Published
2026-01-30
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yulin Li, Syed Kamaruzaman Syed Ali, Ahmad Zabidi Abdul Razak*

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Evaluation of environmental support systems and their social psychological effects on weight management for combat sports student-athletes in higher education institutions
Yulin Li
Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
Syed Kamaruzaman Syed Ali
Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
Ahmad Zabidi Abdul Razak*
Faculty of Education, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4345
Keywords: combat sports; college student-athletes; weight management; environmental support systems; socio-psychological factors; self-efficacy; group norms
Abstract
Combat sports are defined by strict weight classification systems, rendering weight management a pivotal factor influencing athletes’ competitive performance and long-term health outcomes. College student-athletes in combat sports confront unique predicaments stemming from their dual roles as students and athletes, navigating the competing demands of academic workloads, intensive athletic training, and ongoing physical development. While environmental support systems and socio-psychological factors are widely acknowledged as key determinants of health-related behaviors, their integrated impacts on weight management within this specific population remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the current state of environmental support systems for weight management among college combat sports student-athletes and unpack the socio-psychological mechanisms through which these systems shape weight management behaviors and effectiveness. A mixed-methods research design was employed, combining quantitative questionnaires and qualitative in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were collected from 278 college combat sports student-athletes across 10 higher education institutions and analyzed using SPSS and AMOS for descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and structural equation modeling. Qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 18 student-athletes and 6 coaches, processed via thematic analysis with Nvivo. The findings identified three core dimensions of environmental support systems (interpersonal, resource, and institutional support), with an overall moderate level of support (M=3.21, SD=0.58); interpersonal support was the strongest dimension (M=3.54, SD=0.62), while resource support was the weakest (M=2.87, SD=0.71), particularly in terms of access to specialized nutrition counseling and weight management-specific facilities. Correlation analysis confirmed positive relationships between environmental support systems, socio-psychological factors, and weight management effectiveness (r=0.38–0.57, p<0.001). Structural equation modeling revealed that environmental support systems had a direct positive effect on weight management effectiveness (β=0.28, p<0.001) and that self-efficacy (indirect effect=0.17, 95% CI=[0.12, 0.23]) and group norms (indirect effect=0.10, 95% CI=[0.05, 0.15]) served as significant mediators, while behavioral motivation did not exhibit a significant mediating role. Qualitative results complemented the quantitative findings, highlighting an uneven distribution of environmental support (strong coach and peer support alongside limited resource access), the role of self-efficacy as a key enabler of weight management behaviors, and the influence of team norms in either discouraging or normalizing risky rapid weight loss practices. This study enriches interdisciplinary research at the intersection of environmental psychology, sports psychology, and public health, while providing actionable implications for colleges and coaches to optimize weight management support strategies for student-athletes.
References
[1]. 1.Smith, J. D., Thompson, R. J., & Williams, S. E. (2020). Coach support and weight management adherence in collegiate combat sports. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(11), 1289–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1699345
[2]. 2. Jones, A. M., & Williams, M. D. (2018). Team cohesion and weight management behaviors in combat sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 30(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2017.1321358
[3]. 3.Brown, S. D., Miller, C. K., & Davis, J. M. (2021). Health risks of rapid weight loss in collegiate combat sports athletes. Journal of Athletic Training, 56(5), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-56.5.06
[4]. 4.Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2022). Academic-athletic balance and weight management challenges among college combat sports athletes. Asian Journal of Physical Education & Recreation, 28(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.18844/ajper.v28i1.7123
[5]. 5.Wilson, K. L., & Miller, S. T. (2020). Gaps in weight management support systems for college combat sports programs. Journal of Intercollegiate Athletics, 13(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1554662420915818
[6]. 6.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
[7]. 7.Green, L. E., Adams, K. M., & Nelson, M. K. (2022). Environmental support systems and health behaviors in collegiate athletics. Journal of Sports Psychology in Action, 13(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/19308989.2021.1926648
[8]. 8.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
[9]. 9.Artioli, G. G., Gualano, B., & Lancha, A. H. (2019). Weight loss in combat sports: From physiological to psychological implications. Sports Medicine, 49(3), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-1041-1
[10]. 10.Franchini, E., Brito, C. J., & Artioli, G. G. (2020). Weight management in combat sports: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 50(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01183-4
[11]. 11. Zhong et al. (2024). The Practice of Weight Loss in Combat Sports Athletes: A Systematic Review. Nutrients, 16(7), 1050.
[12]. 12.Mendes, B. M., Alves, J. G., & Pereira, L. A. (2022). Short-term effects of rapid weight loss on physical performance in combat sports. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 36(4), 1098–1105. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003934
[13]. 13.Martínez-Aranda et al. (2023). Effects of Different Rapid Weight Loss Strategies and Percentages on Performance-Related Parameters in Combat Sports: An Updated Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 5158.
[14]. 14.Costa, R. J., Silva, M. N., & Santos, R. J. (2021). Motivation for weight management in combat sports: Intrinsic vs. extrinsic drivers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(15), 1765–1773. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1867184
[15]. 15.Garcia, M. A., Lopez, A. M., & Martinez, J. C. (2019). Dual-role challenges: Weight management among college student-athletes in combat sports. Journal of College Student Development, 60(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0028
[16]. 16.Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
[17]. 17.Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
[18]. 18.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[19]. 19.Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
[20]. 20.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[21]. 21.Lebron et al. (2024). Physiological Perturbations in Combat Sports: Weight Cycling and Metabolic Function—A Narrative Review. Metabolites, 14(2), 83.
[22]. 22.Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68






