Endowed with positive values and fatal weaknesses: Public art practices in post-industrial landscape --- A systematic review
Vol 9, Issue 10, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 188 (Abstract) 89 (PDF)
Abstract
Public art, due to its convenient participatory function and strong social integration ability, is being widely used in the protection, adaptive reuse and innovation of urban post-industrial landscape. In the process of urban renewal, although different forms of public art practice have brought many positive values and benefits to post-industrial landscape, such as the preference for sustainable development of the city, the continuation of urban context or the concern for local community residents based on “top-down” and “bottom-up” cases. Meanwhile, a series of fatal weaknesses arise are ultimately attributed to fragment and single protection of post-industrial landscape. The goal of this study is to systematically review and classify articles on the involvement of public art in post-industrial landscape (a process for screening articles was designed) in order to more clearly find out the positive values and fatal weaknesses of public art practice in various process of post-industrial landscape protection based on both “top-down” and “bottom-up” models. Most previous studies have focused on case analysis and have not discussed this issue or used this method. Therefore, the study is valuable. The conclusions of the study show eight positive values and seven fatal weaknesses in the application of public art practice in post-industrial landscape. It should be pointed out that “inspiring interaction and involvement” and “strengthening community identity,” are the most important factors in the practice of public art in post-industrial landscape. In the future stage, we should focus on and address the issue of "how to establish long-term artistic practice?” and “how we can better balance interests and rights among multiple stakeholders?" within public art academic ocean.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Miles, M. (1997). Art, Space and the City (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973110.
2. Song, L. (2024). A Comprehensive Analysis on the Challenges and Opportunities in Teaching Public Art Courses: A Case of JN Normal University, Inner Mongolia, China. Pacific International Journal, 7(2), 131-135. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v7i3.
3. Hall, T., & Robertson, I. (2001). Public art and urban regeneration: advocacy, claims and critical debates. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390120024457.
4. Silver, D., & Clark, T. N. (2013). Buzz as an urban resource. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 38(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs10514
5. Silver, D. A., & Clark, T. N. (2016). Scenescapes. University of Chicago Press. https://www.academia.edu/28665145/Scenescapes.
6. Webster, D., Muller, L., & Cai, J. (2011). The emerging cultural economy in Chinese cities: early dynamics. International Development Planning Review, 33(3), 343-369. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2011.18
7. Yang, C., & Qian, Z. (2023). “Art district without artists”: urban redevelopment through industrial heritage renovation and the gentrification of industrial neighborhoods in China. Urban Geography, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2246846
8. Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-11-2015-0052
9. MILLS, B., PARKINSON, C., Satchwell, C., Herring, L., & Parathian, H. (2024). Creative Approaches to Landscape Research: Multisensory Multispecies Storytelling: Using multisensory and multispecies research perspectives with marginalized groups. Landscape Research, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2024.2336544
10. Loures, L. (2015). Post-industrial landscapes as drivers for urban redevelopment: Public versus expert perspectives towards the benefits and barriers of the reuse of post-industrial sites in urban areas. Habitat International, 45, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.028
11. Martinat, S., Navratil, J., Hollander, J. B., Trojan, J., Klapka, P., Klusacek, P., & Kalok, D. (2018). Re-reuse of regenerated brownfields: Lessons from an Eastern European post-industrial city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 536-545.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.313
12. Di Pietro, F., & Robert, A. (2021). Urban Wastelands as a Form of Urban Nature: An Introduction. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74882-1_17
13. Pérez, A. J. Y., & Verbakel, E. (2022). The role of adaptive reuse in historic urban landscapes towards cities of inclusion. The case of acre. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-05-2022-0074.
14. Zehra Babutsalı Alpler, Nil Paşaoğluları Şahin & Uğur Ulaş Dağlı (2020) A critical discussion of industrial heritage buildings adaptive re-use as film spaces, case study: industrial heritage buildings at Istanbul., Journal of Architectural Conservation, 26:3, 215-234, https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2020.1782105
15. Jiang, Z., Qi, Z., Chen, L., Xu, L., Wan, D., Burak-Gajewski, P., ... & Liu, L. (2024). External Spatial Morphology of Creative Industries Parks in the Industrial Heritage Category Based on Spatial Syntax: Taking Tianjin as an Example. Buildings, 14(3), 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030559.
16. Bose, M. B. (2024). Uncomfortable quilts: textile-based artivism in response to Bangladeshi garment factory disasters. South Asian History and Culture, 15(1), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2023.2298624.
17. Cheung, M. S., Smith, N. K. & Craven, O. (2021). The impacts of public art on cities, places and people’s lives. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 52(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2021.1942361.
18. Gu, S., & Meng, H. (2021). RESEARCH ON THE STRATEGY OF INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE PROTECTION AND RENEWAL. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVI-M-1–2021, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlvi-m-1-2021-279-2021.
19. Jin, M. (2024). Guidelines For Integrating Public Art into Post-Industrial Landscape Redevelopment (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph). https://hdl.handle.net/10214/28281.
