Published
2025-12-12
Section
Review Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mian Zhu*, Supyan Hussin, Harwati Hashim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
EFL pre-service teachers’ professional identity in the age of AI: An integrative review (2015-2025)
Mian Zhu
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia ; School of Foreign Languages, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang 473061, China
Supyan Hussin
Institute of Ethnic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
Harwati Hashim
Institute of Ethnic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4361
Keywords: artificial intelligence; teacher professional identity; pre-service teachers; english as a foreign language; reflective practice; self-efficacy; AI literacy; teacher education
Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education is transforming how teachers are prepared and how their professional identities evolve within digitally mediated environments. While prior studies have examined AI’s influence on teaching effectiveness and digital competence, comparatively little attention has been given to its impact on the identity formation of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pre-service teachers. This integrative review therefore aims to provide a consolidated understanding of how AI shapes their emerging teacher identities. It synthesizes 31 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 from Scopus and Web of Science, following PRISMA-guided screening and MMAT quality appraisal. A mixed analytical strategy combining quantitative trend mapping and qualitative thematic synthesis was employed to trace how AI use interacts with self-efficacy, reflective practice, professional agency, and ethical reasoning in teacher education. The findings indicate three interconnected roles of AI in the development of professional identity: (1) as a reflective partner that enhances metacognitive awareness through adaptive and dialogic feedback; (2) as a pedagogical scaffold that improves efficacy, motivation, and agency during lesson design and microteaching; and (3) as an ethical mediator that encourages reflection on authenticity, authorship, and moral responsibility. Across contexts, AI integration strengthens professional identity when embedded within human-centered, ethically framed pedagogies that balance automation with reflective judgment. The review concludes by proposing an AI-enhanced identity ecology and outlining implications for reflective pedagogy, ethical AI literacy, and identity-oriented teacher education, along with directions for future longitudinal and cross-cultural research.
References
[1]. 1.Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., et al., 2022. Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 32(3), 504–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
[2]. 2.Beauchamp, C., Thomas, L., 2009. Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education. 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252.
[3]. 3.Farrell, T. S., 2016. Surviving the transition shock in the first year of teaching through reflective practice. System, 61, 12–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.005
[4]. 4.Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., 2001. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education. 17(7), 783–805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
[5]. 5.Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
[6]. 6.Shao, J., Sun, S., 2025. Teacher identity in the era of intelligence. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice. 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.62177/jetp.v2i1.141
[7]. 7.Stolpe, K., Hallström, J., 2024. Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open. 6, 100159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159
[8]. 8.Sarkis-Onofre, R., Catalá-López, F., Aromataris, E., et al., 2021. How to properly use the PRISMA statement. Systematic Reviews. 10(1), 117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01671-z
[9]. 9.Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., 2004. Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education. 20(2), 107–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
[10]. 10.Kelchtermans, G., 2005. Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education. 21(8), 995–1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.009
[11]. 11.Bandura, A., 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
[12]. 12.Shulman, L. S., 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review. 57(1), 1–23.
[13]. 13.Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., 2009. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 9(1), 60–70.
[14]. 14.Hockly, N., 2023. Artificial intelligence in English language teaching: The good, the bad, and the ugly. RELC Journal. 54(2), 445–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231168504
[15]. 15.Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., et al., 2024. AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology. 55(6), 2503–2529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
[16]. 16.Barrot, J. S., 2024. ChatGPT as a language learning tool: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 29(4), 1151–1156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09711-4
[17]. 17.Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., et al., 2024. Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence: An intervention study in an initial language teacher education course. System. 125, 103399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103399
[18]. 18.Bauer, E., Sailer, M., Niklas, F., et al., 2025. AI-based adaptive feedback in simulations for teacher education: An experimental replication in the field. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 41(1), e13123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13123
[19]. 19.Pu, S., Ahmad, N. A., Md Khambari, M. N., et al., 2021. Improvement of pre-service teachers’ practical knowledge and motivation about Artificial Intelligence through a service-learning-based module in Guizhou, China: A quasi-experimental study. Asian Journal of University Education. 17(3), 203–219.
[20]. 20.Alkolaly, M., Zeid, F., Al-Shamali, N., et al., 2025. Comparing lecturers and students attitude towards the role of Generative Artificial Intelligence systems in foreign language teaching and learning. Qubahan Academic Journal. 5(3), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n3a1583
[21]. 21.Hatamleh, H. A., Alsaadi, O., Alkhafaji, B., et al., 2025. Game-based and AI-driven engagement strategies to combat demotivation in foreign language learning. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 12(3), 119-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2025.03.013
[22]. 22.Sperling, K., Stenberg, C. J., McGrath, C., et al., 2024. In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open. 6, 100169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169
[23]. 23.Mikeladze, T., Meijer, P. C., Verhoeff, R. P., 2024. A comprehensive exploration of artificial intelligence competence frameworks for educators: A critical review. European Journal of Education. 59(3), e12663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12663
[24]. 24.Spasopoulos, T., Sotiropoulos, D., & Kalogiannakis, M., 2025. Generative AI in pre-service science teacher education: A systematic review. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research. 5(2), 1501–1523.
