Environment and Social Psychology

Managerial accounting for responsible consumption: Behavioral pathways to achieving sustainable development goal 12

Haryanto Haryanto

Accounting Department, BINUS Online Learning, Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia. Email: haryanto006@binus.ac.id ORCID: 0000-0002-9040-6578

Amelia Setiawan

Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics, Parahyangan Catholic University, Indonesia. Email: amelias@unpar.ac.id ORCID: 0000-0002-9386-7089

Li Ting

Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University 99 Moo 10, Bangtoey, Samkhok, Pathumthani, 12160, Thailand. Email: 1263821455@qq.com ORCID: 0009-0009-2679-3022

Gao Yong

Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics, Parahyangan Catholic University, Indonesia. Email: amelias@unpar.ac.id ORCID: 0000-0002-9386-7089

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3675

Keywords: behavioral infrastructure; environmental behavior; managerial accounting; responsible consumption; SDG 12; sustainability accounting

---

Abstract

As organizations confront the escalating imperatives of Sustainable Development Goal 12 — Responsible consumption and production — Sustainability transitions are often framed as strategic or technological challenges. Yet this narrative review argues that the true battleground lies deeper: within the silent infrastructures that shape organizational behavior. Conceptualizing managerial accounting as behavioral infrastructure, this review repositions accounting systems not as neutral measurement tools, but as active cognitive, motivational, and normative architectures that scaffold — or undermine — Sustainability practices. Through a critical synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting, behavioral management, and environmental psychology literatures, the review advances four key contributions. First, it reframes budgeting, costing, performance measurement, and internal control systems as behavioral architectures that condition responsible consumption. Second, it illuminates the underexplored mediating role of accounting infrastructures in shaping employee well-being, organizational culture, and ethical engagement. Third, it critiques the field's preoccupation with external disclosure, calling for a methodological shift toward studying internal behavioral dynamics. Fourth, it reimagines managerial accounting as an ethical infrastructure: a latent moral architecture shaping not only ecological outcomes but the dignity and flourishing of organizational life. By exposing the hidden behavioral terrains where sustainability succeeds or fails, this review calls for an urgent reconfiguration of accounting systems — From instruments of compliance to catalysts of transformative organizational change. Managerial accounting, long relegated to the background of sustainability discourse, must be recognized as a decisive frontier in humanity's struggle to live within planetary limits.

---

References

[1]. 1.Bebbington J, Larrinaga C. Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, organizations and society 2014;39(6):395–413.

[2]. 2.Bebbington J, Russell S, Thomson I. Accounting and sustainable development: Reflections and propositions. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2017;48:21–34.

[3]. 3.Fullerton RR, Kennedy FA, Widener SK. Lean manufacturing and firm performance: The incremental contribution of lean management accounting practices. Journal of Operations Management 2014;32(7–8):414–28.

[4]. 4.Karagiorgos A, Lazos G, Stavropoulos A, Karagiorgou D, Valkani F. Information system assisted knowledge accounting and cognitive managerial implications. EuroMed Journal of Business 2025;20(1):1–20.

[5]. 5.Wall F, Greiling D. Accounting information for managerial decision-making in shareholder management versus stakeholder management. Review of Managerial Science 2011;5:91–135.

[6]. 6.Collins F. Managerial accounting systems and organizational control: A role perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1982;7(2):107–22.

[7]. 7.Merkl-Davies DM, Brennan NM. A theoretical framework of external accounting communication: Research perspectives, traditions, and theories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2017;30(2):433–69.

[8]. 8.Heidmann M. The role of management accounting systems in strategic sensemaking. Springer; 2008.

[9]. 9.Busco C, Scapens RW. Management accounting systems and organisational culture: Interpreting their linkages and processes of change. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 2011;8(4):320–57.

[10]. 10.Lohmann L. Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost–benefit. Accounting, organizations and society 2009;34(3–4):499–534.

[11]. 11.Laine M, Tregidga H, Unerman J. Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge; 2021.

[12]. 12.Crittenden VL, Crittenden WF, Ferrell LK, Ferrell OC, Pinney CC. Market-oriented sustainability: a conceptual framework and propositions. Journal of the academy of marketing science 2011;39:71–85.

[13]. 13.Fisch JE. Making sustainability disclosure sustainable. Geo LJ 2018;107:923.

[14]. 14.Pencle N. Motivating corporate sustainability research in management accounting through the lens of paradox theory. Accounting Perspectives 2022;21(4):663–96.

[15]. 15.Busco C, Giovannoni E, Riccaboni A, Frigo ML. The micro-foundations of corporate purpose: Performance management in dynamic environments. Management Accounting Research 2024;63:100890.

[16]. 16.Su W, Zhang L, Ge C, Chen S. Association between internal control and sustainability: A literature review based on the SOX Act framework. Sustainability 2022;14(15):9706.

