Published
2025-12-12
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zijun Wang*

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Sports, Gender, and Social Equity: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Participation Patterns Through the Lenses of Humanities and Social Psychology
Zijun Wang
School of Physical Education and Health Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4186
Keywords: Sports participation; Gender equity; Social psychology; Humanities; Mixed-methods; Structural barriers; Cultural narratives
Abstract
Sports participation is often celebrated as a pathway to empowerment, yet disparities persist along gender, socioeconomic, and cultural lines. This study aimed to investigate the multi-level mechanisms that create and sustain inequities in sports participation through an interdisciplinary framework combining humanities, social psychology, and equity studies. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. In the quantitative phase, data were collected from a stratified sample of 1,500 participants and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM), multilevel modeling (MLM), latent class analysis (LCA), and moderated-mediation tests. The qualitative phase included 30–40 semi-structured interviews and focus groups, analyzed thematically to capture lived experiences and cultural narratives. The results revealed significant disparities: males reported higher weekly participation (6.1 hours) than females (3.2 hours) and non-binary individuals (2.8 hours). High socioeconomic status predicted substantially greater engagement (81.6% vs. 54.1% for low SES). SEM showed that these structural inequalities operated through self-efficacy, stereotype threat, and perceived barriers, while MLM confirmed that institutional factors accounted for 26.6% of variance in participation. Qualitative findings highlighted gendered expectations, resource inequities, and cultural stereotypes as pervasive barriers. The study concludes that sports inequities emerge through the interplay of structural, psychological, and cultural mechanisms. Applications include designing equity-driven policies, inclusive coaching practices, and targeted media interventions to foster fairer and more inclusive sporting environments.
References
[1]. 1.R. Spaaij, K. Farquharson, and T. Marjoribanks, “Sport and social inequalities,” Sociology Compass, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 400–411, 2015, doi: 10.1111/soc4.12254 vuir.vu.edu.au.
[2]. 2.T. Kose, Y. Öztürk, and K. Özcan, “Gender differences in sports participation: A multi-level analysis,” Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic & Administrative Studies, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 151–176, 2021, doi: 10.21773/boun.35.2.3aura.abdn.ac.ukaura.abdn.ac.uk.
[3]. 3.R. M. Eime, J. T. Harvey, N. A. Sawyer, M. J. Craike, C. M. Symons, and W. R. Payne, “Changes in sport and physical activity participation for adolescent females: a longitudinal study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 16, art. 533, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3203-xpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govbmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com.
[4]. 4.K. B. Owen, P. J. Clare, R. Eime, et al., “Gender gap in physical activity and sport participation across the lifespan in Australia between 2016 and 2023,” BMC Public Health, vol. 25, art. 2889, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24011-5bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com.
[5]. 5.N. S. Cai, S. H. Mkumbuzi, and T. L. F. McHugh, “Advancing gender equity in sport: a scoping review of international sport federation policies for pregnant, postpartum and parenting athletes,” Br. J. Sports Med., vol. 55, no. 21, pp. 1182–1192, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103173.
[6]. 6.D. R. Marqués, E. Molner, and R. F. Hidalgo, “Gender gap in youth sports participation: a cross-cultural analysis of motivational factors,” International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 596–607, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1747954119873008.
[7]. 7.E. A. C. van Ingen and R. K. J. van Houten, “A leveling of the playing field? Girls’ and boys’ participation patterns in organized sports,” Sport in Society, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1126–1144, 2020, doi: 10.1080/17430437.2019.1599201.
[8]. 8.P. A. Pérez-Samaniego, J. A. Devís-Devís, E. Beltrán-Carrillo, and R. Fuentes-Miguel, “Toward a more inclusive sport: understanding the participation of trans people in sports,” Journal of Sport and Social Issues, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0193723515615347.
[9]. 9.B. Nguyen, J. Ding, and J. P. Piff, “Socioeconomic inequality and sport participation: exploring the role of social class in youth sports,” Youth & Society, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1498–1523, 2022, doi: 10.1177/0044118X211024279.
[10]. 10.C. D. Noble and D. E. Vermillion, “Gender dynamics and social inclusion in co-ed sports: A case study of mixed-gender basketball leagues,” Sociology of Sport Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 323–334, 2017, doi: 10.1123/ssj.2017-0012.
[11]. 11.A. L. Snyder, “Title IX at 50: Progress and persistent inequalities in high school sports participation,” Education and Urban Society, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 463–483, 2023, doi: 10.1177/00131245221093768.
[12]. 12.L. M. Han, “Gendered pathways in sports: how childhood socialization and self-perceptions shape adolescent sports participation,” Journal of Adolescence, vol. 80, pp. 185–198, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.02.014.
