Environment and Social Psychology

Legal environment, social trust, and ESG Performance of enterprises: A case study of a-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges in China from 2010 to 2019

Mei Zhang

Guizhou University of Commerce, Gui’yang, Guizhou, 550014, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i3.3490

Keywords: legal environment; social trust; formal institutions; informal institutions; ESG

---

Abstract

Under the background of implementing "carbon peak and carbon neutrality" targets, the ESG performance of enterprises has attracted the attention from the public. This study selects Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2019 as samples, constructs an ESG evaluation system using the entropy method and AHP method, and investigates the impact of the legal environment on corporate ESG performance and the moderating role of social trust through multiple regression models. The study finds that a well-developed legal environment promotes corporate ESG performance, and the synergistic effect of social trust and the legal environment significantly enhances ESG performance. Further research reveals that the positive effect of the legal system on corporate ESG performance is stronger in resource-based cities and economically underdeveloped regions. Industry heterogeneity analysis further shows that companies in resource-based and traditional heavy industries experience more significant improvements in ESG performance under the influence of the legal environment. The findings enrich the research on the factors influencing corporate ESG performance and provide strategic guidance for promoting corporate sustainable development.

---

References

[1]. 1.Bai, X., Zhu, Y.F. & Han, J.M. (2022). ESG performance, institutional investor preference and firm value of listed companies, Statistics & Information Forum, 37(10): 117–128. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2022.10.010

[2]. 2.Duque-Grisales, E. & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack, Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2): 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w

[3]. 3.Zheng, P., Li, Y.X. & He, Y.H. (2020). Research on the impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Based on empirical evidence of Chinese listed companies, The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 41(6): 64–71. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7217.2020.06.009

[4]. 4.Huang, J.B., Chen, L.X. & Ding, J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, media coverage and stock price crash risk, Chinese Journal of Management Science, 30(3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2183

[5]. 5.Khorilov, T.G. & Kim, J. (2024). ESG and firm risk: Evidence in Korea, Sustainability, 16(13): 5388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135388

[6]. 6.Nam, H.-J., Bilgin, M.H. & Ryu, D. (2024). Firm value, ownership structure, and strategic approaches to ESG activities, Eurasian Business Review, 14(1): 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00252-z

[7]. 7.Maaloul, A., Zéghal, D., Ben Amar, W., et al. (2023). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and disclosure on cost of debt: The mediating effect of corporate reputation, Corporate Reputation Review, 26(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8

[8]. 8.Brander, J.A. & Zhang, W. (2017). Employee relations and innovation: An empirical analysis using patent data, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(4): 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202523

[9]. 9.Liu, B., Lu, J.R. & Ju, T. (2023). Formalism or substantialism: Research on green innovation under soft market supervision of ESG rating, Nankai Business Review, 26(5): 16–26. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2023.05.003

[10]. 10.Lei, X. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of energy transition policies on corporate ESG performance: Insights from China’s NEDC initiative, International Journal of Global Warming, 34(4): 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2024.10067829

[11]. 11.Hmouda, A.M.O., Orzes, G., Sauer, P.C., et al. (2024). Determinants of environmental, social and governance scores: Evidence from the electric power supply chains, Journal of Cleaner Production, 471: 143372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143372

[12]. 12.Fan, Y., Li, S. & Yang, W. (2024). The impact of the percentage of female directors on corporate ESG score, Finance Research Letters, 63: 105376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105376

[13]. 13.Tan, G. & Chang, Y. (2024). ESG performance and state ownership in firm valuation: Perspectives from Singapore companies, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 26(2): 2450005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333224500054

[14]. 14.Erben Yavuz, A., Kocaman, B.E., Doğan, M., et al. (2024). The impact of corporate governance on sustainability disclosures: A comparison from the perspective of financial and non-financial firms, Sustainability, 16(19): 8400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198400

[15]. 15.North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

[16]. 16.Tao, G.G. (2016). Pluralistic collaborative governance of ecological environment from the perspective of social capital, Qinghai Social Sciences, 4: 57–63. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2338.2016.04.010

