo
1.Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta 2.School of Business, IPB University
Najib Mukhamad
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University
Sumarwan Ujang
Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University
Asnawi Yudha
School of Business, IPB University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2940
Keywords: multidimensional scale, organic coffee, general reference group, subjective norms, sustainable consumption.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a multidimensional scale to measure subjective norms in green consumption, incorporating both specific and general social pressures, to address the limitations of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), which traditionally focuses on specific reference groups. This exploratory study incorporates a pilot study with 200 participants and a main investigation with 300 participants, all chosen with a purposive sampling technique. The study's participants were consumers aged 18 and older who had prior experience in purchasing coffee, were aware of organic coffee, and were deliberating about purchasing organic coffee products. Analysis techniques included item-to-total correlation, Cronbach's alpha, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). In the conducted pilot and main studies, the developed scale, comprising 14 items, exhibited robust reliability and validity. The findings elucidate that subjective norms influencing green consumption are informed by both significant social networks and broader societal trends, thus offering an exhaustive delineation of the determinants that influence environmentally sustainable behaviors. Practical recommendations were articulated for both retailers and governmental entities aiming to foster organic coffee consumption. These include the strategic enhancement of marketing initiatives to highlight the communal endorsement of organic coffee by both specific and general social collectives, along with the formulation of policies and incentives that promote organic agriculture and sustainable practices. By integrating a broad spectrum of social influences, the scale development introduced in this study advances the understanding of consumer behavior and sustainability.References
[1]. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[2]. Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
[3]. Al-Swidi, A., Huque, S. M. R., Hafeez, M. H., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2014). The role of subjective norms in theory of planned behavior in the context of organic food consumption. British Food Journal, 116(10), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2013-0105
[4]. Al Mamun, A., Nawi, N. C., Hayat, N., & Zainol, N. R. B. (2020). Predicting the Purchase Intention and Behaviour towards Green Skincare Products among Malaysian Consumers. Sustainability, 12(24), 10663. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410663
[5]. Alm, J., Schulze, W. D., von Bose, C., & Yan, J. (2019). Appeals to Social Norms and Taxpayer Compliance. Southern Economic Journal, 86(2), 638–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12374
[6]. Antwi, S., Bei, W., & Ameyaw, M. (2021). Investigating the Moderating Role of Social Support in Online Shopping Intentions. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.7176/JMCR/78-04
[7]. Apadula, L. T., & Predmore, C. E. (2019). The Shift to “Social”: Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship Must Meld to Meet Changing Consumer Preferences. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.33423/jmpp.v20i1.1324
[8]. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
[9]. Ateş, H. (2020). Merging Theory of Planned Behavior and Value Identity Personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.006
[10]. Azzaakiyyah, H. K. (2023). The Impact of Social Media Use on Social Interaction in Contemporary Society. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v1i1.33
[11]. Bagher, A. N., Salati, F., & Ghaffari, M. (2018). Factors affecting intention to purchase organic food products among Iranian consumers. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 22(3), 1–23. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2177046005?accountid=32819
[12]. Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519409539961
[13]. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
[14]. Bosso, H., Barbalho, S. M., de Alvares Goulart, R., & Otoboni, A. M. M. B. (2023). Green coffee: economic relevance and a systematic review of the effects on human health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 63(3), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1948817
[15]. Bracken, P., Burgess, P. J., & Girkin, N. T. (2023). Opportunities for enhancing the climate resilience of coffee production through improved crop, soil and water management. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 47(8), 1125–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2225438
[16]. Chauhan, V., & Bhagat, R. (2018). Analysing Green Purchasing Behaviour through Subjective Norms and Perceived Behaviour Control. MANTHAN: Journal of Commerce and Management, 5(01). https://doi.org/10.17492/manthan.v5i01.13044
[17]. Chu, K. M. (2018). Mediating influences of attitude on internal and external factors influencing consumers’ intention to purchase organic foods in China. Sustainability, 10(12), 4690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124690
[18]. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110
[19]. Chutani, A., Mendoza, L., & Weinell, B. (2022, January). Session 2.1 Is Your Cup of Coffee Green? “Road Home” from Glasgow Youth Summit; Voices of Optimism and Agents of Change. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.yeah-conference/dec2021/all-events/5
[20]. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
[21]. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.
