Play to learn: Exploring the impact of fun english classes on the literacy skills of elementary learners
Vol 9, Issue 10, 2024, Article identifier:
VIEWS - 176 (Abstract) 33 (PDF)
Abstract
Developing literacy skills at an early age is essential for the overall cognitive, social, and emotional growth of children, as it forms the foundation for their academic success and lifelong learning. Early exposure to literature enhances language development by expanding vocabulary, improving comprehension, and promoting critical thinking. This qualitative exploratory paper described different strategies that elementary teachers implement in fun English classes. This study examined the impacts of fun-based teaching strategies in developing the literacy skills of elementary students, focusing on how these strategies contributed to the development of key language competencies, specifically writing and speaking skills. Elementary teachers (n=12) were purposively sampled to be interviewed. Elementary teachers observed that fun English lessons significantly increased student engagement in both writing and speaking activities. Students were interactive, less fearful of making mistakes, and demonstrated greater enthusiasm and participation. Activities such as storytelling, roleplaying, and creative writing encouraged students to express themselves more freely and confidently. Teachers observed improvements in sentence construction, use of vocabulary, and overall expressiveness, particularly among shy students who became more comfortable speaking in front of others. The study also identified three specific strategies—gamification, group work, and roleplaying—that were effective in enhancing literacy. Teachers used games to build vocabulary and grammar skills, group activities to encourage brainstorming and discussion, and role-playing to promote speaking and creative writing. These strategies created a dynamic learning environment that supported both language learning and personal development. Consequently, teachers are encouraged to embrace dynamic and student-centered approaches to create an engaging English learning environment. Fun-based learning strategies should be intentionally designed to support both receptive and productive language skills, providing students with opportunities to practice English in context.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2),1541-1541.
2. Chavez, J. V. (2021). Bilingual parents’ dispositions: Precursor to developing the English language teaching curriculum. Psychology and Education, 58(5), 161-166.
3. Khan, J. U. A., Jamil, B., Ahmed, F., Khan, U. A., & Qaiser, A. (2020). Role play as a learning and teaching modality and its effectiveness in improving the communication and critical thinking skills of medical students. Journal of Medical Sciences, 28(2), 154-157.
4. Mamadjanova, M. U., & qizi Malikova, G. X. (2023). HOW ENGLISH BECOME GLOBAL LANGUAGE: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW. Educational Research in Universal Sciences, 2(17), 888-892.
5. Wicaksana, B., & Fitriani, E. (2020). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ROLE-PLAY TOWARDS VOCATIONAL SCHOOL STUDENTS’SPEAKING SKILL. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 3(2), 74-80.
6. Murillo, A. C., & Vaca-Cárdenas, M. (2023). Role-play as a didactic strategy enhancing the speaking skills in High-School students. Kronos–The Language Teaching Journal, 4(2), 21-34.
7. Barrot, J. S. (2019). English curriculum reform in the Philippines: Issues and challenges from a 21st century learning perspective. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 18(3), 145-160.
8. Valderama, T. (2019). Pinoys’ English proficiency declines sharply. The Manila Times. http://www.google.com/amp/s/www.manilatimes.net/2019/11/18/opinion/columnists
9. Palattao, R. S. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Iloko and English Reading Proficiency Among Grade 4 Pupils of one Philippine Elementary School. Journal of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, 2(3), 252-257.
10. Munder, D. (2024). Writing Errors of English as Second Language (ESL) Learners in the 21st Philippine Context. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 5(2), 276-292.
11. Ninsiana, W., Rosidah, R., Siregar, S., Deiniatur, M., Suprihatin, Y., Septiyana, L., & Huda, M. (2024). Introducing the English Vocabulary and Its Pronunciation to Young Learners Through Community Service Training. DEDIKASI: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(1), 21-30.
12. Nurdianingsih, F., Rozak, R. R., Rohmah, I. I. T., & Izza, T. R. (2024). Fun english class as an effort to improve english literacy for children at elementary level. Zabags International Journal of Engagement, 2(1), 1-7.
13. Purwanto, M. B., Yuliasri, I., Widhiyanto, W., & Rozi, F. (2024). PRIMARY SCHOOL ENGLISH EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF INDUSTRY 4.0: TACKLING CHALLENGES, EXPANDING HORIZONS. Proceedings of Fine Arts, Literature, Language, and Education, 859-873.
14. Muar, M. I. M., Mohamed, S., & Bakar, K. A. (2024). Preschool Teachers' Issues and Beliefs in English Language Teaching: A Systematic Review (2012-2022). European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1).