[13]. 13.E. Elling, J. Knoppers, and A. de Knop, “The social integrative meaning of sport: A critical and comparative analysis of policy and practice in the Netherlands,” International Review for the Sociology of Sport, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 471–489, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1012690217728387.
[14]. 14.F. L. Collins, C. J. Williams, and S. M. Diogenes, “Assessing global gender disparities in sports participation,” World Leisure Journal, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 259–274, 2019, doi: 10.1080/16078055.2019.1650496.
[15]. 15.A. Wicker, “Evidence of a gender gap reversal in youth sports? Examining participation trends from 1980 to 2020,” Sport, Education and Society, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 867–880, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13573322.2020.1777099.
[16]. 16.M. L. A. Wilson and K. C. Martin, “Access and equity in community youth sport programs: The impact of neighborhood socioeconomics on girls’ participation,” Journal of Sport Management, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 562–576, 2018, doi: 10.1123/jsm.2017-0254.
[17]. 17.L. Gálvez, M. Torres, and F. Miret, “Barriers to female participation in sports: A worldwide comparative analysis,” International Journal of Sports Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 39–50, 2015, doi: 10.5923/j.sports.20150502.01.
[18]. 18.N. Stambulova and T. Ryba, “Critical review of research on gender and cultural diversity in sport psychology,” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2018, doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317356.
[19]. 19.S. Ratna, “Intersectional players: South Asian female footballers, identity and collective resistance,” International Review for the Sociology of Sport, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 449–464, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1012690215597659.
[20]. 20.K. H. Bettez and N. M. Hunnicutt, “Still missing the goal: Revisiting gender equity in soccer participation and leadership,” Soccer & Society, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 527–543, 2020, doi: 10.1080/14660970.2019.1677487.
[21]. 21.C. Cooky, M. A. Messner, and M. Musto, “‘It’s Dude Time!’: A quarter century of excluding women’s sports in televised news and highlight shows,” Communication & Sport, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 261–287, 2015, doi: 10.1177/2167479515588761scirp.org.
[22]. 22.T. Bruce, “New rules for new times: Sportswomen and media representation in the third wave,” Sex Roles, vol. 74, no. 7–8, pp. 361–376, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0497-6link.springer.com.
[23]. 23.J. Salido-Fernández and A. M. Muñoz-Muñoz, “Media representation of women athletes at the Olympic Games: A systematic review,” Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes, no. 146, pp. 32–41, 2021, doi: 10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2021/4).146.04revista-apunts.comrevista-apunts.com.
[24]. 24.R. Coche and C. A. Tuggle, “The women’s Olympics?: A gender analysis of NBC’s coverage of the 2012 London Summer Games,” Electronic News, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 121–138, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1931243116647770.
[25]. 25.M. L. K. Ponterotto, “The Virgin and the Temptress: Representations of women athletes in film and literature,” Journal of Sport History, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 170–187, 2016, doi: 10.5406/jsporthistory.43.2.170.
[26]. 26.S. J. Jackson and R. D. Ponic, “Pride and prejudice: Reflecting on culture, media, and the portrayal of women in sport,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 1085–1100, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0002764215578847.
[27]. 27.H. L. LaVoi and C. M. Calhoun, “Digital media and women’s sport: An old view on ‘new’ media,” in Routledge Handbook of Sport and New Media, A. C. Billings and M. Hardin, Eds. New York: Routledge, 2014, pp. 320–330.
[28]. 28.N. M. Eagleman, “Constructing gender differences on ESPN’s SportsCenter: A content analysis of footage, commentary, and graphics,” Journal of Sports Media, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–22, 2015, doi: 10.1353/jsm.2015.0011.
[29]. 29.P. O. Pedersen, “Framing female Olympians: A cross-national analysis of newspaper coverage of the 2016 Rio Games,” European Journal of Sport Science, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 538–545, 2019, doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1535620.
[30]. 30.M. Toffoletti and H. Thorpe, “Female athletes’ self-representation on social media: A feminist analysis of neoliberal marketing strategies,” Communication & Sport, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 689–710, 2018, doi: 10.1177/2167479518809530.
[31]. 31.P. M. Wright and L. Clarke, “A history of exclusion: Women’s struggle for participation in early Olympic history,” Sport in History, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 268–284, 2017, doi: 10.1080/17460263.2017.1310208.
[32]. 32.S. Greenspan, “Before Title IX: The historical fight against girls’ exclusion from US school sports,” Journal of Sport History, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 76–92, 2019, doi: 10.5406/jsporthistory.46.1.0076.
