Published
2026-03-05
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nelson U. Julhamid, Masnona S. Asiri*, Mary Ann G. Lim, Krysha C. Samparani, Firash Zhed S. Ututalum, Raugda J. Julhamid, Tanny T. Lim Jr., Adelaida J. Sabtula, Norenna S. Sarahadil, Aine Rizzi A. Abduhadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Personalized Positive Behaviors on the Sustainable Development Goal on Quality Education among Multidisciplinary Instructors in Higher Education
Nelson U. Julhamid
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Masnona S. Asiri
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Mary Ann G. Lim
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Krysha C. Samparani
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Firash Zhed S. Ututalum
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Raugda J. Julhamid
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Tanny T. Lim Jr.
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Adelaida J. Sabtula
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Norenna S. Sarahadil
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
Aine Rizzi A. Abduhadi
Sulu State College, Jolo, Sulu 7400, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i3.3864
Keywords: education equity, student-centered learning, quality education, Sustainable Development Goals
Abstract
The pursuit of quality education has become increasingly prominent due to its recognized role in building individual empowerment, national development, and global sustainability. Global frameworks such as the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (particularly SDG 4) have elevated the urgency of ensuring inclusive, equitable, and high-quality education for all, framing it not merely as a developmental objective but as a human right and catalyst for lifelong learning, innovation, and social cohesion. This qualitative exploration examined the perceptions and positive behavior of higher education teachers in achieving quality education. Teachers (n=17) were purposively sampled to be interviewed about their perceptions and personal efforts in promoting quality education. Narrative data revealed that higher education teachers perceived quality education as deeply rooted in student-centered learning, professional integrity, and ethical responsibility. Teachers emphasized that learners should be active participants in the learning process and that instructional strategies must be responsive to students’ diverse needs, learning styles, and feedback. Teachers also associated quality education with professionalism and moral responsibility, viewing their roles beyond academic instruction to include character-building and social awareness. Their teaching practices reflected a high degree of self-reflection, accountability, and dedication to continuous improvement. Through responsive pedagogy, ethical consistency, and reflective teaching, they actively shaped inclusive and empowering learning environments aligned with the broader goals of equity and lifelong learning. This suggests the need for policy reforms and professional development programs that prioritize ethical conduct, student-centered approaches, and reflective practice as foundational pillars of quality education.
References
[1]. 1. Edwards Jr, D. B., Asadullah, M. N., & Webb, A. (2024). Critical perspectives at the mid-point of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality education for all—progress, persistent gaps, problematic paradigms, and the path to 2030. International Journal of Educational Development, 107, 103031.
[2]. 2. UNESCO. (2023a). Global education monitoring report 2023—Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.
[3]. 3. UNESCO. (2023b). Why early childhood care and education matters. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/why-early-childhood-care-and-education-matters
[4]. 4. Ahmed, S. K., Jeffries, D., Chakraborty, A., Carslake, T., Lietz, P., Rahayu, B., ... & Sundarsagar, K. (2022). Teacher professional development for disability inclusion in low‐and middle‐income Asia‐Pacific countries: An evidence and gap map. Campbell systematic reviews, 18(4), e1287.
[5]. 5. Gunawan, W. B. (2025). Revisiting the Sustainable Development Goal 4 “Quality Education”: Insights, Prospects, and Recommendations. SAKAGURU: Journal of Pedagogy and Creative Teacher, 2(1), 12-36.
[6]. 6. Reinders, S., Dekker, M., & Falisse, J. B. (2021). Inequalities in higher education in low‐and middle‐income countries: A scoping review of the literature. Development Policy Review, 39(5), 865-889.
[7]. 7. Shava, G. N., Nkengebeza, D., Phuthi, N., Mpuang, K. D., & Alava, J. (2021). Achieving sustainable development goal (SDG) 4 on quality in education challenges and opportunities, experiences from southern African(SADC) universities. International Journal of Research & Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 5(07), 559-573.
[8]. 8. Zayakova-Krushkova, R., & Mitov, A. (2025). INVENTING THE FUTURE: CAN BULGARIAN UNIVERSITIES FULFILL THEIR MISSION AS CATALYSTS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SUSTAINABILITY?. Strategies for Policy in Science & Education/Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika, 33.
[9]. 9. Ashida, A. (2022). The role of higher education in achieving the sustainable development goals. In Sustainable development disciplines for humanity: Breaking down the 5Ps—people, planet, prosperity, peace, and partnerships (pp. 71-84). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[10]. 10. Karatsiori, M. (2023). In the pursuit of “Quality Education”: From ancient times to the digital era, can there be a consensus?. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2286817.
