ESP-3435

Published

2025-03-23

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): Published

Section

Review Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Xiaoqi Xu, Siti Rohaida Binti Mohamed Zainal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Xu, X., & Binti Mohamed Zainal, S. R. (2025). Relative advantage, technology innovativeness: Digital transformation acceptance attitude and employee creativity. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i3.3435

Relative advantage, technology innovativeness: Digital transformation acceptance attitude and employee creativity

Xiaoqi Xu

School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 9990054, Malaysia

Siti Rohaida Binti Mohamed Zainal

School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, 9990054, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i3.3435


Keywords: Employee creativity, employee creativity; digital transformation; digital leadership; relative advantage; technology innovativeness , digital transformation, Digital leadership, Relative advantage, Technology innovativeness

Abstract

With the advent of the global digital and intelligent era, the independent innovation of enterprise employees plays an irreplaceable role in helping Chinese enterprises establish a new competitive edge in the global market. Employee creativity is embodied in cultivating and enhancing employees' innovative abilities. Implementing digital transformation has become a top priority for organizations and leadership. This study examines the relationship between digital leadership and employee creativity based on Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory and Social Exchange Theory (SET).

A quantitative methodology was employed using a questionnaire survey conducted with 302 middle-management employees in the high-tech industry in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. This study utilizes a correlational design, focusing on assessing the strength and nature of relationships between variables. It addresses the research gap concerning the relationship between employees' attitudes toward digital transformation and their creativity. The study also highlights the theoretical and practical implications of technological innovation, employees' acceptance of digital transformation, and digital leadership in fostering creativity within organizations.

The findings reveal that (a) relative advantage and technological innovativeness positively influence digital transformation acceptance attitude (DA); (b) DA mediates the relationship between relative advantage, technological innovativeness, and employee creativity; (c) digital leadership positively moderates the relationship between relative advantage, technological innovativeness, and DA; and (d) DA positively affects employee creativity. These findings elucidate the mechanisms through which relative advantage and technological innovativeness affect employee creativity and expand the literature on the antecedents of employee creativity. The paper discusses practical implications and suggestions for future research.

References

[1]. 1.Abbu H, Mugge P, Gudergan G, Hoeborn G, Kwiatkowski A. Measuring the human dimensions of digital leadership for successful digital transformation[J]. *Research-Technology Management*, 2022, 65(3): 39–49.

[2]. 2.Akhtar S, Hongyun T, Iqbal S, Ashraf S, Bashir I. Impact of Organization Learning Capability on Performance Innovation: Mediating Role of Information Technology[J]. *The Journal of Educational Paradigms*, 2021, 3: 146–150. https://doi.org/10.47609/0301012021

[3]. 3.Amabile T M. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization[J]. *Journal of Personality and Social Psychology*, 1983, 45(2): 357.

[4]. 4.Amabile T M. A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations[M]//Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press, 1988.

[5]. 5.Baer M, Oldham G R. The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity[J]. *Journal of Applied Psychology*, 2006, 91(4): 963.

[6]. 6.Bertani F, Raberto M, Teglio A. The productivity and unemployment effects of the digital transformation: an empirical and modelling assessment[J]. *Review of Evolutionary Political Economy*, 2020, 1(3): 329–355.

[7]. 7.Bresciani S, Ferraris A, Romano M, et al. Digital leadership[M]//Digital transformation management for agile organizations: A compass to sail the digital world. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021: 97-115.

[8]. 8.Cheng W, Li C, Zhao T. The stages of enterprise digital transformation and its impact on internal control: Evidence from China[J]. *International Review of Financial Analysis*, 2024, 92: 103079.

[9]. 9.Chi M, Muhammad S, Khan Z, Ali S, Li R Y M. Is centralization killing innovation? The success story of technological innovation in fiscally decentralized countries[J]. *Technological Forecasting and Social Change*, 2021, 168: 120731.

[10]. 10.Claassen K, Dos Anjos D R, Kettschau J, et al. How to evaluate digital leadership: a cross-sectional study[J]. *Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology*, 2021, 16: 1-8.

