PDF

Published

2024-11-07

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 10 (2024): Published

Section

Review Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Xu, J., Ker, M., & Mustafa, M. (2024). Endowed with positive values and fatal weaknesses: Public art practices in post-industrial landscape --- A systematic review. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.3092

Endowed with positive values and fatal weaknesses: Public art practices in post-industrial landscape --- A systematic review

Jingzong Xu

School of  the Arts, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang,11800, Malaysia.

Mingzhen Ker

School of  the Arts, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang,11800, Malaysia.

Muhizam Mustafa

School of  the Arts, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang,11800, Malaysia.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.3092


Keywords: public art, public art practices, post-industrial landscape, urban renewal

Abstract

Public art, due to its convenient participatory function and strong social integration ability, is being widely used in the protection, adaptive reuse and innovation of urban post-industrial landscape. In the process of urban renewal, although different forms of public art practice have brought many positive values and benefits to post-industrial landscape, such as the preference for sustainable development of the city, the continuation of urban context or the concern for local community residents based on “top-down” and “bottom-up” cases. Meanwhile, a series of fatal weaknesses arise are ultimately attributed to fragment and single protection of post-industrial landscape. The goal of this study is to systematically review and classify articles on the involvement of public art in post-industrial landscape (a process for screening articles was designed) in order to more clearly find out the positive values and fatal weaknesses of public art practice in various process of post-industrial landscape protection based on both “top-down” and “bottom-up” models. Most previous studies have focused on case analysis and have not discussed this issue or used this method. Therefore, the study is valuable. The conclusions of the study show eight positive values and seven fatal weaknesses in the application of public art practice in post-industrial landscape. It should be pointed out that “inspiring interaction and involvement” and “strengthening community identity,” are the most important factors in the practice of public art in post-industrial landscape. In the future stage, we should focus on and address the issue of "how to establish long-term artistic practice?” and “how we can better balance interests and rights among multiple stakeholders?" within public art academic ocean.

References

[1]. Miles, M. (1997). Art, Space and the City (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973110.

[2]. Song, L. (2024). A Comprehensive Analysis on the Challenges and Opportunities in Teaching Public Art Courses: A Case of JN Normal University, Inner Mongolia, China. Pacific International Journal, 7(2), 131-135. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v7i3.

[3]. Hall, T., & Robertson, I. (2001). Public art and urban regeneration: advocacy, claims and critical debates. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390120024457.

[4]. Silver, D., & Clark, T. N. (2013). Buzz as an urban resource. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 38(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs10514

[5]. Silver, D. A., & Clark, T. N. (2016). Scenescapes. University of Chicago Press. https://www.academia.edu/28665145/Scenescapes.

[6]. Webster, D., Muller, L., & Cai, J. (2011). The emerging cultural economy in Chinese cities: early dynamics. International Development Planning Review, 33(3), 343-369. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2011.18

[7]. Yang, C., & Qian, Z. (2023). “Art district without artists”: urban redevelopment through industrial heritage renovation and the gentrification of industrial neighborhoods in China. Urban Geography, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2246846

[8]. Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-11-2015-0052

[9]. MILLS, B., PARKINSON, C., Satchwell, C., Herring, L., & Parathian, H. (2024). Creative Approaches to Landscape Research: Multisensory Multispecies Storytelling: Using multisensory and multispecies research perspectives with marginalized groups. Landscape Research, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2024.2336544

[10]. Loures, L. (2015). Post-industrial landscapes as drivers for urban redevelopment: Public versus expert perspectives towards the benefits and barriers of the reuse of post-industrial sites in urban areas. Habitat International, 45, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.028

[11]. Martinat, S., Navratil, J., Hollander, J. B., Trojan, J., Klapka, P., Klusacek, P., & Kalok, D. (2018). Re-reuse of regenerated brownfields: Lessons from an Eastern European post-industrial city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 536-545.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.313

[12]. Di Pietro, F., & Robert, A. (2021). Urban Wastelands as a Form of Urban Nature: An Introduction. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74882-1_17

[13]. Pérez, A. J. Y., & Verbakel, E. (2022). The role of adaptive reuse in historic urban landscapes towards cities of inclusion. The case of acre. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-05-2022-0074.

