Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    9096
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8284
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7983
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7634
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    6155

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 5 (2025): Published > Research Articles
ESP-3735

Published

2025-05-18

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 5 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Xue Jin, S.M. Ferdous Azam, Jacquline Tham

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Jin, X., Ferdous Azam, S., & Tham, J. (2025). Affective commitment and sustainable procurement in Chinese HEIs: Unravelling the mediated moderation of intention and knowledge. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(5), ESP-3735. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3735
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Affective commitment and sustainable procurement in Chinese HEIs: Unravelling the mediated moderation of intention and knowledge

Xue Jin

Post Graduate Centre, Management & Science University, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

S.M. Ferdous Azam

Post Graduate Centre, Management & Science University, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

Jacquline Tham

Post Graduate Centre, Management & Science University, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3735


Keywords: sustainable procurement; affective commitment; theory of planned behaviour; asymmetric information; higher education institutions; China


Abstract

Research on sustainable procurement has gained traction, recognizing it as an organizational transformation integrating sustainability criteria into procurement processes. Existing literature highlights the direct positive impact of affective commitment to change on sustainable procurement behaviour but overlooks the mediating role of behavioural intention and moderating effects of information environments. This study addresses this gap by constructing a mediated moderation model based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and information asymmetry theory, investigating how affective commitment influences sustainable purchasing behaviour through sustainable purchasing intention, and how knowledge moderates this pathway under information asymmetry. This study adopts the snowball sampling method to collect data from purchasers in procurement centres of higher education institutions (HEIs) in Jiangsu, China, analysed using PLS-SEM. the results showed that sustainable purchasing intention mediates the relationship, with affective commitment exerting both direct (80%) and indirect (20%) effects on behaviour. Knowledge significantly moderates the intention-behaviour link: higher knowledge weakens the positive impact of intention on behaviour. The study enriches theoretical understanding by verifying the mediating role of intention and knowledge’s moderating mechanism, while providing empirical evidence from Chinese HEIs. Practically, it informs policy design for promoting sustainable procurement and highlights the need to balance value identification and decision-making factors in organizational change.


References

[1]. 1.Zaidi SAH, Mirza FM, Hou F, Ashraf RU. Addressing the sustainable development through sustainable procurement: What factors resist the implementation of sustainable procurement in Pakistan? Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2019;68:100671. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.008

[2]. 2.Jacob Nsiah-Sarfo D, Ofori D, Agyapong D. Sustainable procurement implementation among public sector organisations in Ghana: The role of institutional isomorphism and sustainable leadership. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain. 2023;8:100118. doi:10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100118

[3]. 3.Rodriguez-Plesa E, Dimand AM, Alkadry MG. Community social capital, political values, or organizational capacity? Indicators of engagement in sustainable public procurement at the local level. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;338:130556. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130556

[4]. 4.Grandia J. Finding the missing link: examining the mediating role of sustainable public procurement behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;124:183-190. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.102

[5]. 5.Grandia J, Meehan J. Public procurement as a policy tool: using procurement to reach desired outcomes in society. IJPSM. 2017;30(4):302-309. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-03-2017-0066

[6]. 6.Grandia J, Voncken D. Sustainable Public Procurement: The Impact of Ability, Motivation, and Opportunity on the Implementation of Different Types of Sustainable Public Procurement. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5215. doi:10.3390/su11195215

[7]. 7.Dimand AM. Determinants of local government innovation: the case of green public procurement in the United States. IJPSM. 2022;35(5):584-602. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-10-2021-0239

[8]. 8.Meyer JP, Herscovitch L. Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review. 2001;11(3):299-326. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00053-X

[9]. 9.Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review. 1991;1(1):61-89. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

[10]. 10.Brammer S, Walker H. Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2011;31(4):452-476. doi:10.1108/01443571111119551

[11]. 11.Young S, Nagpal S, Adams CA. Sustainable Procurement in Australian and UK Universities. Public Management Review. 2016;18(7):993-1016. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1051575

[12]. 12.Leal Filho W, Skouloudis A, Brandli LL, Salvia AL, Avila LV, Rayman-Bacchus L. Sustainability and procurement practices in higher education institutions: Barriers and drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;231:1267-1280. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.202

[13]. 13.Mendonça RCA, Pedrosa IV, Camara MAOA. Sustainable public procurement in a Brazilian higher education institution. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(11):17094-17125. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01345-9