[11]. 11.China Economic Times. The market capitalization of the STAR Market has exceeded 5 trillion yuan. Supporting hard technology requires strict control over the quality of listed companies[EB/OL]. Baidu.com, 2024. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1803303660437204306&wfr=spider&for=pc

[12]. 12.Chung D, Jung H, Lee Y. Investigating the relationship of high-tech entrepreneurship and innovation efficacy: The moderating role of absorptive capacity[J]. *Technovation*, 2022, 111: 102393.

[13]. 13.Comrey A L, Lee H B. A first course in factor analysis[M]. Psychology press, 2013.

[14]. 14.Cropanzano R, Mitchell M S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review[J]. *Journal of Management*, 2005, 31(6): 874–900.

[15]. 15.Cropanzano R, Prehar C A, Chen P Y. Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice[J]. *Group & Organization Management*, 2002, 27(3): 324–351.

[16]. 16.Davis F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology[J]. *MIS Quarterly*, 1989, 319–340.

[17]. 17.Davis F D. Technology acceptance model: TAM[M]//Al-Suqri M N, Al-Aufi A S. Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption. 205, 219.

[18]. 18.de Araujo L M, Priadana S, Paramarta V, et al. Digital leadership in business organizations[J]. *International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership*, 2021: 45-56.

[19]. 19.Dery K, Sebastian I M, van der Meulen N. The digital workplace is key to digital innovation[J]. *MIS Quarterly Executive*, 2017, 16(2).

[20]. 20.Di Vaio A, Palladino R, Pezzi A, Kalisz D E. The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review[J]. *Journal of Business Research*, 2021, 123: 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042

[21]. 21.Eberl J K, Drews P. Digital Leadership‒Mountain or molehill? A literature review[M]//Innovation through Information Systems: Volume III: A Collection of Latest Research on Management Issues. 2021: 223–237.

[22]. 22.Edwards J R. An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress[J]. *Academy of Management Journal*, 1996, 39(2): 292–339.

[23]. 23.Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, et al. Perceived organizational support[J]. *Journal of Applied Psychology*, 1986, 71(3): 500.

[24]. 24.El Sawy O A, Kræmmergaard P, Amsinck H, Vinther A L. How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership[M]//Strategic information management. Routledge, 2020: 174–201.

[25]. 25.Erjavec J, Manfreda A, Jaklič J, Fehér P, Indihar Štemberger M, Szabó Z, Kő A. Case studies of successful digital transformation in Slovenia And Hungary[C]//5th International Conference on Management and Organization. 2018: 1–11.

[26]. 26.F. Hair Jr J, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, G. Kuppelwieser V. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research[J]. *European Business Review*, 2014, 26(2): 106–121.

[27]. 27.Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research[M]. 1977.

[28]. 28.Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach[M]. Psychology press, 2011.

[29]. 29.Foa E B, Foa U G. Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange[M]//Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. Springer, 1980: 77–94.

[30]. 30.Fornell C, Larcker D F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error[J]. *Journal of Marketing Research*, 1981, 18(1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

[31]. 31.Franke G, Sarstedt M. Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures[J]. *Internet Research*, 2018, 29. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515

[32]. 32.Geser G, Hollauf E-M, Hornung-Prähauser V, Schön S, Vloet F. Makerspaces as social innovation and entrepreneurship learning environments: The DOIT learning program[J]. *Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education*, 2019, 10(2): 60–71.

[33]. 33.Gierlich-Joas M, Hess T, Neuburger R. More self-organization, more control—or even both? Inverse transparency as a digital leadership concept[J]. *Business Research*, 2020, 13(3): 921-947.

[34]. 34.Yang H. China's manufacturing value-added accounts for approximately 30% of the global total, ranking first worldwide for 14 consecutive years—The pace of manufacturing strengthening continues to accelerate [EB/OL]. China Government Network, 2024-02-22. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202402/content_6933130.htm

[35]. 35.Gong Y, Zhou J, Chang S. Core knowledge employee creativity and firm performance: The moderating role of riskiness orientation, firm size, and realized absorptive capacity[J]. *Personnel Psychology*, 2013, 66(2): 443–482.

