Open Journal Systems

Multi-level Analysis of Environmental Justice Perception's Influence on Public Participation in Urban Planning

Jiaxin Yi, Tao Zou

Article ID: 2987
Vol 9, Issue 8, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 121 (Abstract) 12 (PDF)

Abstract

This study investigates the multi-level effects of environmental justice perceptions on public participation willingness in urban planning. Employing a hierarchical linear modeling approach, we analyzed data from 816 residents across three major U.S. cities. Results reveal that procedural justice is the strongest predictor of participation willingness, followed by distributive and recognition justice. Significant cross-level interactions were observed, with neighborhood social capital amplifying the effect of procedural justice, and city-level environmental quality moderating the impact of distributive justice. Socioeconomic factors exhibited both direct and indirect effects, with income level positively moderating the relationship between procedural justice and participation. The study contributes to environmental justice theory by demonstrating the differential impacts of justice dimensions and their contextual variations. It also bridges environmental justice and public participation literature through an integrated multi-level framework. Practical implications include the importance of transparent decision-making processes, context-sensitive participation strategies, and initiatives to build community social capital. These findings provide valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers seeking to enhance public engagement in environmental planning and promote more just, sustainable urban environments.


Keywords

Environmental justice; public participation; urban planning; multi-level analysis; procedural justice; distributive justice; recognition justice; social capital; environmental quality; civic engagement

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., Matthews, C. Trends and directions in environmental justice: from inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2016, 41, pp. 321-340.

2. Schlosberg, D. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.

3. Walker, G. Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. Routledge, London, 2012.

4. Arnstein, S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4), pp. 216-224.

5. Maantay, J., Maroko, A. Mapping urban risk: Flood hazards, race, & environmental justice in New York. Applied Geography, 2009, 29(1), pp. 111-124.

6. Pearsall, H., Pierce, J. Urban sustainability and environmental justice: evaluating the linkages in public planning/policy discourse. Local Environment, 2010, 15(6), pp. 569-580.

7. Laurian, L. Environmental injustice in France. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2008, 51(1), pp. 55-79.

8. Fainstein, S.S. The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2014, 18(1), pp. 1-18.

9. Schlosberg, D. Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 2013, 22(1), pp. 37-55.

10. Walker, G. Beyond distribution and proximity: Exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode, 2009, 41(4), pp. 614-636.

11. Wolch, J.R., Byrne, J., Newell, J.P. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities 'just green enough'. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 125, pp. 234-244.

12. Bullard, R.D., Johnson, G.S. Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 2000, 56(3), pp. 555-578.

13. Schlosberg, D. Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 2004, 13(3), pp. 517-540.

14. Fraser, N. Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. In: Fraser, N., Honneth, A. (Eds.), Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. Verso, London, 2003, pp. 7-109.

15. Sen, A. The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009.

16. Schlosberg, D., Carruthers, D. Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environmental Politics, 2010, 10(4), pp. 12-35.

17. Agyeman, J., Bullard, R.D., Evans, B. Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.

18. Schlosberg, D., Collins, L.B. From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2014, 5(3), pp. 359-374.

19. Healey, P. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Macmillan International Higher Education, London, 2006.

20. Arnstein, S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4), pp. 216-224.

21. egacy, C. Is there a crisis of participatory planning? Planning Theory, 2017, 16(4), pp. 425-442.

22. Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 2004, 5(4), pp. 419-436.

23. Kahila-Tani, M., Kytta, M., Geertman, S. Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 186, pp. 45-55.

24. Afzalan, N., Muller, B. The role of social media in green infrastructure planning: A case study of neighborhood participation in park siting. Journal of Urban Technology, 2014, 21(3), pp. 67-83.

25. Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. Being a 'citizen' in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 2019, 84(1), pp. 1-13.

26. Flyvbjerg, B. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1998.

27. Quick, K.S., Feldman, M.S. Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2011, 31(3), pp. 272-290.

28. Fainstein, S.S. The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2014, 18(1), pp. 1-18.

29. Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J.J., Masip, L., Pearsall, H. Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona. Urban Geography, 2018, 39(3), pp. 458-491.

30. Fainstein, S.S. The Just City. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2010.

31. Certomà, C., Dyer, M., Pocatilu, L., Rizzi, F. (Eds.) Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City. Springer, Cham, 2017.

32. Schlosberg, D., Craven, L. Sustainable Materialism: Environmental Movements and the Politics of Everyday Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019.

33. Anguelovski, I. Neighborhood as Refuge: Community Reconstruction, Place Remaking, and Environmental Justice in the City. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2014.

34. Mohai, P., Pellow, D., Roberts, J.T. Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2009, 34, pp. 405-430.

35. Laurian, L. Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 2009, 10(3), pp. 369-391.

36. Schlosberg, D. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.

37. Pellow, D.N. What is Critical Environmental Justice? Polity Press, Cambridge, 2017.

38. Walker, G. Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. Routledge, London, 2012.

39. Mah, A. Environmental Justice in the Age of Big Data: Challenging Toxic Blind Spots of Voice, Speed, and Expertise. Environmental Sociology, 2017, 3(2), pp. 122-133.

40. Schlosberg, D., Collins, L.B. From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2014, 5(3), pp. 359-374.

41. Sikor, T., Newell, P. Globalizing environmental justice? Geoforum, 2014, 54, pp. 151-157.

42. Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., & Matthews, C. (2016). Trends and directions in environmental justice: From inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 321-340.

43. Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), 743-758.

44. American Planning Association. (2023). What is Planning? https://www.planning.org/aboutplanning/

45. Berke, P. R., Godschalk, D. R., Kaiser, E. J., & Rodriguez, D. A. (2006). Urban land use planning (5th ed.). University of Illinois Press.

46. Campbell, S. D. (2016). The planner's triangle revisited: Sustainability and the evolution of a planning ideal that can't stand still. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(4), 388-397.

47. Hall, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2019). Urban and regional planning (6th ed.). Routledge.

48. Legacy, C. (2017). Is there a crisis of participatory planning? Planning Theory, 16(4), 425-442.

49. Levy, J. M. (2016). Contemporary urban planning (11th ed.). Routledge.

50. Rohe, W. M. (2009). From local to global: One hundred years of neighborhood planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(2), 209-230.

51. Wheeler, S. M. (2013). Planning for sustainability: Creating livable, equitable and ecological communities (2nd ed.). Routledge.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2987
(121 Abstract Views, 12 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jiaxin Yi, Tao Zou

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.