Anti-dependency teaching strategy for innovation in the age of AI among technology-based students
Vol 9, Issue 8, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 200 (Abstract) 123 (PDF)
Abstract
The anti-dependency teaching strategy aims to prepare technology-based students for the evolving world of artificial intelligence (AI). Instead of teaching students to be passive users of technology, it pushes them to become active producers and problem solvers. By cultivating creativity, critical thinking abilities, and a growth mentality, this approach equips students to use AI as a tool for innovation. It explores the potential of AI while acknowledging its limitations and ethical implications through project-based learning, interdisciplinary methodologies, and real-world applications. In order to promote an innovative culture and group problem-solving, it also integrates collaborative learning environments. The approach places a strong emphasis on adaptation and ongoing learning, keeping students abreast of developments in artificial intelligence and related fields. The study's respondents were twenty-four (24) instructors of technology-based disciplines with creative elements. By putting this plan into practice, educators can give students the knowledge and perspective they need to effectively navigate the AI era, producing a new generation of creative thinkers who can transform society for the better.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Haleem A.Javaid M.Asim Qadri M.Pratap Singh R.Suman R. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for marketing: A literature-based study. International Journal of Intelligent Networks. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijin.2022.08.005
2. Smith, J. (2020). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in the Age of AI: Strategies for Technology-Based Students. Journal of Critical Thinking, 25(1), 45-62.
3. Brown, A., & Miller, J. (2018). Fostering Creativity and Innovation in the Age of AI. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 45-62.
4. Chen, L., et al. (2020). Interdisciplinary Approaches to AI Education: ACase Study. International Journal of Technology and Education, 12(2), 78-93.
5. Davis, R., & Johnson, M. (2020). Ethical Considerations in AI Education. Journal of Ethics in Technology, 17(1), 32-48.
6. Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2018). Cultivating Collaboration in Technology-Based Education. International Journal of Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 78-94.
7. Lee, H., & Johnson, S. (2019). Continuous Learning and Adaptability in the Age of AI. Journal of Lifelong Learning, 20(2), 56-71.
8. Martin, L., & Thompson, J. (2020). The Role of Continuous Learning in Fostering Innovation among Technology-Based Students. Journal of Innovation in Education, 27(4), 32-48.
9. Jones, T., et al. (2019). Critical Thinking in the Age of AI: Strategies for Technology-Based Students. Journal of Critical Thinking in Education, 15(3), 45-62.
10. Johnson, E., & Smith, P. (2021). Cultivating Innovation through Project-Based Learning the Age of AI. Journal of Educational Innovation, 32(1), 78-94.
11. Garcia, S., & Thompson, R. (2017). The Role of Interdisciplinary Learning in AI Education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(4), 56-71.
12. Robinson, K., & Martin, M. (2019). Ethical Considerations in the Age of AI: Implications for Technology-Based Education. Journal of Ethical Education, 14(2), 78-93.
13. Gonzalez, M., & Smith, K. (2021). Collaborative Learning in the Age of AI: Strategies for Technology-Based Students. International Journal of Collaborative Education, 8(2), 112-128.
14. Smith, E. N., Romero, C., Donovan, B., Herter, R., Paunesku, D., Cohen, G. L., Gross, J. J. (2018). Emotion theories and adolescent well-being: Results of an online intervention. Emotion, 18(6), 781-788.
15. Brown, J. L., Jones, S. M., LaRusso, M., & Aber, J. L. (2010). Improving classroom quality: Teacher influences and experimental impacts of the 4Rs Program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 153–167. doi:10.1037/a0018160
16. Lee, S., & Kim, E. (2020). Influencer Marketing on Instagram: How Sponsorship Disclosure, Influencer Credibility, and Brand Credibility Impact the Effectiveness of Instagram Promotional Post. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 11, 232-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2020.1752766
17. Chen, Y., Chen, S., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., Li, T., Wu, S., Wang, Y., Carey, L.B., and Qian, W. (2019). Overdosage of Balanced Protein Complexes Reduces Proliferation Rate in Aneuploid Cells. Cell Syst. 9, this issue, 129–142.
18. Wang, B., Liu, Y., & Parker, S. (2020). How Does the Use of Information Communication Technology Affect Individuals? A Work Design Perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 695-725. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0127
19. Braun V, Clarke V, (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychologyDOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
20. Paesano, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence and creative activities inside organizational behavior. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-09-2020-2421
21. Mukhamediev R. I.Popova Y.Kuchin Y.Zaitseva E.Kalimoldayev A.Symagulov A.Levashenko V.Abdoldina F.Gopejenko V.Yakunin K.Muhamedijeva E.Yelis M. (2022). Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies: Classification, Restrictions, Opportunities and Challenges. Mathematics. DOI: 10.3390/math10152552
22. Solberg, E., Kaarstad, M., Eitrheim, M. H. R., Bisio, R., Reegård, K., & Bloch, M. (2022). A Conceptual Model of Trust, Perceived Risk, and Reliance on AI Decision Aids. Group and Organization Management, 47(2), 187–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221081238
23. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D., (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Management Review Vol. 32, No. 2, 344– 354.
