Open Journal Systems

Alternative teaching strategies and activities for non-science enthusiast learners in higher education

Lanie Pacadaljen

Article ID: 3212
Vol 9, Issue 12, 2024, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 69 (Abstract) 147 (PDF)

Abstract

Developing student interest in non-major science courses in higher education can be extremely difficult, particularly for students who do not identify as science majors. This study explores the challenges faced by non-science enthusiast learners in engaging with science courses, focusing on their perceptions and learning behaviors. Many students view science as difficult and disconnected from their daily lives, leading to decreased motivation and participation. The study aimed to identify the learning behaviors of these students and to determine effective teaching strategies to enhance their engagement. Qualitative data were collected through one-on-one interviews with 20 educators using purposive sampling, allowing for in-depth insights into their experiences with non-enthusiast learners. The findings revealed that students often displayed disengaged behaviors, such as distractibility and passive participation, which hinder their academic success. Effective teaching strategies identified included making science relatable to students’ everyday experiences, creating inclusive and supportive classroom environments, and employing engaging, interactive methods like hands-on activities and collaborative projects. Additionally, fostering emotional connections between educators and students was found to be crucial in enhancing interest and participation in science. Furthermore, future research should investigate the long-term impacts of these strategies to develop effective educational frameworks.


Keywords

Non-science enthusiast learners; teaching strategies; activities; higher education

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Palmer, T., Burke, P. F., & Aubusson, P. (2017). Why school students choose and reject science: a study of the factors that students consider when selecting subjects. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1299949

2. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

3. Garil, B. A., Abbas, T. S. C., & Limen, M. V. (2024). Analyzing the demographic-based grammatical competence and its relationship to academic performance in higher education setting. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6453

4. Murro, R. a. R. A., Lobo, J. G., Inso, A. R. C., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). Difficulties of parents with low educational attainment in assisting their children in modular distance learning during pandemic. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1957

5. Midden, W. R. (2018). Teaching chemistry with civic engagement: Non-science majors enjoy chemistry when they learn by doing research that provides benefits to the local community. In Citizens first! Democracy, social responsibility and chemistry (pp. 1–31). American Chemical Society.

6. Chavez, J. V. (2023). Assessing Online Academic Integrity and Humanized Teaching in Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sduhs/article/view/268335

7. De Leon, A., Jumalon, R., Chavez, J., Kairan, M., Abbas, K., Radjuni, A., Kadil, H., Sahirul, J., Tantalie, E., Hussin, A., Amlih, M., & Albani, S. (2024). Analysis on the implementation of inclusive classroom: perception on compliances and obstructions of selected public-school teachers. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2537

8. Quisay, A. R. C., & Aquino, M. E. C. (2024). Stress levels of science teachers when delivering distance education instruction in a state college during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2916

9. Gamtso, C. W., & Halpin, P. A. (2018). Tailoring library instruction for Non-Science majors taking hybrid and online science classes: Student Perceptions of Information Literacy in the Virtual environment. Public & Access Services Quarterly, 14(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2017.1372729

10. Verdeflor, R. N. (2024). Choosing science and mathematics programs in college: practical and psychological arbiters in career-pathing. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2777

11. Chavez, J. V. (2020). Academic and health insecurities of indigent students during pandemic: study on adaptive strategies under learning constraints. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.47696/adved.202035

12. Whenham, T. (2024, July 2). 15 active learning activities to energize your next college class. education. https://www.nureva.com/blog/education/15-active-learning-activities-to-energize-your-next-college-class

13. Tanner, K. D. (2013). Structure Matters: Twenty-One teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115

14. Entong, M. B. M., Garil, B. A., Muarip, V. C., & Chavez, J. V. (2024). Language Delivery Styles in Academic Trainings: Analysis of Speaker’ s Emotional Connection to Audience for Lasting Learning. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6533

15. Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of Bilingual Parents on the Real-Life Use of English Language: Materials for English Language Teaching Curriculum. Arab World English Journal, 13(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.21

16. Chavez JV, Ceneciro CC. (2024). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology 2024; 9(1): 1912. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1912

17. Kelly, S. (2010). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R and de Vries R (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research.

18. Chavez, J.V., Lamorinas, D.D., and Ceneciro, C.C. (2023). Message patterns of online gender-based humor, discriminatory practices, biases, stereotyping, and disempowering tools through discourse analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies 2023; 5(2): 1535. http://doi.org/10.59400.fls.v5i2.1535

19. Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1541. https://doi.org/10.59400.fls.v5i2.1541

20. Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.

21. Duhaylungsod, A. V., & Chavez, J. V. (2023). ChatGPT and other AI users: Innovative and creative utilitarian value and mindset shift. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33, 4367-4378

22. Garil, B.A. Entong, M.B.M. Muarip, V.C. et. al., 2024. Language Delivery Styles in Academic Trainings: Analysis of Speaker’s Emotional Connection to Audience for lasting Learning. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(3): 326-342. DOI: http://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6533

23. Castro, F. L. T., Ventura, B. L. O., Estajal, R. S., Timpangco-Macario, J., Limen, M. V., Garil, B. A., & Chavez, J. V. (2024). Teachers handling multiple subject areas: Difficulties and adaptive attributes in the delivery of instructions. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2520

24. McFarlane, H. G., & Richeimer, J. (2015). Using the humanities to teach neuroscience to non-majors. PubMed, 13(3), A225-33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26240533

25. Smith, M., & Firth, J. (2018). Psychology in the classroom: A teacher’s guide to what works. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315163420

26. Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St John, K., Van Der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974

27. Chen, Y., Aguirre-Mendez, C., & Terada, T. (2020). Argumentative writing as a tool to develop conceptual and epistemic knowledge in a college chemistry course designed for non-science majors. International Journal of Science Education, 42(17), 2842–2875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1837990


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i12.3212
(69 Abstract Views, 147 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Lanie Pacadaljen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.