Published
2025-12-25
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Teng Zhu*, Jamilah Binti Jamal, Suhaini binti Muda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Mediating effect of social media influencer’s credibility on the relationship between CSR initiatives, CSR supportive behavior, and consumer brand loyalty
Teng Zhu
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Jamilah Binti Jamal
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Suhaini binti Muda
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4411
Keywords: CSR initiatives; social media influencer credibility; CSR-supportive behavior; consumer brand loyalty; structural equation modelin
Abstract
This study explores the impact of CSR initiatives (CSRI) and CSR-supportive behaviors (CSRSB) on consumer brand loyalty (CBL), with social media influencer credibility (SMIC) as a mediating factor. A survey of 550 Chinese sports brand consumers was conducted, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed for data analysis. The results show that CSRI significantly influences CSRSB (β = 0.667, t = 27.538, p < 0.001) and SMIC (β = 0.685, t = 13.793, p < 0.001). Additionally, CSRSB positively affects SMIC (β = 0.472, t = 13.793, p < 0.001) and CBL (β = 0.232, t = 5.425, p < 0.001). The mediation analysis confirms that SMIC partially mediates the relationship between CSRI and CBL (β = 0.209, t = 4.830, p = 0.001), highlighting the importance of influencer credibility in consumer trust and brand loyalty. The findings suggest that brands should strategically collaborate with credible influencers to amplify CSR messages and enhance long-term consumer engagement. The study provides valuable insights for businesses on optimizing influencer marketing strategies to strengthen CSR-driven brand loyalty.
References
[1]. 1.Fernandes, T., & Moreira, M. (2019) - Consumer brand engagement, satisfaction and brand loyalty: A comparative study between functional and emotional brand relationships. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
[2]. 2.Jibril, A. B., Kwarteng, M. A., Chovancova, M., & Pilik, M. (2019). The impact of social media on consumer-brand loyalty: A mediating role of online based-brand community. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1673640. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1673640
[3]. 3.Coelho, P. S., Rita, P., & Santos, Z. R. (2018) - On the relationship between consumer-brand identification, brand community, and brand loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 101–110.
[4]. 4.Khamitov, M., Wang, X., & Thomson, M. (2019) - How well do consumer-brand relationships drive customer brand loyalty? Generalizations from a meta-analysis of brand relationship elasticities. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1868026
[5]. 5.Mansouri, H., Rasaee Rad, A., Tsiotsou, R. H., & Md Husin, M. (2024). Measuring the patronage intentions among football fans: The role of corporate social responsibility, brand credibility, and brand equity. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship.
[6]. 6.Ortas, E., Álvarez, I., Jaussaud, J., & Garayar, A. (2015). The impact of institutional and social context on corporate environmental, social, and governance performance of companies committed to voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 673–684.
[7]. 7.Halkos, G., & Nomikos, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 106–117.
[8]. 8.Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., & Kim, Y. (2017). Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 360–385.
[9]. 9.Mishra, P., & Schmidt, G. B. (2018). How can leaders of multinational organizations be ethical by contributing to corporate social responsibility initiatives? Guidelines and pitfalls for leaders trying to do good. Business Horizons, 61(6), 833–843.
[10]. 10.Sen, S., Du, S., & Bhattacharya, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: A consumer psychology perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 70–75.
[11]. 11.Lau, C., Lu, Y., & Liang, Q. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in China: A corporate governance approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 73–87.
[12]. 12.Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87–96.
[13]. 13.Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 123–135.
[14]. 14.Gürlek, M., Düzgün, E., & Meydan Uygur, S. (2017). How does corporate social responsibility create customer loyalty? The role of corporate image. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(3), 409–427.
[15]. 15.Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., Bagherzadeh, M., & Singh, J. J. (2020). Co-creation: A key link between corporate social responsibility, customer trust, and customer loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 163, 151–166.
[16]. 16.Kim, E., & Ham, S. (2016). Restaurants’ disclosure of nutritional information as a corporate social responsibility initiative: Customers’ attitudinal and behavioral responses. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 96–106.
[17]. 17.Kim, S.-B., & Kim, D.-Y. (2016). The impacts of corporate social responsibility, service quality, and transparency on relationship quality and customer loyalty in the hotel industry. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1(1), 39–55.
[18]. 18.Niskanen, H. (2019). Sustainability in the sporting goods industry: How Nike, Adidas, and Puma have developed company sustainability.
[19]. 19.Tingchi Liu, M., Anthony Wong, I., Rongwei, C., & Tseng, T.-H. (2014). Do perceived CSR initiatives enhance customer preference and loyalty in casinos? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(7), 1024–1045.
[20]. 20.Li, J.-Y., Overton, H., & Bhalla, N. (2020). Communicative action and supportive behaviors for environmental CSR practices: An attitude-based segmentation approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(2), 171–186.
[21]. 21.Ogunfowora, B., Stackhouse, M., & Oh, W.-Y. (2018). Media Depictions of CEO Ethics and Stakeholder Support of CSR Initiatives: The Mediating Roles of CSR Motive Attributions and Cynicism. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 525–540.
[22]. 22.Kim, Y., & Chon, M.-G. (2022). Exploring effects of message framing on supportive behaviors toward environmental corporate social responsibility. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(4), 760–780.
