Published
2025-12-31
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pritam Kumar, Amarjeet Singh Mastana, Aya Fukushige and Yunmei Wang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Wearable technology in social efforts to improve health and happiness of consumer applications: A Systematic literature review
Pritam Kumar
MSME Business School, Department of Digital Business Management, Assumption University, Bangkok, Thailand
Amarjeet Singh Mastana
St Teresa International University, Nakorn Nayok, Thailand
Aya Fukushige
MSME Business School, Department of Sustainable Business Management, Assumption University, Bangkok, Thailand
Yunmei Wang
MSME Business School, Department of Marketing, Assumption University, Bangkok, Thailand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4360
Keywords: Wearable; Fitness Trackers; Wearable devices; Smartwatches; Health and well-being
Abstract
Wearable technology is quickly changing how people keep track and take care of their health, fitness, and daily tasks. Fitness trackers, health monitoring systems, and smartwatches are becoming essential instruments in modern healthcare since they give instant updates on vital signs, help with early diagnosis of health problems, and make it easier to create personalized treatment programs. The PRISMA methodology enabled the execution of this systematic literature evaluation, while the PICOC framework assisted in formulating research questions. This systematic review was also registered in the INPLASY database (INPLASY2025100053) retrospectively. Publish or Perish software (version 8) and the Scopus API key was used together to make it easier and more consistent to find relevant papers. After finding 674 possible studies in the Scopus database, filtering procedures reduced this number down to 32 papers that were thoroughly examined to see if wearable health technology may improve health and well-being. Wearables have a lot of potential, but just a few studies look at what they can do. Key findings show that wearables may make people more active, but they lose interest over time. This shows how important it is to keep coming up with new technologies, ways to motivate people, and social networks that support them. Stress tracking and sleep monitoring were two features that showed moderate gains in mental health. Sharing data with healthcare practitioners in real time typically led to more proactive care. However, flaws with privacy, data security, and user training are still matters of fears. Overall, compounding wearable data with mHealth services has a lot of potential, as long as fair access, strong data protection, and thorough user education are kept as top desired outcomes.
References
[1]. 1.Lu L, Zhang J, Xie Y, Gao F, Xu S, Wu X, et al. Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth [Internet]. 2020 Sep 24;8(11):e18907. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/18907
[2]. 2.Alshamrani M. IoT and artificial intelligence implementations for remote healthcare monitoring systems: A survey. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences [Internet]. 2021 Jun 17;34(8):4687–701. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.06.005
[3]. 3.Huifeng W, Kadry SN, Raj ED. Continuous health monitoring of sportsperson using IoT devices based wearable technology. Computer Communications [Internet]. 2020 Jun 27;160:588–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.04.025
[4]. 4.Lee SM, Lee D. Healthcare wearable devices: an analysis of key factors for continuous use intention. Service Business [Internet]. 2020 Oct 15;14(4):503–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-020-00428-3
[5]. 5.Jacobsen M, Rottmann P, Dembek TA, Gerke AL, Gholamipoor R, Blum C, et al. Feasibility of Wearable-Based remote monitoring in patients during intensive treatment for aggressive hematologic malignancies. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics [Internet]. 2022 Jan 13;(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.21.00126
[6]. 6.Cheung ML, Leung WKS, Chan H. Driving healthcare wearable technology adoption for Generation Z consumers in Hong Kong. Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers [Internet]. 2020 Sep 25;22(1):10–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-04-2020-1123
[7]. 7.Nuss K, Li K. Motivation for physical activity and physcial activity engagement in current and former wearable fitness tracker users: A mixed-methods examination. Computers in Human Behavior [Internet]. 2021 Mar 29;121:106798. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106798
[8]. 8.Robles-Granda P, Lin S, Wu X, Martinez GJ, Mattingly SM, Moskal E, et al. Jointly predicting job performance, personality, cognitive Ability, affect, and Well-Being. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine [Internet]. 2021 Apr 21;16(2):46–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/mci.2021.3061877
