Published
2025-12-17
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jianghua Li, N. Asipova, Qianwen Zheng, Zaichao Zhai, Wenhui Dong

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
The Synergy of Pedagogical Environment and Psychological Climate in Fostering Creative Self-Realization of Students in Music Education
Jianghua Li
Kyrgyz state university named after I. Arabaev, Bishkek, C0026 lijianghua@kmtdzy.cn
N. Asipova
Kyrgyz National University named after Jusup , Balasagyn; Bishkek,,C0026, n-asipova@mail.ru
Qianwen Zheng
Kyrgyz state university named after I. Arabaev, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, C0026,winnie9916@163.com
Zaichao Zhai
Kyrgyz state university named after I. Arabaev, Bishkek, C0026,351732050@qq.com
Wenhui Dong
Academy of The Zhonghuaminzu Community, Xizang university, China Lhasa,850000 ,1039110912@qq.com
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4272
Keywords: Music education; Psychological climate; Creative self-realization; Autonomy support; Formative/ rubric-based assessment; Improvisation; Pedagogical environment; Collaborative learning
Abstract
Chinese music classrooms face large classes, uneven resources, and time-limited lessons. We tested whether a compact “Blueprint” (autonomy-supportive tasks, transparent assessment, flow-aligned deep-work windows, weekly low-stakes improvisation, structured collaboration, inclusive repertoire) improves Psychological Climate (PC) and, through it, Creative Self-Realization (CSR). Cluster-randomized, mixed-methods trial in ordinary schools: 24 classes (12 Blueprint; 12 BAU), ≈38 students/class (N ≈ 900). Measures at baseline (T0), midline (T1), post (T2), and short follow-up (T3). Multilevel regressions and multilevel SEM tested PE → PC → CSR; blinded external ratings scored creative products (0–4 rubric). Blueprint improved the higher-order PC factor at T2 (β = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22, 0.44],
p < .001). PC strongly predicted CSR (β = 0.52, [0.43, 0.60], p < .001); the indirect Blueprint → CSR effect via PC was β = 0.17 ([0.10, 0.25], p < .001), total β = 0.26 ([0.16, 0.36], p < .001). PC subscale effects (Cohen’s d) at T2: Safety 0.37, Autonomy 0.35, Competence 0.31, Goal clarity 0.29, Belonging 0.27. Product gains at T2 (Blueprint − BAU, 0–4 scale): Originality +0.38, Coherence +0.32, Craft +0.28, Reflective Intent +0.35. Lever models: assessment support → PC-Competence β = 0.28 and PC-Safety β = 0.26; flow design → PC-Goal clarity β = 0.24 with small direct boosts to Originality (β = 0.11) and Coherence (β = 0.09); improvisation dosage (per +5 min/week) → CSR β = 0.06. Moderation: PC × cultural inclusivity β = 0.07 (simple slopes: 0.58 vs 0.46), stronger Blueprint effects for lower-skill learners (INT→PC 0.41 vs 0.24), and buffering in large/low-resource classes via peer roles and stations. Same-lesson feedback improved next-iteration quality by +0.12. Mean fidelity ≈ 78%. Feasible, routine-based design warms climate and unlocks creativity in typical Chinese music classrooms. Small architectural shifts—clear criteria, protected deep-work, frequent improv, structured collaboration, inclusive repertoire, and same-lesson feedback—produce measurable gains in student engagement, efficacy, identity, and creative products.
References
[1]. 1.M. Liu, H. Wang, H. Shi, B. Zhang, X. Sun, and J. Wang, “Examining the personal growth of college teacher educators through the lens of human development ecology: An approach utilizing artificial neural networks (ANNs) modeling,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 21, p. e39372, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39372.
[2]. 2.A. V. Kharkhurin, Х. А. Владимирович, E. V. Kashirskaya, К. Е. Владимировна, A. S. Pasechnik-Lyle, and П.-Л. А. Сергеевна, “Plurilingual Intercultural Creative Keys: An Author Educational Program Developing Soft Skills,” RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 705–738, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-3-705-738.
[3]. 3.J. Mae and S. Espinosa, “ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND RESILIENCE AS PREDICTORS OF QUALITY OF WORK LIFE AMONG EDUCATORS: A CONVERGENT DESIGN,” Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 2, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10580464.
[4]. 4.Y. Liang, “Things I’ve Learned From Doing Cosplay: An Investigation On Incorporating ‘Atypical’ Creative Practices Into Art Education,” Masters Theses, Jun. 2024, Accessed: Oct. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/masterstheses/1199
[5]. 5.F. Yang, Y. Arifani, Y. Liu, and W. Siripala, “The promoting effect of natural environment in music education on the cognitive and emotional development of college students: A quasi-experimental study,” Environment and Social Psychology, vol. 10, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.59429/ESP.V10I4.3544.
[6]. 6.L. Nijs, “Fostering a Synergy Between the Development of Well-Being and Musicianship: A Kinemusical Perspective,” Education Sciences 2025, Vol. 15, Page 1245, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 1245, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3390/EDUCSCI15091245.
