Published
2026-01-13
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qing Wang*

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Research on the impact of social norms and psychological distance on participation willingness in reverse logistics: An empirical study of sharing economy platform users
Qing Wang
Modern Logistics College, Zhejiang Technical Institute of Economics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310018, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4435
Keywords: sharing economy; reverse logistics; social norms; psychological distance; participation willingness; environmental responsibility
Abstract
The rapid growth of the sharing economy faces a critical bottleneck in its sustainable development: low participation rates in reverse logistics. This study builds an influence model based on Norm Activation Theory and Construal Level Theory. The model examines how social norms and psychological distance affect participation willingness in reverse logistics. It explores the mediating mechanisms of environmental responsibility and perceived behavioral control. The study also tests the moderating effects of platform type, usage frequency, and environmental values. We conducted a questionnaire survey with 468 sharing economy platform users. Structural equation modeling was used for empirical analysis. The findings reveal several important patterns. Social norms positively influence participation willingness in reverse logistics. Injunctive norms show stronger effects (β=0.387) than descriptive norms (β=0.234). All four dimensions of psychological distance produce negative inhibiting effects. Hypothetical distance demonstrates the most prominent hindering effect (β=-0.276). Environmental responsibility and perceived behavioral control serve as partial mediators. The mediating effect of the former is significantly stronger than the latter. Environmental values show the most significant moderating effect. Users with high environmental values respond to norms 1.55 to 2.03 times more strongly than those with low values. This research reveals the psychological mechanisms through which social norms activate moral responsibility and psychological distance weakens emotional identification. These mechanisms shape participation willingness. The study provides theoretical foundations and practical guidance for sharing economy platforms. It helps platforms design norm-based incentives and distance-reduction strategies. The findings carry important practical significance for promoting circular economy development.
References
[1]. 1.Zhou D, Tian J X, Zhang Y, et al. Analysis of realizing social sharing of university sports education resources from the perspective of sharing economy[J]. Modern Vocational Education, 2025, (27): 173-176.
[2]. 2.Cristina P, Diana B. Sharing is not for the weak: A systematic review of the main drawbacks of the sharing economy[J]. Journal of Management & Organization, 2025, 31(5): 2555-2571.
[3]. 3.Alimamy S, Nadeem W. Circularity Within Service‐Dominant Logic: The Role of Perceived Ethics on Co‐Creation in Sharing Economy Platforms[J]. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2025, 49(3): e70076-e70076.
[4]. 4.Jiang X J. Accelerating safe, orderly and efficient sharing of government data according to law to better empower economic and social development[J]. China Information World, 2025, (07): 4-5.
[5]. 5.Zheng J. Basic logic, mechanism and optimization path of institutional supply promoting high-quality development of sharing economy[J]. Journal of Ningbo University of Technology, 2025, 37(02): 58-64.
[6]. 6.Rojanakit P, Oliveira D T R, Dulleck U. Beyond ownership: Exploring the sharing economy platforms in Thailand's emerging market[J]. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 2025, 24: e00556-e00556.
[7]. 7.Belleflamme P, Li M, Périlleux A. Sharing Economy Platforms in the Face of Crises: A Conceptual Framework[J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(14): 6370-6370.
[8]. 8.Tu Q, Dong C, Guo S, et al. Trust Anchors in the Sharing Economy: A Study on Trust and Usage Intention in Shijiazhuang's AI-Era Sharing Economy[J]. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2025, 12(3): 29-35.
[9]. 9.Bi Z Y, Zhang Y S. Research on the dilemma and countermeasures of labor relationship identification under the sharing economy[J]. Industrial & Science Tribune, 2025, 24(07): 27-29.
[10]. 10.Zheng Y. Research on the transformation of labor relations in the form of sharing economy[J]. China Management Informationization, 2025, 28(03): 121-124.
[11]. 11.Farmaki A, Stergiou P D, Efthymiadou F. Examining pro-environmental behaviour in the sharing economy: A service provider perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2025, 527: 146673-146673.
[12]. 12.Facilitating circularity through sharing economy practices in the construction industry: potential shareable resources[J]. Construction Innovation, 2025, 25(7): 292-330.
[13]. 13.Rifkin S L, Corus C, Kovacheva A, et al. How Concealing Sharing Economy Ratings Undermines Consumers' Trustworthiness and Appeal Across Digital Spaces[J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2025, 24(6): 2757-2771.
[14]. 14.Jiang Q H. Research on reverse logistics network for shared express packaging recycling[J]. Green Packaging, 2025, (05): 56-60.
[15]. 15.Cheng Z P, Huang Q Q. Research on the construction of reverse logistics recycling system for waste paper packaging[J]. Paper Science & Technology, 2025, 44(04): 53-56.
[16]. 16.Li H, Yang J, Zhang W. Optimization of Reverse Logistics Networks for Hazardous Waste Incorporating Health, Safety, and Environmental Management: Insights from Large Cruise Ship Construction[J]. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(11): 6056-6056.
[17]. 17.Huang Y, Shen Y, Lai F, et al. The Categorical Paradoxes in the Sharing Economy: Empirical Evidence from Airbnb[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2025, 34(12): 3793-3813.
[18]. 18.Tourism and the sharing economy: research gaps and insights[J]. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Horizons, 2025, 1(4): 452-469.
[19]. 19.Gao R X. Collaborative development of labor relations and labor law under the sharing economy model[J]. Journal of Social Science of Jiamusi University, 2024, 42(03): 72-76.
[20]. 20.Mahboubi A, Miyangaskary K M, Keivanpour S, et al. The Sustainable Shared Reverse Logistics Framework: A Blueprint for EV Battery Recovery[J]. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2025, 5(5): 1-23.
