Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    9096
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8284
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7983
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7634
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    6155

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 5 (2025): Published > Research Articles
ESP-3692

Published

2025-05-22

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 5 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Zhibai Li

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Li, Z. (2025). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and investor psychology: Do environmentally friendly companies generate more stable shareholder sentiment. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(5), ESP-3692. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3692
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and investor psychology: Do environmentally friendly companies generate more stable shareholder sentiment

Zhibai Li

Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450046, China


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3692


Keywords: environmental performance; investor sentiment; sentiment stability; behavioral finance; sustainable finance


Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates whether environmentally responsible companies generate more stable shareholder sentiment compared to their less environmentally conscious counterparts, addressing a critical gap in understanding the psychological mechanisms through which environmental performance influences investor behavior.

Methodology: Using a comprehensive dataset of 2,458 firm-year observations from 351 companies across five industries during 2018-2024, This study employs panel regression analysis with instrumental variable estimation to examine the relationship between multidimensional environmental performance and sentiment stability. Environmental performance is measured across four dimensions: emissions reduction, resource efficiency, environmental management, and climate initiatives. Sentiment stability captures volatility, persistence, and recovery dynamics of investor emotional responses derived from social media analytics and traditional sentiment indicators.

Findings: Results demonstrate a significant positive relationship between environmental performance and sentiment stability (β = 0.153, p < 0.01). Environmental management systems exhibit the strongest influence (β = 0.156), followed by resource efficiency (β = 0.124), indicating investors prioritize systematic governance structures over specific outcomes. Market volatility significantly moderates this relationship, with high environmental performers maintaining sentiment stability during turbulent periods (10.3% decline) compared to low performers (35.4% decline), confirming environmental responsibility's "safe haven" effect.

Practical Implications: Environmental initiatives represent strategic investments in investor psychology rather than mere compliance activities. Companies should prioritize environmental management systems and operational efficiency to maximize sentiment stability benefits. For investors, environmental performance serves as a risk mitigation tool, particularly during volatile market conditions.


References

[1]. 1.Briere, M., & Ramelli, S. (2022). Green sentiment, stock returns, and corporate behavior. Available at SSRN 3850923.

[2]. 2.Wang, W., Sun, Z., Wang, W., Hua, Q., & Wu, F. (2023). The impact of environmental uncertainty on ESG performance: Emotional vs. rational. Journal of Cleaner Production, 397, 136528.

[3]. 3.Bhutta, U. S., Tariq, A., Farrukh, M., Raza, A., & Iqbal, M. K. (2022). Green bonds for sustainable development: Review of literature on development and impact of green bonds. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121378.

[4]. 4.Barko, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. (2022). Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 777-812.

[5]. 5.Azad, S., & Devi, S. T. (2025). Sustainable development and investor confidence: The safe‐haven appeal of green‐bond issuing firms. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 1249-1268.

[6]. 6.Kumar, S. (2022). A quest for sustainium (sustainability Premium): review of sustainable bonds. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 26(2), 1-18.

[7]. 7.Gao, Y., Zhao, C., Sun, B., & Zhao, W. (2022). Effects of investor sentiment on stock volatility: new evidences from multi-source data in China’s green stock markets. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 77.

[8]. 8.Gao, Y., & Zhao, C. (2023). Investor sentiment and stock price jumps: A network analysis based on China’s carbon–neutral sectors. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 68, 101954.

[9]. 9.Shen, C., Fang, B., & Zhou, X. (2022). The relationship between corporate sustainable development performance, investor sentiment, and managerial overconfidence. Sustainability, 14(17), 10606.

[10]. 10.Sarfraz, M., Ozturk, I., & Abdullah, M. I. (Eds.). (2021). Entrepreneurship Psychology, CSR, and Sustainability. Frontiers Media SA.

[11]. 11.Majid, S., Sultana, N., Abid, G., & Elahi, A. R. (2021). The impact of corporate innovation on abnormal stock returns: The moderating role of investor sentiment. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1-16.

[12]. 12.Piñeiro-Chousa, J., López-Cabarcos, M. Á., Caby, J., & Šević, A. (2021). The influence of investor sentiment on the green bond market. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120351.

[13]. 13.Wu, R., & Liu, B. Y. (2023). Do climate policy uncertainty and investor sentiment drive the dynamic spillovers among green finance markets?. Journal of Environmental Management, 347, 119008.

[14]. 14.hao, Z., & Yan, J. (2023). The impact of investor sentiment on firms’ green total factor productivity—facilitator or inhibitor?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(27), 70303-70314.

[15]. 15.Kvam, E., Molnár, P., Wankel, I., & Ødegaard, B. A. (2022). Do sustainable company stock prices increase with ESG scrutiny? Evidence using social media. SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]. 16.Wang, P., Gu, G., & Fang, W. (2023). The impact of enterprise digitization on green total factor productivity: a case study of high-polluting companies in China. IEEE Access, 11, 77073-77085.

[17]. 17.Maulida, S., & Hakim, B. A. (2022). Twitter Sentiment Analysis on Green Finance. Accounting and Sustainability, 1(1).

[18]. 18.Pineiro-Chousa, J., López-Cabarcos, M. Á., & Šević, A. (2022). Green bond market and Sentiment: Is there a switching Behaviour?. Journal of Business Research, 141, 520-527.

[19]. 19.Kheradmandzadeh, E., & Jahanshad, A. (2025). Presenting the financial behavior model of investors based on corporate social responsibility according to the role of perceptions of stock returns. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 16(3), 343-360.

[20]. 20.Maurya, P. K., Bansal, R., & Mishra, A. K. (2025). Investor sentiment and its implication on global financial markets: a systematic review of literature. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.

[21]. 21.Zervoudi, E. K., Moschos, N., & Christopoulos, A. G. (2025). From the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria to the Sentiment Stability Score (SSS)"greenwashing phenomenon: A comprehensive literature review about the causes, consequences and solutions of the phenomenon with specific case studies. Sustainability, 17(5), 2222.



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com