20. Shaffrey, C. (2010). What Is Public Art? Edited by Lisa Moran. Dublin: Museum of Modern Art Ireland.https://publicart.ie/fileadmin/user_upload/images/projects/A_Misc/Whatis_publicart.pdf.
21. Zhang, Y. (2012). Cultural Sustainability of a post-industrial brownfield in Wanzhou China: Maintaining cultural value through brownfield redevelopment (thesis, Clemson). https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1324
22. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X0300300213
23. Luo, L., & Cao, Y. (2023). The museum method of reusing Shanghai waterfront industrial heritage: continuation and reconstruction of urban memory. Built Heritage, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00102-3.
24. H. J. Lavery (2017) Australian landscape art as a contributor to environmental management planning at Berrys Bay (Sydney Harbour), Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 24:3, 261-275, https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2017.1310061
25. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424.
26. MasterClass. (2021, June 17). Public Art Guide: 8 Examples of Major Public art Installations - 2023 - MasterClass. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/public-art-g.
27. Hung Hing Chan, Tai-Shan Hu & Peilei Fan (2019): Social sustainability of urban regeneration led by industrial land redevelopment in Taiwan, European Planning Studies.https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1577803
28. Ma, Pengfei, Xiang Ning Li, and Di Lan. 2023. "A Dual Strategy in the Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage Buildings: The Shanghai West Bund Waterfront Refurbishment" Buildings 13, no. 7: 1582. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071582
29. Shao, L. (2024). Research on the Spatial Renovation Design of the 798 Art District and Ullens Centre for Contemporary Art Guided by Gordon Cullen’s Methodology. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 490, p. 02018). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449002018
30. “Inkinen, T. (2024). The art of dancing for urban design. In Julie Miao & Tan Yigitcanlar (eds.): Routledge Companion of Creativity and the Built Environment. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292821-19”
31. Yang, Q. (2023). The social production of industrial heritage spaces in the background of cultural governance: a comparative study based on cases from taipei and Hong Kong. Buildings, 13(7), 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071579.
32. Kwon, M. (2002). Public art and urban identities. European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies. https://transversal.at/transversal/0102/kwon/en.
33. Andrzejewski, A. & Mecacci, A. (2022). Foreword. Public Art and Aesthetics. Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi dell’estetico, 15(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.36253/Aisthesis-13832.
34. DeBernardi, J. 2004. Rites of Belonging: Memory, Modernity, and Identity in a Malaysian Chinese Community. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/214535
35. Mathews, V. (2014). Incoherence and tension in culture‐led redevelopment. International journal of urban and regional research, 38(3), 1019-1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12108
36. Miao Sun & Chen Chen (2021): Renovation of industrial heritage sites and sustainable urban regeneration in post-industrial Shanghai, Journal of Urban Affairs, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1881404
37. Carlo Salone, Sara Bonini Baraldi & Giangavino Pazzola (2017): Cultural production in peripheral urban spaces: lessons from Barriera, Turin (Italy), European Planning Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1327033
38. Lim, Y., Im, D. U., & Lee, J. (2019). Promoting the sustainability of city communities through ‘Voluntary Arts Activities’ at regenerated cultural arts spaces: A focus on the combination of the ‘Democratization of Culture’and ‘Cultural Democracy’perspectives. Sustainability, 11(16), 4400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164400
39. Dogan, E., Cuomo, F., & Battisti, L. (2023). Reviving urban greening in post-industrial landscapes: The case of Turin. Sustainability, 15(17), 12760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712760
40. Douet, J. (2011, October). The ‘art factory’, a natural re-use process. In En Paper presented at VCPD Research Centre for Industrial Heritage conference (Vol. 15).
41. Sudarmanto, Joni Agung (2024) "Performativity of JaF art agency on the land, city, and its surroundings," Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya: Vol. 52: No. 1, Article 9. Available at: https://citeus.um.ac.id/jbs/vol52/iss1/9
42. Franta, J. (2018). Gare d'Austerlitz-Paris Rive Gauche-Smart complex na skalę metropolii. Środowisko Mieszkaniowe.DOI: 10.4467/25438700SM.18.041.9206.
43. Schroeder, S. (2020). Crafting New Lifestyles and Urban Places: The Craft Beer Scene of Berlin. Papers in Applied Geography, 6(3), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2020.1776149.
