ESP-4450

Published

2026-01-19

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Publishing

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Lu Xing

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Lu Xing. (2026). Negotiating identity across cultures: A cross-national study of youth self-representation in online communication. Environment and Social Psychology, 11(1), ESP-4450. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4450

Negotiating identity across cultures: A cross-national study of youth self-representation in online communication

Lu Xing

The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4072, Australia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4450


Keywords: Social media; youth identity; self-representation; privacy behavior, cultural differences, cross-cultural communication.

Abstract

The role of social media in developing youth identity, self-representation, and cross-cultural interactions is highly significant, especially for users of diverse backgrounds. The goal of this research project was to investigate the influence of cultural context – specifically China, the USA, and the UK – on active social media users aged 15-24 in relation to self-representation practices, self-exposure behaviors, privacy management, and identity negotiation strategies. The participants were recruited through a stratified purposive sampling frame and required to have updated or posted on their social media profile in the previous three months. The study collected a total of 450 valid responses using online surveys (Google Forms for the USA and the UK, and Wenjuanxing for China). The data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). Participants had a balanced demographic distribution across age groups, gender, and countries. The findings reported moderate agreement (across behavioral measures) and weak correlations across variables, indicating that each dimension operates relatively independently of the others. Differences in preferences for platforms, with Facebook preferred most (22.2%) and TikTok/Douyin second (20.2%); WeChat was the lowest (17.8%). Daily usage indicated 26.9% spend less than 1 hour and 23.1% spend more than 4 hours each day online. The findings begin to expose differences in practice in relation to cultural differences in online identity practices. The findings also affirm that valuing culturally responsive processes is meaningful.

References

[1]. 1.M. T. Cuomo, D. Tortora, P. Foroudi, A. Giordano, G. Festa, and G. Metallo, “Digital transformation and tourist experience co-design: Big social data for planning cultural tourism,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 162, p. 120345, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120345.

[2]. 2.E. Setty, “‘Frexting’: exploring homosociality among girls who share intimate images,” Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 667–682, May 2022, doi: 10.1080/13676261.2021.1923675.

[3]. 3.A. Wilke, T. van Rhijn, K. Squires, and K. Barton, “Digital Bonds: Exploring the Impact of Computer-Mediated Communication on Parent–Educator Relationships in Early Childhood Education and Care,” Education Sciences, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 123, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14020123.

[4]. 4.C. Pressley, D. Newton, J. Garside, P. Simkhada, and B. Simkhada, “Global migration and factors that support acculturation and retention of international nurses: A systematic review,” International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, vol. 4, p. 100083, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100083.

[5]. 5.C. Wang and L. Si, “The Intersection of Public Policy and Public Access: Digital Inclusion, Digital Literacy Education, and Libraries,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 1878, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16051878.

[6]. 6.T.-V. Giang and V.-S. Huynh, “The impact of Confucianism on social and emotional health of Vietnamese adolescents: A phenomenological study,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 229, p. 103700, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103700.

[7]. 7.N. V. Roman et al., “Strengthening Family Bonds: A Systematic Review of Factors and Interventions That Enhance Family Cohesion,” Social Sciences, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 371, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3390/socsci14060371.

[8]. 8.S. Gabrielli, S. Rizzi, O. Mayora, S. More, J. C. Pérez Baun, and W. Vandevelde, “Multidimensional Study on Users’ Evaluation of the KRAKEN Personal Data Sharing Platform,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 3270, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12073270.

[9]. 9.N. F. M. Nor, N. Iqbal, and A. H. Shaari, “The Role of False Self-Presentation and Social Comparison in Excessive Social Media Use,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 675, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/bs15050675.

[10]. 10.D. Al Kez, A. M. Foley, D. Laverty, D. F. Del Rio, and B. Sovacool, “Exploring the sustainability challenges facing digitalization and internet data centers,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 371, p. 133633, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133633.

