Published
2025-03-28
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuhong Dang, Dr. Siegfried M. Erorita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP
Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
The impact of perceived risk of AI-enabled vehicles on consumer purchase intention: The mediating role of trust mechanism
Yuhong Dang
College of Business Administration, University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City, 2600, Philippines
Dr. Siegfried M. Erorita
College of Accountancy, University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City, 2600, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i3.3311
Keywords: perceived risk; trust mechanism; purchase intention; autonomous vehicles; AI technology adoption; consumer behavior; structural equation modeling; mediation analysis
Abstract
This research study has been conducted to explore the direct impacts of perceived risk on buying intentions for AI-enabled vehicles, with strategic attention given to the mediating effect of trust. This research uses a rigorously designed online survey of 587 respondents to find the relationship between main variables using structural equation modeling. The results are that the perceived risk significantly negatively influences purchase intention both directly, with a β of -0.342 and p < 0.001, and indirectly via trust at 39.4% of the whole effect. While perceived risk had a strong negative effect, trust had a strong positive effect on purchase intention, β = 0.487, p < 0.001, thus moderating the relationship between perceived risk and purchase intention. It will help extend the theoretical understanding of consumer behavior in AI-enabled markets and also provide practical implications for the manufacturer and marketer of an autonomous vehicle. Results suggest that, along with the strategy of decreasing risks, an organization must engage in the initiatives of building up trust for improving consumer acceptance of the technology.
References
[1]. 1.Jain, V., Wadhwani, K., & Eastman, J. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence consumer behavior: A hybrid review and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 676-697.
[2]. 2.Mariani, M. M., Hashemi, N., & Wirtz, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence empowered conversational agents: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113838.
[3]. 3.Kumar, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Anand, A. (2023). Responsible artificial intelligence (AI) for value formation and market performance in healthcare: The mediating role of patient's cognitive engagement. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(6), 2197-2220.
[4]. 4.Northey, G., Hunter, V., Mulcahy, R., Choong, K., & Mehmet, M. (2022). Man vs machine: how artificial intelligence in banking influences consumer belief in financial advice. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(6), 1182-1199.
[5]. 5.Cheng, X., Su, L., Luo, X., Benitez, J., & Cai, S. (2022). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Impact of analytics and artificial intelligence-enabled personal information collection on privacy and participation in ridesharing. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 339-363.
[6]. 6.Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023). Trust in AI and its role in the acceptance of AI technologies. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1727-1739.
[7]. 7.Gupta, S., Kamboj, S., & Bag, S. (2023). Role of risks in the development of responsible artificial intelligence in the digital healthcare domain. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-18.
[8]. 8.Malhotra, G., & Ramalingam, M. (2023). Perceived anthropomorphism and purchase intention using artificial intelligence technology: examining the moderated effect of trust. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
[9]. 9.Chin, C. H., Wong, W. P. M., Cham, T. H., Thong, J. Z., & Ling, J. P. W. (2024). Exploring the usage intention of AI-powered devices in smart homes among millennials and zillennials: the moderating role of trust. Young Consumers, 25(1), 1-27.
[10]. 10.Bach, T. A., Khan, A., Hallock, H., Beltrão, G., & Sousa, S. (2024). A systematic literature review of user trust in AI-enabled systems: An HCI perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(5), 1251-1266.
[11]. 11.Chandra, B., & Rahman, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence and value co-creation: a review, conceptual framework and directions for future research. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 34(1), 7-32.
[12]. 12.Mari, A., Mandelli, A., & Algesheimer, R. (2024). Empathic voice assistants: Enhancing consumer responses in voice commerce. Journal of Business Research, 175, 114566.
[13]. 13.Wu, X., Zhou, Z., & Chen, S. (2024). A mixed-methods investigation of the factors affecting the use of facial recognition as a threatening AI application. Internet Research.
[14]. 14.Roh, T., Park, B. I., & Xiao, S. S. (2023). Adoption of AI-enabled Robo-advisors in Fintech: Simultaneous Employment of UTAUT and the Theory of Reasoned Action. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 24(1), 29-47.
[15]. 15.Yang, X. (2023). The effects of AI service quality and AI function-customer ability fit on customer's overall co-creation experience. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(6), 1717-1735.
[16]. 16.Konya-Baumbach, E., Biller, M., & von Janda, S. (2023). Someone out there? A study on the social presence of anthropomorphized chatbots. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107513.
[17]. 17.Hu, P., Gong, Y., Lu, Y., & Ding, A. W. (2023). Speaking vs. listening? Balance conversation attributes of voice assistants for better voice marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(1), 109-127.
[18]. 18.Solakis, K., Katsoni, V., Mahmoud, A. B., & Grigoriou, N. (2024). Factors affecting value co-creation through artificial intelligence in tourism: A general literature review. Journal of Tourism Futures, 10(1), 116-130.
[19]. 19.Dhiman, N., Jamwal, M., & Kumar, A. (2023). Enhancing value in customer journey by considering the (ad) option of artificial intelligence tools. Journal of Business Research, 167, 114142.