15. Belarmino, K. F. (2024). Reading Strategies Employed by English Teachers In Rizal Elementary School in Bansalan East District, Davao Del Sur. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDIES, 4(4), 226-234.
16. Sinaga, R. R. F., & Pustika, R. (2021). Exploring STUDENTS’ATTITUDE towards English online learning using moodle during COVID-19 pandemic at smk yadika bandarlampung. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 8-15.
17. Ramzan, M., Javaid, Z. K., Kareem, A., & Mobeen, S. (2023). Amplifying classroom enjoyment and cultivating positive learning attitudes among ESL learners. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(2), 2236-2246.
18. Ismaili, Y. (2021). Evaluation of students’ attitude toward distance learning during the pandemic (Covid-19): a case study of ELTE university. On the horizon, 29(1), 17-30.
19. Akram, H., Yang, Y., Ahmad, N., & Aslam, S. (2020). Factors contributing low English language literacy in rural primary schools of Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(6), 335-346.
20. Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 61.
21. Shehata, B., Tlili, A., Huang, R., Adarkwah, M. A., Liu, M., & Chang, T. (2024). How are we doing with student-centered learning facilitated by educational technologies? A systematic review of literature reviews. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 7813-7854.
22. Carillo, B. (2024). Student-Centered Classrooms: Public Elementary school teachers’ engagement strategies for learners in the 21st century. Nexus International Journal of Science and Education, 1(1).
23. Agregado, M. E. P., & Gaitano, J. H. (2024). Learners’ Motivation and Engagement in Learning. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 7(5), 71-84.
24. Abu-Rabia, S., & Khalaily, A. (2023). Effect of Viewing Children’s Movies in Literary Arabic on Kindergartners’ Oral Skills. Int J Psychiatry, 8(5), 129-38.
25. Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of child language, 29(2), 417-447.
26. Lonigan, C. J., Farver, J. M., Phillips, B. M., & Clancy-Menchetti, J. (2011). Promoting the development of preschool children’s emergent literacy skills: A randomized evaluation of a literacy-focused curriculum and two professional development models. Reading and writing, 24, 305-337.
27. Pinto, G., Bigozzi, L., Vezzani, C., & Tarchi, C. (2017). Emergent literacy and reading acquisition: a longitudinal study from kindergarten to primary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32, 571-587.
28. Kilag, O. K., Uy, F., Dogomeo, Y., Rey Dela Cruz, J., Matis, P. J., Gier, R. A., & Doroy, E. (2024). English Language Education in the Philippines: Policy Landscape and Future Directions. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(7), 79-84.
29. Madrunio, M. R., Martin, I. P., & Plata, S. M. (2016). English language education in the Philippines: Policies, problems, and prospects. English language education policy in Asia, 245-264.
30. Fontillas, L., Quintos, S., & Ronquillo, C. (2022). Philippine English Proficiency of the K12 students: Basis for the improvement of the English Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 36th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 733-739).
31. Chi, C. (2023). Philippines still lags behind world in math, reading and science — PISA 2022. PhilStar Global [Online]. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/06/2316732/philippines-still-lags-behind-world-math-reading-and-science-pisa-2022
32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD (2023), PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en.
33. Adarlo, G., & Jackson, L. (2016). For whom is K-12 education: A critical look into twenty-first century educational policy and curriculum in the Philippines. In Educating for the 21st century: Perspectives, policies and practices from around the world (pp. 207-223). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
34. Magallanes, K., Chung, J. Y., & Lee, S. (2022). The Philippine teachers concerns on educational reform using concern based adoption model. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 763991). Frontiers Media SA.
35. Birken, C. S., Maguire, J., Mekky, M., Manlhiot, C., Beck, C. E., DeGroot, J., ... & Parkin, P. C. (2012). Office-based randomized controlled trial to reduce screen time in preschool children. Pediatrics, 130(6), 1110-1115.
36. Brown, A., & Council on Communications and Media. (2011). Media use by children younger than 2 years. Pediatrics, 128(5), 1040-1045.
37. Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental review, 26(1), 55-88.
38. Nayak, R., & Mohanty, S. (2018). Let's Have Fun While Learning English: Activities to Develop Speaking Skills of Rural School Children. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), 502.
39. Redlarska, J. (2020). Games and fun activities as a tool for teaching English to young learners.
40. Tisza, G. (2021). The role of fun in learning. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 391-393).
41. Tisza, G., & Markopoulos, P. (2021). Understanding the role of fun in learning to code. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 28, 100270.
42. Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children. Journal of research in science teaching, 2(2), 176-186.
43. Mokhtar, N., Xuan, L. Z., Lokman, H. F., & Noor Hayati Che Mat, N. H. C. M. (2023). Theory, Literature Review, and Fun Learning Method Effectiveness in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 3(08), 1738-1744.
44. Taş, E. A., & Koçyiğit, S. (2023). Examining the Effect of Parent-supported Interactive Book Reading Program on Early Literacy Skills of Pre-school Children. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(5), 2537-2558.
45. Uy, F., Kilag, O. K., Sasan, J. M., Cerna, Y. M. D., Doroy, E., & Gier, R. A. (2024). Student-Centered Learning: Examining the New MATATAG Curriculum. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(6), 967-973.
46. Hindun, H., Rapiko, R., Rasidin, R., & Aisah, S. (2024). Strategy for Increasing Early Childhood Literacy Skills at PAUD Ar-Rahman Benteng, Sungain Batang District, Indragiri Ilir Regency, Jambi Province. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary, 2(4), 915-927.
47. Komatsu, H., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2021). Student-centered learning and sustainability: Solution or problem?. Comparative Education Review, 65(1), 6-33.
48. Vlasyuk, O., & Daragan, T. (2024). Student-Centered Learning as a New Approach in Higher Education Due to the Establishment of University Autonomy. Problems of Education, (1 (100)), 6-20.
49. Lasala Jr., N. L. (2024). STUDENTS’INTRINSIC MOTIVATION USING GAME-BASED ACTIVITIES. DALAT UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 14(2), 50-70.
50. Pitac, E. (2024). Developing Literacy Skills: Exploring Teachers' Experiences in Implementing Intervention Strategies for Public Elementary School Learners. Available at SSRN 4913977.
51. Adao, L., Relleve, C. C., Salazar, J., Macawile, K. F., & Chavez, M. (2023). Teachers’ challenges, capabilities, and needs in teaching learners with reading difficulties. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 3(3), 221-231.
52. Hanna, I. D., Setiyawan, A., & Listyowati, R. (2024). DEVELOPING AN INTERACTIVE ENGLISH MATERIALS FOR YOUNG LARNERS: FUN LEARNING-BASED ACTIVITY. In International Conference on Language and Language Teaching, 55-66.
53. Farih, A. (2018). DEVELOPING ENGLISH BOOK FOR YOUNG LEARNERS USING FUN ENGLISH GAMES AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS. The International English Language Teachers and Lecturers Conference (iNELTAL), 249-256.
54. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). What is exploration. Exploratory research in the social sciences, 48, 2-17.
55. Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).
56. Chavez, J. V., Libre, J. M., Gregorio, M. W., & Cabral, N. P. (2023). Human resource profiling for post-pandemic curriculum reconfiguration in higher education. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(2), 1975.
57. Singh, A. (2021). An introduction to experimental and exploratory research. Available at SSRN 3789360.
58. Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.
59. Akhtar, S., Shah, S. W. A., Rafiq, M., & Khan, A. (2016). Research design and statistical methods in Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (PJMS). Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 32(1), 151.
60. Asika, N. (2004). Research methodology: A process approach. Mukugamu & Brothers Enterprises, Lagos.
61. Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).
62. Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of Purposive Sampling Techniques with Their Examples and Application in Qualitative Research Studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(1), 90-99.
63. Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.
64. Chavez, J. V., Lamorinas, D. D., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Message patterns of online gender-based humor discriminatory practices biases stereotyping and disempowering tools through discourse analysis. In Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1535-1535.
65. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
66. Krauss, S. E., Hamzah, A., Omar, Z., Suandi, T., Ismail, I. A., Zahari, M. Z., & Nor, Z. M. (2009). Preliminary investigation and interview guide development for studying how Malaysian farmers' form their mental models of farming. The Qualitative Report, 14(2), 245.
67. Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews: an ongoing and continuous journey. Qualitative report, 16(2), 563-566.
68. Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 21(3), 63-64.
69. De Fina, A., & Perrino, S. (2011). Introduction: Interviews vs.‘natural’contexts: A false dilemma. Language in society, 40(1), 1-11.
70. Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1), 1-7.
71. Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative research in accounting & management, 8(3), 238-264.
72. Schensul, S. L., Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires (Vol. 2). Rowman Altamira.
73. Finlay, L. (2021). Thematic analysis: the ‘good’, the ‘bad’and the ‘ugly’. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 11, 103-116.