[9]. 9.Gumasing MaJJ, Carrillo GZDV, De Guzman MAA, Suñga CAR, Tan SYB, Mascariola MM, et al. Investigating User-Centric factors influencing smartwatch adoption and user experience in the Philippines. Sustainability [Internet]. 2024 Jun 25;16(13):5401. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135401
[10]. 10.Pancar T, Yildirim SO. Exploring factors affecting consumers’ adoption of wearable devices to track health data. Universal Access in the Information Society [Internet]. 2021 Oct 21;22(2):331–49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00848-6
[11]. 11.Zovko K, Šerić L, Perković T, Belani H, Šolić P. IoT and health monitoring wearable devices as enabling technologies for sustainable enhancement of life quality in smart environments. Journal of Cleaner Production [Internet]. 2023 May 16;413:137506. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137506
[12]. 12.Siepmann C, Kowalczuk P. Understanding continued smartwatch usage: the role of emotional as well as health and fitness factors. Electronic Markets [Internet]. 2021 Feb 18;31(4):795–809. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00458-3
[13]. 13.Düking P, Strahler J, Forster A, Wallmann-Sperlich B, Sperlich B. Smartwatch step counting: impact on daily step-count estimation accuracy. Frontiers in Digital Health [Internet]. 2024 Aug 8;6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1400369
[14]. 14.Gupta M, Sinha N, Singh P, Liébana-Cabanillas F. Instagram Advertising among Young Consumers in Wearable Fitness Trackers: The Moderating Role of Technology Acceptance Factors. Journal of Global Marketing [Internet]. 2021 Jun 7;34(5):411–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2021.1931616
[15]. 15.Salahuddin M, Romeo L. Wearable technology: are product developers meeting consumer’s needs? International Journal of Fashion Design Technology and Education [Internet]. 2020 Jan 2;13(1):58–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1723713
[16]. 16.Chow HW, Yang CC. Accuracy of optical heart rate sensing technology in wearable fitness trackers for young and older Adults: Validation and Comparison study. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth [Internet]. 2020 Feb 5;8(4):e14707. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/14707
[17]. 17.Hong W. Advances and opportunities of mobile health in the post-pandemic era: Smartphonisation of wearable devices and wearable deviceisation of smartphones (Preprint). JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth [Internet]. 2023 May 7; Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/48803
[18]. 18.Kim KB, Baek HJ. Photoplethysmography in Wearable Devices: A comprehensive review of technological advances, current challenges, and future directions. Electronics [Internet]. 2023 Jul 3;12(13):2923. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132923
[19]. 19.Huhn S, Axt M, Gunga HC, Maggioni MA, Munga S, Obor D, et al. The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping review. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth [Internet]. 2022 Jan 25;10(1):e34384. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/34384
[20]. 20.Grace T, Salyer J. Use of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improves Glycemic Control and Other Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Less Intensive Therapy. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics [Internet]. 2021 Sep 15;24(1):26–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0212
[21]. 21.Guo Y, Liu X, Peng S, Jiang X, Xu K, Chen C, et al. A review of wearable and unobtrusive sensing technologies for chronic disease management. Computers in Biology and Medicine [Internet]. 2020 Dec 13;129:104163. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104163
[22]. 22.Natalucci V, Marmondi F, Biraghi M, Bonato M. The Effectiveness of wearable Devices in Non-Communicable Diseases to manage Physical activity and nutrition: Where we are? Nutrients [Internet]. 2023 Feb 11;15(4):913. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040913
[23]. 23.Oba T, Takano K, Katahira K, Kimura K. Use patterns of smartphone apps and wearable devices supporting physical activity and exercise: Large-Scale Cross-Sectional survey. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth [Internet]. 2023 Aug 18;11:e49148. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/49148
[24]. 24.Dorokhov O, Yevstrat D, Chyrva Y, Yermolenko O, Dorokhova L. Consumer choice of fitness trackers: An example of modeling. TEM Journal [Internet]. 2022 Aug 29;1034–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18421/tem113-07
[25]. 25.Muller C, Dye ALB. Generation Y consumers’ wearable activity-tracker adoption intention: applying the theory of planned behaviour. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1;23(3):204. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsmm.2023.130695
