Published
2025-03-15
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ronie N. Saporno

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Students’ biases and accommodation in inclusive education: Understanding barriers and promoting equity in the classroom
Ronie N. Saporno
Filipino Department, Zamboanga State College of Marine Sciences and Technology, Zamboanga City, 7000, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i3.3196
Keywords: inclusivity bias; inclusive education; inclusive practices; SPED students
Abstract
Inclusive education holds significant value today as it builds an environment where all students, regardless of their abilities, backgrounds, or needs, have equal opportunities to participate in learning. This approach promotes social integration, encouraging students to develop empathy, respect, and understanding for each other's differences, which are essential skills for life beyond the classroom. Inclusive education not only supports individual student development but also strengthens the social fabric by cultivating a more equitable, respectful, and inclusive society. This paper was positioned in exploring the inclusivity biases of pre-service special education (SPED) college students in handling classrooms with pupils having special needs. Their narratives reflected self-efficacy in promoting equity in classrooms. Pre-service SPED college students were purposively sampled from a higher education institution in Province of Biliran, Philippines. The study revealed that pre-service SPED students’ belief systems, formed by their perceptions, attitudes, and experiences, strongly influence how they approach inclusive education, particularly biases and low self-efficacy can hinder these. SPED college students feel uncertain and unprepared to meet diverse needs, often due to limited practical experience and a lack of confidence. The study suggested that training, practical field experiences, and reflective activities in teacher preparation programs can help future educators confront and overcome biases, strengthening their self-efficacy and readiness to support all students effectively. By addressing these beliefs early, teacher training programs have the potential to encourage inclusivity and promote equitable learning environments.
References
[1]. 1.Kudarinova, A., Autaeva, A., Paylozyan, Z., & Rymkhanova, A. (2023). Readiness of pre-service teachers to implement inclusive education. Wisdom, (1 (25)), 145-155.
[2]. 2.Hornby, G., & Kauffman, J. M. (2024). Inclusive education, intellectual disabilities and the demise of full inclusion. Journal of Intelligence, 12(2), 20.
[3]. 3.Mendoza, M., & Heymann, J. (2024). Implementation of inclusive education: A systematic review of studies of inclusive education interventions in low-and lower-middle-income countries. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 71(3), 299-316.
[4]. 4.Nurjanah, S., Sultan, J., Martaputri, N. A., & Aisyah, S. (2024). Mapping The Trends of Inclusive Education Research Based on Scopus Database: 2019-2024. In Proceeding of International Conference on Special Education in South East Asia Region, 3(1), 489-512.
[5]. 5.Nilholm, C., & Göransson, K. (2017). What is meant by inclusion? An analysis of European and North American journal articles with high impact. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(3), 437-451.
[6]. 6.Scherer, P., & Bertram, J. (2024). Professionalisation for inclusive mathematics—teacher education programs and changes in pre-service teachers’ beliefs and self-efficacy. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1-13.
[7]. 7.Bergmann, E. R. (2024). Pathways to Change: Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences Providing Support to College Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro).
[8]. 8.Bastian, A., König, J., Weyers, J., Siller, H. S., & Kaiser, G. (2024). Effects of teaching internships on preservice teachers’ noticing in secondary mathematics education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1360315). Frontiers Media SA.
[9]. 9.Salam, M., Awang Iskandar, D. N., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20, 573-591.
[10]. 10.Blanton, L. P., Pugach, M. C., & Florian, L. (2011). Preparing general education teachers to improve outcomes for students with disabilities. American association of colleges for teacher education, 20005, 1-32.
[11]. 11.Woodcock, S., Gibbs, K., Hitches, E., & Regan, C. (2023). Investigating teachers’ beliefs in inclusive education and their levels of teacher self-efficacy: Are teachers constrained in their capacity to implement inclusive teaching practices?. Education Sciences, 13(3), 280.
[12]. 12.Selisko, T. J., Klopp, E., Eckert, C., & Perels, F. (2024). Attitudes toward Inclusive Education from a Network Perspective. Education Sciences, 14(3), 319.
[13]. 13.Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs, in the context of policy reform. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 114-121.
[14]. 14.Fox, R. A., Leif, E. S., Moore, D. W., Furlonger, B., Anderson, A., & Sharma, U. (2022). A systematic review of the facilitators and barriers to the sustained implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Education and Treatment of Children, 45(1), 105-126.
[15]. 15.Navarro-Mateu, D., Franco-Ochoa, J., Valero-Moreno, S., & Prado-Gascó, V. (2020). Attitudes, sentiments, and concerns about inclusive education of teachers and teaching students in Spain. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 521.
[16]. 16.Saloviita, T. (2020a). Attitudes of teachers towards inclusive education in Finland. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 64(2), 270-282.
