Environment and Social Psychology

Environmental Attitudes Outweigh Personality in Predicting Pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Investigation of the Dark and Light Triads

Chloe Rutjens

School of Psychology, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150

Brianne Hastie

School of Psychology, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150

Andrea R. Steele

School of Psychology, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4177

Keywords: Pro-environmental behaviour; environmental attitudes; Dark Triad; Light Triad; personality

---

Abstract

Identifying predictors of pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) is critical for designing effective interventions to reduce environmentally harmful activities. This study examined whether personality traits, specifically the Dark Triad (Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy) and Light Triad (Kantianism, humanism, faith in humanity), and environmental attitudes, predicted PEB. Australian participants (N = 383) completed an online survey assessing these personality traits, environmental attitudes, and two measures of PEB: dietary behaviour (meat consumption) and willingness to donate to an environmental charity. Analyses using hierarchical regressions and MANOVAs indicated that only narcissism and psychopathy modestly reduced donation likelihood and Kantianism modestly increased it; however, there was limited evidence of mediation by environmental attitudes between personality traits and PEB. In contrast, stronger environmental activism and lower human dominance attitudes robustly predicted both lower meat consumption and greater donation likelihood. These findings suggest that although personality shapes environmental attitudes, the attitudes themselves play a more direct role in driving PEB. Overall, the results support attitude-behaviour models and highlight attitudinal change as a pathway for designing effective sustainability interventions.  

---

References

[1]. 1.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ (accessed May 2025)

[2]. 2.Koneswaran, G., & Nierenberg, D. Global farm animal production and global warming: impacting and mitigating climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives (2008), 116(5), 578-582. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11034

[3]. 3.Steg, L., & Vlek, C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2009), 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

[4]. 4.Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology (2014), 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034

[5]. 5.Stern, P. C. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues (2000), 56(3), 407-424. http://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

[6]. 6.Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics (2016), 134(2), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2425-z

[7]. 7.Horgan, GW., Perrin, A., Whybrow, S., & Macdiarmid, JI. Achieving dietary recommendations and reducing greenhouse gas emissions: Modelling diets to minimize the change from current intakes. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2019), 16(1), 1–11. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-016-0370-1

[8]. 8.Topf, S., & Speekenbrink, M. Evidence of 'green' behaviours: Exploring behavioural traces of pro-and anti-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2021), 84(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101886

[9]. 9.Martin, M., & Brandão, M. Evaluating the environmental consequences of Swedish food consumption and dietary choices. Sustainability (2017), 9(12), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122227

[10]. 10.Thomas, EF., Bury, SM., Louis, WR., Amiot, CE., Molenberghs, P., Crane, MF., & Decety, J. Vegetarian, vegan, activist, radical: Using latent profile analysis to examine different forms of support for animal welfare. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (2019), 22(6), 836-857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218824407

[11]. 11.Hoek, AC., Luning, PA., Stafleu, A., & De Graaf, C. Food-related lifestyle and health attitudes of Dutch vegetarians, non-vegetarian consumers of meat substitutes, and meat consumers. Appetite (2004), 42(3), 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2003.12.003

[12]. 12.Lund, TB., McKeegan, DE., Cribbin, C., & Sandøe, P. Animal ethics profiling of vegetarians, vegans and meat-eaters. Anthrozoös (2016), 29(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2015.1083192

[13]. 13.Kaiser, FG. A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences (2006), 41(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.028

[14]. 14.North, M., Kothe, E., Klas, A., & Ling, M. How to define “vegan”: An exploratory study of definition preferences among omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans. Food Quality and Preference (2021), 93, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104246

[15]. 15.Sabate, J. Religion, diet and research. British Journal of Nutrition (2004), 92(2), 199-201. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20041229

[16]. 16.Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2007), 27(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002

[17]. 17.Bamberg, S. How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2003), 23(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6

[18]. 18.Milfont, TL., & Duckitt, J. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2010), 30(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001

[19]. 19.Bissing‐Olson, MJ., Iyer, A., Fielding, KS., & Zacher, H. Relationships between daily affect and pro‐environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro‐environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior (2013), 34(2), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1788

