Environment and Social Psychology

An exploratory study on the role of social auditing in well-being at work within the context of organizational change in CSR-labeled companies

Sara Nait Slimane

Center for doctoral studies in comparative law, applied economics and sustainable development, Faculty of economic, Legal and social sciences of sale, Mohammed V University Rabat, Morocco

Mahouat Nacer

Department of Management Science, Prism Laboratory, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco

Maha Dridat

Ibn Tofail University-ENCG Kenitra, Kenitra, Morocco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4243

Keywords: Social auditing; well-being at work; corporate social responsibility; qualitative study; organizational change

---

Abstract

In a rapidly evolving environment where stakeholder demands are rising, CSR and social auditing are increasingly expected not only as reputational tools but as drivers of genuine organizational transformation. Many CSR labeled companies claim to initiate social responsibility commitments to stay competitive. This study explores how social auditing, when coupled with organizational changes and guided by an exemplary manager, influences employee well being at work.

We adopted a qualitative research methodology, conducting in depth interviews with nine key informants: proximity managers, CSR/HR specialists, and managers from CSR labeled companies in Morocco. Data were transcribed and analyzed using NVivo software. Thematic coding, node construction, and guided exploration of patterns were used to capture the lived experience of organizational change following social audit recommendations.

Results show that social auditing serves as a catalyst for employee well being in the context of organizational change: communication processes are improved, training policies are revised, and working conditions adjusted. Under the leadership of exemplary managers, these changes are mediated effectively — employees report increased clarity in their roles, enhanced autonomy, stronger recognition, and improved work climate. These organizational shifts are perceived as directly contributing to employee well being—psychological, relational, and to some extent physical.

This qualitative perspective adds depth to existing quantitative findings: it reveals how and why social auditing affects well being through organizational transformation and managerial behavior. Implications suggest that companies cannot rely merely on social audit reports; they must ensure that change is implemented structurally, and that proximity managers are empowered and exemplify the values of CSR.

---

References

[1]. 1.HILMI etal. (2016) Social auditing and company performance: an empirical study within the Moroccan organizational field. DISCOUNTS. Vol. 1 No. 3

[2]. 2.Carpentier, S., et al. (2010). Social auditing and quality of life at work. (8): 52-57.

[3]. 3.Peretti, J.-M. (2012). The encyclopedia of social auditing and social responsibility, EMS.

[4]. 4.Frimousse, S. and Peretti, J.-M. J. M. A. (2005). Strategic learning of HRM practices, internationalization of firms and Euro-Maghreb area. (3): 45-61

[5]. 5.Cherkaoui, A. (2016). CSR practices of SMEs in Morocco: a perceptual analysis of Casablanca's leaders. Management question(s), 14(3), 13-26.

[6]. 6.Candau, P. (1985). Social auditing: Methods and techniques for effective management, Vuibert.

[7]. 7.FARSI, B., & EL IDRISSI, L. H. (2024). SOCIAL AUDITING AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COMPANIES. Moroccan Journal of Commerce and Management, 1, 230-245.

[8]. 8.Grosjean, M. (Ed.). (2004) Negotiation at work. University Press Lyon.

[9]. 9.Rolland, J. P. (2000). Subjective well-being: a review of the question. Psychological practices, 1(1), 5-21.

[10]. 10.Richard, D. (2012). Psychosocial risk management: A perspective in terms of well-being at work and the enhancement of discussion spaces.

[11]. 11.Rosenfeld, A. J. (2019). The neuroscience of happiness and well-being: What brain findings from optimism and compassion reveal. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 28(2), 137-146.

[12]. 12.Sen, A. (1999). The possibility of social choice [Nobel Conference]. OFCE Review, 70(1), 7-61.

[13]. 13.Deci, E. and Ryan, L.R.M.J.C.P.C. (2008). Promote optimal motivation and mental health in various living environments. 49(1): 24.

[14]. 14.Ryan, R. M. and Frederick, C. J. J. o. p. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. 65(3): 529-565.

[15]. 15.Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of health and social behavior, 207-222.

[16]. 16.Laguardia, J-G. and Ryan, R.M. R. Q. d. Psychology (2000). Personal goals, basic psychological needs and well-being: theory of self-determination and applications. 21(2).

[17]. 17.Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?. Gifted child quarterly, 44(3), 152-170.

[18]. 18.Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and weil‐being in two work settings 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068.