[22]. Do, V. T. H., & Do, L. T. (2024). The effectiveness of social norms in promoting green consumption. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(3), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2022-0466
[23]. Ejelöv, E., Bergquist, M., Hansla, A., & Nilsson, A. (2022). Why are they eco-friendly? Attributing eco-friendly descriptive norms to intrinsic motivation increases pro-environmental purchase intention. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0265839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265839
[24]. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020
[25]. Foreign Agricultural Service. (2019). Coffee: World Markets and Trade. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/coffee.pdf
[26]. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[27]. Forward, S. E. (2019). Views on Public Transport and How Personal Experiences Can Contribute to a More Positive Attitude and Behavioural Change. In Social Sciences (Vol. 8, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020047
[28]. Gavrilets, S. (2021). Coevolution of actions, personal norms and beliefs about others in social dilemmas. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3, e44. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.40
[29]. Gomez, M., Klare, D., Ceballos, N., Dailey, S., Kaiser, S., & Howard, K. (2022). Do You Dare to Compare?: The Key Characteristics of Social Media Users Who Frequently Make Online Upward Social Comparisons. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(10), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1976510
[30]. Guevara, S., & Julián, I. P. (2019). Sustainable Consumption and Production: A Crucial Goal for Sustainable Development—Reflections on the Spanish SDG Implementation Report. Journal of Sustainability Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20190019
[31]. Ham, M., Jeger, M., & Ivković, A. F. (2015). The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 28(1), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1083875
[32]. Harbo, S., De Young, R., & Guckian, M. (2017). Beyond Green Consumerism: Uncovering the Motivations of Green Citizenship. Michigan Journal of Sustainability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/mjs.12333712.0005.105
[33]. Hindriks, F. (2019). Norms that Make a Difference: Social Practices and Institutions. Analyse & Kritik, 41(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2019-410109
[34]. Hughner, R. S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Shultz, C. J., & Stanton, J. (2007). Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(2–3), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.210
[35]. Hynes, N., & Wilson, J. (2016). I do it, but don’t tell anyone! Personal values, personal and social norms: Can social media play a role in changing pro-environmental behaviours? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.034
[36]. Jellason, N. P., Baines, R. N., Conway, J. S., & Ogbaga, C. C. (2019). Climate Change Perceptions and Attitudes to Smallholder Adaptation in Northwestern Nigerian Drylands. In Social Sciences (Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp. 1–20). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020031
[37]. Kamalanon, P., Chen, J.-S., & Le, T.-T.-Y. (2022). “Why Do We Buy Green Products?” An Extended Theory of the Planned Behavior Model for Green Product Purchase Behavior. Sustainability, 14(2), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020689
[38]. La Barbera, F., & Ajzen, I. (2020). Control interactions in the theory of planned behavior: Rethinking the role of subjective norm. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.2056
[39]. Lahlou, S. (2017). Installation Theory: The Societal Construction and Regulation of Behaviour. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480922
[40]. Levitan, L. C., & Verhulst, B. (2016). Conformity in Groups: The Effects of Others’ Views on Expressed Attitudes and Attitude Change. Political Behavior, 38(2), 277–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9312-x
[41]. Mabry, A., & Turner, M. M. (2016). Do sexual assault bystander interventions change men’s intentions? Applying the theory of normative social behavior to predicting bystander outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 21(3), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1058437
[42]. McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. In Psychological Bulletin (Vol. 107, Issue 2, pp. 247–255). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.247
[43]. Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Turel, O., Oliveira, T., & Lascano, J. E. (2021). Drivers of online social media addiction in the context of public unrest: A sense of virtual community perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106784
[44]. Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., & Nguyen, B. K. (2018). Young consumers’ green purchase behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(7), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2017.1318946
[45]. Organic Trade Association. (2021). Global Organic Trade. https://globalorganictrade.com/country/indonesia
[46]. Park, H. S., Klein, K. A., Smith, S., & Martell, D. (2009). Separating Subjective Norms, University Descriptive and Injunctive Norms, and U.S. Descriptive and Injunctive Norms for Drinking Behavior Intentions. Health Communication, 24(8), 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230903265912
[47]. Peattie, K. (2010). Green Consumption: Behavior and Norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 195–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328
[48]. Perry, G. L. W., Richardson, S. J., Harré, N., Hodges, D., Lyver, P. O., Maseyk, F. J. F., Taylor, R., Todd, J. H., Tylianakis, J. M., Yletyinen, J., & Brower, A. (2021). Evaluating the Role of Social Norms in Fostering Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.620125
[49]. Reynolds, K. J., Subašić, E., & Tindall, K. (2015). The Problem of Behaviour Change: From Social Norms to an Ingroup Focus. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12155
[50]. Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2
[51]. Safitri, A. M., & Setiawan, V. (2019). Masyarakat Indonesia Doyan “Ngopi”, Tapi Apakah Jumlahnya Sudah Aman? Honestdoc. https://www.honestdocs.id/batas-minum-kopi-sehari-indonesia
[52]. Saleem, M. A., Ismail, H., & Rao, A. A. (2021). Actions Speak Louder than Words: Investigating the Interplay between Descriptive and Injunctive Norms to Promote Alternative Fuel Vehicles. Sustainability, 13(17), 9662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179662
[53]. Saracevic, S., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Wu, T. (2022). How normative appeals influence pro-environmental behavior: The role of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344, 131086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131086
[54]. Sezgin, M., & Uler, Ş. (2020). The Role of Digital Feedback on the Self-Esteem of Digital Natives. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 35, 46–62. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.593767
[55]. Shou, Y., Shan, X., Dai, J., Xu, D., & Che, W. (2023). Actions speak louder than words? The impact of subjective norms in the supply chain on green innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(6), 879–898. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2022-0265
[56]. Sivapalan, A., Heidt, T. von der, Scherrer, P., & Sorwar, G. (2021). A consumer values-based approach to enhancing green consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.013
[57]. Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 647–666. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X269748
[58]. Thøgersen, J. (2014). The Mediated Influences of Perceived Norms on Pro-environmental Behavior. Revue d’économie Politique, Vol. 124(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.242.0179
[59]. Utama, A. P., Sumarwan, U., Suroso, A. I., & Najib, M. (2021). Roles of Regulation and Lifestyle on Indonesian Coffee Consumption Behavior Across Generations. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(6), 1153–1162. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160616
[60]. Vesely, S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2018). Global Social Norms and Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 50(3), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517702190
[61]. Worrall, R., & O’Leary, F. (2019). Towards greater collective impact: Developing the collaborative capability of the local community development committees (LCDCs). Administration, 67(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2019-0009
[62]. Xu, Y., Du, J., Khan, M. A. S., Jin, S., Altaf, M., Anwar, F., & Sharif, I. (2022). Effects of Subjective Norms and Environmental Mechanism on Green Purchase Behavior: An Extended Model of Theory of Planned Behavior. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.779629
[63]. Young, H. P. (2015). The Evolution of Social Norms. Annual Review of Economics, 7(1), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115322
[64]. Zhao, G., Geng, Y., Sun, H., Tian, X., Chen, W., & Wu, D. (2020). Mapping the knowledge of green consumption: a meta-analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(36), 44937–44950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11029-y