[11]. 11. Carvalho, L., Almeida, D., Loures, A., Ferreira, P., & Rebola, F. (2024). Quality education for all: A fuzzy set analysis of sustainable development goal compliance. Sustainability, 16(12), 5218.
[12]. 12. Macatangay, L. (2023). The Status, Challenges & Opportunities of Education Service Industry in the Philippines. Challenges & Opportunities of Education Service Industry in the Philippines (April 15, 2023).
[13]. 13. Kurniawan, J. E., Rahmawati, K. D., & Tanuwijaya, E. (2025). School teacher's innovative work behaviour model. International Journal of Management in Education, 19(7), 1-36.
[14]. 14. Wang, L., & Dai, J. (2024). Screening English teachers’ professional identity, autonomy, and creativity and their relations with their success. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101535.
[15]. 15. Smeplass, E. (2025). Nurturing inclusivity and professional growth among vocational teachers through communities of practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(3), 785-804.
[16]. 16. Runde, D. F., Bandura, R., & McLean, M. (2023). Investing in quality education for economic development, peace, and stability. Center for Strategic & International Studies. https://www. csis. org/publications/investing-quality-education-economic-developmentpeace-and-stability.
[17]. 17. Ullah, A., & Usman, M. (2023). Role of libraries in ensuring quality education at higher education institutions: a perspective of Pakistan. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), 13-22.
[18]. 18. United Nations. (2022, May 18). The 17 goals | Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
[19]. 19. Ladines, T. G. (2023). Addressing Educational Disparities in the Philippines: An Examination of the Impact of Alternative Delivery Modes (ADMs) on Achieving Inclusive and Quality Education. WIMAYA, 4(02), 104-115.
[20]. 20. André, S., Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Telli, S., Chun, S., Fernandez-Garcia, C. M., ... & Jeon, M. (2020). Student perceptions in measuring teaching behavior across six countries: A multi-group confirmatory factor analysis approach to measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 273.
[21]. 21. Hidayat, N., Andriani, F., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2024). Exploring Challenges and Strategies for Improving the Quality of Education: Integrative Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(1), 128-141.
[22]. 22. Macatangay, L. (2023). The Status, Challenges & Opportunities of Education Service Industry in the Philippines. Challenges & Opportunities of Education Service Industry in the Philippines (April 15, 2023).
[23]. 23. UNESCO. (2005). Education for all: The quality imperative. EFA global monitoring report 2005. https://www.right-to-education.org/sites/right-to-education.org/files/resource-attachments/EFA_GMR_Quality_Imperative_2005_en.pdf
[24]. 24. Zickafoose, A., Ilesanmi, O., Diaz-Manrique, M., Adeyemi, A. E., Walumbe, B., Strong, R., ... & Dooley, K. (2024). Barriers and challenges affecting quality education (Sustainable Development Goal# 4) in sub-Saharan Africa by 2030. Sustainability, 16(7), 2657.
[25]. 25. Baclig, C. E. (2023, January 3). PH halfway through in achieving SDGs as 2030 deadline looms. INQUIRER.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1712047/ph-halfway-through-in-achieving-sdgs-as-2030-deadline-looms
[26]. 26. Kurniawan, J. E., Rahmawati, K. D., & Tanuwijaya, E. (2025). School teacher's innovative work behaviour model. International Journal of Management in Education, 19(7), 1-36.
[27]. 27. Huang, M., Zhang, M., & Greenier, V. (2024). Modeling the contribution of self‐efficacy, collective efficacy, and autonomy to professional creativity of Chinese EFL teachers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.
[28]. 28. Yasin, I. R., Razak, A. Z. A., & Abdullah, Z. (2024). A recent systematic review of tailoring teacher autonomy through personality insights. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(10), 2024238-2024238.
[29]. 29. Gkontelos, A., Vaiopoulou, J., & Stamovlasis, D. (2023). Teachers’ innovative work behavior as a function of self-efficacy, burnout, and irrational beliefs: a structural equation model. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(2), 403-418.
[30]. 30. Johari, A., Abdul Wahat, N. W., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2021). Innovative work behavior among teachers in Malaysia: The effects of teamwork, principal support, and humor. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 7(2), 72-84.
[31]. 31. Phuong, N. D., Quynh, P. H., & Hien, H. T. T. (2021). Supportive work environment and teacher’s innovative work behaviour: The mediating role of informal learning in Vietnam. Review of Economics and Finance, 19, 97-106.
[32]. 32. Dara, V. L., & Kesavan, C. (2025). Analyzing the concept of participatory learning: strategies, trends and future directions in education. Kybernetes, 54(7), 3882-3915.
