Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    9096
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8284
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7983
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7634
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    6155

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 5 (2025): Published > Research Articles
ESP-3724

Published

2025-05-29

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 5 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Taejin Koh, Yongjeong Kim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Koh, T., & Kim, Y. (2025). Green campus awareness in cross-cultural contexts: Analyzing national and gender differences between Korean and Indian university students. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(5), ESP-3724. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3724
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Green campus awareness in cross-cultural contexts: Analyzing national and gender differences between Korean and Indian university students

Taejin Koh

Department of Indian Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea

Yongjeong Kim

Institution of Indian Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3724


Keywords: green campus; environmental awareness; sustainability; gender differences; cross-national comparison; South Korea; India


Abstract

This study aims to compare and analyze the perceptions of green campus initiatives among Korean and Indian university students, with a particular focus on the influence of nationality and gender in five key areas: environmental awareness, environmental behavior, perceived need, willingness to participate, and support for green campus policies. A total of 94 participants were surveyed, including Korean students majoring in Indian Studies and Indian students majoring in Korean Studies. SPSS 21.0 was used to analyze the significance of nationality and gender differences using independent t-tests and two-way ANOVAs. The results showed that female students had significantly higher levels of environmental awareness and behavior compared to male students, and Indian students consistently outperformed their Korean counterparts in all five domains, with a mean score difference of more than one point, especially for willingness to participate and policy support. While the gender-nationality interaction effect was not statistically significant in most cases, the study found strong country-specific effects. This suggests that environmental awareness and engagement are deeply influenced by the broader sociocultural and policy context. These findings highlight the importance of developing culturally tailored and gender-specific educational programs to promote sustainability in higher education.


References

[1]. 1.Lauder A, Sari RF, Suwartha N, Tjahjono G. Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015; 108: 852-863. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.080

[2]. 2.Cortese AD. The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education 2003; 31(3): 15-22.

[3]. 3.Tan H, Chen S, Shi Q, Wang L. Development of green campus in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2014; 64: 646-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.019

[4]. 4.Lauder A, Sari RF, Suwartha N, Tjahjono G. Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015; 108: 852-863. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.080

[5]. 5.Filho WL, Will M, Salvia AL, Adomßent M, Grahl A, Spira F. The role of green and Sustainability Offices in fostering sustainability efforts at higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 232: 1394-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.273.

[6]. 6.Velazquez L, Munguia N, Platt A, Taddei J. Sustainable university: what can be the matter?. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006; 14(9-11): 810-819. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.008

[7]. 7.Tiyarattanachai R, Hollmann NM. Green Campus initiative and its impacts on quality of life of stakeholders in Green and Non-Green Campus universities. SpringerPlus 2016; 5(84). doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1697-4

[8]. 8.Faghihi V, Hessami AR, Ford DN. Sustainable campus improvement program design using energy efficiency and conservation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015; 107: 400-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.040

[9]. 9.Ralph M, Stubbs W. Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education 2014; 67(1): 71-90. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9641-9

[10]. 10.Ávila LV, Leal Filho W, Brandli L, Macgregor CJ, Molthan-Hill P, Özuyar PG, Moreira RM. Barriers to innovation and sustainability at universities around the world. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017; 164: 1268-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.025

[11]. 11.Dagiliūtė R, Liobikienė G. University contributions to environmental sustainability: challenges and opportunities from the Lithuanian case. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015; 108: 891-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.015

[12]. 12.Nomura K, Abe O. Higher education for sustainable development in Japan: policy and progress. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2010; 11(2): 120-129.

[13]. 13.Tan H, Chen S, Shi Q, Wang L. Development of green campus in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2014; 64: 646-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.019

[14]. 14.Xiong W, Mok KH. Sustainability Practices of Higher Education Institutions in Hong Kong: A Case Study of a Sustainable Campus Consortium. Sustainability 2020; 12(2):452. doi: 10.3390/su12020452.

[15]. 15.Yuan X, Zuo J, Huisingh D. Green Universities in China-what matters?. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013; 61: 36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.030

[16]. 16.Yoo S, Lee J, Yang J, Kwon J. The Performance and the Challenge of the Student-led Green Campus Movement. KIAEBS 2011; 3: 238-241.

[17]. 17.Puri K, Vel AS, Maoharan N. Environment education in India: challenges and opportunities. The holistic approach to environment 2021; 11(4):122-127. doi: 10.33765/thate.11.4.3

[18]. 18.Kumar JS, Shobana D. A study on green education in India: A pathway to sustainable development. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 2024; 22(3): 1747-1758. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.3.1911

[19]. 19.Chhokar KB. Higher education and curriculum innovation for sustainable development in India. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2010; 11(2): 141-152. doi: 10.1108/14676371011031865

[20]. 20.Boeve-de Pauw J, Van Petegem P. A cross-national perspective on youth environmental attitudes. The Environmentalist 2010; 30(2): 133-144. doi: 10.1007/s10669-009-9253-1

[21]. 21.Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56(3): 443-457. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177

[22]. 22.Xiao C, McCright AM. Gender differences in environmental concern: Revisiting the institutional trust hypothesis in the USA. Environment and Behavior 2013; 47(1): 17-37. doi: 10.1177/0013916513491571

[23]. 23.Alshuwaikhat HM, Abubakar I. An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008; 16(16): 1777-1785. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.002

[24]. 24.Filho WL, Shiel C, Paço AMFd. Integrative approaches to environmental sustainability at universities: an overview of challenges and priorities. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 2015; 12(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1080/1943815X.2014.988273

[25]. 25.Yoo S, Lee J, Yang J, Kwon J. The Performance and the Challenge of the Student-led Green Campus Movement. KIAEBS 2011; 3: 238-241.

