Published
2025-12-25
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yanfeng Hu, Mohd Faiz bin Yahaya, Saiful Hasley bin Ramliand, Yu-Lin Hsu, Si Cheng

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Exploring the psychological mechanism of how the multidimensional features of computer products affect consumer satisfaction: An extension of the unified model of aesthetics (UMA)
Yanfeng Hu
Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia
Mohd Faiz bin Yahaya
Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia
Saiful Hasley bin Ramliand
Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia
Yu-Lin Hsu
College of Tea and Food Science and Technology, Zhangzhou College of Science and Technology, Fujian, 363000, China
Si Cheng
Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4433
Keywords: perceptual organisation; cognitive evaluation; social meaning; visual coherence; aesthetic judgement
Abstract
This study examines the psychological mechanisms underlying consumer responses to computer product appearances by employing the Unified Model of Aesthetics (UMA) as an integrative framework. UMA proposes that aesthetic evaluation arises from the reconciliation of evolutionary needs for safety and accomplishment across perceptual, cognitive, and social levels. Building on this model, the study incorporates key attributes—unity, variety, proximity, closure, symmetry, continuity, typicality, novelty, performance, security, connectedness, and autonomy—to analyze their contributions to consumer satisfaction. Data were collected from 211 computer users in China and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The results show that perceptual organization cues, including unity, variety, and Gestalt-based principles, enhance satisfaction by supporting coherent and fluent visual processing. Cognitive attributes such as typicality and novelty jointly reinforce the balance between familiarity and advancement, while performance and security strengthen safety-oriented evaluations. Social attributes, including connectedness and autonomy, significantly influence satisfaction by addressing needs for group affiliation and individual expression. Overall, the findings validate UMA as a useful framework for explaining aesthetic responses to high-technology products and highlight the importance of integrating perceptual, cognitive, and social dimensions in product design. These insights provide actionable implications for firms seeking to improve user experience through strategically crafted visual and symbolic features.
References
[1]. 1.Zhenlong, Z. The Use of Computer Hardware and Software. Heilongjiang Sci. Inf. 2003, 4, 42-42.
[2]. 2.International Data Corporation (IDC) Report on Global PC Shipments. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/technology/global-pc-market-returns-growth-first-quarter-after-two-year-decline-idc-says-2024-04-08 (accessed on 6 November 2024).
[3]. 3.Gartner, Inc. Worldwide PC Shipments Increased 1.9 Percent in Second Quarter of 2024. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-07-10-gartner-says-worldwide-pc-shipments-increased-1-point-9-percent-in-second-quarter-of-2024 (accessed on 6 November 2024).
[4]. 4.Counterpoint Research on Global PC Market Shipments. Available online: https://www.199it.com/archives/1722327.html (accessed on 6 November 2024).
[5]. 5.Jung, C. and Lim, D. Development of an adaptive forecasting system: a case study of a pc manufacturer in south korea. Sustainability 2016, 8(3), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030263
[6]. 6.Handayani, P., Ariantana, I., & Pinem, A. (2020). How to increase customer repurchase intention in an online retailing store? an extended expectation confirmatory model. International Journal of Electronic.Int. J. Electron. Commerce Stud. 2020, 11(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.7903/ijecs.1721
[7]. 7.Lindström, J. A Model for Value-Based Selling: Enabling Corporations to Transition from Products and Services towards Further Complex Business Models. J. Multi Bus. Model Innov. Technol. 2016, 2(1), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.13052/jmbmit2245-456x.213
[8]. 8.Hekkert, P. Design Aesthetics: Principles of Pleasure in Design. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 48(2), 157–172.