[33]. 33. Smeplass, E. (2025). Nurturing inclusivity and professional growth among vocational teachers through communities of practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(3), 785-804.
[34]. 34. Whitehead, J., & Huxtable, M. (2024). Living Educational Theory Research as an epistemology for practice: the role of values in practitioners’ professional development. Taylor & Francis.
[35]. 35. İdil, Ş., Gülen, S., & Dönmez, İ. (2024). What should we understand from PISA 2022 results?. Journal of STEAM Education, 7(1), 1-9.
[36]. 36. Prabawa, A. F. I., Indreswari, H., Setiyowati, A. J., & Mahalle, S. (2024). How Can We Enhance PISA Ranking Through Effective Learning Methods? Systematic Literature Review From 2019 to 2024. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 14(2), 1421-1442.
[37]. 37. Alhussam, M. A., Samanta, S., Ray, A. K., Kar, B., & Dibiat, N. (2024). Evaluating education quality as a research instrument: A systematic review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(6), 2024115-2024115.
[38]. 38. Crawford, R. (2025). Responding to the De-Professionalisation of Teaching: Empowering Teachers to Enhance Their Pedagogy Through Action Research. Education Sciences, 15(3), 274.
[39]. 39. Abdurasul, R. T., Pearly Jade E. Samilo, Neña Vanessa A. Cabiles, Jason V. Chavez, & Sar-Ana M. Abdurasul. (2025). Preservation Habits towards Sustainable Use of the Filipino Language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(5), 358–372.
[40]. 40. Carpio, L. B., Covarrubias, S., Nolledo, S., & Samson, M. A. A. (2025). Restricted and hands-on clinical experience on patient care: Effects on the confidence and integrity of care among nursing students. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(4), 1-15.
[41]. 41. Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1541-1541.
[42]. 42. Comeros, N. A., Cuilan, J. T., & Chavez, J. V. (2024). Parental Discretionary Influence on Their Children’s Manner of Learning English Language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(4), 284-299.
[43]. 43. Benbrahim, F. Z., Frichi, Y., Benabdelhadi, A., & Jawab, F. (2024). The qualitative exploratory study: A necessary prerequisite to the quantitative study. In Data collection and analysis in scientific qualitative research (pp. 57-86). IGI Global.
[44]. 44. Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.
[45]. 45. Chavez, J. V., & Vicente, M. B. (2025). Halal compliance behaviors of food and accommodation businesses in the Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(5), 2025259-2025259.
[46]. 46. Entong, M. B. M., Garil, B. A., Muarip, V. C., & Chavez, J. V. (2024). Language delivery styles in academic trainings: Analysis of speaker’s emotional connection to audience for lasting learning. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 326–342.
[47]. 47. Bouncken, R. B., Qiu, Y., Sinkovics, N., & Kürsten, W. (2021). Qualitative research: extending the range with flexible pattern matching. Review of Managerial Science, 15(2), 251-273.
[48]. 48. Chavez, J. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).
[49]. 49. Hunter, D., McCallum, J., & Howes, D. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1).
[50]. 50. Hunter, D., McCallum, J., & Howes, D. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1).
[51]. 51. Mwita, K. (2022). Factors influencing data saturation in qualitative studies. Available at SSRN 4889752.
[52]. 52. Chavez, J. V. (2021). Bilingual parents’ dispositions: Precursor to developing the English language teaching curriculum. Psychology and Education, 58(5), 161-166.
[53]. 53. Tajik, O., Golzar, J., & Noor, S. (2024). Purposive sampling. International Journal of Education and Learning Studies, 2(2).
[54]. 54. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.
[55]. 55. Banda, S., Mpolomoka, D. L., Mbono, D., & Sampa, R. L. (2017). Use of questions in qualitative research: How questions guided our study. International Journal of Development Research, 7(12), 17895-17898.
[56]. 56. Robinson, O. C. (2023). Probing in qualitative research interviews: Theory and practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 20(3), 382-397.
[57]. 57. Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of life research, 18, 1263-1278.
[58]. 58. Majid, M. A. A., Othman, M., Mohamad, S. F., Lim, S. A. H., & Yusof, A. (2017). Piloting for interviews in qualitative research: Operationalization and lessons learnt. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4), 1073-1080.
[59]. 59. Freire, D., de Araújo Wanderley, C., Fontes, A. L., & Lagioia, U. (2025). Research Protocol in Studies With Semi-Structured Interviews. In Evolving Designs, Applications, Technological Advances, and the Future of Qualitative Research (pp. 181-194). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
[60]. 60. Belina, A. (2023). Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society. Voluntary Sector Review, 14(2), 331-347.