[20]. 20.Choi, AS., & Fielding, KS. Environmental attitudes as WTP predictors: A case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics (2013), 89, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.027

[21]. 21.Liu, P., Teng, M., & Han, C. How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors?: The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions. Science of the Total Environment (2020), 728, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138126

[22]. 22.Miller, LB., Rice, RE., Gustafson, A., & Goldberg, M. H. Relationships among environmental attitudes, environmental efficacy, and pro-environmental behaviors across and within 11 countries. Environment and Behavior (2022), 54(7-8), 1063-1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165221131002

[23]. 23.Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (1991), 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

[24]. 24.Fielding, KS., McDonald, R., & Louis, WR. Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2008), 28(4), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003

[25]. 25.Hayley, A., Zinkiewicz, L., & Hardiman, K. Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diets in Australians. Appetite (2015), 84, 98-106. http://10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.002

[26]. 26.Carrico, AR., Raimi, KT., Truelove, HB., & Eby, B. Putting your money where your mouth is: an experimental test of pro-environmental spillover from reducing meat consumption to monetary donations. Environment and Behavior (2018). 50(7), 723-748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517713067

[27]. 27.Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research (2002), 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

[28]. 28.Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer "attitude–behavioral intention" gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (2006), 19(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3

[29]. 29.Hartmann, C., & Siegrist, M. Our daily meat: Justification, moral evaluation and willingness to substitute. Food Quality and Preference (2020), 80, Article 103799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103799

[30]. 30.Kahneman, D. Thinking, ast and Slow. (2011), Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[31]. 31.Milfont, TL. The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. Environmentalist (2009), 29, 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9192-2

[32]. 32.McCrae, RR., & Costa, PT. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist (1997), 52(5), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509

[33]. 33.Paulhus, DL., & Williams, KM. The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality (2002), 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

[34]. 34.Furnham, A., Richards, SC., & Paulhus, DL. The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass (2013), 7(3), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018

[35]. 35.Kaufman, SB., Yaden, DB., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. The light vs. dark triad of personality: Contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Frontiers in Psychology (2019), 10, Article 438704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467

[36]. 36.Moshagen, M., Hilbig, BE., & Zettler, I. The dark core of personality. Psychological Review (2018), 125(5), 656-688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111

[37]. 37.Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science (2017), 12(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070

[38]. 38.Dahling, JJ., Whitaker, BG., & Levy, PE. The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management (2009), 35(2), 219-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618

[39]. 39.Campbell, WK., & Foster, JD. The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer (Eds.), The Self. Psychology Press (2007). pp. 115–138.

[40]. 40.Mertens, A., von Krause, M., Meyerhöfer, S., Aziz, C., Baumann, F., Denk, A., Heitz, T., & Maute, J. Valuing humans over animals–gender differences in meat-eating behavior and the role of the Dark Triad. Appetite (2020), 146, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104516

[41]. 41.Jonason, PK., Strosser, GL., Kroll, CH., Duineveld, JJ., Baruffi, SA. Valuing myself over others: The dark triad traits and model and social values. Personality and Individual Differences (2015)., 81, 102-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.045

[42]. 42.Sevi, B., & Dogruyol, B. Looking from the bright side: The Light Triad predicts Tinder use for love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (2020), 37(7), 2136-2144. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075209189

[43]. 43.Bowen, KT., Musarra, G., Ou, Y-C. How and when Narcissism and faith in humanity drive sustainable consumption. Psychology and Marketing (2022), 39(1), 1706–1724. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21694

[44]. 44.Kesenheimer, JS., & Greitemeyer, T. Going green is exhausting for dark personalities but beneficial for the light ones: An experience sampling study that examines the subjectivity of pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology (2022), 13, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883704

[45]. 45.Curtis, GJ. It Kant be all bad: Contributions of Light and Dark Triad traits to academic misconduct. Personality and Individual Differences (2023), 212, Article 112262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112262

[46]. 46.Mejía-Suazo, CJ., Landa-Blanco, M., Mejía-Suazo, GA., & Martínez-Martínez, CA. Dark and Light triad: relationship between personality traits and addiction to mobile phones, video games and internet. PsyArXiv Preprints (2021). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dp659