[26]. 26.Yoo S, Lee J, Yang J, Kwon J. The Performance and the Challenge of the Student-led Green Campus Movement. KIAEBS 2011; 3: 238-241.

[27]. 27.Wright T. Definitions and frameworks for environmental sustainability in higher education. High Educ Policy 2002; 15: 105-120. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8733(02)00002-8

[28]. 28.Lozano R, Lukman R, Lozano FJ, Huisingh D, Lambrechts W. Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013; 48: 10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006

[29]. 29.Findler F, Schönherr N, Lozano R, Reider D, Martinuzzi A. The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development: A review and conceptualization. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2019; 20(1): 23-38. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-07-2017-0114

[30]. 30.Yun Y, Lee M. A Study on the Comprehensive Planning of Sustainable Green Campus. Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities 2013; 20(5). 19-26.

[31]. 31.Koo J, Cho Y, Lee S, Kim J, Jeong J, Kim Y. Recognition Comparison for Green Campus System in Korean and Japanese Universities. Journal of Korean Society for Environmental Education 2012; 25(2): 180-194.

[32]. 32.Yoo S, Lee J, Yang J, Kwon J. The Performance and the Challenge of the Student-led Green Campus Movement. KIAEBS 2011; 3: 238-241.

[33]. 33.Yoo S, Lee J, Yang J, Kwon J. The Performance and the Challenge of the Student-led Green Campus Movement. KIAEBS 2011; 3: 238-241.

[34]. 34.Kim K. The Effect of University Students’ Environmental Attitude/Knowledge on Environmentally Friendly Behavior for the Establishment of a Sustainable Campus. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 2017; 25(3): 95-118.

[35]. 35.Kim DH, Lee H, Jeon KE, Kim SY. A Case Study on the Green Campus Operating System - Focused on the Green Campus Support Institutions of the United States and Harvard University-. The Journal of Korean Institute of Educational Facilities 2013; 20(4): 11–22. doi: 10.7859/KIEF.2013.20.4.011

[36]. 36.Choi Y, Lee D, Lee S, Kim D. The Current Status of the Green Campus Promotion in Korea: Review on Systematical Assistance and Survey about Universities' implementation. Journal of The Residential Environment Institute of Korea 2018; 16(2): 107-127. doi: 10.22313/reik.2018.16.2.107

[37]. 37.Kim DH, Lee H, Jeon KE, Kim SY. A Case Study on the Green Campus Operating System - Focused on the Green Campus Support Institutions of the United States and Harvard University-. The Journal of Korean Institute of Educational Facilities 2013; 20(4): 11–22. doi: 10.7859/KIEF.2013.20.4.011

[38]. 38.Lee K. A Study on Improvement of Sustainable Campus Design and Planning. Journal of Youth Facility and Environment 2009; 7(1): 61-72.

[39]. 39.Jeong T. Research for strategies of development for sustainable campus in Korea [MA dissertation]. Aju University; 2013.

[40]. 40.Cheon W, Koo JK. Analysis of Green Campus Initiatives Led by Voluntary Participants of University Students. Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment 2017; 17(4): 21-32. doi: 10.12813/kieae.2017.17.4.021

[41]. 41.Oh J, Yeom D. University Green Campus Policy & Evaluation Criteria: Focus on Comparison of Korea, US AASHE, UNEP & ISCN-GULF. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 2018; 16(5): 577-86. Doi: 10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.5.577

[42]. 42.Narayanan V. Water, wood, and wisdom: Ecological perspectives from the hindu traditions. Daedalus 2001; 130(4): 179-206.

[43]. 43.Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). Annual Report 2017–2018. Available online: https://www.education.gov.in/annual-report-2017-2018-mhrd-english (accessed on 7 May 2025).

[44]. 44.Roychowdhury A, Sareen R, Grover S, Singh M. A Green Campus Compendium: Incubation, Experimentation and Demonstration of a Green Future. Centre for Science and Environment; 2020. pp.1-40.

[45]. 45.Roychowdhury A, Sareen R, Grover S, Singh M. A Green Campus Compendium: Incubation, Experimentation and Demonstration of a Green Future. Centre for Science and Environment; 2020. pp. 1-40.