[25]. 25.Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., Hu, X., 2022. Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences. 12(8), 569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569
[26]. 26.Guan, L., Zhang, Y., Gu, M. M., 2025. Pre-service teachers preparedness for AI-integrated education: An investigation from perceptions, capabilities, and teachers’ identity changes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 8, 100341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100341
[27]. 27.Ghiasvand, F., Seyri, H., 2025. A collaborative reflection on the synergy of artificial intelligence (AI) and language teacher identity. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 10(1), 1–19.
[28]. 28.Lan, Y., 2024. Through tensions to identity-based motivations: Exploring teacher professional identity in Artificial Intelligence-enhanced teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education. 151, 104736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104736
[29]. 29.Hopia, H., Latvala, E., Liimatainen, L., 2016. Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 30(4), 662–669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12327
[30]. 30.Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., et al., 2018. The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information. 34(4), 285–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
[31]. 31.Thomas, J., Harden, A., 2008. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 8(1), 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
[32]. 32.Chuang, H. H., 2016. Leveraging CRT awareness in creating web-based projects through use of online collaborative learning for pre-service teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development. 64(4), 857–876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9438-5
[33]. 33.Mitchell, C., Friedrich, L., Appleget, C., 2019. Preservice teachers’ blogging: Collaboration across universities for meaningful technology integration. Teaching Education. 30(4), 356–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1486815
[34]. 34.Campbell, C., Tran, T. L. N., 2021. Using an implementation trial of an ePortfolio system to promote student learning through self-reflection: Leveraging the success. Education Sciences. 11(6), 263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060263
[35]. 35.Hunt, P., Leijen, Ä., Van der Schaaf, M., 2021. Automated feedback is nice and human presence makes it better: Teachers’ perceptions of feedback by means of an e-portfolio enhanced with learning analytics. Education Sciences. 11(6), 278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060278
[36]. 36.Han, Y., Ni, R., Gao, J., 2023. Regional inequality of higher education development in China: Comprehensive evaluation and geographical representation. Sustainability. 15(3), 1824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031824
[37]. 37.Cai, H., Lu, L., Han, B., et al., 2025. Exploring pre-service teachers’ reflection mediated by an AI-powered teacher dashboard in video-based professional learning: A pilot study. Educational Technology Research and Development. 73(2), 1129–1154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10442-1
[38]. 38.Sert, O., 2025. Partnering with AI in teacher education? Using an automatic question detection tool to reflect on classroom interaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2025.2504355
[39]. 39.Arefian, M. H., Çomoğlu, I., Dikilitaş, K., 2024. Understanding EFL teachers’ experiences of ChatGPT-driven collaborative reflective practice through a community of practice lens. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2412769
[40]. 40.Demir, B., Özdemir, D., 2025. AI voice journaling for future language teachers: A path to well‐being through reflective practices. British Educational Research Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4174
[41]. 41.Erbay-Çetinkaya, Ş., 2025. A triadic support framework for reflective teacher identity: Peer, AI, and faculty collaboration within a community of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education. 168, 105239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105239
[42]. 42.Wei, X., Wang, L., Koszalka, T. A., et al., 2025. Enhancing pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking skills through generative AI-assisted digital storytelling creation: A three-dimensional framework analysis. Computers & Education. 105356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105356
[43]. 43.Chen, P., Kim, S., 2023. The impact of digital transformation on innovation performance-The mediating role of innovation factors. Heliyon. 9(3).
[44]. 44.Carroll, W. R., Bandura, A., 1985. Role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior. 17(3), 269–281.