[21]. 21.Li X, Jiang B, Meng X, et al. Refining waste and elevating customer service: assessing the efficacy of reverse logistics strategies for product returns management[J]. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2025, 49(5): 87-87.
[22]. 22.Ding H J, Zong L Y. Governance countermeasures for promoting healthy and orderly development of shared ride-hailing economy[J]. Cyberspace Security, 2024, 15(02): 8-13.
[23]. 23.Zhou W T. Identification of labor relations in the sharing economy era[J]. Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators, 2024, 37(01): 54-57.
[24]. 24.Wang Z, Liu Y. A new bi-level sustainable reverse logistics waste management problem with accelerated Benders decomposition method[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2025, 208: 111341-111341.
[25]. 25.Zhou C, Li S. Reverse Logistics Network Optimization for Retired BIPV Panels in Smart City Energy Systems[J]. Buildings, 2025, 15(14): 2549-2549.
[26]. 26.Singh V S P, Amit K, Deepa M, et al. Green supply chain model for decaying raw materials with reverse logistics and preservation investment under a fuzzy environment[J]. RAIRO - Operations Research, 2025, 59(4): 1865-1897.
[27]. 27.Chen H M, Yang Y P, Wang C Y. Living space and social value of sharing platforms[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2024, 27(01): 1-16.
[28]. 28.Guo Z, Bei Y S, Zhao J Z, et al. The impact of sharing economy on prosocial behavior: The mediating role of trust[J]. Psychological Science, 2023, 46(04): 944-951.
[29]. 29.John R, Rahman M, Garg A. Technology intelligence framework for smart reverse logistics and sustainability: a systematic literature review[J]. OPSEARCH, 2025, (prepublish): 1-46.
[30]. 30.Bafadal Z I, Ardi R, Salsabila Y N. A Proposed Reverse Logistics Network for End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Battery Management in the Jakarta Greater Area: A MILP Approach[J]. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 2025, 16(8): 476-476.
[31]. 31.Olipp N, Schwarz M, Woschank M. Integrating the Principles of Reverse Logistics into Circular Economy Strategies: A Mixed-Method Study of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises[J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(16): 7361-7361.
[32]. 32.Gao Y X, Li K K, Zhang W T, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution and prediction of urban heat islands in China under shared socioeconomic pathways[J]. Climate Change Research, 2023, 19(04): 431-445.
[33]. 33.Li G H. Legal nature identification of new employment forms under the sharing economy model[J]. Industrial Innovation Research, 2023, (12): 64-66.
[34]. 34.Wang Y. Decision Framework for Reverse Logistics Models of Decommissioned Wind Turbine Blades[J]. Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies, 2025, 8(4): 71-76.
[35]. 35.Mehdi A, Javad B. Generalized benders decomposition approach for designing a reverse logistics network for unused drugs within a circular economy framework[J]. RAIRO - Operations Research, 2025, 59(5): 2633-2656.
[36]. 36.Implementing reverse logistics practices in the supply chain: a case study analysis of recycling firms[J]. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 2025, 7(2): 200-227.
[37]. 37.Ma X, Dong B Y. Theoretical innovation and contemporary significance of shared development thought in the new era[J]. Teaching Reference of Middle School Politics, 2023, (24): 14-19.
[38]. 38.Chen Y. Difficulties and improvements in identifying labor relations under the sharing economy[J]. Legality Vision, 2023, (17): 105-107.
[39]. 39.Soares M, Paço D A, Braga A, et al. Modelling the Barriers to Reverse Logistics for Sustainable Supply Chains: A Combined ISM and MICMAC Analysis Approach[J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(21): 9375-9375.
[40]. 40.Long J, Liu J. Hidden footprints in reverse logistics: The environmental impact of apparel returns and carbon emission assessment[J]. Sustainable Futures, 2025, 10: 101360-101360.
[41]. 41.Shi Y, Wu X. Multi-objective optimization for risk mitigation of medical waste disposal reverse logistics network[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2025, 102: 102322-102322.
[42]. 42.Zhang Y J, Liu Y, Luo T H. Research on the content and governance countermeasures of social responsibility of sharing economy platforms[J]. Business Observer, 2023, 9(14): 105-108.
[43]. 43.Mamaghani J E, Battaia O. Toward sustainable and customer-centric reverse logistics: Machine learning-enhanced multi-objective optimization[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2026, 211: 111622-111622.
[44]. 44.Anandhabalaji V. Mapping reverse logistics: Research insights, environmental impacts, and pathways to sustainability[J]. Transport Economics and Management, 2025, 3: 403-422.
[45]. 45.Liu X L. Research on the development of reverse logistics from the perspective of green supply chain[J]. China Storage & Transport, 2025, (11): 172-173.
[46]. 46.Yang X H, Wang Y, Gou M Y, et al. Vehicle routing problem in reverse logistics based on dynamic demand and resource sharing[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2025, 44(09): 74-83.
[47]. 47.Toward a sustainable future: enhancing environmental performance through reverse logistics, resource commitment and organizational learning capability for circular business models[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2025, 38(5): 951-965.
[48]. 48.Retraction notice: Enhancing firm performance through knowledge sharing, knowledge management, supply chain efficiency and integration: exploring the moderating influence of reverse logistic[J]. Kybernetes, 2025, 54(12): 7159-7159.
[49]. 49.Fu S J, Li X Y, Quan M, et al. Optimization of reverse logistics system for circular express boxes based on data-driven approach[J]. Logistics Engineering and Management, 2025, 47(07): 56-59.
[50]. 50.Dehshiri H J S. Reverse logistics and lean, agile, resilient, and green paradigms in supply chain: A comparative analysis of fuzzy decision-making methods[J]. Cleaner Logistics and Supply






