Published
2026-01-14
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meichan Zhang*, Chuanjia Wu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Kinship, Territory, and Spirit: A Socio-Psychological Analysis of Resilience and Community Formation in Laurence Yep's Dragonwings
Meichan Zhang
School of Humanities and Social Science, Nanjing University of Science and Technology Zijin College, 210023 Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Chuanjia Wu
School of Humanities and Social Science, Nanjing University of Science and Technology Zijin College, 210023 Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4155
Keywords: Chinese immigration; ferdinand tönnies; social identity; acculturation; community psychology; dragonwings; immigrant resilience; interdisciplinary analysis.
Abstract
Findings from this study highlight the importance of immigrants' social networks as a psychological tool in the struggle against systematic marginalization. The plot revolves around Laurence Yep, the study will investigate the ways in which spiritual devotion, territorial enclaves, and familial ties helped early Chinese immigrants to the United States maintain their cultural identity, culture, and sense of community. This study draws on a variety of academic frameworks, including Social Identity Theory, Community Psychology, Berry's acculturation theory, and Ferdinand Tönnies' concept of community, to look into the social and psychological factors that allowed immigrants to endure and transition. Researchers found that those who have strong kinship ties and a strong sense of in-group solidarity are better able to cope with the psychological stresses of acculturation. Cultural customs could be preserved while assimilation into the host community is fostered in Chinatowns and other territorial groupings, providing a cognitive-emotional home for individuals. Take the rising spiritual communities as an example of how poverty may inspire cross-cultural solidarity and charity via shared goals and interethnic collaboration. The common perception holds that the 1906 San Francisco earthquake shows how prejudice can be turned into opportunities for people from different backgrounds to work together and build stronger communities through the face of hardship. Using methods from sociology and psychology, this interdisciplinary study posits that immigrant communities arose as a structural reaction to exclusion and a dynamic process of psychosocial maintenance. These examples demonstrate how grassroots groups can strengthen diverse cultures by promoting and preserving their distinctive customs.
References
[1]. 1.Qi Y, Liu H, Ruan J. Chinese Literature in American High School World Literature Textbooks. Journal of Beijing Normal University 2011; (04): 54–60.
[2]. 2.Yep L. Dragonwings. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1975.
[3]. 3.Cai M. A Balanced View of Acculturation: Comments on Laurence Yep’s Three Novels. Children’s Literature in Education 1992; 23: 107–118.
[4]. 4.Miller JH. Communities in Fiction. See Translator’s Preface. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2024.
[5]. 5.Coe A. Chop suey: A cultural history of Chinese food in the United States. Oxford University Press; 2009 Jul 16.
[6]. 6.Chu L. Eat a Bowl of Tea. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1979.
[7]. 7.Coolidge M. Chinese Immigration. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1909.
[8]. 8.Kwong P, Miscevic D. Chinese America. New York: The New Press, 2005.
[9]. 9.Li Z, Wang X. On the Word Formation and Theoretical Construction of the Concept of Community. Journal of Yunnan University 2019; (02): 33–34.
[10]. 10.Rosenzweig F. Hegel and the State. Taylor & Francis; 2023 Nov 30.
[11]. 11.Yin Q. Community: A Keyword in Critical Theory. Foreign Literature 2016; (02): 70–79.
[12]. 12.Pu R. Ethnic Experience and Cultural Imaginaries: A Study of Recurring Motifs in Chinese American Fiction. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2006.
[13]. 13.Bauman Z. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Translated by Ouyang Jingen. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House, 2003.
[14]. 14.Rui Y, Chen X. Studies in Contemporary American Young Adult Literature. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2017.
[15]. 15.Tan F. The Construction of Cultural Identity in Chinese American’s Childhood Narration about Chinatown. Journal of Nanjing Normal University 2023; (01).
[16]. 16.Tönnies F. Community and Civil Society. Ed. Jose Harris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[17]. 17.Brink M, Pritsch S. Gemeinschaft in Der Literatur: Zur Aktualitӓt poetisch-politischer Interventionen. Translated by Xie Jianwen, Zhangxiao, et al. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2022.
[18]. 18.Yep L. Dragons I Have Known and Loved. Journal of The Fantastic in the Arts 2010; 21(3): 389.
[19]. 19.Yu M. A Study on Cultural Narrative of Contemporary Chinese-American Children’s Literature. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2023
[20]. 20.Chen J. From “Returning to One’s Roots” to “Taking Root in the Soil”: A Social History of Chinese Americans. Taiwan: Daoxiang Publishing House, 2003.
[21]. 21.Mei J. Socioeconomic Origins of Emigration: Guangdong to California, 1850–1882. Modern China 1979; 5.
[22]. 22.Hui Z. An Overview of Studies in Dragonwings. Frontiers in Educational Research. 2020 Sep 5;3(10):49-53. DOI: 10.25236/FER.2020.031011
[23]. 23.Pu R. Community Imaginaries in Chinese American Literature. Social Sciences in Guangdong 2023; (01): 189.
[24]. 24.Brown R, Hewstone M. An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in experimental social psychology. 2005 Jan 1;37(37):255-343.






