Published
2025-04-27
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jinwen Zhang, Muhammad Rafiq, Yet Mee Lim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Occupational stigma and career exploration: Testing mediation and moderation effects of Mianzi concern
Jinwen Zhang
1 UCSI Graduate Business School, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, 55100, Malaysia 2 Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Ningxia University, Ningxia, 750001, China
Muhammad Rafiq
UCSI Graduate Business School, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, 55100, Malaysia
Yet Mee Lim
UCSI Graduate Business School, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, 55100, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i4.3511
Keywords: perceived occupational stigma; Mianzi concern; career exploration; tour guides
Abstract
This research is grounded in the Conservation of Resources theory to examine the impact of perceived occupational stigma on the career exploration of tour guides. This research examines the mediating and moderating influence of Mianzi concern in the relationship between perceived occupational stigma and career exploration. A total of 421 valid responses were gathered from full-time tour guides in China. The research employed the Partial Least Squares structural equation modelling approach. The research demonstrated that Mianzi concern mediates the relationship between perceived occupational stigma and career exploration. However, the moderating effect of Mianzi concern was not supported. This study enhances the understanding of the impact of occupational stigma and the elements that promote external career exploration, providing insights for reducing or removing occupational stigma.
References
[1]. 1.Cheung, R., & Arnold, J. (2010). Antecedents of career exploration among Hong Kong Chinese university students: Testing contextual and developmental variables. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(1), 25-36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.006
[2]. 2.Presbitero, A., & Teng-Calleja, M. (2022). Job attitudes and career behaviors relating to employees' perceived incorporation of artificial intelligence in the workplace: a career self-management perspective. Personnel Review, 52(4), 1169-1187. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2021-0103
[3]. 3.Li, Y., Liu, B., Zhang, R., & Huan, T. C. (2020). News information and tour guide occupational stigma: Insights from the stereotype content model. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 100711. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100711
[4]. 4.Li, Y., Song, Y., Wang, M., & Huan, T. C. T. (2021). The influence of tour guides’ service quality on tourists' tour guide stigma judgment: An Asian perspective. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 551-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.08.011
[5]. 5.Fan, Z., Shi, X., Liu, L., Yang, S., & Li, L. (2024). The development and validation of tour guides internalized occupational stigma scale (TIOSS). BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18519-5
[6]. 6.Kreiner, G., Mihelcic, C. A., & Mikolon, S. (2022). Stigmatized work and stigmatized workers. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9(1), 95-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091423
[7]. 7.Xu, S., Zuo, Y., Chen, S., Law, R., & Zhang, M. (2023). Broken windows in tourism: The effect of occupational stigma perception of tour guides on interpersonal deviance toward tourists. International Journal of Tourism Research, 25(1), 137-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2557
[8]. 8.Meng, L., Zhang, X. F., Li, J. M., & Sun, Z. Y. (2024). Occupational stigma perception and emotional labor: the role of Ambivalent occupational identification and leaders’ emotional intelligence. Current Psychology, 43, 17225-17238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05686-2
[9]. 9.Jiang, Z., Newman, A., Le, H., Presbitero, A., & Zheng, C. (2019). Career exploration: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 338-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.08.008
[10]. 10.Ho, D. Y. F. (1976). On the concept of face. American journal of sociology, 81(4), 867-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226145
[11]. 11.Lv, X., Zhang, K., Liu, Y., Wang, C., & Wang, Y. (2023). Why Chinese hospitality management undergraduates give up a hotel career: the effects of perceived occupational stigma and perceived work dirtiness. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(17), 2863-2882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2101437
[12]. 12.Lv, X., Zhang, K., Song, Q., Fu, X., & Liu, Y. (2024). How does occupational stigma and work dirtiness inhibit hotel front-line employees’ proactive customer service performance and its solutions? Tourism Management, 104, 104932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104932
[13]. 13.Ting-Toomey, S. (2004). TRANSLATING CONFLICT FACE-NEGOTIATION THEORY. Handbook of intercultural training, 217.
[14]. 14.Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 5(1), 103-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
[15]. 15.Kusluvan, H., Akova, O., & Kusluvan, S. (2022). Occupational stigma and career commitment: Testing mediation and moderation effects of occupational self-esteem. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103149
[16]. 16.Lai, J. Y., Chan, K. W., & Lam, L. W. (2013). Defining who you are not: The roles of moral dirtiness and occupational and organizational disidentification in affecting casino employee turnover intention. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1659-1666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.012
[17]. 17.Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Doubleday. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788387
[18]. 18.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
[19]. 19.Wan, L. C., Poon, P. S., & Yu, C. (2016). Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility brands: the role of face concern. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(1), 52-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2013-0493
[20]. 20.Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
[21]. 21.Oetzel, J., Garcia, A. J., & Ting‐Toomey, S. (2008). An analysis of the relationships among face concerns and facework behaviors in perceived conflict situations: A four‐culture investigation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(4), 382-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060810909310
[22]. 22.Stumpf, S. A., Colarelli, S. M., & Hartman, K. (1983). Development of the career exploration survey (CES). Journal of vocational behavior, 22(2), 191-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(83)90028-3
[23]. 23.Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 879-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[24]. 24.Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
[25]. 25.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[26]. 26.Hair, J.F.J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M. (2014), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. DOI: ttps://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
[27]. 27.Chin, W. W. (2009). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655-690). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29
[28]. 28.Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
[29]. 29.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, New Jarsey.
[30]. 30.Rafiq, M., Shahzad, F., Farrukh, M., & Khan, I. (2022). The psychological mechanism linking life satisfaction and turnover intention among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Work, 71(3), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210995
[31]. 31.Aman, A., Rafiq, M., & Dastane, O. (2023). A cross-cultural comparison of work engagement in the relationships between trust climate–Job performance and turnover intention: Focusing China and Pakistan. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.






