ESP-4230

Published

2026-01-12

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Publishing

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Syeda Rabia Tahir*

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Syeda Rabia Tahir. (2026). Social psychological pathways to climate action: Reframing education for SDG 13. Environment and Social Psychology, 11(1), ESP-4230. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4230

Social psychological pathways to climate action: Reframing education for SDG 13

Syeda Rabia Tahir

Faculty of Education and Humanities, UNITAR International University Malaysia, Jalan SS 6/3, Ss 6, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4230


Keywords: climate psychology; SDG 13; social identity; collective efficacy; temporal discounting; risk perception; climate literacy; behavioral change; education; sustainability

Abstract

Climate change poses an existential challenge whose resolution depends not only on technological ingenuity but also on the transformation of human psychology. Despite decades of awareness and policy commitments, behavioral inertia continues to undermine global mitigation efforts. This paper proposes an integrative theoretical framework that explains how education can mobilize climate action by leveraging core constructs from social psychology. Drawing on recent empirical work (2019–2025), it argues that climate behavior is governed by the interplay of five processes: social identity formation, normative influence, collective efficacy, temporal discounting, and risk perception. These processes constitute the Integrative Socio-Psychological Model of Climate Engagement (ISPMCE), a conceptual structure that illuminates how education can shift cognition, motivation, and group dynamics toward sustainability. The model demonstrates that effective climate education must go beyond information delivery to cultivate shared identity, normative alignment, and perceived agency. It also highlights the necessity of reducing psychological distance to counteract temporal discounting and amplify risk salience. The paper concludes that embedding this framework within curricula and communication strategies can accelerate behavioral transitions essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 13 (SDG 13).

References

[1]. 1.Bain, P. G., Milfont, T. L., Kashima, Y., Bilewicz, M., Doron, G., Garðarsdóttir, R. B., & Kurz, T. (2021).

[2]. 2.How identity and morality shape climate action. Nature Climate Change, 11(9), 781–789.

[3]. 3.Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., Kotcher, J. E., & Maibach, E.

[4]. 4.W. (2020). Systems thinking as a pathway to global warming belief and concern. Nature Climate Change, 10(10), 830–836.

[5]. 5.Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.

[6]. 6.Brügger, A., Morton, T. A., & Dessai, S. (2021). Hand in hand: Public endorsement of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Environmental Research Letters, 16(6), 064031.

[7]. 7.Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (2021). Revisiting social norms and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75, 101616.

[8]. 8.Clayton, S., & Manning, C. (2023). Psychology and climate change: Human perceptions, impacts, and responses (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

[9]. 9.Feldman, G., Haffar, M., & Kandek, C. (2022). Reducing temporal discounting in climate action through experiential education. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80, 101755.

[10]. 10.Hambali, N., Muhamad, S. H. A., Noh, N., Alias, A. F. N., & Rahmat, N. H. (2025). Exploring the influence of existence, relatedness and growth on learner’s motivation. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15804199

[11]. 11.Hornsey, M. J., Chapman, C. M., & Oelrichs, D. M. (2022). Why are facts not enough: Understanding and managing the motivated rejection of science. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101302.

[12]. 12.IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

[13]. 13.Karim, H. H., Che Leh, A., Ma Weng Chuen, N. N., Buang, N. F., & Abd Jalil, N. A. (2025). The impact of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) training on fostering a culture of sustainability in the workplace: A conceptual paper. International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Sciences, 7(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15803441

[14]. 14.Klas, A., Leicht, C., & Hurst, M. (2023). Identity threat and climate inaction: Bridging polarization through inclusive framing. Global Environmental Change, 82, 102710.

[15]. 15.Lacroix, K., Gifford, R., & Chen, A. (2022). Intergroup dynamics in environmental behavior: Social identity processes and collective action. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 876543.

[16]. 16.Markowitz, E. M., & Shariff, A. F. (2020). Climate change and moral judgment revisited. Nature Climate Change, 10(3), 197–199.

[17]. 17.Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S., & Sibley, C. G. (2021). The climate-change dilemma: Predicting public support for climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 397–404.

[18]. 18.Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., & Cialdini, R. B. (2021). Social norms interventions in environmental behavior: A meta-analytic update. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101642.

[19]. 19.Schubert, S., Rees, J. H., & Klöckner, C. A. (2023). Intergenerational appeals and temporaldiscounting in climate communication. Environmental Communication, 17(4), 512–527.

[20]. 20.Schumpe, B. M., van Zomeren, M., & Barth, M. (2022). Predicting climate activism: The role of moral obligation and collective efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101732.

[21]. 21.Sparkman, G., Howe, L., & Walton, G. M. (2020). Dynamic norms as catalysts for behavior change. Psychological Science, 31(8), 914–928.

[22]. 22.United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

[23]. 23.van der Linden, S. (2021). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 1–8.

[24]. 24.van Valkengoed, A. M., Steg, L., & Perlaviciute, G. (2022). Shifting perspectives: Climate change adaptation and mitigation from a psychological perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 54, 101159.

[25]. 25.van Zomeren, M., & Saguy, T. (2021). Collective action and hope: How efficacy beliefs sustain climate movements. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(5), e12601.*



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com