44. Oevermann, H., Wergeland, E. S., & Hanika, S. (2024). Industrial Heritage and Pathways for Cultural-Creative Development in Bamberg, Germany. Urban Planning, 9. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.8072
45. Garcia, A. (2022, June 7). The Importance of Community Murals and dialogue through art - Product Care Recycling. Product Care Recycling. https://www.productcare.org/about/blog/importance-of-community-murals/
46. Chen Yang & Zhu Qian (18 Aug 2023): “Art district without artists”: urban redevelopment through industrial heritage renovation and the gentrification of industrial neighborhoods in China, Urban Geography, https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2246846
47. Zielke, P., & Waibel, M. (2015). Creative spaces and the local state in China: The case of Guangzhou's Redtory Art+ Design Factory. City, Culture and Society, 6(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.03.005
48. Mironică, M. (2019). Cultural workers from the Paintbrush Factory. Between institution-building and urban development challenges. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Sociologia, 64(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0011
49. Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-11-2015-0052
50. Miao Sun & Chen Chen (2021): Renovation of industrial heritage sites and sustainable urban regeneration in post-industrial Shanghai, Journal of Urban Affairs, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1881404
51. Melia Belli Bose (2024) Uncomfortable quilts: textile-based artivism in response to Bangladeshi garment factory disasters, South Asian History and Culture, 15:1, 88-110, https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2023.2298624
52. Mathews, V. (2014). Incoherence and tension in culture‐led redevelopment. International journal of urban and regional research, 38(3), 1019-1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12108
53. Luo, L., & Cao, Y. (2023). The museum method of reusing Shanghai waterfront industrial heritage: continuation and reconstruction of urban memory. Built Heritage, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00102-3
54. Meng, L., Lin, B. G., Zhang, H. Z., & Bu, R. (2023). Sustainable Development Evaluation on the Landscape Design of Industrial Heritage Park: A Case Study of Tao Sichuan, China. Journal of Environmental and Public Health,2023(1), 1564614.https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1564614
55. Dogan, E., Cuomo, F., & Battisti, L. (2023). Reviving urban greening in post-industrial landscapes: The case of Turin. Sustainability 15 (17), 12760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su151712760
56. Cano-Sanchiz, J. M. (2022). Spaces and roles of contemporary art in industrial and technological ruins1. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 34(1), 85-107. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/aris.72669
57. Remesar, A. (2020). Public Art in Urban Regeneration. Piotrkowska street. Pride of a city: Łódź. on the w@ terfront. Public Art. Urban Design. Civic Participation. Urban Regeneration, 62(5), 29-78. https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2020.62.6.8
58. Hsiu-Ching, H., Chun-Yu, H., & Yun-Ci, Z. (2018) Discussing the innovative experience design model of tourism factory—A case study on Shiroi Koibito Park in Hokkaido, Japan. https://doi.org/10.35745/ecei2018v1.011
59. Carlo Salone, Sara Bonini Baraldi & Giangavino Pazzola (2017): Cultural production in peripheral urban spaces: lessons from Barriera, Turin (Italy), European Planning Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1327033
60. Sepe, M. (2018). Place identity and creative district regeneration: The case of 798 in Beijing and M50 in Shanghai art zones. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2017.2.15
61. Hui, A., T. Stickley, M. Stubley, and F. Baker. 2019. “Project eARTh: Participatory Arts and Mental Health Recovery, a Qualitative Study.” Perspectives in Public Health 139 (6): 296–302. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1757913918817575.
62. Keidar, N., & Silver, D. (2024). The space of ideas: Public art policy and the concept of urban model spaces. Journal of Urban Affairs, 46(1), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2038033
63. Mironică, M. (2019). Cultural workers from the Paintbrush Factory. Between institution-building and urban development challenges. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Sociologia, 64(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0011
64. Tsilika, E., & Vardopoulos, I. (2022). The FIX-up mix-up; undue façadism or adaptive reuse? Examining the former FIX brewery transformation into the National Museum of Contemporary Art in Athens. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(3), 688-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-09-2021-0255
65. Fernández, L., Llobet, J., & Viladomiu, À. (2021). Public Art? Examining the Differences between Contemporary Sculpture inside and outside the Art Institution. Barcelona, Research, Art, Creation, 9(3), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.17583/brac.5087
66. Sepe, M. (2018). Place identity and creative district regeneration: The case of 798 in Beijing and M50 in Shanghai art zones. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2017.2.15
67. Bi, W., & He, Z. (2020, April). Research on form construction of art intervention in old renovation space. In 2020 International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS) (pp. 505-507). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICUEMS50872.2020.00111
68. Zielke, P., & Waibel, M. (2015). Creative spaces and the local state in China: The case of Guangzhou's Redtory Art+ Design Factory. City, Culture and Society, 6(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.03.005
69. Gandy, M. (2013). Marginalia: aesthetics, ecology, and urban wastelands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(6), 1301–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.832105
70. Bu, J. Y., and Z. Y. Liu. 2012. “Research on Improving the Citizens’ Orderly Interest-Driven Political Participation in China.” 8th International Conference on Public Administration, Osmania Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Hyderabad, India
71. Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-11-2015-0052
72. H. J. Lavery (2017) Australian landscape art as a contributor to environmental management planning at Berrys Bay (Sydney Harbour), Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 24:3, 261-275, https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2017.1310061
73. Nakagawa, S. 2013. “Art as a Mechanism for Enhancing Social Accessibility.” Journal of Urban Culture Research 7:72–7.
74. Zhong, Y., Yang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2024). Nearby art: A new type of public art practice in the Pearl River Delta, China. Global Media and China, 20594364231223772. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231223772
75. Rifai, G., & Emekci, S. (2024). Experiences of war and peace in public spaces—Aleppo city case study. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(3), 2789. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
76. Marie Migeon (29 Feb 2024): Peace and Conflict in Public Space: Gendered Murals Shaping Belfast, Geopolitics, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2321164.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.3092
(188 Abstract Views, 89 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jingzong Xu, Mingzhen Ker, Muhizam Mustafa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.