74. Campbell, K. A., Orr, E., Durepos, P., Nguyen, L., Li, L., Whitmore, C., ... & Jack, S. M. (2021). Reflexive thematic analysis for applied qualitative health research. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2011-2028.
75. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Page Publication.
76. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
77. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
78. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
79. Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Fors, U., & Knutsson, O. (2020). Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school. Computers & Education, 149, 103783.
80. Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education, 143, 103682.
81. Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E., Luo, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Teacher beliefs, classroom process quality, and student engagement in the smart classroom learning environment: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 183, 104501.
82. Castro-Vaca, B. D., & Argudo-Garzón, A. L. (2024). Classroom environment influences in speaking anxiety levels. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 7(1), 115-122.
83. Ghafar, Z. N. (2024). A Learner-Centered Approach to Learning: Students from Diverse Professional Backgrounds. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION, 3(2), 958-966.
84. Faubla, E., & Leime, Y. (2024). How to develop English Oral production skills for tenth-year of basic education students, level A2. 1," 9 DE OCTUBRE" high school-academic year 2023-24 (Master's thesis).
85. Prasetyani, M., & Gunawan, N. E. (2024). Effectiveness of Teacher Performance in Maximizing Student's Expressive Writing in Science Learning at Sebatik Vocational School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3367-3373.
86. Amos, J. (2024). Expressive writing for adolescent mental health and emotion regulation: Intervention outcomes and implementation considerations.
87. Maria, H., & Paidi, P. (2024). Development of Interactive E-Module Integrated with Science, Environment, Technology, Society on Environmental Change Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 1220-1228.
88. Tüzün, H., Yılmaz-Soylu, M., Karakuş, T., Inal, Y., & Kızılkaya, G. (2009). The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & education, 52(1), 68-77.
89. Hung, C. M., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Effects of digital game-based learning on students’ self-efficacy, motivation, anxiety, and achievements in learning mathematics. Journal of Computers in Education, 1, 151-166.
90. Akinsola, M. K., & Animasahun, I. A. (2007). The Effect of Simulation-Games Environment on Students Achievement in and Attitudes to Mathematics in Secondary Schools. Online Submission, 6(3).
91. Sung, H. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2013). A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students' learning performance in science courses. Computers & education, 63, 43-51.
92. Iten, N., & Petko, D. (2016). Learning with serious games: Is fun playing the game a predictor of learning success?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 151-163.
93. Dahalan, F., Alias, N., & Shaharom, M. S. N. (2024). Gamification and game based learning for vocational education and training: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1279-1317.
94. Lampropoulos, G., & Sidiropoulos, A. (2024). Impact of Gamification on Students’ Learning Outcomes and Academic Performance: A Longitudinal Study Comparing Online, Traditional, and Gamified Learning. Education Sciences, 14(4), 367.
95. Ofosu-Ampong, K., Boateng, R., Anning-Dorson, T., & Kolog, E. A. (2020). Are we ready for Gamification? An exploratory analysis in a developing country. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1723-1742.
96. Walton, M., & Pallitt, N. (2012). ‘Grand Theft South Africa’: Games, literacy and inequality in consumer childhoods. Language and Education, 26(4), 347-361.
97. Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of education, 48(1), 103-122.
98. Ismail, A. O., Mahmood, A. K., & Abdelmaboud, A. (2018). Factors influencing academic performance of students in blended and traditional domains. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 13(2), 170.
99. Zheng, X., Johnson, T. E., & Zhou, C. (2020). A pilot study examining the impact of collaborative mind mapping strategy in a flipped classroom: learning achievement, self-efficacy, motivation, and students’ acceptance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3527-3545.
100. Cagatan, A. N. P., & Quirap, E. A. (2024). Collaborative learning and learners’ academic performance. International journal of multidisciplinary research and analysis, 7(3), 1326-1335.
101. Nhi, D. T. N., & Huan, N. B. (2017). Drama-based role play activities to impact on students’ speaking performance. CTU Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, (07), 91-99.
102. Yusuf, K., & Setyamardani, F. A. (2020). Engaging Students’ Speaking Skill Using Role Play in Junior High School. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 3(2), 327-339.
103. Sayow, E. L. M., & Marsevani, M. (2024). Improving high school students’ speaking skill through role play strategy: A classroom action research. English Learning Innovation, 5(1), 132-141.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.3164
(176 Abstract Views, 33 PDF Downloads)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mary Joy B. Gelizon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.