[26]. 26.Cho I, Kaplanidou K, Sato S. Gamified Wearable Fitness Tracker for Physical Activity: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Sustainability [Internet]. 2021 Jun 22;13(13):7017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137017
[27]. 27.Kuosmanen E, Visuri A, Kheirinejad S, Van Berkel N, Koskimäki H, Ferreira D, et al. How does sleep tracking influence your life? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction [Internet]. 2022 Sep 19;6(MHCI):1–19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3546720
[28]. 28.Zahrt OH, Evans K, Murnane E, Santoro E, Baiocchi M, Landay J, et al. Effects of wearable fitness trackers and activity adequacy mindsets on affect, behavior, and health: longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research [Internet]. 2022 Nov 14;25:e40529. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/40529
[29]. 29.Wiesent T, Alnatour J, Heidl C, Seeberger B. Health-related consumer wearable use for elderly people. Gerontechnology [Internet]. 2024 Jul 31;23(s):1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2024.23.s.1022.opp
[30]. 30.Kyytsönen M, Vehko T, Anttila H, Ikonen J. Factors associated with use of wearable technology to support activity, well-being, or a healthy lifestyle in the adult population and among older adults. PLOS Digital Health [Internet]. 2023 May 10;2(5):e0000245. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000245
[31]. 31.Pardamean B, Soeparno H, Budiarto A, Mahesworo B, Baurley J. Quantified Self-Using Consumer Wearable Device: Predicting Physical and Mental Health. Healthcare Informatics Research [Internet]. 2020 Apr 30;26(2):83–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.2.83
[32]. 32.Grossi NR, Batinic B, Moharitsch S. Sleep and health: examining the relation of sleep to burnout and well-being using a consumer fitness tracker. Health and Technology [Internet]. 2021 Oct 5;11(6):1247–57. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00603-0
[33]. 33.Alhejaili R, Alomainy A. The use of wearable technology in providing assistive solutions for Mental Well-Being. Sensors [Internet]. 2023 Aug 24;23(17):7378. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177378
[34]. 34.Devine JK, Schwartz LP, Choynowski J, Hursh SR. Expert Demand for consumer sleep technology features and wearable Devices: a case study. IoT [Internet]. 2022 Jun 8;3(2):315–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/iot3020018
[35]. 35.Tikkanen H, Heinonen K, Ravald A. Smart Wearable Technologies as Resources for Consumer Agency in Well-Being. Journal of Interactive Marketing [Internet]. 2023 Feb 1;58(2–3):136–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221143351
[36]. 36.Yen HY, Liao Y, Huang HY. Smart wearable device users’ behavior is essential for physical activity improvement. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine [Internet]. 2021 Aug 6;29(3):278–85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10013-1
[37]. 37.Rani N, Chu SL. Wearables can help me learn: A survey of user perception of wearable technologies for learning in everyday life. Education and Information Technologies [Internet]. 2021 Sep 25;27(3):3381–401. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10726-6
[38]. 38.Hewitt B, Deranek K, McLeod A, Gudi A. Exercise motives impact on physical activities measured using wearable devices. Health Promotion International [Internet]. 2022 Jun 1;37(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac071
[39]. 39.Morozova D, Gurova O. Being like others vs. being different: Wearable technology and daily practices of 50+ consumers in Russia and Finland. International Journal of Consumer Studies [Internet]. 2021 Jan 26;45(6):1335–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12656
[40]. 40.Meier DY, Barthelmess P, Sun W, Liberatore F. Wearable technology acceptance in health care based on national culture differences: Cross-Country Analysis between Chinese and Swiss consumers. Journal of Medical Internet Research [Internet]. 2020 Jul 29;22(10):e18801. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/18801
[41]. 41.Gorecki MC, Piotrowski ME, Brown CM, Teli RR, Percy Z, Lane L, et al. STEP IN: Supporting together exercise and play and improving nutrition; a feasibility study of Parent-Led group sessions and fitness trackers to improve family healthy lifestyle behaviors in a Low-Income, predominantly Black population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2023 Apr 28;20(9):5686. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20095686
[42]. 42.Díaz-Quesada G, Bahamonde-Pérez C, Giménez-Egido JM, Torres-Luque G. Use of wearable devices to study physical activity in early childhood education. Sustainability [Internet]. 2021 Dec 18;13(24):13998. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413998