[46]. 46.Turaga RMR, Sugathan A. Environmental Regulations in India. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, Oxford University Press; 2020. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.417

[47]. 47.Roy SK. Green university initiatives and undergraduates' reuse intention for environmental sustainability: The moderating role of environmental values. Environmental Challenges 2023; 13: doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2023.100797

[48]. 48.Tikka PM, Kuitunen MT, Tynys SM. Effects of educational background on students' attitudes, activity levels, and knowledge concerning the environment. The Journal of Environmental Education 2000; 31(3): 12-19. doi: 10.1080/00958960009598640

[49]. 49.Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research 2002, 8(3), 239-260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401

[50]. 50.Hsu SJ. The Effects of an Environmental Education Program on Responsible Environmental Behavior and Associated Environmental Literacy Variables in Taiwanese College Students. The Journal of Environmental Education 2004; 35(2): 37-48. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.35.2.37-48

[51]. 51.Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56(3): 443-457. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177

[52]. 52.Hodgkinson SP, Innes J M. The Attitudinal Influence of Career Orientation in 1st-year University Students: Environmental Attitudes as a Function of Degree Choice. The Journal of Environmental Education 2001; 32(3): 37-40. doi: 10.1080/00958960109599144

[53]. 53.Franzen A, Meyer R. Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000, European Sociological Review 2010; 26(2): 219-234. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp018

[54]. 54.Milfont TL, Duckitt J. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010; 30(1): 80-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001

[55]. 55.Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56(3): 443-457. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177

[56]. 56.Eisler AD, Eisler H, Yoshida M. Perception of human ecology: Cross-cultural and gender comparisons. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003; 23(1): 89-101. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00083-X

[57]. 57.Davidson DJ, Freudenburg WR. Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior 1996; 28(3): 302-339. doi: 10.1177/0013916596283003

[58]. 58.Xiao C, Hong D. Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China. Population & Environment 2010; 32(1): 88-104. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0115-z

[59]. 59.Hunter LM, Hatch A, Johnson A. Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly 2004; 85(3): 677-694. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x

[60]. 60.Tindall DB, Davies S, Mauboules C. Activism and conservation behavior in an environmental movement: The contradictory effects of gender. Society & Natural Resources 2003; 16(10): 909-932. doi: 10.1080/716100620

[61]. 61.Xiao C, Hong D. Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China. Population & Environment 2010; 32(1): 88-104. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0115-z

[62]. 62.Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56(3): 425-442. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00176

[63]. 63.Inglehart R. Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies. PS: Political Science & Politics 1995; 28(1): 57-72. doi:10.2307/420583

[64]. 64.Franzen A, Meyer R. Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000, European Sociological Review 2010; 26(2): 219-234. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp018

[65]. 65.Emanuel R, Adams JN. College students' perceptions of campus sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2011; 12(1): 79-92. doi: 10.1108/14676371111098320

[66]. 66.Levine DS, Strube MJ. Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, Intentions and Behaviors Among College Students. The Journal of Social Psychology 2012; 152(3): 308-326. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.604363

[67]. 67.Milmont TL, Duckitt J, Cameron LD. A Cross-Cultural Study of Environmental Motive Concerns and Their Implications for Proenvironmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior 2006; 38(6): 745-767. doi: 10.1177/0013916505285933

[68]. 68.Zsóka Á, Szerényi ZM, Széchy A, Kocsis T. Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013; 48: 126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030

[69]. 69.Nunnally JC. Assessment of reliability. In: Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill; 1978. pp. 245–246. Available online: https://archive.org/details/dli.scoerat.1556psychometrictheorysecondedition/page/n11/mode/2up

[70]. 70.Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39: 31-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02291575

[71]. 71.Lee B, Lee S, Jho H. Analysis of Primary and Secondary Students' Perceptions and Attitudes toward Climate Change. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education 2022; 2(2): 153-163. doi: 10.22368/ksecce.2022.12.2.153

[72]. 72.Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56(3): 443-457. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177

[73]. 73.Xiao C, Hong D. Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China. Population & Environment 2010; 32(1): 88-104. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0115-z

[74]. 74.Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56(3): 443-457. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177

[75]. 75.Eisler AD, Eisler H, Yoshida M. Perception of human ecology: Cross-cultural and gender comparisons. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003; 23(1): 89-101. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00083-X

[76]. 76.Schultz PW, Zelezny L. Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1999; 19(3): 255-265. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0129

[77]. 77.Chhokar KB, Pandya M, Raghunathan M. Citizen Action. In: Understanding environment, 1st ed. SAGE Publications India; 2004. pp. 279-297. doi: 10.4135/9788132101901

[78]. 78.Narayanan V. Water, wood, and wisdom: Ecological perspectives from the hindu traditions. Daedalus 2001; 130(4): 179-206.

[79]. 79.Gifford R, Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology 2014; 49(3): 141-157. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12034

[80]. 80.Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56(3): 443-457. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177

[81]. 81.Hunter LM, Hatch A, Johnson A. Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly 2004; 85(3): 677-694. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x

[82]. 82.Dietz T, Kalof L, Stern PC. Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly 2002; 83(1): 353-364. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00088

[83]. 83.Vicente-Molina MA, Fernández-Sainz A, Izagirre-Olaizola J. Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 176: 89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079

[84]. 84.Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research 2002, 8(3), 239-260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401

[85]. 85.Gifford R, Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology 2014; 49(3): 141-157. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12034



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com