[36]. 36.Gujarati D N, Porter D C, Gunasekar S. Basic econometrics[M]. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New Delhi, 2009.

[37]. 37.Hair J F, Risher J J, Sarstedt M, Ringle C M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM[J]. *European Business Review*, 2019, 31(1): 2–24.

[38]. 38.Hair J F, Sarstedt M, Ringle C M. Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares[J]. *European Journal of Marketing*, 2019, 53(4): 566–584.

[39]. 39.Hair J, Hollingsworth C, Randolph A, Chong A. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research[J]. *Industrial Management & Data Systems*, 2017, 117: 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130

[40]. 40.Hair J, Howard M, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis[J]. *Journal of Business Research*, 2020, 109: 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069

[41]. 41.Hanaysha J R. Impact of transformational and authentic leadership on employee creativity in Malaysian higher education sector: Mediating effect of organizational citizenship behaviour[J]. FIIB Business Review, 2022, 23197145221130668.

[42]. 42.Hanelt A, Bohnsack R, Marz D, Antunes Marante C. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2021, 58(5): 1159–1197.

[43]. 43.Henseler J, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015, 43: 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

[44]. 44.Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, Zhou J. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(2): 280–293.

[45]. 45.Huang S P. Effects of Innovative Education on Innovation Capability and Organizational Performance in High-Tech Industry[J]. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2017, 14. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80127

[46]. 46.Jaccard J, Turrisi R. Interaction effects in multiple regression[M]. Sage, 2003.

[47]. 47.Jayawardena C, Ahmad A, Valeri M, Jaharadak A A. Technology acceptance antecedents in digital transformation in hospitality industry[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2023, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103350

[48]. 48.Karahanna E, Straub D W, Chervany N L. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1999: 183–213.

[49]. 49.Kastelli I, Dimas P, Stamopoulos D, Tsakanikas A. Linking digital capacity to innovation performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity[J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2024, 15(1): 238–272.

[50]. 50.Khalili A. Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate[J]. Management Decision, 2016, 54(9): 2277–2293.

[51]. 51.Kim K. Moderating effects of legitimacy on the liability-and R&D investment-innovation relationships in manufacturing SMEs[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2019, 27(1): 23–45.

[52]. 52.Korzynski P, Paniagua J, Rodriguez-Montemayor E. Employee creativity in a digital era: the mediating role of social media[J]. Management Decision, 2019, 58(6): 1100–1117.

[53]. 53.Lawler E J, Thye S R. Bringing emotions into social exchange theory[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1999, 25(1): 217–244.

[54]. 54.Li C, Zhao H, Begley T M. Transformational leadership dimensions and employee creativity in China: A cross-level analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(6): 1149–1156.

[55]. 55.Li J, Gardner H. How domains constrain creativity: The case of traditional Chinese and Western painting[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 1993, 37(1): 94–101.

[56]. 56.Martinaityte I, Sacramento C, Aryee S. Delighting the customer: Creativity-oriented high-performance work systems, frontline employee creative performance, and customer satisfaction[J]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(2): 728–751.

[57]. 57.Meier C, Sachs S, Stutz C, McSorley V. Establishing a digital leadership barometer for small and medium enterprises (SME)[C]//Management Challenges in a Network Economy: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM International Conference 2017. 2017: 103–109.

[58]. 58.Moore G C, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation[J]. Information Systems Research, 1991, 2(3): 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192

[59]. 59.Morakanyane R, O’Reilly P, McAvoy J, Grace A. Determining digital transformation success factors[J]. 2020.

[60]. 60.Nadkarni S, Prügl R. Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research[J]. Management Review Quarterly, 2021, 71: 233–341.