[17]. 17.Peng, Y. (2004). Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China’s transitional economy, American Journal of Sociology, 109(5): 1045–1074. https://doi.org/10.1086/382347

[18]. 18.Helmke, G. & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda, Perspectives on Politics, 2(4): 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472

[19]. 19.Lei, X. & Zhao, K. (2024). Exploring and assessing construction companies’ ESG performance in sustainability, Global NEST Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.30955/GNJ.005698

[20]. 20.Su, F., Liang, X.F., Chen, S.J., et al. (2022). How institutional pressure affects corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from Chinese listed companies, Environmental Conformity Assessment, 14(4): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2022.04.091

[21]. 21.Campbell, J.L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684

[22]. 22.Shen, Q.T.S., Ge, X.C. & Song, C.C. (2014). A study of institutional pressures’ influence on corporate social responsibility: An organizational legitimacy perspective, Scientific Research Management, 1: 123–130. https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2014.01.016

[23]. 23.He, H.J. & Gao, J. (2017). An empirical test of the impact of institutional perception on corporate social responsibility, Statistics and Decision, 24: 183–185. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2017.24.045

[24]. 24.La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., et al. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance, The Journal of Finance, 52(3): 1131–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x

[25]. 25.Brockman, P. & Chung, D.Y. (2003). Investor protection and firm liquidity, The Journal of Finance, 58(2): 921–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00551

[26]. 26.Williamson, O.E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations, The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1086/466942

[27]. 27.Delhey, J., Newton, K. & Welzel, C. (2011). How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius of trust problem, American Sociological Review, 76(5): 786–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411420817

[28]. 28.Zhang, H.L. & Lu, Z.F. (2012). The cash distribution, the corporate governance, and the over-investment: An investigation based on the state of the cash holdings of China’s listed companies and their subsidiaries, Management World, 3: 141–150. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2012.03.012

[29]. 29.Hu, W.J. (2022). Heterogeneity of major shareholders, managerial power and corporate governance efficiency, Communication of Finance and Accounting, 19: 52–57. https://doi.org/10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.20220829.001

[30]. 30.Huang, G.L. & Xia, Y.X. (2022). Research on capital market opening and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from “Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connect,” Friends of Accounting, 12: 126–134. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-5937.2022.12.017

[31]. 31.Ma, Z.G. & Cao, L. (2020). Construction and measurement of manufacturing enterprises high-quality development evaluation system, Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 37(17): 126–133. https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2020030358

[32]. 32.Su, C. & Chen, C. (2022). Research on ESG evaluation system of listed companies under the new development concept: Taking heavily polluting manufacturing listed companies as an example, Finance and Accounting Monthly, 6: 155–160. https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2022.06.020

[33]. 33.Lin, Z.K. (2012). City insurance social responsibility based on an entropy and AHP combination model, Science Research Management, 33(3): 142–147, 160. https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2012.03.019

[34]. 34.Sun, Z.Y. & Qi, B.L. (2022). Social trust, legal environment and corporate social responsibilities, Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences), 37(1): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.12085/j.issn.1009-6116.2022.01.007

[35]. 35.Li, G.L. & Zhu, P.H. (2022). Does information infrastructure construction improve corporate ESG performance?, Finance and Economy, 9: 52–61. https://doi.org/10.19622/j.cnki.cn36-1005/f.2022.09.005

[36]. 36.Zhao, M.L., Feng, J.K. & Sun, W. (2023). Ways and policy suggestions of environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in resource-based cities, Journal of Natural Resources, 38(1): 186–204. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20230112

[37]. 37.Fang, X.T. (2018). Institutional constraints on the development of private economy in underdeveloped regions, Commercial Times, 4: 161–164. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5863.2018.04.049

[38]. 38.Jin, X. & Lei, X. (2023). A study on the mechanism of ESG’s impact on corporate value under the concept of sustainable development, Sustainability, 15(11): 8442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118442