Published
2024-10-22
Section
Research Articles
License
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Appraising correlation between international organisation for standardisation 50001 and green productivity: A study of workers in Baiji, Iraq
Baser Khalaf Khazeal
Department of Management Office, Technical Institute Hawijah, Northern Technical University, Mosul, 31001, Iraq
Majid Mohammed Saleh
Department of Management Office, Technical Institute Hawijah, Northern Technical University, Mosul, 31001, Iraq
Mohamed Ahmed Hafez Ahmed
Department of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Nilai, 71800, Malaysia
Zakaria Che Muda
Department of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Nilai, 71800, Malaysia
Saleh Noori Ragab
Hawijah Education Department, Northern Technical University, Mosul, 31001, Iraq
Andrew Ebekozien
1. Department of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Nilai, 71800, Malaysia 2. Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology, Walter Sisulu University, East London, 5200, South Africa 3. Department of Quantity Surveying, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, 312101, Nigeria 4. School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, 11700, Malaysia
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4663-5592
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2969
Keywords: ISO 50001, green productivity, Iraq, productivity improvement, environmental protection
Abstract
Studies have shown that the progress and success of companies are achieved through their ability to improve energy performance and preserve the environment. It would translate to environmentally friendly products. However, there is a paucity of studies regarding the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) 50001 and its role in enhancing environmentally friendly products in developing countries such as Iraq. This study investigates the correlation between ISO 50001 standards and green productivity among Baiji's refinery workers in Iraq. Utilising a structured questionnaire, data from 128 respondents were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results indicate a significant positive correlation between ISO 50001 and green productivity, underscoring the importance of energy management training in enhancing productivity and environmental protection. As part of the study’s implications, it suggests increasing the company’s management’s attention to training in energy management and green productivity. Its positive impact on improving productivity and protecting the environment through continuous improvement of inputs, processes, outputs, and feedback to the company cannot be overstated.
Author Biography
Andrew Ebekozien, 1. Department of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Nilai, 71800, Malaysia 2. Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology, Walter Sisulu University, East London, 5200, South Africa 3. Department of Quantity Surveying, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, 312101, Nigeria 4. School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, 11700, Malaysia
Senior Research AssociateReferences
[1]. Kadusic E, Imamovic N (2023). Implementation of the energy management system iso 50 001 in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, 13th Research/Expert Conference with International Participations” QUALITY 2023“, Neum, B&H, June 19 –21.
[2]. Barbosa J (2023). Engineering assessment for ISO 50001 implementation. Universidad Cienciay Tecnología, 2023(Special), pp. 81-89.
[3]. AL-Doury MMI (2019). Treatment of oily sludge produced from Baiji oil refineries using surfactants. Petroleum Science and Technology, 37(6): 718-726.
[4]. Yucel M, Halis M (2016). ISO 50001 based integrated energy management system and organisation performance. Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, 2(2): 59-65.
[5]. International Organisation for Standardisation (2011). ISO 50001:2011 energy management systems—requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO.
[6]. Yuriev A Boiral O (2018). Implementing the ISO 50001 system: a critical review. ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and New Management Standards, pp. 145-175.
[7]. Kadusic E, Imamovic N. (2023). Implementation of the energy management system ISO 50001 in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 13th Research/Expert Conference with International Participations ”QUALITY 2023“, Neum, B&H, June 19 –21, 2023
[8]. Petnji Yaya LH, Marimon F, Casadesus M (2015). The mechanisms through which certain variables influence customer loyalty: The mediating roles of perceived value and satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(6): 627-637.
[9]. Chiu TY, Lo SL, Tsai YY (2012). Establishing an integration-energy-practice model for improving energy performance indicators in ISO 50001 energy management systems”, Energies, 5(12): 5324-5339.
[10]. Kahlenborn W, Kabisch S, Klein J, Richter I, Schürmann S (2012). Energy management systems in practice: ISO 50001: A guide for companies and organisations. BMU: Berlin, Germany.
[11]. Howell MT (2014). Effective implementation of an ISO 50001 energy management system (EnMS). Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.
[12]. Gopalakrishnan B, Ramamoorthy K, Crowe E, Chaudhari S, Latif H (2014). A structured approach for facilitating the implementation of ISO 50001 standard in the manufacturing sector. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 7: 154-165.
[13]. Apriyanti D, Prasetyo T, Warsito B (2019). The sustainability of energy management system implementation in pilot company’s industry of Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 248, No. 1, p. 012069). IOP Publishing.
[14]. Uriarte-Romero R, Gil-Samaniego M, Valenzuela-Mondaca E, Ceballos-Corral J (2017). Methodology for the successful integration of an energy management system to an operational environmental system. Sustainability, 9(8): 1304.