[9]. 9.Liu, D. Enterprise Digital Retail Business Data Analysis and Forecasting Based on Time Series Analysis. Adv. Econ. Manag. Polit. Sci. 2024, 77(1), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/77/20241678
[10]. 10.Menggalawati, S. Determinants of Earnings Persistence: Literacy Study Manufacturing in Indonesia. Fokus Ekon. J. Ilmiah 2024, 19(1): 53-64. https://doi.org/10.34152/fe.19.1.53-64
[11]. 11.Kaura, V.; Prasad, C.S.D.; Sharma, S. Service Quality, Service Convenience, Price and Fairness, Customer Loyalty, and the Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2015, 33(4), 404–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2014-0048
[12]. 12.Joudeh, J.; Dandis, A. Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Internet Service Providers. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2018, 13(8), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v13n8p108
[13]. 13.Sampaio, C.; Mogollón, J.M.; Rodrigues, R.G. The Relationship Between Market Orientation, Customer Loyalty and Business Performance: A Sample from the Western Europe Hotel Industry. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2019, 20(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358419829179
[14]. 14.Adelia, S.P.; Aprianingsih, A. Proposed Marketing Strategy to Increase Customer Loyalty with Customer Satisfaction at Restaurant. Int. J. Curr. Sci. Res. Rev. 2023, 6(1), 290–295.. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V6-i1-30, Impact Factor: 5.995
[15]. 15.Post, R.; Nguyen, T.; Hekkert, P. Unity in Variety in Website Aesthetics: A Systematic Inquiry. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2017, 103, 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.003
[16]. 16.Valencia-Romero, A.; Lugo, J.E. An Immersive Virtual Discrete Choice Experiment for Elicitation of Product Aesthetics Using Gestalt Principles. Des. Sci. 2017, 3, e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.12
[17]. 17.Forbes, G. Visual Grouping and Its Application to Road Design and Traffic Control. Transp. Transp. Sci. 2020, 11(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2019.003
[18]. 18.Mandagi, D. Empirical Nexus of Hospital Brand Gestalt, Patient Satisfaction and Revisit Intention. Int. J. Pharm. Healthc. Mark. 2023, 18(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-04-2023-0030
[19]. 19.Pandey, R.; Ganatra, V.; Sonawane, H.; Fauzi, F.; Kee, D.; Yasir, N.; Zamri, N. The Impact of Global Trend on Courier Service and Consumer Satisfaction: A Study of DHL. Int. J. Tour. Hosp. Asia Pac. 2021, 4(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijthap.v4i1.1022
[20]. 20.Mather, Robert D., and Erin McReynolds. "Book Review: From the Gutter to the Stars: The Dynamical System of Evolutionary Forensic Psychology." Evolutionary Psychology. 2011.309-312.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900303
[21]. 21.Blijlevens, J.; Hekkert, P. Autonomous, Yet Connected: An Aesthetic Principle Explaining Our Appreciation of Product Designs. Psychol. Mark. 2019, 36(5), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21195
[22]. 22.Berghman, M. The Beauty of Balance—An Empirical Integration of the Unified Model of Aesthetics for Product Design. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 2016.
[23]. 23.Winlow, H. Darwinism and Social Darwinism. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2nd ed.; Kobayashi, A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10249-5
[24]. 24.Eyuboglu, N.; Buja, A. Quasi-Darwinian Selection in Marketing Relationships. J. Mark. 2007, 71(4), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.4.48
[25]. 25.Milner, R.; Furnham, A. Measuring Customer Feedback, Response and Satisfaction. Psychology 2017, 8(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.83021
[26]. 26.Teo, W. The Impact of Hedonic and Utilitarian Values, Alongside Psychological Factors, on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty of Female Consumers. Int. J. Adv. Bus. Stud. 2024, 3(Suppl. 1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.59857/ijabs.3912
[27]. 27.Hodgson, G. Understanding Organizational Evolution: Toward a Research Agenda Using Generalized Darwinism. Organ. Stud. 2013, 34(7), 973–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613485855
[28]. 28.Fauchart, E.; Gruber, M. Darwinians, Communitarians, and Missionaries: The Role of Founder Identity in Entrepreneurship. Acad. Manag. J. 2011, 54(5), 935–957. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0211
[29]. 29.Thurgood, C.; Hekkert, P.; Blijlevens, J. The Joint Effect of Typicality and Novelty on Aesthetic Pleasure for Product Designs: Influences of Safety and Risk. In Proceedings of the 23rd Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics; New York, NY, USA, 22–24 August 2014. Available online: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A650f4b20-9632-4810-a046-88695b9a01da
[30]. 30.Post, R.A.G.; Blijlevens, J.; Hekkert, P. To Preserve Unity While Almost Allowing for Chaos: Testing the Aesthetic Principle of Unity-in-Variety in Product Design. Acta Psychol. 2016, 163, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.013
[31]. 31.Khoshneshan, S. Comparing the Effectiveness of Problem-Solving Skills Training Based on Tolman and Gestalt Theories on Problem Solving Styles in High School Students. JAYPS 2023, 4(3), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jayps.4.3.4