[19]. 19.TIGUIT, H. (2019). Social auditing as a tool for improving company performance: theoretical analysis. International Journal of Management Sciences, 2(4).

[20]. 20.Peretti, J.-M. (2012). The encyclopedia of social auditing and social responsibility, EMS.

[21]. 21.Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L., & Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 155-162.

[22]. 22.Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.

[23]. 23.Thiétart, R. A. (2001). Management et complexité: concepts et théories. AC Martinet et R.-A. Thietart (Eds.).

[24]. 24.Balambo, M. A. (2012). L'impact de la culture nationale sur la nature de l'intégration des supply chains: une étude à travers l'effet médiateur de la nature de la confiance: une application aux équipementiers automobiles marocains (Doctoral dissertation, Aix-Marseille).

[25]. 25.Jolibert, A., & Jourdan, P. (2011). Les techniques d’analyse qualitatives. Jolibert A. et Jourdan P.(éd.), Marketing research, méthodes de recherche et d’études en marketing, 49-65.

[26]. 26.Gavard-Perret, M. L., Gotteland, D., Haon, C., & Jolibert, A. (2012). Méthodologie de la recherche en sciences de gestion. Réussir son mémoire ou sa thèse, 2.

[27]. 27.Roche, D. (2009). Réaliser une étude de marché avec succès. Editions Eyrolles.

[28]. 28.Bobineau, C. (2016). E-Commerce: Stratégies et Pratiques (Doctoral dissertation, Grenoble INP).

[29]. 29.Deschenaux, F. (2007). Guide d’introduction. Les cahiers pédagogiques de l’Association pour la recherche qualitative.

[30]. 30.Castel, R. (2008). La propriété sociale: émergence, transformations et remise en cause. Esprit, (8), 171-190.

[31]. 31.Igalens, J. (2007). L’analyse du discours de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise à travers les rapports annuels de développement durable d’entreprises françaises du CAC 40. Revue Finance Contrô le Straté gie, 10(2), 129-155.

[32]. 32.Carpentier, S., et al. (2010). Social auditing and quality of life at work. (8): 52-57.

[33]. 33.ESTELLAT N. and BESSEYRE DES HORTS C.H. (2012), “Social auditing and organizational change: the role of coaching” in Peretti J.M. (ed.) (2012), The encyclopedia of social auditing and social responsibility, chapter 51, pp. 415-424.

[34]. 34.Devriendt, P. (2012). Accélérer le changement: le théorème de Welch. Éditions EMS.

[35]. 35.Giroux, N. (1993). Communication et changement dans les organisations. Communication et organisation. Revue scientifique francophone en Communication organisationnelle, (3).

[36]. 36.Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[37]. 37.ORHA. (2011). Définition du bien-être au travail incluant les risques psychosociaux. ORHA – Cabinet de conseil.

[38]. 38.Mahouat, N., Gharrafi, M., Wissa, H., Rachida, B., Abdelaziz, B., & Zaim, M. (2024). Impact of cooperation between internal and external auditors on internal audit effectiveness in Moroccan public companies: Analysis using the structural equation modeling (SEM). Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(2), 7046-7059.

[39]. 39.Gharrafi, M., Fellah, I. B., Loubna, A., Mahouat, N., & Abderrahim, B. E. N. L. A. K. O. U. I. R. I. (2024). Exploring the external factors affecting the effectiveness of internal audit in Moroccan public enterprises with commercial activities: A qualitative approach. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 7419-7429.

[40]. 40.Mahouat, N., Azenzoul, A., Chaiboub, M., Daoudi, L., Lemsieh, H., Aftiss, A., & Mokhlis, K. (2025). Exploratory study on the role of digitalization in improving the external audit quality in public institutions: Evidence from Morocco. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(3), 176-194.

[41]. 41.Pollack, J., & Pollack, R. (2015). Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organisational change program: Presentation and practice. Systemic practice and action research, 28(1), 51-66.

[42]. 42.Mahouat, N., Azenzoul, A., Nait Slimane, S., Es-Sanoun, M., Mokhlis, K., & Jbene, M. (2026). Corporate Governance and Tax Aggressiveness: The Moderating Role of Audit Quality. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19010010

[43]. 43.Azenzoul, A., Mahouat, N., Mokhlis, K., & Moussaid, A. (2025). Digital transformation and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Moroccan listed firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), 575.