[14]. Zehra Babutsalı Alpler, Nil Paşaoğluları Şahin & Uğur Ulaş Dağlı (2020) A critical discussion of industrial heritage buildings adaptive re-use as film spaces, case study: industrial heritage buildings at Istanbul., Journal of Architectural Conservation, 26:3, 215-234, https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2020.1782105

[15]. Jiang, Z., Qi, Z., Chen, L., Xu, L., Wan, D., Burak-Gajewski, P., ... & Liu, L. (2024). External Spatial Morphology of Creative Industries Parks in the Industrial Heritage Category Based on Spatial Syntax: Taking Tianjin as an Example. Buildings, 14(3), 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030559.

[16]. Bose, M. B. (2024). Uncomfortable quilts: textile-based artivism in response to Bangladeshi garment factory disasters. South Asian History and Culture, 15(1), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2023.2298624.

[17]. Cheung, M. S., Smith, N. K. & Craven, O. (2021). The impacts of public art on cities, places and people’s lives. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 52(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2021.1942361.

[18]. Gu, S., & Meng, H. (2021). RESEARCH ON THE STRATEGY OF INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE PROTECTION AND RENEWAL. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVI-M-1–2021, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlvi-m-1-2021-279-2021.

[19]. Jin, M. (2024). Guidelines For Integrating Public Art into Post-Industrial Landscape Redevelopment (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph). https://hdl.handle.net/10214/28281.

[20]. Shaffrey, C. (2010). What Is Public Art? Edited by Lisa Moran. Dublin: Museum of Modern Art Ireland.https://publicart.ie/fileadmin/user_upload/images/projects/A_Misc/Whatis_publicart.pdf.

[21]. Zhang, Y. (2012). Cultural Sustainability of a post-industrial brownfield in Wanzhou China: Maintaining cultural value through brownfield redevelopment (thesis, Clemson). https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1324

[22]. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X0300300213

[23]. Luo, L., & Cao, Y. (2023). The museum method of reusing Shanghai waterfront industrial heritage: continuation and reconstruction of urban memory. Built Heritage, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00102-3.

[24]. H. J. Lavery (2017) Australian landscape art as a contributor to environmental management planning at Berrys Bay (Sydney Harbour), Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 24:3, 261-275, https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2017.1310061

[25]. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424.

[26]. MasterClass. (2021, June 17). Public Art Guide: 8 Examples of Major Public art Installations - 2023 - MasterClass. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/public-art-g.

[27]. Hung Hing Chan, Tai-Shan Hu & Peilei Fan (2019): Social sustainability of urban regeneration led by industrial land redevelopment in Taiwan, European Planning Studies.https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1577803

[28]. Ma, Pengfei, Xiang Ning Li, and Di Lan. 2023. "A Dual Strategy in the Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage Buildings: The Shanghai West Bund Waterfront Refurbishment" Buildings 13, no. 7: 1582. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071582

[29]. Shao, L. (2024). Research on the Spatial Renovation Design of the 798 Art District and Ullens Centre for Contemporary Art Guided by Gordon Cullen’s Methodology. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 490, p. 02018). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449002018

[30]. “Inkinen, T. (2024). The art of dancing for urban design. In Julie Miao & Tan Yigitcanlar (eds.): Routledge Companion of Creativity and the Built Environment. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292821-19”

[31]. Yang, Q. (2023). The social production of industrial heritage spaces in the background of cultural governance: a comparative study based on cases from taipei and Hong Kong. Buildings, 13(7), 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071579.

[32]. Kwon, M. (2002). Public art and urban identities. European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies. https://transversal.at/transversal/0102/kwon/en.

[33]. Andrzejewski, A. & Mecacci, A. (2022). Foreword. Public Art and Aesthetics. Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi dell’estetico, 15(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.36253/Aisthesis-13832.