[32]. 32.Ali, N. and Peebles, D. (2012). The effect of gestalt laws of perceptual organization on the comprehension of three-variable bar and line graphs. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 55(1), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812452592
[33]. 33.Yalcinkaya, M.; Singh, V. Exploring the Use of Gestalt’s Principles in Improving the Visualization, User Experience and Comprehension of COBie Data Extension. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2019, 26(6), 1024–1046. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2017-0226
[34]. 34.Zemliak, V. Spike Synchrony as a Measure of Gestalt Structure. bioRxiv 2023. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.570259
[35]. 35.Haskins, B. Machine Learning as a Feedback Tool for the Gestalt Principle of Proximity. In Proceedings of the iCARTi 2023 Conference; Mahebourg, Mauritius, 9th and 10th November 2023; pp. 101–106. https://doi.org/10.59200/icarti.2023.014
[36]. 36.Pandey, R. Impact of Aesthetics in Innovative Product Development on Consumer Perception and Acceptance. ECS Trans. 2022, 107(1), 9915–9922. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.9915ecst
[37]. 37.Gerhardstein, P.; Tse, J.; Dickerson, K.; Hipp, D.; Moser, A. The Human Visual System Uses a Global Closure Mechanism. Vision Res. 2012, 71, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.08.011
[38]. 38.Kootstra, G.; Kragić, D. Fast and Bottom-Up Object Detection, Segmentation, and Evaluation Using Gestalt Principles. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); Shanghai, China, 9–13 May 2011; pp. 3423–3428. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2011.5980410
[39]. 39.Wei, N.; Zhou, T.; Chen, L. Objective Measurement of Gestalts: Quantifying Grouping Effect by Tilt Aftereffect. Behav. Res. Methods 2017, 50(3), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0919-1
[40]. 40.Hu, Y.; Yahaya, M.F.; Ramli, S.H. Combining the Unified Model of Aesthetics (UMA) with Visual Information Processing to Investigate Computer Aesthetics. In Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy; Nanjing, China, 1-3 March; pp. 413–419.
[41]. 41.Chen, J. Interpreting several common consumer psychology from the perspective of evolutionary psychology. Consumer Guide 2009, (22), 15, 17. DOI: CNKI:SUN.0.2009-22-011
[42]. 42.Saad, G.; Gill, T. Applications of Evolutionary Psychology in Marketing. Psychol. Mark. 2000, 17(12), 1005–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200012)17:12<1005::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-H
[43]. 43.Qi, W.; Yahaya, M.F.B.; Tai, L.; Qianhui, R. Integrating the Unified Model of Aesthetics and the Categorical-Motivation Model. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2024, 14(2), 1261–1272. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/V14-I2/20754.
[44]. 44.Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2009, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
[45]. 45.Baumeister, R.F.; Leary, M.R. The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Interpersonal Development, 2007, pp. 57–89. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351153683-3/need-belong-desire-interpersonal-attachments-fundamental-human-motivation-roy-baumeister-mark-leary
[46]. 46.Lynn, M.; Harris, J. The Desire for Unique Consumer Products: A New Individual Differences Scale. Psychol. Mark. 1997, 14(6), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199709)14:6<601::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-B
[47]. 47.Griskevicius, V.; Kenrick, D.T. Fundamental Motives: How Evolutionary Needs Influence Consumer Behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 2013, 23(3), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.003
[48]. 48.Marmot, M. Status Syndrome. Significance 2004, 1(4), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2004.00058.x
[49]. 49.Kim, M.; Kim, D. Exploring the Psychological Mechanism of How the Multidimensional Service Quality of Fitness Centers Affects Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Depending on the Level of Exercise Involvement. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1049. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111049
[50]. 50.Wang Jing. On the application of material alienation in product appearance design. Modern Decoration (Theory) 2016, (11), 28. DOI: CNKI:SUN.0.2016-11-027
[51]. 51.Yang Meng, Jin Yi. Product semantics research on notebook computer design. Art Panorama 2009, (10), 113. DOI: CNKI:SUN.0.2009-10-067
[52]. 52.Faerber, S.J.; Carbon, C.-C. The Power of Liking: Highly Sensitive Aesthetic Processing for Guiding Us through the World. i-Perception 2012, 3(8), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0506
[53]. 53.Post, R.A.G.; Blijlevens, J.; Hekkert, P.; Saakes, D.; Arango, L. Why We Like to Touch: Consumers’ Tactile Aesthetic Appreciation Explained by a Balanced Combination of Unity and Variety in Product Designs. Psychol. Mark. 2023, 40(6), 1249–1262. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21798
[54]. 54.Suhaimi, S.N. Investigating the Significance of Typicality and Novelty in the Aesthetic Preference of Industrial Products. Ph.D. Thesis, Swinburne University, Swinburne, Australia, 2021.