[7]. 7.R. Zhang and H. P. Wang, “The impact of Chinese university music teachers’ teaching beliefs on creative teaching behaviors: the mediating role of technological acceptance,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 9, p. 1404541, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3389/FEDUC.2024.1404541/BIBTEX.
[8]. 8.X. Ge, “Music teachers’ perceptions of creativity in the context of twenty-first century Chinese education: a qualitative study on the influence of experience and policy on primary school music and piano teachers,” 2024.
[9]. 9.L. Lin, “Cultural and Religious Studies,” vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 484–489, 2025, doi: 10.17265/2328-2177/2025.08.005.
[10]. 10.Q. Zhu, M. Á. Solano-Sánchez, and O. Lorenzo Quiles, “Situation of music education in primary school in Wuhan (China). Analysis from the perspective of music teachers,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 9, p. 1480946, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3389/FEDUC.2024.1480946/BIBTEX.
[11]. 11.L. Zhao, H. Jiang, S. A. Attan, K. F. K. Ibrahim, and B. Han, “Exploring the impact of classroom climate on music aesthetic literacy in nonmusic majors,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 10, p. e0333470, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0333470.
[12]. 12.L. Song, Z. Huang, L. Cao, and S. Yang, “Exploring Students’ Learning Experiences Under the China–Korea Cooperative Teaching Model: A Positive Psychology Perspective,” Behavioral Sciences 2025, Vol. 15, Page 374, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 374, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/BS15030374.
[13]. 13.H. Zhu, L. Li, and C. Gao, “Teacher Collective Efficacy and Teacher Commitment Co-Mediate the Path From School Leadership to Student Achievement Among Minority Students in Chinese Rural Schools,” Psychol Sch, 2025, doi: 10.1002/PITS.70048.
[14]. 14.V. Solovei, O. Marushchak, I. Shymkova, I. Krasylnykova, and T. Zuziak, “Exploring the Impact of Art Education on Socialization in Multicultural Classrooms: A Survey Study of Ukrainian Students,” Rotura – Revista de Comunicação, Cultura e Artes, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 113–127, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.34623/557R-XK89.
[15]. 15.H. Zeng, G. Yao, and X. Ma, “The impact of short videos on young people’s willingness to engage in martial arts: establishing and testing a conditional process model,” Humanit Soc Sci Commun, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1057/S41599-025-04963-0;SUBJMETA.
[16]. 16.B. Lin and C. Liu, “Little Being in the Great Art Worlds : an anthropological study on self, creativity, aspiration and escape among young Chinese artists in London,” Jun. 2025, doi: 10.17630/STA/1233.
[17]. 17.Q. Song et al., “User Well-Being in Kitchen Environment Design from a Positive Psychology Perspective: A Quantitative and Qualitative Literature Analysis,” Buildings 2025, Vol. 15, Page 845, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 845, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/BUILDINGS15060845.
[18]. 18.S. Xu and D. Li, “Autonomy-supportive music teaching, collective learning, flow, and music Students’ well-being: A mediational model,” Acta Psychol (Amst), vol. 254, p. 104827, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2025.104827.
[19]. 19.L. Nijs and G. Nicolaou, “Flourishing in Resonance: Joint Resilience Building Through Music and Motion,” Front Psychol, vol. 12, p. 666702, May 2021, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2021.666702/FULL.
[20]. 20.Q. Fang and X. Chen, “The Nexus between music classes and psychological wellbeing: the moderating role of sustainable education policy and teachers innovative support in the post Covid-19 era,” BMC Psychol, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 491, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1186/S40359-025-02833-7.
[21]. 21.R. Curren et al., “Finding consensus on well-being in education,” Theory and Research in Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 117–157, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1177/14778785241259852.
[22]. 22.[22] A. Lebasi and G. Talischi, “The Impact of Physical Learning Environments on Creativity in Educational Settings: A Systematic Review,” International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 2024, 2024, doi: 10.22068/ijaup.841.
[23]. 23.J. Jiang, “Impact of music learning on students’ psychological development with mediating role of self-efficacy and self-esteem,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 9, p. e0309601, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0309601.
[24]. 24.T. Winters, “Enhancing Integrated Learning in Higher Education: Affective and Psycho-Social Dimensions of Creative Learning,” J Furth High Educ, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 467–479, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2025.2465495.
[25]. 25.R. Aziz, “Creativity in Higher Education: The Effect of Personality on Students’ Creative Thinking Skills,” Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44–51, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.23887/TSCJ.V6I1.54916.
[26]. 26.S. E. Kassab, R. Rathan, D. C. M. Taylor, and H. Hamdy, “The impact of the educational environment on student engagement and academic performance in health professions education,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1186/S12909-024-06270-9/FIGURES/3.
[27]. 27.W. Wang et al., “An Empirical Study on the Creative Learning Environment Fostering Student Creativity: A Multiple Mediation Analysis Using Smart PLS 4,” Journal of Educational and Social Research www.richtmann.org, vol. 13, 2023, doi: 10.36941/jesr-2023-0085.
[28]. 28.M. Shoaib and H. Ullah, “Classroom Environment, Teacher, and Girl Students’ Learning Skills,” Educ Urban Soc, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1039–1063, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1177/00131245211001908.