[17]. 17.Yada, A., & Alnahdi, G. H. (2024). A comparative study on Saudi and Japanese in-service teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education and self-efficacy in inclusive practices. Educational Studies, 50(4), 539-557.
[18]. 18.Yada, A., & Savolainen, H. (2017). Japanese in-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education and self-efficacy for inclusive practices. Teaching and teacher education, 64, 222-229.
[19]. 19.San Martin, C., Ramirez, C., Calvo, R., Muñoz-Martínez, Y., & Sharma, U. (2021). Chilean teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education, intention, and self-efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Sustainability, 13(4), 2300.
[20]. 20.Büssing, A. G., Menzel, S., Schnieders, M., Beckmann, V., & Basten, M. (2019). Values and beliefs as predictors of pre‐service teachers’ enjoyment of teaching in inclusive settings. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19, 8-23.
[21]. 21.Saloviita, T. (2020). Teacher attitudes towards the inclusion of students with support needs. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(1), 64-73.
[22]. 22.Castro, P. G., Álvarez, M. I. C., & Baz, B. O. (2016). Inclusión educativa. Actitudes y estrategias del profesorado. Revista Española de Discapacidad (REDIS), 4(2), 25-45.
[23]. 23.Baum, S., & McPherson, M. (2019). Improving teaching: Strengthening the college learning experience. Daedalus, 148(4), 5-13.
[24]. 24.Geiger, J. M., & Johnson, R. M. (2023). Expanding our Understanding of Student Experiences and the Supports and Programs for College Students with Foster Care Experience: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Foster Care and Higher Education. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 40(2), 159-161.
[25]. 25.Daane, C. J., Beirne-Smith, M., & Latham, D. (2000). ADMINISTRATORS'AND TEACHERS'PERCEPTIONS OF THE COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS OF INCLUSION IN THE ELEMENTARY GRADES. Education, 121(2).
[26]. 26.Ginja, T. G., & Chen, X. (2023). Conceptualising inclusive education: the role of teacher training and teacher's attitudes towards inclusion of children with disabilities in Ethiopia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(9), 1042-1055.
[27]. 27.Kuyini, A. B., Desai, I., & Sharma, U. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes and concerns about implementing inclusive education in Ghana. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(14), 1509-1526.
[28]. 28.Sharek, C. (2023). Inclusive Education for All: Identifying Teacher Beliefs About Working With Students With Disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University).
[29]. 29.Luștrea, A. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward school inclusion in Romania. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 1-16.
[30]. 30.Avramidis, E., Toulia, A., Tsihouridis, C., & Strogilos, V. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and their self‐efficacy for inclusive practices as predictors of willingness to implement peer tutoring. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19, 49-59.
[31]. 31.Malinen, O. P., Savolainen, H., & Xu, J. (2012). Beijing in-service teachers' self-efficacy and attitudes towards inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 526-534.
[32]. 32.Sharma, U., & Jacobs, D. K. (2016). Predicting in-service educators' intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms in India and Australia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 13-23.
[33]. 33.Cruz, C. E. C., Garzón, F. R., & Gutierrez, H. (2023). Inclusive education strategies for the EFL teaching context. Revista Boletín Redipe, 12(11), 53-62.
[34]. 34.Dignath, C., Rimm-Kaufman, S., van Ewijk, R., & Kunter, M. (2022). Teachers’ beliefs about inclusive education and insights on what contributes to those beliefs: a meta-analytical study. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2609-2660.
[35]. 35.Magtuba, C. G., & Caballero, C. G. (2024). THE INFLUENCE OF SYSTEMS LEADERSHIP, TEACHER EMPOWERMENT, PERCEPTION, ATTITUDE AND COMMITMENT ON THE INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES OF SPED TEACHERS. European Journal of Education Studies, 11(10).
[36]. 36.Judilla, E. B., Balucan, S. F. O., Ogahayon, A. M. C., & Cagape, W. E. (2023). Inclusive Education Practices at General Santos City SPED Integrated School. Inclusive Education Practices at General Santos City SPED Integrated School, 116(1), 12-12.
[37]. 37.Colì, E., Paciello, M., Lamponi, E., Calella, R., & Falcone, R. (2023). Adolescents and trust in online social interactions: A qualitative exploratory study. Children, 10(8), 1408.
[38]. 38.Akhtar, F., Khan, H., & Rasheed, M. (2019). The power of positive psychological capital: An Exploratory study. Arabian J Bus Manag Review, 9(387), 2.
[39]. 39.Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science, 2(1), 17-41.
[40]. 40.Hunter, D., McCallum, J., & Howes, D. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1).
[41]. 41.Singh, A. (2021). An introduction to experimental and exploratory research. Available at SSRN 3789360.
[42]. 42.Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).