[47]. 47.Giancola, M., Palmiero, M., & D’Amico, S. La asociación entre la Tríada Oscura y las conductas proambientales: el papel moderador de la inteligencia emocional rasgo [The association between Dark Triad and pro-environmental behaviours: the moderating role of trait emotional intelligence]. PsyEcology (2023), 14(3), 338-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2023.2234154

[48]. 48.Mertens, A., von Krause, M., Denk, A., & Heitz, T. Gender differences in eating behavior and environmental attitudes - The mediating role of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences (2021), 168, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110359

[49]. 49.Uçar, GK., Malayyali, MK., Planali, GO., & Kanik, B. Personality and pro-environmental engagements: the role of the Dark Triad, the Light Triad, and value orientations. Personality and Individual Differences (2023), 203, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.112036

[50]. 50.Sariyska, R., Markett, S., Lachmann, B., & Montag, C. What does our personality say about our dietary choices? Insights on the association between dietary habits, primary emotional systems and the dark triad of personality. Frontiers in Psychology (2019), 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02591

[51]. 51.Huang, N., Zuo, S., Wang, F., Cai, P., & Wang, F. Environmental attitudes in China: The roles of the Dark Triad, future orientation and place attachment. International Journal of Psychology (2019), 54(5), 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12518

[52]. 52.Pitiruţ, B., Ogunbode, C., & Enea, V. Attitudes towards global warming: The role of anticipated guilt and the Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences (2022), 185, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111285

[53]. 53.Gunschera, LJ., Brazil, IA., & Driessen, JMA. Social economic decision making and psychopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2022), 143, Article 104966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104966

[54]. 54.Dirtu, MC., & Prundeanu, O. Narcissism and pro-environmental behaviors: The mediating role of self-monitoring, environmental control and attitudes. Sustainability (2023), 15(2), 1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021571

[55]. 55.Kesenheimer, JS., & Greitemeyer, T. Greenwash yourself: The relationship between communal and agentic narcissism and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2021), 75, 101621.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101621

[56]. 56.Naderi, I., & Strutton, D. I support sustainability but only when doing so reflects fabulously on me: Can green narcissists be cultivated? Journal of Macromarketing (2015), 35(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713516796

[57]. 57.Kesenheimer, JS., & Greitemeyer, T. Going green (and not being just more pro-social): do attitude and personality specifically influence pro-environmental behavior? Sustainability (2021), 13(6), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063560

[58]. 58.Amiot, CE., & Bastian, B. Toward a psychology of human–animal relations. Psychological Bulletin (2015), 141(1), 6-47. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038147

[59]. 59.Herzog, HA. Gender differences in human–animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoös (2007), 20(1), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216687

[60]. 60.Ruby, MB., & Heine, SJ. Meat, morals, and masculinity. Appetite (2011), 56, 447–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.018

[61]. 61.Rothgerber, H. Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity (2013), 14(4), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030379

[62]. 62.Jones, DN., & Paulhus, DL. Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment (2014), 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105

[63]. 63.Kormos, C., & Gifford, R. The validity of self-report measures of pro-environmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology (2014), 40, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003

[64]. 64.Sutton, SG., & Gyuris, E. Optimizing the environmental attitudes inventory: Establishing a baseline of change in students’ attitudes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (2015), 16(1), 16-33. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0027

[65]. 65.Statista. Share of People who are Vegan or Vegetarian Australia in 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1267834/australia-vegan-or-vegetarian-population-share/#:~:text=Share%20of%20people%20who%20are%20vegan%20or,that%20restricted%20their%20intake%20of%20animal%20products (accessed May 2025).

[66]. 66.Kaufman, SB., Yaden, DB., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. Light Triad Scale (LTS). APA PsycTests (2019). https://doi.org/10.1037/t77215-000

[67]. 67.Kim, E J., Tanford, S., & Book, LA. The effect of priming and customer reviews on sustainable travel behaviors. Journal of Travel Research (2021), 60(1), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519894069

[68]. 68.Dunlap, RE., Van Liere, KD., Mertig, AG., & Jones, RE. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues (2000), 56(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176

[69]. 69.Johnson, BT., Martinez-Berman, L., & Curley, CM. Formation of attitudes: How people (wittingly or unwittingly) develop their viewpoints. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.812