[11]. 11.O. Lopez-Fernandez et al., “Problematic Internet Use among Adults: A Cross-Cultural Study in 15 Countries,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 1027, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jcm12031027.

[12]. 12.K. Vgena, A. Kitsiou, C. Kalloniatis, and S. Gritzalis, “Determining the Role of Social Identity Attributes to the Protection of Users’ Privacy in Social Media,” Future Internet, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 249, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/fi14090249.

[13]. 13.S. C. Boyle, S. Baez, B. M. Trager, and J. W. LaBrie, “Systematic Bias in Self-Reported Social Media Use in the Age of Platform Swinging: Implications for Studying Social Media Use in Relation to Adolescent Health Behavior,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 16, p. 9847, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169847.

[14]. 14.A. B. Jędrzejewska, B. J. Ślusarska, K. Jurek, and G. J. Nowicki, “Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the International Questionnaire to Measure the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q) for the Polish and Cross-Sectional Study,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 124, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010124.

[15]. 15.R. Mostaghel, P. Oghazi, V. Parida, and V. Sohrabpour, “Digitalization driven retail business model innovation: Evaluation of past and avenues for future research trends,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 146, pp. 134–145, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.072.

[16]. 16.M. J. Hernández-Serrano, B. Jones, P. Renés-Arellano, and R. A. C. Ortuño, “Analysis of Digital Self-Presentation Practices and Profiles of Spanish Adolescents on Instagram and TikTok,” J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–63, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.7821/naer.2022.1.797.

[17]. 17.N. A. J. D. Bij de Vaate, J. Veldhuis, and E. A. Konijn, “Ethno-racial identity and digitalisation in self-presentation: a large-scale Instagram content analysis,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 2210–2225, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2112613.

[18]. 18.A. Veum, M. Ø. Burgess, and K. A. Mills, “Adolescents’ critical, multimodal analysis of social media self-representation,” Language and Education, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 482–501, May 2024, doi: 10.1080/09500782.2023.2287508.

[19]. 19.E. Al-Shatti, M. Ohana, P. Odou, and M. Zaitouni, “Impression Management on Instagram and Unethical Behavior: The Role of Gender and Social Media Fatigue,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 16, p. 9808, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169808.

[20]. 20.M. Cui, A. Frühauf, and Y. Demetriou, “How Chinese adolescents present themselves online regardiC. B. Rebello, K. L. C. Reddock, S. Ghir, A. Ignacio, and G. C. Cupchik, “Self-Regulation of Internet Behaviors on Social Media Platforms,” Societies, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 220, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/soc14110220.

[21]. 21.J. Dempsey, G. Sim, B. Cassidy, and V.-T. Ta, “Children designing privacy warnings: Informing a set of design guidelines,” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 31, p. 100446, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100446.

[22]. 22.Y. Jang and B. Ko, “Online Safety for Children and Youth under the 4Cs Framework—A Focus on Digital Policies in Australia, Canada, and the UK,” Children, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1415, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/children10081415.

[23]. 23.N. Chatlani, A. Davis, K. Badillo-Urquiola, E. Bonsignore, and P. Wisniewski, “Teen as research-apprentice: A restorative justice approach for centering adolescents as the authority of their own online safety,” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 35, p. 100549, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100549.

[24]. 24.F. Fang, S. Soleimanzadeh, W. Zhang, and M. Elahi Shirvan, “Chinese students’ multilingual identity constructions after studying abroad: A multi-theoretical perspective,” System, vol. 115, p. 103053, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2023.103053.

[25]. 25.W. Czakon, K. Mania, M. Jedynak, A. Kuźniarska, M. Choiński, and M. Dabić, “Who are we? Analyzing the digital identities of organizations through the lens of micro-interactions on social media,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 198, p. 123012, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123012.

[26]. 26.C. Novak, M. Haselbacher, A. Mattes, and K. Limacher, “Religious ‘Bubbles’ in a Superdiverse Digital Landscape? Research with Religious Youth on Instagram,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 213, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/rel13030213.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com