[20]. 20.Shi, S., Gong, Y., & Gursoy, D. (2021). Antecedents of trust and adoption intention toward artificially intelligent recommendation systems in travel planning: a heuristic–systematic model. Journal of Travel Research, 60(8), 1714-1734.
[21]. 21.Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660.
[22]. 22.Kang, H. J., Shin, J. H., & Ponto, K. (2020). How 3D virtual reality stores can shape consumer purchase decisions: The roles of informativeness and playfulness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 49(1), 70-85.
[23]. 23.Sung, E. C., Bae, S., Han, D. I. D., & Kwon, O. (2021). Consumer engagement via interactive artificial intelligence and mixed reality. International journal of information management, 60, 102382.
[24]. 24.Puntoni, S., Reczek, R. W., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021). Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 131-151.
[25]. 25.Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Academy of management review, 46(3), 534-551.
[26]. 26.Lalicic, L., & Weismayer, C. (2021). Consumers' reasons and perceived value co-creation of using artificial intelligence-enabled travel service agents. Journal of Business Research, 129, 891-901.
[27]. 27.Hu, P., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2022). Experiencing power over AI: The fit effect of perceived power and desire for power on consumers' choice for voice shopping. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107091.
[28]. 28.Jain, S., Basu, S., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Kaur, S. (2022). Interactive voice assistants–Does brand credibility assuage privacy risks?. Journal of Business Research, 139, 701-717.
[29]. 29.Nguyen, T. M., & Malik, A. (2022). Impact of knowledge sharing on employees' service quality: the moderating role of artificial intelligence. International Marketing Review, 39(3), 482-508.
[30]. 30.Cui, Y. (2022). Sophia Sophia tell me more, which is the most risk-free plan of all? AI anthropomorphism and risk aversion in financial decision-making. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(6), 1133-1158.
[31]. 31.Cui, Y., van Esch, P., & Jain, S. P. (2022). Just walk out: the effect of AI-enabled checkouts. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1650-1683.
[32]. 32.Chandra, S., Shirish, A., & Srivastava, S. C. (2022). To be or not to be… human? Theorizing the role of human-like competencies in conversational artificial intelligence agents. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39(4), 969-1005.
[33]. 33.Ashrafi, D. M., & Easmin, R. (2023). The Role of Innovation Resistance and Technology Readiness in the Adoption of QR Code Payments Among Digital Natives: A Serial Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management, 18(1).
[34]. 34.Lin, R., Chen, Y., Qiu, L., Yu, Y., & Xia, F. (2024). The Influence of Interactivity, Aesthetic, Creativity and Vividness on Consumer Purchase of Virtual Clothing: The Mediating Effect of Satisfaction and Flow. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-15.
[35]. 35.Islam, M. S., Tan, C. C., Sinha, R., & Selem, K. M. (2024). Gaps between customer compatibility and usage intentions: The moderation function of subjective norms towards chatbot-powered hotel apps. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 123, 103910.
[36]. 36.Alam, S. S., Masukujjaman, M., Mohamed Makhbul, Z. K., Helmi Ali, M., Ahmad, I., & Al Mamun, A. (2024). Experience, trust, eWOM engagement and usage intention of ai enabled services in hospitality and tourism industry: Moderating mediating analysis. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 25(6), 1635-1663.
[37]. 37.Ahmad, I., & Du, R. Ai Summarized Reviews vs. Customers' Reviews: Impact on Purchase Intentions in Varied Review Valence Context. Customers' Reviews: Impact on Purchase Intentions in Varied Review Valence Context.
[38]. 38.Yao, R., Qi, G., Wu, Z., Sun, H., & Sheng, D. (2024). Digital human calls you dear: How do customers respond to virtual streamers' social-oriented language in e-commerce livestreaming? A stereotyping perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103872.
[39]. 39.Pham, H. C., Duong, C. D., & Nguyen, G. K. H. (2024). What drives tourists' continuance intention to use ChatGPT for travel services? A stimulus-organism-response perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103758.
[40]. 40.Riedel, A., Mulcahy, R., & Northey, G. (2022). Feeling the love? How consumer's political ideology shapes responses to AI financial service delivery. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(6), 1102-1132.
[41]. 41.Ahmed, S., Ahmed, R., Ashrafi, D. M., Ahmed, E., & Annamalah, S. (2024). Building trust in cybernetic payment network: Insights from an emerging economy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100331.
[42]. 42.Ho, S. P. S., & Chow, M. Y. C. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in consumers' brand preference for retail banks in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 1-14.
[43]. 43.Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, M., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2025). Benefit versus risk: A behavioral model for using robo-advisors. The Service Industries Journal, 45(1), 132-159.
[44]. 44.Meng, H., Lu, X., & Xu, J. (2025). The Impact of Chatbot Response Strategies and Emojis Usage on Customers' Purchase Intention: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Distance and Performance Expectancy. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 117.