[43]. 43.Chavez, J. V., Anuddin, F. O., Mansul, H. H., Hawari, N. A., Irilis, F. B., Umaron, A. A., ... & Albani, S. E. (2024). Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(7).
[44]. 44.Duhaylungsod, A. V., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). ChatGPT and other AI users: Innovative and creative utilitarian value and mindset shift. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 4367-4378.
[45]. 45.Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of mixed methods research, 14(4), 473-495.
[46]. 46.Inoferio HV, Espartero MM, Asiri MS, et al. Coping with math anxiety and lack of confidence through AI-assisted learning. Environment and Social Psychology 2024; 9(5): 2228. doi: 10.54517/esp.v9i5.2228
[47]. 47.Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8-15.
[48]. 48.Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
[49]. 49.Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.
[50]. 50.Subedi, K. R. (2021). Determining the Sample in Qualitative Research. Online Submission, 4, 1-13.
[51]. 51.Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.
[52]. 52.Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335.
[53]. 53.Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
[54]. 54.Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45.
[55]. 55.Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.
[56]. 56.Pope, C., & Mays, N. (Eds.). (2020). Qualitative research in health care (pp. 111-133). Oxford, UK:: Wiley-Blackwell.
[57]. 57.Monday, T. U. (2020). Impacts of interview as research instrument of data collection in social sciences. Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, 1(1), 15-24.
[58]. 58.Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research Methods in Social Relations. London: Thomson Learning. Inc. UK.
[59]. 59.Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York University.
[60]. 60.Hardon, A., Hodgkin, C., & Fresle, D. (2004). How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers. In How to investigate the use of medicines by consumers (pp. 89-89).
[61]. 61.Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.
[62]. 62.Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative report, 21(5).
[63]. 63.Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College.
[64]. 64.Bolderston, A. (2012). Conducting a research interview. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 43(1), 66-76.
[65]. 65.Ng, C. K., & White, P. (2005). Qualitative research design and approaches in radiography. Radiography, 11(3), 217-225.
[66]. 66.Benlahcene, A., & Ramdani, A. (2020). The process of qualitative interview: Practical insights for novice researchers. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 406-413.
[67]. 67.Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
[68]. 68.Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).
[69]. 69.Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1).
[70]. 70.Luo, L., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Semistructured interviews. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, 232.
[71]. 71.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, 2, 57-71.
[72]. 72.Chavez, J. V., & Cuilan, J. T. (2023). Gender mainstreaming campaign as a casualty of the online gender-based humor: A discourse analysis. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(2).
[73]. 73.Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L., & Jenkinson, E. (2023). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research (pp. 19-38). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[74]. 74.Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Reflexive thematic analysis. In Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 430-441). Edward Elgar Publishing.
[75]. 75.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
[76]. 76.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and psychotherapy research, 21(1), 37-47.
[77]. 77.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.
[78]. 78.Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us?.
[79]. 79.Chalise, K. (2024). Perceptions of Teachers toward Inclusive Education with a Focus on Hearing Impairment: A Quantitative Study (Doctoral dissertation, Kathmandu University School of Education).
[80]. 80.Guillemot, F., Lacroix, F., & Nocus, I. (2024). Teachers' non‐response bias in questionnaires about their attitude towards inclusive education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs.
[81]. 81.Wilson, C., Marks Woolfson, L., & Durkin, K. (2020). School environment and mastery experience as predictors of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards inclusive teaching. International journal of inclusive education, 24(2), 218-234.
[82]. 82.Dankyi, L. A., Laryea, J. E., Dankyi, J. K., & Arhin, V. (2021). Child Abuse Among Basic School Pupils in Ghana: Awareness and Utilisation of Safety Net Structures. REMIE: Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 3.
[83]. 83.Sharma, U., Sokal, L., Wang, M., & Loreman, T. (2021). Measuring the use of inclusive practices among pre-service educators: A multi-national study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103506.
[84]. 84.Pohan, C. A., & Aguilar, T. E. (2001). Measuring educators’ beliefs about diversity in personal and professional contexts. American educational research journal, 38(1), 159-182.
[85]. 85.Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. Handbook of research on teacher education/Macmillan.
[86]. 86.Urton, K., Wilbert, J., & Hennemann, T. (2014). Attitudes towards inclusion and self-efficacy of principals and teachers. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(2), 151-168.
[87]. 87.Vaz, S., Wilson, N., Falkmer, M., Sim, A., Scott, M., Cordier, R., & Falkmer, T. (2015). Factors associated with primary school teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of students with disabilities. PloS one, 10(8), e0137002.
[88]. 88.Woodcock, S., Sharma, U., Subban, P., & Hitches, E. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers’ engagement with inclusive practices. Teaching and teacher education, 117, 103802.
[89]. 89.Savolainen, H., Malinen, O. P., & Schwab, S. (2022). Teacher efficacy predicts teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion–a longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. International journal of inclusive education, 26(9), 958-972.