Environment and Social Psychology

Impact of Mindful Leadership on Deviant Innovation Behavior among Post-90s Employees: Evidence from Chinese Enterprises

Junbo He

Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210, Bangkok Thailand, 1126392970@qq.com

chun-shuo Chen

Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210, Bangkok Thailand，chun-shuo.che@dpu.ac.th

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4320

Keywords: Mindful leadership; deviant innovation behavior; post-90s employees; psychological safety; intrinsic motivation; Chinese enterprises

---

Abstract

This paper explores how mindful leadership affects deviant innovation behavior among post-1990s born employees, which is a generation that is still emerging in the Chinese companies as the workforce. Based on the social exchange theory and mindfulness theory, the study examines the influence of mindfulness qualities of leaders on the motivation and the desire to engage in innovative behaviors that do not align with the norms of traditional norms but contribute positively to the growth of organizations. A quantitative survey used was carried out on 472 workers of various industries in China with the help of validated scales of measurement of mindful leadership, psychological safety, intrinsic motivation and deviant innovation. The data were evaluated using regression models, mediation tests using correlation analysis and regression models. Findings point out that mindful leadership contributes greatly to the deviant innovation behavior among the employees by increasing their psychological safety and intrinsic motivation. These variables were also found to mediate the relationship between mindful leadership and deviant innovation, which in turn confirms that mindful leadership has both direct and indirect consequences. The paper emphasizes that managers need to incorporate mindfulness training into their leadership training programs and organizational culture to elicit nontraditional but beneficial innovation behaviors among young workers. The results have an implication on the field of leadership theory and management of innovation as it helps to broaden the scope of mindfulness use in the study of organizational behavior.

---

References

[1]. 1.Tu, C. C., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2021). Innovation as a driver of enterprise competitiveness. Journal of Business Economics, 94(3), 231–245.

[2]. 2.Chen, L., Lin, Y., & Xu, D. (2022). Innovation capabilities and firm competitiveness. Technovation, 110, 102386.

[3]. 3.Cozzolino, A., & Pisano, G. (2019). Revisiting innovation processes in dynamic markets. Research Policy, 48(5), 1212–1226.

[4]. 4.Verona, G., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and continuous innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1301–1321.

[5]. 5.Grosser, T. J., Obstfeld, D., & Borgatti, S. P. (2017). Network mechanisms of innovation. Organization Science, 28(2), 223–238.

[6]. 6.Montani, F., & Staglianò, R. (2022). Employee innovation and firm resilience: An empirical analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 57–68.

[7]. 7.Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. (2016). A multilevel model of employee innovation behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1072–1093.

[8]. 8.Knight, K. (1967). A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. Journal of Business, 40(4), 478–496.

[9]. 9.Augsdorfer, P. (2005). Bootlegging and path dependency in innovation. Research-Technology Management, 48(3), 43–49.

[10]. 10.Criscuolo, P., & Mainemelis, C. (2010). Standing on the shoulders of mavericks: Employees’ deviant innovation and the pursuit of novelty. Research Policy, 39(5), 730–743.

[11]. 11.Salter, A., & Ter Wal, A. (2014). Beyond the boundaries: How bootlegging shapes corporate innovation. Research Policy, 43(2), 315–327.

[12]. 12.Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 558–578.

[13]. 13.Masoudnia, S., & Szwejczewski, M. (2012). Exploring the benefits of deviant innovation in organizations. Technovation, 32(3–4), 101–109.

[14]. 14.Globocnik, D. (2019). The benefits of bootlegging: How deviant innovation accelerates organizational learning. R&D Management, 49(4), 635–648.

[15]. 15.Mainemelis, C., & Sakellariou, N. (2022). Creative deviance revisited: The evolution of bootlegging. Research Policy, 51(2), 104392.

[16]. 16.Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Edgeman, R. L. (2019). Mindfulness, innovation and sustainable performance in the VUCA world. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(S1–2), 1–14.

[17]. 17.Zhang, J. (2019). Mindfulness and work performance in Chinese enterprises. Journal of Applied Psychology in China, 25(4), 45–57.

[18]. 18.Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143.

[19]. 19.Azar, S., Detzen, D., & Lam, W. (2015). Mindfulness in the workplace: Effects on creativity and emotional regulation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(2), 201–220.

[20]. 20.Beverage, S., Crane, M., & Thompson, L. (2014). Leadership mindfulness and emotional intelligence: Managing complexity in organizations. Management Decision, 52(4), 701–713.

[21]. 21.Baron, L., Franklin, N., & Hazer, J. (2018). Mindfulness and leadership effectiveness: Managing stress and complexity. Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), 367–382.

[22]. 22.Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Mindfulness and leadership: A practical framework for organizations. Mindfulness, 5(2), 105–115.

[23]. 23.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

[24]. 24.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.

[25]. 25.Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120–151.

[26]. 26.Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112–1142.

[27]. 27.Liu, Y. (2009). Organizational innovation climate and individual creativity. Management Science in China, 22(5), 105–114.

[28]. 28.Qu, S. (2015). Innovation climate and deviant creativity. Chinese Management Studies, 9(3), 312–330.

[29]. 29.Farr, J. L. (1990). Individual innovation and creativity at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 63–80). Wiley.

[30]. 30.Burcharth, A. L. (2017). Encouraging employee innovation through job autonomy: Evidence from Danish firms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(3), 309–324.

[31]. 31.Wang, D., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Job autonomy and creativity among Chinese employees. Management Review, 23(7), 102–114.

[32]. 32.Huang, W., Xu, S., & Gao, J. (2017). Deviant innovation behavior and creative performance. Management Science, 63(9), 3170–3186.

[33]. 33.Criscuolo, P., Salter, A., & Ter Wal, A. (2014). Going underground: Bootlegging and individual innovative performance. Organization Science, 25(5), 1287–1305.

[34]. 34.Augsdorfer, P. (2012). Managing the unmanageable: How to motivate employees to innovate. Palgrave Macmillan.

[35]. 35.Ghasemmzdeh, H., Akbari, M., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Deviant innovation behavior and organizational learning. Journal of Business Research, 134, 615–624.

[36]. 36.Haider, S. et al. (2023). Ambidextrous leadership and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0083

[37]. 37.Yasmin, S. et al. (2024). Knowledge-based HRM & performance. Journal of Innovation and Professional Development. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9383

[38]. 38.Zhang, X. et al. (2025). Digital transformation & sustainable performance. Future Technologies Journal. https://doi.org/10.55670/fpll.futech.4.3.25

[39]. 39.Sibghatullah, A. et al. (2025). Digital and green synergies. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.19437

[40]. 40.Sohail, M. et al. (2024a). Green finance in France. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4668

[41]. 41.Sohail, M. et al. (2024b). Green fintech & green finance in Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4979

[42]. 42.Huhtala, H., & Parzefall, M. (2007). A review of employee well-being and innovation in organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(4), 414–433.

[43]. 43.Janssen, O., van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of deviant innovation: When good intentions lead to bad outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129–145.

[44]. 44.Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.

[45]. 45.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

[46]. 46.Arendt, J. F., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Kugler, K. G. (2019). Mindfulness and leadership: Communication as a behavioral correlate of leader mindfulness and its effect on follower satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 414486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00667

[47]. 47.Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.001

[48]. 48.Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995

[49]. 49.Kirmeyer, S. L., & Shirom, A. (1986). Perceived job autonomy in the manufacturing sector: Effects of unions, gender, and substantive complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 832–840. https://doi.org/10.5465/255949