[34]. DeBernardi, J. 2004. Rites of Belonging: Memory, Modernity, and Identity in a Malaysian Chinese Community. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/214535

[35]. Mathews, V. (2014). Incoherence and tension in culture‐led redevelopment. International journal of urban and regional research, 38(3), 1019-1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12108

[36]. Miao Sun & Chen Chen (2021): Renovation of industrial heritage sites and sustainable urban regeneration in post-industrial Shanghai, Journal of Urban Affairs, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1881404

[37]. Carlo Salone, Sara Bonini Baraldi & Giangavino Pazzola (2017): Cultural production in peripheral urban spaces: lessons from Barriera, Turin (Italy), European Planning Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1327033

[38]. Lim, Y., Im, D. U., & Lee, J. (2019). Promoting the sustainability of city communities through ‘Voluntary Arts Activities’ at regenerated cultural arts spaces: A focus on the combination of the ‘Democratization of Culture’and ‘Cultural Democracy’perspectives. Sustainability, 11(16), 4400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164400

[39]. Dogan, E., Cuomo, F., & Battisti, L. (2023). Reviving urban greening in post-industrial landscapes: The case of Turin. Sustainability, 15(17), 12760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712760

[40]. Douet, J. (2011, October). The ‘art factory’, a natural re-use process. In En Paper presented at VCPD Research Centre for Industrial Heritage conference (Vol. 15).

[41]. Sudarmanto, Joni Agung (2024) "Performativity of JaF art agency on the land, city, and its surroundings," Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya: Vol. 52: No. 1, Article 9. Available at: https://citeus.um.ac.id/jbs/vol52/iss1/9

[42]. Franta, J. (2018). Gare d'Austerlitz-Paris Rive Gauche-Smart complex na skalę metropolii. Środowisko Mieszkaniowe.DOI: 10.4467/25438700SM.18.041.9206.

[43]. Schroeder, S. (2020). Crafting New Lifestyles and Urban Places: The Craft Beer Scene of Berlin. Papers in Applied Geography, 6(3), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2020.1776149.

[44]. Oevermann, H., Wergeland, E. S., & Hanika, S. (2024). Industrial Heritage and Pathways for Cultural-Creative Development in Bamberg, Germany. Urban Planning, 9. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.8072

[45]. Garcia, A. (2022, June 7). The Importance of Community Murals and dialogue through art - Product Care Recycling. Product Care Recycling. https://www.productcare.org/about/blog/importance-of-community-murals/

[46]. Chen Yang & Zhu Qian (18 Aug 2023): “Art district without artists”: urban redevelopment through industrial heritage renovation and the gentrification of industrial neighborhoods in China, Urban Geography, https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2246846

[47]. Zielke, P., & Waibel, M. (2015). Creative spaces and the local state in China: The case of Guangzhou's Redtory Art+ Design Factory. City, Culture and Society, 6(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.03.005

[48]. Mironică, M. (2019). Cultural workers from the Paintbrush Factory. Between institution-building and urban development challenges. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Sociologia, 64(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0011

[49]. Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-11-2015-0052

[50]. Miao Sun & Chen Chen (2021): Renovation of industrial heritage sites and sustainable urban regeneration in post-industrial Shanghai, Journal of Urban Affairs, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1881404

[51]. Melia Belli Bose (2024) Uncomfortable quilts: textile-based artivism in response to Bangladeshi garment factory disasters, South Asian History and Culture, 15:1, 88-110, https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2023.2298624

[52]. Mathews, V. (2014). Incoherence and tension in culture‐led redevelopment. International journal of urban and regional research, 38(3), 1019-1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12108

[53]. Luo, L., & Cao, Y. (2023). The museum method of reusing Shanghai waterfront industrial heritage: continuation and reconstruction of urban memory. Built Heritage, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-023-00102-3

[54]. Meng, L., Lin, B. G., Zhang, H. Z., & Bu, R. (2023). Sustainable Development Evaluation on the Landscape Design of Industrial Heritage Park: A Case Study of Tao Sichuan, China. Journal of Environmental and Public Health,2023(1), 1564614.https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1564614

[55]. Dogan, E., Cuomo, F., & Battisti, L. (2023). Reviving urban greening in post-industrial landscapes: The case of Turin. Sustainability 15 (17), 12760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su151712760