[43]. 43.AlSayegh LA, Al-Mustafa MS, Alali AH, Farhan MF, AlShamlan NA, AlOmar RS. Association between fitness tracker use, physical activity, and general health of adolescents in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Family and Community Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Oct 1;30(4):251–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_110_23
[44]. 44.Stefana E, Marciano F, Rossi D, Cocca P, Tomasoni G. Wearable Devices for Ergonomics: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors [Internet]. 2021 Jan 24;21(3):777. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030777
[45]. 45.Syifa AM, Musyahda L, Segoh D. Systematic literature review: DOGBL in enhancing EFL students’ motivation. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) [Internet]. 2024 Feb 17;18(2):544–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21156
[46]. 46.Aziz AA, Nor R nor H, Jusoh YY, Rahman WNWAb, Ali NMohd. Factors Influencing Information Quality of Information Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization [Internet]. 2024 Nov 30;8(3–2):1923. Available from: https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.3-2.3483
[47]. 47.Carrera-Rivera A, Ochoa W, Larrinaga F, Lasa G. How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research. MethodsX [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1;9:101895. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895
[48]. 48.Kebede R, Moscati A, Johansson P. Semantic Web and Linked Data for Information Exchange between the Building and Product Manufacturing Industries: A Literature Review. CIB W78 Conference Series [Internet]. 2020 Aug 4;248–65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46421/2706-6568.37.2020.paper018
[49]. 49.Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2015 Oct 19;106(1):213–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
[50]. 50.Güzel O, Vizuete-Luciano E, Merigó-Lindahl JM. A systematic literature review of the Pay-What-You-Want pricing under PRISMA protocol. European Research on Management and Business Economics [Internet]. 2024 Dec 4;31(1):100266. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2024.100266
[51]. 51.García-López IM, González CSG, Ramírez-Montoya MS, Molina-Espinosa JM. Challenges of implementing ChatGPT on education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research Open [Internet]. 2024 Nov 20;8:100401. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100401
[52]. 52.Shakthinathan R, Kunjuraman V. A Systematic literature review of resilience Approaches in Small and Medium Tourism-Based sector. Deleted Journal [Internet]. 2024 Nov 30;20(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2024.2104.46
[53]. 53.Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, McGuinness LA. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2022 Mar 27;18(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
[54]. 54.Shi X, Huang Z. Wearable device monitoring exercise energy consumption based on internet of things. Complexity [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1;2021(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8836723
[55]. 55.Deranek K, Hewitt B, Gudi A, McLeod A. The impact of exercise motives on adolescents’ sustained use of wearable technology. Behaviour and Information Technology [Internet]. 2020 Feb 1;40(7):691–705. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2020.1720295
[56]. 56.Miller DJ, Sargent C, Roach GD. A validation of six wearable devices for estimating sleep, heart rate and heart rate variability in healthy adults. Sensors [Internet]. 2022 Aug 22;22(16):6317. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166317
[57]. 57.Saylam B, İncel ÖD. Quantifying Digital Biomarkers for Well-Being: stress, anxiety, positive and negative affect via wearable devices and their Time-Based predictions. Sensors [Internet]. 2023 Nov 5;23(21):8987. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218987
[58]. 58.Bhanvadia SB, Brar MS, Delavar A, Tavakoli K, Saseendrakumar BR, Weinreb RN, et al. Assessing Usability of Smartwatch Digital Health Devices for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring among Glaucoma Patients. Informatics [Internet]. 2022 Oct 6;9(4):79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040079
[59]. 59.Kang H, Jung EH. The smart wearables-privacy paradox: A cluster analysis of smartwatch users. Behaviour and Information Technology [Internet]. 2020 Jun 12;40(16):1755–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2020.1778787
[60]. 60.Phonthanukitithaworn C, Sellitto C. A willingness to disclose personal information for monetary reward: a study of fitness tracker users in Thailand. SAGE Open [Internet]. 2022 Apr 1;12(2):215824402210973. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221097399
[61]. 61.Alshammari SA, Albalawi NS. Enhancing Healthcare Monitoring: A Deep Learning Approach to Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors. Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research [Internet]. 2024 Dec 2;14(6):18843–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.9255