[61]. 61. Olorunfemi, O., Oyegoke, E. O., Abiodun, O. O., Kunle-Abioye, F. B., & Ayeni, B. A. (2024). Achieving a balance between ethical and legal obligations with regard to confidentiality and patient privacy. Amrita Journal of Medicine, 20(3), 90-93.
[62]. 62. Sánchez, G. S., Bezhold, G. A., & Farnós, I. A. (2023). Research ethics: From principles to practical aspects. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), 99(3), 195-202.
[63]. 63. Welch, C., & Piekkari, R. (2006). Crossing language boundaries: Qualitative interviewing in international business. Management International Review, 46, 417-437.
[64]. 64. Nathan, S., Newman, C., & Lancaster, K. (2018). Qualitative interviewing. In Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 1-20). Springer, Singapore.
[65]. 65. Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 10(6), 807-815.
[66]. 66. Majumdar, A. (2019). Thematic analysis in qualitative research. In Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis (pp. 197-220). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
[67]. 67. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
[68]. 68. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com) ing a knowing researcher. International journal of transgender health, 24(1), 1-6.
[69]. 69. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3), 328-352.
[70]. 70. Uleanya, C., & Yassim, K. (2025). Quality education versus sustainable development and sustainability in South Africa: scholarly perceptions. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 49(5), 568-584.
[71]. 71. Cariaga, Rujonel. (2023). The Philippine Education Today and Its Way Forward (Journal of Ongoing Educational Research). 1. 40-42. 10.5281/zenodo.8418880.
[72]. 72. Dulay, S. (2023). What makes an effective teacher? Unveiling teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 5(3), 112-130.
[73]. 73. Shoaib, A. (2023). Student perceptions of teacher immediacy, credibility, and love of pedagogy in enhancing learner engagement and motivation in higher EFL education. Journal of Language Teaching, 3(10), 1-13.
[74]. 74. Tang, K. H. D. (2025). A Narrative Review of How Students Perceive a Good Teacher. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(2), 66-85.
[75]. 75. Cizreli, S., Kırtay, R., Boynukara, Z., Çelik, S., Yılmaz, N., Tiryaki, E., Günay, E., & Durum, M. O. (2023). Perceptions of teachers relating to the extent they have effective teacher behavior. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research, 10(93), 694-708.
[76]. 76. İlter, İ. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about the “Good Teachers”. Baskent University Journal of Education, 9(1), 1-13.
[77]. 77. Radičuks, R., Bula-Biteniece, I., Gulbe, A., & Paškevica, B. (2025). Constructivism in European school education: A qualitative systematic review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(6), 2025186-2025186.
[78]. 78. Al Abri, M. H., Al Aamri, A. Y., & Elhaj, A. M. A. (2024). Enhancing student learning experiences through integrated constructivist pedagogical models. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(1), 130-149.
[79]. 79. Fatima, I. (2023). Role of Teachers to impart quality education for equitable learning. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(3), 462-471.
[80]. 80. De Bortoli, L., Underwood, C., & Thomson, S. (2023). PISA 2022. Reporting Australia’s results. Volume I: Student performance and equity in education.
[81]. 81. Adeniyi, I. S., Al Hamad, N. M., Adewusi, O. E., Unachukwu, C. C., Osawaru, B., Onyebuchi, C. N., & David, I. O. (2024). Educational reforms and their impact on student performance: A review in African Countries. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 750-762.
[82]. 82. Taylor, D. L., Yeung, M., & Bashet, A. Z. (2021). Personalized and adaptive learning. Innovative learning environments in STEM higher education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward, 17-34.
[83]. 83. Forster, D., & Maxwell, B. (2023). Using codes of professional ethics and conduct in teacher education: Pitfalls and best practice. In Ethics and integrity in teacher education (pp. 25-42). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[84]. 84. Shortt, D., Hallett, F., Spendlove, D., Hardy, G., & Barton, A. (2012). Teaching, morality, and responsibility: A Structuralist analysis of a teachers’ code of conduct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 124-131.
[85]. 85. da Silva, T. M. H. R. (2025). Teaching With Adaptability. Holistic Approaches to Teacher Development: Leadership, Pedagogical Practices, and Cognitive Insights: Leadership, Pedagogical Practices, and Cognitive Insights, 205.
[86]. 86. Sauda, Nanyonjo & University VI, Kampala International. (2025). The Role of Standardized Testing in Public Education. 6. 102-109.