[15]. Dzene I, Polikarpova I, Zogla L, Rosa M (2015). Application of ISO 50001 for implementation of sustainable energy action plans. Energy Procedia, 72: 111-118.
[16]. Jelic DN, Gordic DR, Babic MJ, Koncalovic DN, Sustersi VM (2010). Review of existing energy management standards and possibilities for its introduction in Serbia. Thermal Science, 14(3): 613-623.
[17]. Trubetskaya A, McDermott O, McGovern S (2023). Implementation of an ISO 50001 energy management system using Lean Six Sigma in an Irish dairy: a case study. The TQM Journal, 35(9): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-08-2022-0252.
[18]. McKane A (2009). Thinking Globally: How ISO 50001-Energy Management can make industrial energy efficiency standard practice.
[19]. Mubin A (2020). Green productivity application for improving productivity and environmental performance through the selection of the best solution scenario in the agroindustry. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 821(1): 012031. IOP Publishing.
[20]. Findiastuti W, Anityasari M, Singgih ML (2011). Green productivity index: do different terms measure the same things. Proceeding of Industrial Engineering and Service Science, pp. 20-21.
[21]. Ahmed EM (2020). Modelling green participations QUALITY effects on sustainability. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development., 2(1): 1-12.
[22]. Kim JD (2019). Comparative analysis of green productivity in selected Asian countries by AHP Method. 27: 103-129.
[23]. Balist J, Sargazi H, Hoveidi H, Faryadi S (2016). Environmental management system and green productivity (EMS_GP) Implementation in Kurdistan Cement Plant. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(4): 01-07.
[24]. Logaa M (2010). Company practices influencing the implementation of green productivity initiatives and its effect on the performance among EMS 14001 certified companies in Malaysia, Master of Business Administration, Malaysian.
[25]. Logaa SM, Zailani S (2013). Motives in implementing green productivity among EMS 14001 certified companies in Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management, 7(38): 3914-3922.
[26]. Hwa TJ (2001). Green productivity and supply chain management. In Conference on enhancing competitiveness through green productivity, China (Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 25-27).
[27]. Fakhry HN, Alkhazraje EM, Saleh RM (2024). Job Immersion and Its Role in Reducing Organisational Obesity Through Job Compatibility. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 12(2): 166-183.
[28]. Ebekozien A, Abdul-Aziz A-R, Jaafar M (2023). Mitigating high development cost of low-cost housing: findings from an empirical investigation. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(3): 472-483, DOI:10.1080/15623599.2021.1889748
[29]. Plano-Clark VL, Creswell JW (2015). Understanding research: a consumer guide. 2nd ed. Boston (MA): Pearson.
[30]. Aliu J, Agbaje D, Oke A, Ebekozien A (2024). Driving forces behind the adoption of IEQ principles in building design: Evidence from Nigerian quantity surveying firms. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. 10.1108/IJBPA-11-2023-0163.
[31]. Oke A, Aliu J, Ebekozien A, Akinpelu M T, Olatunde MT, Ogunsanya AO (2024). Strategic drivers for the deployment of energy economics principles in the developing construction industry: A Nigerian perspective. Environmental Process and Sustainable Energy. DOI: 10.1002/ep.14351.
[32]. Nunnally JC (1978). Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
[33]. Ebekozien A, Abdul-Aziz A-R, Jaafar M (2019). Housing finance inaccessibility for low-income earners in Malaysia: Factors and solutions. Habitat International, 87: 27-35. doi.10.1016/j.habitantint.2019.03.009.
[34]. Ebekozien A, Aigbavboa C, Thwala DW (2025). A practical research process for developing a sustainable built environment in emerging economies. London: United Kingdom: Taylor and Francis.
[35]. Pallant J (2016). SPSS survival manual: a step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 6th ed. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Education.
[36]. Egas D, Ponsa S, llenas L, Colon J (2021). Towards energy-efficient small dairy production systems: an environmental and economic assessment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28: 39-51.
[37]. Kanchiralla FM, Jalo N, Thollander P, andersson M, Johnsson S (2021). Energy use categorisation with performance indicators for the food industry and a conceptual energy planning framework. Applied Energy, 304: 117788.
[38]. Testa F, Vigolo V (2015). Sustainability through energy efficiency: an Italian perspective. Sinergie. Ital J Manage, 33: 93–111
[39]. Imel MR, Gastesi R, Stone R (2015). Monroe County, Florida A case study in sustainable energy management. Energy Eng, 8595: 37–41.
[40]. Zhao W, Irfan M (2023). Does healthy city construction facilitate green growth in China? Evidence from 279 cities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(46): 102772-102789.
[41]. Li G, Jia X, Khan AA, Khan SU, Ali MAS, Luo J (2023). Does green finance promote agricultural green total factor productivity? Considering green credit, green investment, green securities, and carbon finance in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13): 36663-36679.