[33]. 33.B. Wilson, “The narrative of the ‘tomboy’: Cultural resistance and compliance in girls’ organized sport, 1940–1990,” Sport History Review, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 202–220, 2015, doi: 10.1123/shr.2015-0010.
[34]. 34.S. J. Anderson and M. W. McCormack, “The glitter and the gold: Media images of female athletes in the 21st century,” Feminist Media Studies, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1050–1066, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2018.1494618.
[35]. 35.A. Francois, “Courting controversy: Women, tennis, and the politics of clothing,” Sport in Society, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1868–1885, 2019, doi: 10.1080/17430437.2018.1564791.
[36]. 36.P. Majumdar and B. Mehta, “Representations of Indian sportswomen: A postcolonial feminist analysis of media narratives,” Media, Culture & Society, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1184–1200, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0163443717745128.
[37]. 37.A. E. Johnson, “From prohibition to progress: A global history of women’s boxing,” The International Journal of the History of Sport, vol. 34, no. 5–6, pp. 377–392, 2017, doi: 10.1080/09523367.2017.1388120.
[38]. 38.L. A. K. Bruce, “15 rules of (mis)representation: Trends in global media coverage of sportswomen,” Communication & Sport, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 615–632, 2017, doi: 10.1177/2167479516645538.
[39]. 39.D. L. Kian, B. C. Mondello, and T. D. Vincent, “Masculine hegemonic hoops: An analysis of media coverage of March Madness,” Journal of Sports Media, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 19–43, 2015, doi: 10.1353/jsm.2015.0003.
[40]. 40.R. L. Schmidt, “Cultural narratives of female athleticism: From Greek mythology to modern media,” Journal of Sport and Social Issues, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 343–359, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0193723518778121.
[41]. 41.C. Heidrich and S. Chiviacowsky, “Stereotype threat affects the learning of sport motor skills,” Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 18, pp. 42–46, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.12.002researchgate.net.
[42]. 42.A. Gentile, S. Boca, and I. Giammusso, “‘You play like a woman!’: Effects of gender stereotype threat on women’s performance in physical and sport activities: A meta-analysis,” Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 39, pp. 95–103, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.004idrottsforum.org.
[43]. 43.E. E. Cormack and C. Hand, “A systematic review of gender stereotype beliefs and their relationship with youth sport participation and performance,” Sport & Exercise Psychology Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 39–60, 2020, doi: 10.53841/bpssepr.2020.16.2.39researchgate.netresearchgate.net.
[44]. 44.A. Vanzella-Yang and T. Finger, “Gender in coed team sports: A social psychological perspective,” Sociology of Sport Journal, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 429–435, 2021, doi: 10.1123/ssj.2019-0164ouci.dntb.gov.uaouci.dntb.gov.ua.
[45]. 45.S. E. Hively and S. El-Alayli, “‘You throw like a girl’: The effect of stereotype threat on women’s athletic performance,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 59, pp. 77–87, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.003.
[46]. 46.R. J. Schmid, J. A. Seguín, and A. R. Caldarella, “Impact of stereotype threat on female athletes’ self-efficacy and future intentions in sport,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 232–247, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0361684319891168.
[47]. 47.M. Chalabaev, C. Sarrazin, P. Fontayne, C. Boiché, and C. Clément-Guillotin, “The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions,” Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 136–144, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.005.
[48]. 48.M. Ehrlinger and K. Dunning, “How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2015, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.5.
[49]. 49.F. C. Wilson and L. E. Martin, “Motivational climate and gender differences in youth sport: Effects on self-efficacy and enjoyment,” Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 30, pp. 123–130, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.02.008.
[50]. 50.J. L. Fox and L. M. Stallings, “Stereotype perceptions and motor performance under pressure in male and female athletes,” International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 81–96, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2018.1486875.
[51]. 51.D. E. Marra and T. M. Morissette, “Exploring the effects of gendered feedback on athletes’ self-confidence and motivation,” Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2020, doi: 10.1037/spy0000164.
[52]. 52.S. R. L. Barnes, “Gender role identity development through sport: A social cognitive perspective,” Sex Roles, vol. 81, no. 1–2, pp. 91–103, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11199-018-0978-3.
[53]. 53.L. M. Bell, D. M. Razor, and K. A. Stang, “Girls’ sport self-efficacy and the ‘coach effect’: A longitudinal study,” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 416–433, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10413200.2018.1557763.
[54]. 54.K. M. Appleby and E. R. Fisher, “She’s got game: The role of significant others in female athletes’ socialization and continued sport participation,” International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 156–172, 2019, doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2017.1329221.
