PDF

Published

2024-09-29

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 9 (2024): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Chi, J., Kamarudin, S., & Rahman, S. N. A. (2024). Shaping governance through social media: A review of Chinese government strategies and public engagement (2013-2023). Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.3096

Shaping governance through social media: A review of Chinese government strategies and public engagement (2013-2023)

Jinglin Chi

Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43000, Malaysia

Syafila Kamarudin

Institute for Social Science Studies, Putra Infoport, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43000, Malaysia

Saiful Nujaimi Abdul Rahman

Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43000, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.3096


Keywords: government social media, China, PRISMA, bibliometric analysis, content analysis

Abstract

This systematic literature review employs the PRISMA framework to assess the literature of Chinese government social media (GSM) from 2013 to 2023. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach that combines bibliometric and content analysis, this review investigates the evolving use of GSM in China. The bibliometric analysis reveals significant trends in research focus and methodologies over the decade, indicating a shift towards more qualitative and mixed-method approaches as the complexity of digital governance increases. Content analysis further delineates these findings into specific themes: governance strategies and implementation, technological evolution, and the audience. Through the examination of these themes, the review highlights how Chinese GSM has been strategically used to foster a more transparent and engaging government presence online, facilitating improved public services and citizen involvement in governmental processes. This study also incorporates a brief cross-analysis to explore the interactions between different research dimensions, offering nuanced insights into the dynamics of GSM applications. This research underscores the critical role of social media in shaping modern governance, suggesting that ongoing technological adaptation and strategic communication are essential for enhancing public engagement and trust in the context of China. The findings advocate for continued research and policy development to leverage the potential of GSM fully, ensuring that digital governance strategies remain responsive to technological advancements and evolving public expectations.

References

[1]. Zhang, M. Y. (2010). China 2.0: The transformation of an emerging superpower and the new opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.

[2]. Segura Vides, M. J. (2018). Contemporary threats to human rights in the online public sphere. The case of Facebook (Doctoral dissertation).

[3]. Erdem, B. (2021). The role of social media in the times of the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 106-123.

[4]. Page, Matthew J., et al. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews." bmj 372 (2021).

[5]. Cabrera, Derek, and Laura L. Cabrera. "The Steps to Doing a Systems Literature Review (SLR)." Journal of Systems Thinking Preprints (2023).

[6]. Hijriyah, L., Alias, A., & Sahabuddin, M. F. M. (2023). Exploring walkability research trends based on systematic literature review (SLR) by applying PRISMA. Open House International, 49(1), 63-121.

[7]. Gusenbauer, Michael. "Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases." Scientometrics 118.1 (2019): 177-214.

[8]. Singh, Vivek Kumar, et al. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis." Scientometrics 126 (2021): 5113-5142.

[9]. Fadillah, Dani, Sularso Sularso, and Zhou Huiqian. "A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Developing Music as A Foundation for Health Communication." Komunikator 15.2 (2023): 167-185.

[10]. Liu, B. F., Zhao, Y. L., Liang, P. H., & Zhang, J. (2023). New media in government affairs and local government trust: Evidence from the launch of government Weibo accounts. World Economy, (05), 177-200.

[11]. Pham, Xuan-Lam, and Thi Thu Le. "Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Research on Expert Finding: A PRISMA-guided Approach." The International Arab Journal of Information Technology 21.4 (2024).

[12]. Lamovšek, A., & Černe, M. (2023). Past, present and future: A systematic multitechnique bibliometric review of the field of distributed work. Information and Organization, 33(2), 100446.

[13]. Imani, B., Mirezati, S. Z., & Saberi, M. K. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of international journal of nursing studies (1963–2018). Library Philosophy and Practice, 2019, 1-15.

[14]. Forman, J., & Damschroder, L. (2007). Qualitative content analysis. In Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer (pp. 39-62). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

[15]. Vespestad, M. K., & Clancy, A. (2021). Exploring the use of content analysis methodology in consumer research. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102427.

[16]. Abuhassna, Hassan, et al. "Strategies for Successful Blended Learning-A Bibliometric Analysis and Reviews." Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 16.13 (2022): 66-80.

[17]. Jiang, Y. (2023). Public use of social media, government transparency, and government trust: An empirical study based on the survey of netizens' social consciousness. Sociologist, (07), 127-133.

