ESP-4418

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 12 (2025): Publishing

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ziyan Li

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Ziyan Li. (2025). The extension of wealth gap in education: the impact of economic inequality perception on students’ value perception. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(12), ESP-4418. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4418

The extension of wealth gap in education: the impact of economic inequality perception on students' value perception

Ziyan Li

Sociology，Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, The United Kingdom


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4418


Keywords: wealth gap; value perception; economic inequality; fairness perception; equal opportunity

Abstract

Abstract: Wealth gap is one of the key issues facing modern society. The inequality in social distribution and the risk of class solidification caused by it have gradually penetrated into the field of education. For young students, the economic inequality perception brought about by wealth gap affects students' correct values. Therefore, the study proposes hypotheses H1 and H2 to analyze the specific impact of economic inequality perception on students’ educational value perceptions and fairness beliefs. The study conducts a questionnaire survey on 463 middle school students, and conducts regression analysis and mediation analysis based on the survey results. A negative correlation was observed between students' economic inequality perception and their educational value perception, at -0.24, (p<0.01). Students' economic inequality perception and their equal opportunity perception also showed a significant negative correlation, at -0.27 (p<0.01). Economic inequality perception also had negative impacts on educational values (β=-0.17, t=4.14 and p<0.001), while fairness perception and the equal opportunity perception had a significant mediating effect.

References

[1]. 1.Schmalor A, Heine S J. The construct of subjective economic inequality[J]. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2022, 13(1): 210-219.

[2]. 2.Mijs J J B. The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand[J]. Socio-Economic Review, 2021, 19(1): 7-35.

[3]. 3.Ugur Z B. How does inequality hamper subjective well-being? The role of fairness[J]. Social indicators research, 2021, 158(2): 377-407.

[4]. 4.Vezzoli M, Valtorta R R, Mari S, et al. Effects of objective and subjective indicators of economic inequality on subjective well‐being: Underlying mechanisms[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2023, 53(2): 85-100.

[5]. 5.Willis G B, García-Sánchez E, Sánchez-Rodríguez Á, García-Castro J D, Rodríguez-Bailón R. The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception[J]. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2022, 1(5): 301-309.

[6]. 6.Wang Z, Jetten J, Steffens N K. Restless in an unequal world: Economic inequality fuels the desire for wealth and status[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2023, 49(6): 871-890.

[7]. 7.Xu H, Bolton L E, Winterich K P. How do consumers react to company moral transgressions? The role of power distance belief and empathy for victims[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2021, 48(1): 77-101.

[8]. 8.Liu Z, Hasan M M, Xuan L I, Saydaliev H B, Lan J, Iqbal W. Trilemma association of education, income and poverty alleviation: managerial implications for inclusive economic growth[J]. The Singapore Economic Review, 2023, 68(04): 1469-1492.

[9]. 9.Spada A, Fiore M, Galati A. The impact of education and culture on poverty reduction: Evidence from panel data of European countries[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2024, 175(3): 927-940.

[10]. 10.Du H, King R B. What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2022, 61(1): 19-36.

[11]. 11.Heiserman N, Simpson B. Measuring perceptions of economic inequality and justice: An empirical assessment[J]. Social Justice Research, 2021, 34(2): 119-145.

[12]. 12.Killen M, Rutland A. Promoting fair and just school environments: Develope inclusive youth[J]. Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences, 2022, 9(1): 81-89.

[13]. 13.Soler-Martínez F M, García-Sánchez E, Willis G B. Beyond Income Disparities: Perceived Health and Education Inequities Drive Actions to Reduce Economic Inequality[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2025, 55(2): 396-415.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com