[23]. 23.Ajina, A. S., Japutra, A., Nguyen, B., Syed Alwi, S. F., & Al-Hajla, A. H. (2019). The importance of CSR initiatives in building customer support and loyalty: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(3), 691–713.
[24]. 24.Kim, S., & Ferguson, M. A. T. (2018). Dimensions of effective CSR communication based on public expectations. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(6), 549–567.
[25]. 25.Lee, C.-K., Kim, J., & Kim, J. S. (2018). Impact of a gaming company’s CSR on residents’ perceived benefits, quality of life, and support. Tourism Management, 64, 281–290.
[26]. 26.Eisingerich, A. B., Auh, S., & Merlo, O. (2014). Acta Non Verba? The Role of Customer Participation and Word of Mouth in the Relationship Between Service Firms’ Customer Satisfaction and Sales Performance. Journal of Service Research, 17(1), 40–53.
[27]. 27.Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How Social Media Influencers Foster Relationships with Followers: The Roles of Source Credibility and Fairness in Parasocial Relationship and Product Interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 133–147.
[28]. 28.Balaban, D., & Mustățea, M. (2019). Users’ perspective on the credibility of social media influencers in Romania and Germany. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 21(1), 31–46.
[29]. 29.Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73.
[30]. 30.Saima, & Khan, M. A. (2021). Effect of Social Media Influencer Marketing on Consumers’ Purchase Intention and the Mediating Role of Credibility. Journal of Promotion Management, 27(4), 503–523.
[31]. 31.Weismueller, J., Harrigan, P., Wang, S., & Soutar, G. N. (2020). Influencer Endorsements: How Advertising Disclosure and Source Credibility Affect Consumer Purchase Intention on Social Media. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 160–170.
[32]. 32.Nafees, L., Cook, C. M., Nikolov, A. N., & Stoddard, J. E. (2021). Can social media influencer (SMI) power influence consumer brand attitudes? The mediating role of perceived SMI credibility. Digital Business, 1(2), 100008.
[33]. 33.Zia, M., Zahra, M. F., & Hayat, N. (2021). Instagram Beauty Influencers and Purchase Decisions: Exploring The Mediating Role of Source Credibility. https://www.vfast.org/journals/index.php/VTESS/article/view/651
[34]. 34.Lee, J. K. (2021). The effects of team identification on consumer purchase intention in sports influencer marketing: The mediation effect of ad content value moderated by sports influencer credibility. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1957073. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1957073
[35]. 35.Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., & Toivonen, H. (2016). Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 182–192.
[36]. 36.Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101736. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-10-2015-0154
[37]. 37.Jang, W. (Eric), Kim, J. (Jay), Kim, S., & Chun, J. W. (2021). The role of engagement in travel influencer marketing: The perspectives of dual process theory and the source credibility model. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(17), 2416–2420. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1673640
[38]. 38.Chan, Y. Y., & Mansori, S. (2016). Factor that influences consumers’ brand loyalty towards cosmetic products. Journal of Marketing Management and Consumer Behavior, 1(1)
[39]. 39.Plewa, C., Carrillat, F. A., Mazodier, M., & Quester, P. G. (2016). Which sport sponsorships most impact sponsor CSR image? European Journal of Marketing, 50(5/6), 796–815.
[40]. 40.Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2016). Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 253–264.
[41]. 41.Fernández, P., Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza, V. (2022). What drives CSR communication effectiveness on social media? A process-based theoretical framework and research agenda. International Journal of Advertising, 41(3), 385–413.
[42]. 42.Dalla-Pria, L., & Rodríguez-de-Dios, I. (2022). CSR communication on social media: The impact of source and framing on message credibility, corporate reputation and WOM. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(3), 543–557.
[43]. 43.Sharma, R., & Jain, V. (2019). CSR, Trust, Brand Loyalty and Brand Equity: Empirical Evidences from Sportswear Industry in the NCR Region of India. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 18(1), 57–67.
[44]. 44.Rivera, J. J., Bigne, E., & Curras-Perez, R. (2019). Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on consumer brand loyalty. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 21, 395–415.
[45]. 45.Ismail, A. (2017). The influence of perceived social media marketing activities on brand loyalty: The mediation effect of brand and value consciousness. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-10-2015-0154
[46]. 46.Smith, B. G., Kendall, M. C., Knighton, D., & Wright, T. (2018). Rise of the Brand Ambassador: Social Stake, Corporate Social Responsibility and Influence among the Social Media Influencers. Communication Management Review, 03(01), 6–29.
[47]. 47.Martínez, P., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. (2013). CSR and customer loyalty: The roles of trust, customer identification with the company and satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 89–99.
[48]. 48.Kim, E. (Anna), Duffy, M., & Thorson, E. (2021). Under the Influence: Social Media Influencers’ Impact on Response to Corporate Reputation Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 50(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1868026
[49]. 49.Morgan, K. (1970). Sample size determination using Krejcie and Morgan table. Kenya Projects Organization (KENPRO), 38, 607-610.
[50]. 50.Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934
[51]. 51.Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64–65
[52]. 52.Orzan, P. G. (n.d.). Conceptual Model Regarding the Influence of Social Media Marketing Communication on Brand Trust, Brand Affect and Brand Loyalty.
[53]. 53.Kim, T.-H., & White, H. (2004). On more robust estimation of skewness and kurtosis. Finance Research Letters, 1(1), 56–73