[18]. Liu, Weina, et al. "Evolution of tourism risk communication: A bibliometric analysis and meta-analysis of the antecedents of communicating risk to tourists." Sustainability 15.12 (2023): 9693.

[19]. Noesselt, N. (2014). Microblogs and the Adaptation of the C hinese P arty‐S tate's Governance Strategy. Governance, 27(3), 449-468.

[20]. Schlæger, J., & Jiang, M. (2014). Official microblogging and social management by local governments in China. China Information, 28(2), 189-213.

[21]. Huang, Q., & Hu, M. X. (2022). A new model construction for government trust influenced by multiple sources of information during COVID-19 pandemic prevention and control. Global Media Journal, (02), 76-93. doi:10.16602/j.gjms.20220016.

[22]. Wang, Z. Y., & Liu, Y. W. (2023). Construction of a knowledge graph of natural disasters based on government Weibo: A case study of forest fires. Modern Information, 1-18.

[23]. Gu, T., Harrison, T. M., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Municipal government use of social media: an analysis of three Chinese cities.

[24]. Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Liu, G. (2013). Chinese government use of social media: A case of Shanghai Weibo@ Shanghaicity. In 2012 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

[25]. Zhang, H. Y. (2023). Rhetoric of order and collaboration: The logic reconstruction and pluralistic practices of government public communication in the context of social media. Journalism & Communication, (09), 140-162. doi:10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2023.09.001.

[26]. Zheng, L., & Zheng, T. (2014). Innovation through social media in the public sector: Information and interactions. Government information quarterly, 31, S106-S117.

[27]. Lu, Y., & Pan, J. (2022). The pervasive presence of Chinese government content on Douyin trending videos. Computational Communication Research, 4(1).

[28]. Li, Z., Wang, M., Zhong, J., & Ren, Y. (2022). Improving the Communication and Credibility of Government Media in Response to Public Health Emergencies: Analysis of Tweets From the WeChat Official Accounts of 10 Chinese Health Commissioners. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 900776.

[29]. Sullivan, J., Zhao, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). China's Livestreaming Local Officials: An Experiment in Popular Digital Communications. The China Quarterly, 1-17.

[30]. Zhou, M. (2013). An empirical study on the impact of government Weibo on government trust: The case of Hubei province. Media, (12), 72-74.

[31]. Shao, C. A., Guan, X., Sun, J., Cole, M., & Liu, G. (2022). Social media interactions between government and the public: A Chinese case study of government WeChat official accounts on information related to COVID-19. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 955376.

[32]. Medaglia, R., & Zhu, D. (2017). Public deliberation on government-managed social media: A study on Weibo users in China. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 533-544.

[33]. Lu, Y., & Pan, J. (2021). Capturing clicks: How the Chinese government uses clickbait to compete for visibility. Political Communication, 38(1-2), 23-54.

[34]. Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., Evans, R., & Min, C. (2021). Why do citizens share COVID-19 fact-checks posted by Chinese government social media accounts? The elaboration likelihood model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10058.

[35]. Banghui, Z., Yonghan, Z., & Guitao, K. (2020, June). E-government use via social media as a tool to influences young people's trust in government: An empirical study in a Chinese Municipality. In The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 16-23).

[36]. Fu, H., Mensah, I. K., Wang, R., Gui, L., Wang, J., & Xiao, Z. (2022). The predictors of mobile government services adoption through social media: A case of Chinese citizens. Information Development, 02666669221114649.

[37]. Chen, Q., Xu, X., Cao, B., & Zhang, W. (2016). Social media policies as responses for social media affordances: The case of China. Government information quarterly, 33(2), 313-324.

[38]. Cai, Q. M., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Empirical research on public satisfaction with government Weibo. Journal of Liaoning University of Science and Technology, (05), 89-93.

[39]. Van Eck N. and Waltman L., “Accuracy of Citation Data in Web of Science and Scopus,” arXiv Preprint, vol. abs/1906.07011, pp. 1-6, 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.07011

[40]. Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of internal medicine, 126(5), 376-380.

[41]. Huckin, T. (2003). Content analysis: What texts talk about. In What writing does and how it does it (pp. 19-38). Routledge.

[42]. Mallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2012). The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. Journal of development effectiveness, 4(3), 445-455.

[43]. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of planning education and research, 39(1), 93-112.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com