[55]. 55.Wibisono, A. Product Design of Upper Sandal Fabric Cutting Machine Using Ergonomic Function Deployment Method. Oper. Excell. J. Appl. Ind. Eng. 2023, 15(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2023.v15.i2.084
[56]. 56.Berghman, M. The Beauty of Balance—An Empirical Integration of the Unified Model of Aesthetics for Product Design. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 2017.
[57]. 57.Yahaya, M.F. Investigating Typicality and Novelty through Visual and Tactile Stimuli. Ph.D. Thesis, Swinburne University, Swinburne, Australia, 2017. Available online: https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/items/daaa042a-f94b-4d59-845b-dacbdb6fb349/1/mohd_yahaya_thesis.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2024).
[58]. 58.Tyagi, S. The Influence of Individual Elements on the Aesthetic Pleasure of Furniture Designs. Ph.D. Thesis, Swinburne University, Swinburne, Australia, 2017.
[59]. 59.Carbon, C.-C.; Leder, H. The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET): A Method to Capture Dynamic Effects of Innovativeness and Attractiveness. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2005, 19(5), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1098
[60]. 60.Palmer, S.E.; Schloss, K.B. An Ecological Valence Theory of Human Color Preference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107(19), 8877–8882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906172107
[61]. 61.Leder, H.; Belke, B.; Oeberst, A.; Augustin, D. A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments. Br. J. Psychol. 2004, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
[62]. 62.Orth, U.R.; Malkewitz, K. Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions. J. Mark. 2008, 72(3), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.064
[63]. 63.Hekkert, P.; Snelders, D.; van Wieringen, P.C.W. "Most Advanced, Yet Acceptable": Typicality and Novelty as Joint Predictors of Aesthetic Preference in Industrial Design. Br. J. Psychol. 2003, 94(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603762842147
[64]. 64.Blijlevens, J.; Carbon, C.-C.; Mugge, R.; Schoormans, J.P.L. Aesthetic Appraisal of Product Designs: Independent Effects of Typicality and Arousal. Br. J. Psychol. 2012, 103(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02038.x
[65]. 65.Loos, S.; van der Wolk, S.; de Graaf, N.; Hekkert, P.; Wu, J. Towards Intentional Aesthetics within Topology Optimization by Applying the Principle of Unity-in-Variety. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2022, 65(7), 185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03288-9
[66]. 66.Blijlevens, J.; Hekkert, P.; Leder, H.; Thurgood, C.; Chen, L.-L.; Whitfield, T.W.A. The Aesthetic Pleasure in Design Scale: The Development of a Scale to Measure Aesthetic Pleasure for Designed Artifacts. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2017, 11(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000098
[67]. 67.Higgins, E.T.; Cornwell, J.F.M. Securing Foundations and Advancing Frontiers: Prevention and Promotion Effects on Judgment & Decision Making. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2016, 136, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.005
[68]. 68.Ceballos, L.M.; Hodges, N.N.; Watchravesringkan, K. The MAYA Principle as Applied to Apparel Products: The Effects of Typicality and Novelty on Aesthetic Preference. J. Fashion Mark. Manag. 2019, 23(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-09-2018-0116