24. Duhaylungsod, A.V., Chavez, J.V., (2023). ChatGPT and other AI Users: Innovative and Creative Utilitarian Value and Mindset Shift. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33(2023): 4367–4378
25. Ayu N.SuharnoChrysti Suryandari K. (2023). Exploration: Creative Thinking Skills inWriting Essays Media-Based Image Series. International Journal of Elementary Education. DOI: 10.23887/ijee.v7i1.54095
26. Awasthi S. (2019). Plagiarism and academic misconduct: A systematic review. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.39.2.13622
27. Weber M. Engert M. Schaffer N. Weking J. Krcmar H. (2023). Organizational Capabilities for AI Implementation—Coping with Inscrutability and Data Dependency in AI. Information Systems Frontiers. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-022-10297-y
28. Zielinski C. Winker M. Aggarwal R. Ferris L. Heinemann M. Lapeña J. F. Pai S. Ing E. Citrome L. Alam M. Voight M.Habibzadeh F. (2023). Chatbots, Generative AI, and Scholarly Manuscripts: WAME Recommendations on Chatbots and Generative Artificial Intelligence in Relation to Scholarly Publications Revised May 31, 2023. Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. DOI: 10.32412/pjohns.v38i1.2135
29. Zhang D. Wu H. Yang F. (2021). Fscr: A deep social recommendation model for misleading771 information. Information (Switzerland). DOI: 10.3390/info12010037
30. Delos Reyes, R.B., Tongkoh, A.L., Chavez, J.V., (2023). Transitional Challenges AndFactors Affecting English-Speaking Learners In Learning The Filipino Language. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 1720-1744. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.3141
31. Mitchell C. (2023). Max-Neef (2005) and the great transdisciplinary swindle: Lack of originality or something more worrisome?. Ecological Economics. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107953
32. Sallam M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare (Switzerland). DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060887
33. Deniz G. (2023). The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Academic Paper WritingandIts Prospective Application as a Co-Author: A Letter to the Editor. European Journal of Therapeutics. DOI: 10.58600/eurjther1808
34. Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1541. Retrieved from https://ojs.acad-pub.com/index.php/FLS/article/view/v5i2.1541
35. Currie G.Hawk K. E.Rohren E.Vial A.Klein R. (2019). Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Intelligent Imaging. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2019.09.005
36. Sabdani-Asiri, M. L. ., Chavez, J. V. ., & DPA, K. I. S. S.. (2024). Analysis of Public Speaking Resources And Alternative Improvement Strategies Among Academic Leaders With Public Speaking Woes. Migration Letters, 21(S6), 817–831. Retrievedfrom https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/8005
37. Inoferio, H.V., Espartero, M.M., Asiri, M.S., Damin, M.D., Chavez, J.V., (2024). Coping With math anxiety and lack of confidence through AI-assisted Learning.Environment and Social Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2228
38. Šašić S. Š.Kalajžić A.Nikčević-Milković A. (2021). Promoting Self-Regulated Learning–the Role of some Sociodemographic Factors, Teachers’ Perceptions of Teaching and Learning, Commitment to Work and Work Burnout. Psihologijske Teme. DOI: 10.31820/pt.30.3.4
39. Ennis R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
40. Fikriyatii A.Agustini R.Sutoyo S. (2022). Critical thinking cycle model to promote critical thinking disposition and critical thinking skills of pre-service science teachers. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. DOI: 10.18844/cjes.v17i1.6690
41. Murro, R.A., Lobo, J.G., Inso, AR.C., Chavez, J.V., (2023). Difficulties of parents with low educational attainment in assisting their children in modular distance learning during pandemic. Environment and Social Psychology, DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1957
42. Koos S.Wachsmann S. (2023). Navigating the Impact of ChatGPT/GPT4 on Legal Academic Examinations: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations. Media Iuris. DOI: 10.20473/mi.v6i2.45270
43. Baron N. S. (2023). How ChatGPT robs students of motivation to write and think for themselves. The Conversation.
44. Fauziya O.Aigerim B.Gulfairuz Y.Elmira O.Meruyert I.Akhmetzhanova G.IlhamD.Azizi Z.Mousavi M. S.Anamagh A. N. (2022). Development of Students' Speech Using the Method of Creative Thinking. Education Research International. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4958538
45. Arisoy B.Aybek B. (2021). The effects of subject-based critical thinking education in mathematics on students’ critical thinking skills and virtues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2021.92.6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.3026
(200 Abstract Views, 123 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Kier P. Dela Calzada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.