[14]. 14.Pacheco-Blanco B, Bastante-Ceca MJ. Green public procurement as an initiative for sustainable consumption. An exploratory study of Spanish public universities. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;133:648-656. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.056

[15]. 15.Ograh T, Ayarkwa J, Acheampong A, Osei-Asibey D. Developing green knowledge toward supplier selection: a green intellectual capital perspective. Journal of Public Procurement. 2023;23(3/4):389-415. doi:10.1108/JOPP-04-2023-0020

[16]. 16.Herscovitch L, Meyer JP. Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87(3):474-487. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474

[17]. 17.Kromah MD, Ayoko OB, Ashkanasy NM. Commitment to organizational change: The role of territoriality and change-related self-efficacy. Journal of Business Research. 2024;174:114499. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114499

[18]. 18.Jing R, Lin Xie J, Ning J. Commitment to organizational change in a Chinese context. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2014;29(8):1098-1114. doi:10.1108/JMP-08-2011-0042

[19]. 19.Straatmann T, Nolte JK, Seggewiss BJ. Psychological processes linking organizational commitment and change-supportive intentions. PR. 2018;47(2):403-424. doi:10.1108/PR-09-2016-0230

[20]. 20.Shadrina EV, Vinogradov DV, Kashin DV. Implicit incentives in green public procurement: Good intentions versus rigid regulations. Ecological Economics. 2022;198:107458. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107458

[21]. 21.Appiah-Kubi E. Management knowledge and sustainability reporting in SMEs: The role of perceived benefit and stakeholder pressure. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;434:140067. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140067

[22]. 22.Leonidou CN, Skarmeas D. Gray Shades of Green: Causes and Consequences of Green Skepticism. J Bus Ethics. 2017;144(2):401-415. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2829-4

[23]. 23.Liu J, Shi B, Xue J, Wang Q. Improving the green public procurement performance of Chinese local governments: From the perspective of officials’ knowledge. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 2019;25(3):100501. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2018.05.002

[24]. 24.Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

[25]. 25.Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The prediction of behaviour from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1970;6(4):466-487. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(70)90057-0

[26]. 26.Yaojing Lai, Wenfeng Lü. Research on Green Food Purchase Behaviour Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Ecological Economy (Academic Edition). 2008;(2):83-86. Accessed November 6, 2023.

[27]. 27.Yang M, Mamun AA, Mohiuddin M, Nawi NC, Zainol NR. Cashless Transactions: A Study on Intention and Adoption of e-Wallets. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):831. doi:10.3390/su13020831

[28]. 28.Jianfang Liang, Jiawei He. Relationship between sustainable consumption cognition and clothing reuse behaviour based on the mediating effect of behavioural intention. Journal of Donghua University (Natural Science Edition. 2020;46(3):463-471+478.

[29]. 29.Chen J. Supply chain contracting with asymmetric cost information and behavioural preferences: Theory and experiment. Published online 2024.

[30]. 30.Lan Y, Cai X, Shang C, Zhang L, Zhao R. Heterogeneous suppliers’ contract design in assembly systems with asymmetric information. European Journal of Operational Research. 2020;286(1):149-163. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.03.004

[31]. 31.Ahmad MM, Hunjra AI, Islam F, Zureigat Q. Does asymmetric information affect firm’s financing decisions? IJOEM. 2023;18(9):2718-2734. doi:10.1108/IJOEM-01-2021-0086

[32]. 32.Smither RD, Houston J, McIntire SA. Organization Development: Strategies for Changing Environments. Second edition. Routledge; 2016.

[33]. 33.Chen KY, Huan TC. Facilitating weaker firms’ market knowledge in asymmetric B2B relationship from structure, process, and strategy aspects – a case of travel industry. JKM. 2020;24(3):697-716. doi:10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0017

[34]. 34.Korbi FB, Chouki M. Knowledge transfer in international asymmetric alliances: the key role of translation, artifacts, and proximity. JKM. 2017;21(5):1272-1291. doi:10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0501

[35]. 35.Sinha R, Annamdevula S. Unveiling the consequences of perceived greenwash among youth: a focus on the moderating role of environmental knowledge.