[45]. 45.Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., Hoy, W. K., 1998. Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research. 68(2), 202–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
[46]. 46.Zhao, L., Liu, X., Su, Y. S., 2021. The differentiate effect of self-efficacy, motivation, and satisfaction on pre-service teacher students’ learning achievement in a flipped classroom: A case of a modern educational technology course. Sustainability. 13(5), 2888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052888
[47]. 47.Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., et al., 2021. The power of feedback and reflection: Testing an online scenario-based learning intervention for student teachers. Computers and Education. 169, 104194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104194
[48]. 48.Pozas, M., Letzel, V., Frohn, J., 2024. An empirical study exploring pre-service teachers’ profiles and their prospective ICT integration: Is it a matter of attitudes, self-efficacy, self-concept or concerns? Journal of Computers in Education. 11(1), 237–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00254-8
[49]. 49.Karataş, F., Ataç, B. A., 2024. When TPACK meets artificial intelligence: Analyzing TPACK and AI-TPACK components through structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies. 30, 8979–9004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13164-2
[50]. 50.Irani, F. H., 2024. A path to an innovative teacher education design: Significance of teachers’ professional identity as a central construct. Education and Self Development. 19(3), 12–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.19.3.02
[51]. 51.Garcia-Esteban, S., Villarreal, I., Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., 2021. The effect of telecollaboration in the development of the Learning to Learn competence in CLIL teacher training. Interactive Learning Environments. 29(6), 973–986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1614960
[52]. 52.Zhu, S., Li, Q., Yao, Y., et al., 2025. Improving writing feedback quality and self-efficacy of pre-service teachers in Gen-AI contexts: An experimental mixed-method design. Assessing Writing. 66, 100960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100960
[53]. 53.Al-Nofaie, H., Alwerthan, T. A., 2024. Appreciative inquiry into implementing artificial intelligence for the development of language student teachers. Sustainability. 16(21), 9361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219361
[54]. 54.Meegan, J., Young, K., 2025. It’s a tool not a crutch: A pilot Generative AI intervention to enhance pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy and AI literacy. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09875-1
[55]. 55.Wong, G. K., 2015. Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers of primary mathematics in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 31(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1890
[56]. 56.Akayoglu, S., Satar, H. M., Dikilitas, K., et al., 2020. Digital literacy practices of Turkish pre-service EFL teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 36(1), 85–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4711
[57]. 57.Prilop, C. N., Mah, D. K., Jacobsen, L. J., et al., 2025. Generative AI in teacher education: Educators’ perceptions of transformative potentials and the triadic nature of AI literacy explored through AI-enhanced methods. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 100471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100471
[58]. 58.Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Bakogianni, D., Danidou, Y., et al., 2025. Investigating student teacher engagement with data-driven AI and ethical reasoning in a graduate-level education course. Education Sciences. 15(9), 1179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091179
[59]. 59.Xu, G., Yu, A., Gao, A., et al., 2025. Developing an AI-TPACK framework: Exploring the mediating role of AI attitudes in pre-service TCSL teachers’ self-efficacy and AI-TPACK. Education and Information Technologies. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13630-5
[60]. 60.Bae, H., Hur, J., Park, J., et al., 2024. Pre-service teachers’ dual perspectives on Generative AI: Benefits, challenges, and integration into their teaching and learning. Online Learning. 28(3), 131–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4543
[61]. 61.McLay, K. F., Reyes, V. C., 2019. Identity and digital equity: Reflections on a university educational technology course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 35(6), 15–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5552
[62]. 62.Lan, G., Feng, X., Du, S., et al., 2025. Integrating ethical knowledge in generative AI education: Constructing the GenAI-TPACK framework for university teachers’ professional development. Education and Information Technologies. 1–24.
[63]. 63.Zhang, Y., Lai, C., Gu, M. M. Y., 2025. Becoming a teacher in the era of AI: A multiple-case study of pre-service teachers’ investment in AI-facilitated learning-to-teach practices. System. 133, 103746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103746
[64]. 64.Creely, E., Carabott, K., 2025. Teaching and learning with AI: An integrated AI-oriented pedagogical model. The Australian Educational Researcher. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00913-6
[65]. 65.Abdulbaki, S., Harrathi, H., Khasawneh, M. A., et al., 2025. A comparative study of national, gender, and academic differences in smartphone addiction among students from Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the UAE. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 12(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2025.08.010
[66]. 66.Beirat, M. A., Tashtoush, D. M., Khasawneh, M. A. S., et al., 2025. The effect of artificial intelligence on enhancing education quality and reduce the levels of future anxiety among Jordanian teachers. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences. 19(2), 279-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/190205
[67]. 67.Demirtaş, B., Mumcu, F., 2021. Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of ICT and TPACK competencies. Acta Educationis Generalis. 11(2), 60–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2021-0013
[68]. 68.Lee, S., Jeon, J., Choe, H., 2025. Generative AI (GenAI) and pre-service teacher agency in ELT. ELT Journal. 79(2), 287–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaf005
[69]. 69.Xerri, D., 2025. Enhancing reflective practice in language teacher education: Technology as a critical reflective partner. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning. 7(2), 103214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v7n2.103214
[70]. 70.Zagami, J., 2024. AI chatbot influences on preservice teachers’ understanding of student diversity and lesson differentiation in online initial teacher education. International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 23(4), 443–455.
[71]. 71.Sun, P., Ma, K., Xu, X., et al., 2025. How self-efficacy shapes professional identity: The mediating role of meaning in life and self-esteem in pre-service physical education teachers. BMC Psychology. 13(1), 1–13.
[72]. 72.Wang, K., Ruan, Q., Zhang, X., et al., 2024. Pre-service teachers’ GenAI anxiety, technology self-efficacy, and TPACK: Their structural relations with behavioral intention to design GenAI-assisted teaching. Behavioral Sciences. 14(5), 373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050373
[73]. 73.Gudmundsdottir, S., Shulman, L., 1987. Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 31(2), 59–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383870310201






