| Environment and Social Psychology
ESP-3312

Published

2025-03-30

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Liying Li, Dr. Siegfried M. Erorita

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Li, L., & M. Erorita, S. (2025). The psychological impact of budgeting on financial decision-makers: Implications for comprehensive budget management systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i3.3312

The psychological impact of budgeting on financial decision-makers: Implications for comprehensive budget management systems

Liying Li

College of Business Administration, University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City, 2600, Philippines

Siegfried M. Erorita

College of Accountancy, University of the Cordilleras, Baguio City, 2600, Philippines


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i3.3312


Keywords: budgeting psychology; financial decision-making; behavioral finance; comprehensive budget management systems; stress in budgeting; cognitive biases

Abstract

Budgeting is a fundamental tool in financial management, yet its psychological impact on financial decision-makers remains underexplored. This study investigates the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral effects of budgeting on individuals responsible for financial decisions in corporate and personal contexts. The research highlights how budgeting can induce stress, trigger cognitive biases such as anchoring and loss aversion, and influence emotional well-being, often leading to suboptimal decision-making. Using a mixed-methods approach, including surveys and interviews with financial managers and planners, the study identifies key psychological challenges in the budgeting process. Results reveal that stringent budgeting environments increase decision fatigue and stress levels, whereas user-centric and psychologically adaptive budgeting systems can mitigate these effects. Furthermore, incorporating behavioral finance principles into comprehensive budget management systems (CBMS) significantly improves decision-making efficiency, reduces emotional strain, and fosters a positive attitude toward financial planning.

The findings underscore the need for integrating psychological considerations into CBMS design, such as stress reduction tools, cognitive bias alerts, and motivational feedback mechanisms. This approach not only supports financial decision-makers but also enhances overall financial management outcomes. Future research should explore long-term psychological adaptations to advanced budgeting tools and their role in promoting financial resilience.

References

[1]. 1.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

[2]. 2.Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

[3]. 3.Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05002.x

[4]. 4.Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The Role of Affect in Decision Making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 619–642). Oxford University Press.

[5]. 5.Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x

[6]. 6.Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

[7]. 7.Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The Heat of the Moment: The Effect of Sexual Arousal on Sexual Decision Making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.501

[8]. 8.Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2012). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (8th ed.). Wiley.

[9]. 9.Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346

[10]. 10.Kunda, Z. (1990). The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

[11]. 11.Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, Anger, and Risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146

[12]. 12.Loewenstein, G., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as Feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267

[13]. 13.Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2011). Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 373–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq004

[14]. 14.Odean, T. (1998). Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00072

[15]. 15.Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The Springs of Action: Affective and Analytical Information Processing in Choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1465–1475. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002612002

[16]. 16.Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.36.1.11

[17]. 17.Shiller, R. J. (2003). From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com