[36]. 36.Ainsleigh PL, George JD. Signal modeling in reverberant environments with application to underwater electroacoustic transducer calibration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1995;98(1):270-279. doi:10.1121/1.413720

[37]. 37.Robinson SP, Hayman G, Harris PM, Beamiss GA. Signal-modelling methods applied to the free-field calibration of hydrophones and projectors in laboratory test tanks. Meas Sci Technol. 2018;29(8):085001. doi:10.1088/1361-6501/aac752

[38]. 38.Wang W, Wang M, Yang P, He L, Xing G, Wang K. Three-parameter signal modeling for amplitude estimation of direct sound in semi-anechoic environments. Applied Acoustics. 2025;235:110682. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110682

[39]. 39.Niederhoff JA, Kouvelis P. Effective and necessary: Individual supplier behaviour in revenue sharing and wholesale contracts. European Journal of Operational Research. 2019;277(3):1060-1071. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.038

[40]. 40.Jin X, Azam SMF, Tham J. Challenges of sustainable public procurement in Chinese higher education institutions: a Delphi study. JOPP. 2024;24(3):371-392. doi:10.1108/JOPP-05-2024-0051

[41]. 41.Liu J, Ma Y, Appolloni A, Cheng W. How external stakeholders drive the green public procurement practice? An organizational learning perspective. JOPP. 2021;21(2):138-166. doi:10.1108/JOPP-04-2020-0035

[42]. 42.Zhu Q, Geng Y, Sarkis J. Motivating green public procurement in China: An individual level perspective. Journal of Environmental Management. 2013;126:85-95. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.009

[43]. 43.Vu TD, Nguyen HV, Vu PT, Tran THH, Nguyen HN, Ngo TS. Survey data of Gen Z customer behaviour using food delivery applications in Vietnam. Data in Brief. 2023;51:109779. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.109779

[44]. 44.Dolnicar S. 5/7-point “Likert scales” aren’t always the best option: Their validity is undermined by lack of reliability, response style bias, long completion times and limitations to permissible statistical procedures. Annals of Tourism Research. 2021;91:103297. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2021.103297

[45]. 45.Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(5):879-903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

[46]. 46.Armstrong JS, Overton TS. Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research. 1977;14(3):396. doi:10.2307/3150783

[47]. 47.Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 2011;19(2):139-152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

[48]. 48.Shmueli G, Sarstedt M, Hair JF, et al. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. EJM. 2019;53(11):2322-2347. doi:10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189

[49]. 49.Diamantopoulos A, Riefler P, Roth KP. Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research. 2008;61(12):1203-1218. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009

[50]. 50.F. Hair Jr J, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, G. Kuppelwieser V. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review. 2014;26(2):106-121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

[51]. 51.Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. EBR. 2019;31(1):2-24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

[52]. 52.Vaithilingam S, Ong CS, Moisescu OI, Nair MS. Robustness checks in PLS-SEM: A review of recent practices and recommendations for future applications in business research. Journal of Business Research. 2024;173:114465. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114465

[53]. 53.Christmann A, Van Aelst S. Robust estimation of Cronbach’s alpha. Journal of Multivariate Analysis. 2006;97(7):1660-1674. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2005.05.012

[54]. 54.Adamson KA, Prion S. Reliability: Measuring Internal Consistency Using Cronbach’s α. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013;9(5):e179-e180. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2012.12.001

[55]. 55.Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J of the Acad Mark Sci. 2012;40(3):414-433. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6

[56]. 56.Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39. doi:10.2307/3151312

[57]. 57.Usakli A, Rasoolimanesh SM. Which SEM to Use and What to Report? A Comparison of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. In: Okumus F, Rasoolimanesh SM, Jahani S, eds. Cutting Edge Research Methods in Hospitality and Tourism. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2023:5-28. doi:10.1108/978-1-80455-063-220231002

[58]. 58.Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(5):879-903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

[59]. 59.Kim H, Im J, Shin YH. The impact of transformational leadership and commitment to change on restaurant employees’ quality of work life during a crisis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2021;48:322-330. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.07.010

[60]. 60.Monteiro De Castro ML, Reis Neto MT, Ferreira CAA, Gomes JFDS. Values, motivation, commitment, performance and rewards: analysis model. BPMJ. 2016;22(6):1139-1169. doi:10.1108/BPMJ-09-2015-0132

[61]. 61.61. Jaiswal, D., & Kant, R. Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2018;41:60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com