[17]. 17.Haryanto H, Suharman H, Koeswayo PS, Umar H. Employee Engagement in Indonesian Logistics Industry. Quality-Access to Success 2023;24(194).

[18]. 18.Juntunen M, Lehenkari M. Narrative reviews: flexible, rigorous, and practical. Studies in Higher Education 2021;46(2):330–42.

[19]. 19.Sukhera J. Narrative reviews: flexible, rigorous, and practical. Journal of graduate medical education 2022;14(4):414–7.

[20]. 20.Nations U. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition [Internet]. United Nations. 2023. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/

[21]. 21.Unerman J. Strategic reputation risk management and corporate social responsibility reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2008 Jan;21(3):362–4.

[22]. 22.Merchant KA. Measuring general managers’ performances: Market, accounting and combination‐of‐measures systems. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2006;19(6):893–917.

[23]. 23.Schaltegger S, Wagner M. Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 2006;3(1):1–19.

[24]. 24.Brown J, Dillard J. Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Charl de Villiers Professor PJU and DLR, editor. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2014 Jan 1;27(7):1120–56.

[25]. 25.Makrygiannakis G, Jack L. Understanding management accounting change using strong structuration frameworks. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal 2016;29(7):1234–58.

[26]. 26.Pentland BT, Hærem T. Organizational routines as patterns of action: Implications for organizational behavior. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 2015;2(1):465–87.

[27]. 27.Atkins J, Atkins BC, Thomson I, Maroun W. “Good” news from nowhere: Imagining utopian sustainable accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2015;28(5):651–70.

[28]. 28.Christ KL, Dijkstra-Silva S, Burritt RL, Schaltegger S. Sustainability management accounting–enabling macro-level sustainability transformation towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Meditari Accountancy Research 2024;32(3):923–44.

[29]. 29.Andersen MS. An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustainability science 2007;2(1):133–40.

[30]. 30.Eshet T, Ayalon O, Shechter M. Valuation of externalities of selected waste management alternatives: A comparative review and analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2006;46(4):335–64.

[31]. 31.Negri P. Innovators and Transformers: Enhancing supply chain sustainability: a methodology combining dynamic simulation and case studies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2025;

[32]. 32.Goldstein A, Turner WR, Gladstone J, Hole DG. The private sector’s climate change risk and adaptation blind spots. Nature Climate Change 2019;9(1):18–25.

[33]. 33.Hamed R. The role of internal control systems in ensuring financial performance sustainability. Sustainability 2023;15(13):10206.

[34]. 34.Koeswayo PS, Haryanto H, Handoyo S. The Impact of Corporate Governance, Internal Control and Corporate Reputation on Employee Engagement: A Moderating Role of Leadership Style. Cogent Business & Management 2024;11(1).

[35]. 35.Henri JF, Boiral O, Roy MJ. Strategic cost management and performance: The case of environmental costs. The British accounting review 2016;48(2):269–82.

[36]. 36.Chams N, García-Blandón J. On the importance of sustainable human resource management for the adoption of sustainable development goals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2019;141:109–22.

[37]. 37.Miller P, Power M. Accounting, organizing, and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals 2013;7(1):557–605.

[38]. 38.Arroyo P. Management accounting change and sustainability: an institutional approach. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change 2012;8(3):286–309.

[39]. 39.Baker M, Gray R, Schaltegger S. Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2023;36(2):591–619.

[40]. 40.Brunton M, Eweje G, Taskin N. Communicating corporate social responsibility to internal stakeholders: Walking the walk or just talking the talk? Business Strategy and the Environment 2017;26(1):31–48.

[41]. 41.Reilly AH, Larya N. External communication about sustainability: Corporate social responsibility reports and social media activity. Environmental Communication 2018;12(5):621–37.

[42]. 42.Arjaliès DL, Mundy J. The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research 2013;24(4):284–300.

[43]. 43.Hossain M, Islam K, Andrew J. Corporate social and environmental disclosure in developing countries. Evidence from Bangladesh 2006;

[44]. 44.Deegan C. The accountant will have a central role in saving the planet… really? A reflection on ‘green accounting and green eyeshades twenty years later.’ Critical perspectives on accounting 2013;24(6):448–58.

[45]. 45.Dumay J, La Torre M, Farneti F. Developing trust through stewardship: Implications for intellectual capital, integrated reporting, and the EU Directive 2014/95/EU. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2019;20(1):11–39.

[46]. 46.Michaelson C, Pratt MG, Grant AM, Dunn CP. Meaningful work: Connecting business ethics and organization studies. Journal of business ethics 2014;121:77–90.

[47]. 47.Hsiao PK, de Villiers C, Horner C, Oosthuizen H. A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda. Accounting & Finance 2022;62(4):4453–83.