[56]. Cano-Sanchiz, J. M. (2022). Spaces and roles of contemporary art in industrial and technological ruins1. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 34(1), 85-107. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/aris.72669

[57]. Remesar, A. (2020). Public Art in Urban Regeneration. Piotrkowska street. Pride of a city: Łódź. on the w@ terfront. Public Art. Urban Design. Civic Participation. Urban Regeneration, 62(5), 29-78. https://doi.org/10.1344/waterfront2020.62.6.8

[58]. Hsiu-Ching, H., Chun-Yu, H., & Yun-Ci, Z. (2018) Discussing the innovative experience design model of tourism factory—A case study on Shiroi Koibito Park in Hokkaido, Japan. https://doi.org/10.35745/ecei2018v1.011

[59]. Carlo Salone, Sara Bonini Baraldi & Giangavino Pazzola (2017): Cultural production in peripheral urban spaces: lessons from Barriera, Turin (Italy), European Planning Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1327033

[60]. Sepe, M. (2018). Place identity and creative district regeneration: The case of 798 in Beijing and M50 in Shanghai art zones. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2017.2.15

[61]. Hui, A., T. Stickley, M. Stubley, and F. Baker. 2019. “Project eARTh: Participatory Arts and Mental Health Recovery, a Qualitative Study.” Perspectives in Public Health 139 (6): 296–302. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1757913918817575.

[62]. Keidar, N., & Silver, D. (2024). The space of ideas: Public art policy and the concept of urban model spaces. Journal of Urban Affairs, 46(1), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2038033

[63]. Mironică, M. (2019). Cultural workers from the Paintbrush Factory. Between institution-building and urban development challenges. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Sociologia, 64(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0011

[64]. Tsilika, E., & Vardopoulos, I. (2022). The FIX-up mix-up; undue façadism or adaptive reuse? Examining the former FIX brewery transformation into the National Museum of Contemporary Art in Athens. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(3), 688-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-09-2021-0255

[65]. Fernández, L., Llobet, J., & Viladomiu, À. (2021). Public Art? Examining the Differences between Contemporary Sculpture inside and outside the Art Institution. Barcelona, Research, Art, Creation, 9(3), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.17583/brac.5087

[66]. Sepe, M. (2018). Place identity and creative district regeneration: The case of 798 in Beijing and M50 in Shanghai art zones. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2017.2.15

[67]. Bi, W., & He, Z. (2020, April). Research on form construction of art intervention in old renovation space. In 2020 International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS) (pp. 505-507). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICUEMS50872.2020.00111

[68]. Zielke, P., & Waibel, M. (2015). Creative spaces and the local state in China: The case of Guangzhou's Redtory Art+ Design Factory. City, Culture and Society, 6(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.03.005

[69]. Gandy, M. (2013). Marginalia: aesthetics, ecology, and urban wastelands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(6), 1301–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.832105

[70]. Bu, J. Y., and Z. Y. Liu. 2012. “Research on Improving the Citizens’ Orderly Interest-Driven Political Participation in China.” 8th International Conference on Public Administration, Osmania Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Hyderabad, India

[71]. Chen, J., Judd, B., & Hawken, S. (2016). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for cultural purposes in Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/SS-11-2015-0052

[72]. H. J. Lavery (2017) Australian landscape art as a contributor to environmental management planning at Berrys Bay (Sydney Harbour), Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 24:3, 261-275, https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2017.1310061

[73]. Nakagawa, S. 2013. “Art as a Mechanism for Enhancing Social Accessibility.” Journal of Urban Culture Research 7:72–7.

[74]. Zhong, Y., Yang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2024). Nearby art: A new type of public art practice in the Pearl River Delta, China. Global Media and China, 20594364231223772. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231223772

[75]. Rifai, G., & Emekci, S. (2024). Experiences of war and peace in public spaces—Aleppo city case study. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(3), 2789. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

[76]. Marie Migeon (29 Feb 2024): Peace and Conflict in Public Space: Gendered Murals Shaping Belfast, Geopolitics, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2321164.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com