[55]. 55.D. Inkster, S. L. Kerr, and P. Jackson, “Gender stereotypes and attributions of athletic performance among adolescent peers,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 67, pp. 56–68, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.10.006.
[56]. 56.F. Lirgg, D. W. Feltz, S. M. Walker, and M. H. Peterson, “Girls and boys in competitive youth sport: The influence of peers on self-perceptions of competence,” Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 46–56, 2016, doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1039461.
[57]. 57.S. E. Martin, “Motivational factors for girls’ participation in sport and physical activity: A retrospective study,” Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2018, doi: 10.1123/wspaj.2017-0030.
[58]. 58.G. B. Cunningham and J. N. Singer, “Diversity issues in sport and exercise psychology: A systematic review,” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 211–242, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2019.1571189.
[59]. 59.C. S. Perry and M. D. Fisher, “Gender role conflict in male athletes: Coaching implications for reducing stigma and enhancing performance,” Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 338–352, 2018, doi: 10.1037/spy0000131.
[60]. 60.M. Principe and S. E. Benson, “Breaking stereotypes: Effects of female athletic success on young women’s self-concept and aspirations,” Journal of Adolescence, vol. 78, pp. 50–59, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.010.
[61]. 61.K. Lambert, L. Young, R. Jeanes, N. Bevan, G. Roy, L. Hunter, J. O’Connor, R. Spaaij, F. Turelli, and F. McLachlan, “How is intersectionality being represented by Australian sports organisations? A content analysis,” Sport, Education and Society, pp. 1–18, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1080/13573322.2025.2485259ramonspaaij.comramonspaaij.com.
[62]. 62.K. Hextrum, C. Knoester, and J. Tompsett, “Inequalities in girls’ high school sports participation: How social class, race/ethnicity, and gender route opportunities to play and persist in athletics,” Sociological Focus, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 281–298, 2024, doi: 10.1080/00380237.2024.2317480sciencedaily.com.
[63]. 63.N. A. Walker and E. N. Melton, “The tipping point: The intersection of race, gender, and sexual orientation in intercollegiate sports,” Journal of Sport Management, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 257–271, 2015, doi: 10.1123/jsm.2013-0079researchgate.netresearchgate.net.
[64]. 64.A. R. Carter-Francique, “Black female collegiate athletes and intersectionality: Navigating race, gender, and sport,” Sociology of Sport Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2017, doi: 10.1123/ssj.2017-0087.
[65]. 65.E. K. Anderson and A. Travers, “Transgender inclusion and the changing face of gender in sport,” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 228–244, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00948705.2017.1317608.
[66]. 66.H. Lenning and S. Bright, “Queer students of color and school sport participation: Addressing the void,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 119–134, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13613324.2018.1468747.
[67]. 67.D. J. Lovett and S. M. Lowry, “Good governance and gender equality in sport leadership: A policy analysis of international sport federations,” European Sport Management Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 436–457, 2018, doi: 10.1080/16184742.2018.1424223.
[68]. 68.H. Leberman, S. Shaw, and F. J. Leonard, “Career pathways of women in sport leadership: An intersectional analysis,” Journal of Sport Management, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 393–405, 2018, doi: 10.1123/jsm.2017-0244.
[69]. 69.T. Pegoraro, “LGBT inclusion in sport: A global review of policies and practices,” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 137–150, 2020, doi: 10.1080/19406940.2019.1627485.
[70]. 70.S. J. A. Hayhurst, J. A. Giles, and E. Radforth, “Utilizing intersectionality in sport for development: A critical analysis of girls’ empowerment programs,” Journal of Sport Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 373–389, 2015, doi: 10.1123/jsm.2014-0137.
[71]. 71.B. C. P. Lundquist, “Sports at the intersection of gender and disability: Title IX’s unfinished business,” Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 206–222, 2019, doi: 10.18060/23285.
[72]. 72.S. J. A. Newhall and E. Buzuvis, “Transgender rights in school athletics: The law, policies, and culture,” Marquette Sports Law Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 155–181, 2016.
[73]. 73.R. L. Sharrow, “Intersectionality in athletic administration: Exploring the experiences of women of color in NCAA leadership,” Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, vol. 10, pp. 57–77, 2017.
[74]. 74.A. M. Burton and J. M. Leberman, “Intersectionality and leadership development: Reflections of women college athletic directors,” Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 2019, doi: 10.1123/wspaj.2018-0020.
[75]. 75.Creswell JW, Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications; 2017 Aug31.https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/735110-studies-in-language-testing-volume-43.pdf#page=53
[76]. 76.Lowry PB, Gaskin J. Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE transactions on professional communication. 2014 Apr 22;57(2):123-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452