[61]. 61.Oh K, Kho H, Choi Y, Lee S. Determinants for Successful Digital Transformation[J]. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2022, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031215

[62]. 62.Oldham G R, Cummings A. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(3): 607–634.

[63]. 63.Park I, Kim D, Moon J, Kim S, Kang Y, Bae S. Searching for new technology acceptance model under social context: analyzing the determinants of acceptance of intelligent information technology in digital transformation and implications for the requisites of digital sustainability[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(1): 579.

[64]. 64.Peng Y, Tao C. Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance?—From the perspective of public policy and innovation[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2022, 7(3): 100198.

[65]. 65.PEOPLE'S DAILY. Shenzhen's science and technology innovation is cultivating a thriving "rainforest-like ecosystem," with more than ten national high-tech enterprises per square kilometer[EB/OL]. Iqilu.com, 2022 [2025-01-20]. https://sdxw.iqilu.com/share/YS0yMS0xMzU5NzQwNw.html

[66]. 66.Preacher K J, Hayes A F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models[J]. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 2004, 36: 717–731.

[67]. 67.Ram R. Wagner’s Hypothesis in Time-Series and Cross-Section Perspectives: Evidence from “Real” Data for 115 Countries[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987, 69(2).

[68]. 68.Rhodes M. An analysis of creativity[J]. The Phi Delta Kappan, 1961, 42(7): 305–310.

[69]. 69.Rogers E M. Diffusion of innovations[M]. 4th ed. The Free Press, 1995.

[70]. 70.Rogers E M, Williams D. Diffusion of Innovations[M]. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1962.

[71]. 71.Rusu B, Sandu C B, Avasilcai S, et al. Acceptance of digital transformation: Evidence from Romania[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(21): 15268.

[72]. 72.Selimović J, Pilav-Velić A, Krndžija L. Digital workplace transformation in the financial service sector: Investigating the relationship between employees’ expectations and intentions[J]. Technology in Society, 2021, 66: 101640.

[73]. 73.Shalley C E, Gilson L L. What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2004, 15(1): 33–53.

[74]. 74.Su C W, Qin M, Tao R, Umar M. Financial implications of fourth industrial revolution: Can bitcoin improve prospects of energy investment?[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 158: 120178.

[75]. 75.Sun Y, Wang C, Jeyaraj A. Enterprise social media affordances as enablers of knowledge transfer and creative performance: An empirical study[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2020, 51: 101402.

[76]. 76.Usai A, Fiano F, Petruzzelli A M, Paoloni P, Briamonte M F, Orlando B. Unveiling the impact of the adoption of digital technologies on firms’ innovation performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 133: 327–336.

[77]. 77.Venkatesh V, Morris M G, Davis G B, Davis F D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2003: 425–478.

[78]. 78.Verhoef P C, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, Bhattacharya A, Dong J Q, Fabian N, Haenlein M. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 122: 889–901.

[79]. 79.Vial G. Understanding Digital transformation: a Review and a Research Agenda[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(2): 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

[80]. 80.Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda[M]//Managing Digital Transformation. 2021: 13–66.

[81]. 81.Wang K H, Umar M, Akram R, Caglar E. Is technological innovation making world" Greener"? An evidence from changing growth story of China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 165: 120516.

[82]. 82.Weber E, Büttgen M, Bartsch S. How to take employees on the digital transformation journey: An experimental study on complementary leadership behaviors in managing organizational change[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 143: 225–238.

[83]. 83.Woodman R W, Sawyer J E, Griffin R W. Toward a theory of organizational creativity[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18(2): 293–321.

[84]. 84.Yang N, Liu Q, Qian F, Wang X. Does global value chain position affect innovation performance of China’s high-tech industries?[J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2023, 17(3): 660–682.

[85]. 85.Yoo Y, Boland R J, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1398–1408.

[86]. 86.Zhang X, Bartol K M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(1): 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118

[87]. 87.Zulu S L, Khosrowshahi F. A taxonomy of digital leadership in the construction industry[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2021, 39(7): 565–578.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10 Primz Bizhub Singapore 737854

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com