ESP-4452

Published

2026-02-02

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Zhou Beihao

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Zhou Beihao. (2026). Smart Media, Smart Politics: How AI is Reshaping Political Communication and Public Policy. Environment and Social Psychology, 11(1), ESP-4452. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4452

Smart Media, Smart Politics: How AI is Reshaping Political Communication and Public Policy

Zhou Beihao

Communication University of China,Jinyun County, Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i1.4452


Keywords: AI- political communication; citizen perceptions; trust and transparency; algorithmic gatekeeping; ethical concerns; qualitative analysis

Abstract

This study examines citizens’ perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in political communication through a qualitative research design based on semi-structured interviews with 40 purposively selected participants. Responses were gathered through semi-structured interviews and then processed within a framework utilizing Python where various filters were applied including token frequency counts; co-occurrence mapping and sentiment polarity scores to analyze the data. A number of common themes emerged from the data; most significantly the most discussed theme was Awareness, with 37 of the 40 individuals referring to this. All 40 individuals referred to the themes of Trust, Ethics, and Behaviour; however, the theme of ethics was the most highly coded with 234 occurrences. Respondents reported that they tended to have a trust that was cautious of the AI generated political information, and provided examples of how there was a lack of transparency, presence of bias, manipulation of information and the potential for misinformation. While it was determined within the analysis that AI will not have a large impact on changing opinions about political stakeholders, it was also noted that the information produced by AI impacts visibility, prioritization and engagement with political information. Overall, the results suggest a duality of intent seen amongst respondents; they see AI as a potential Information Tool but also as an Ethical and Credibility Challenge. The need for citizen center governance of AI is stressed in the conclusions provided.

References

[1]. 1.D. Nguyen and E. Hekman, “The news framing of artificial intelligence: a critical exploration of how media discourses make sense of automation,” AI Soc., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 437–451, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01511-1.

[2]. 2.T. Supriyanto, “The Influence of Social Media on Political Participation in the Digital Era,” Int. J. Soc. Polit. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–54, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.69812/ijsps.v1i1.46.

[3]. 3.S. Srivastava, “Algorithmic Governance and the International Politics of Big Tech,” Perspect. Polit., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 989–1000, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.1017/S1537592721003145.

[4]. 4.J. A. García-Díaz, R. Colomo-Palacios, and R. Valencia-García, “Psychographic traits identification based on political ideology: An author analysis study on Spanish politicians’ tweets posted in 2020,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 130, pp. 59–74, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.12.011.

[5]. 5.S. A. Sheikh, “Data and Democracy: Social Media Analytics in Political Campaign Strategies,” Int. J. Engl. Lit. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 204–211, 2024, doi: 10.22161/ijels.91.27.

[6]. 6.S. M. Williamson and V. Prybutok, “The Era of Artificial Intelligence Deception: Unraveling the Complexities of False Realities and Emerging Threats of Misinformation,” Information, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 299, June 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15060299.

[7]. 7.A. F. Vatamanu and M. Tofan, “Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Public Administration: Challenges and Vulnerabilities,” Adm. Sci., vol. 15, no. 4, p. 149, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/admsci15040149.

[8]. 8.I. C. Fest, “Jérôme Duberry (2022) Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: Risks and Promises of AI-mediated citizen-government relations, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham,” Inf. Polity, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 435–438, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3233/IP-239006.

[9]. 9.M. B. E. Islam, M. Haseeb, H. Batool, N. Ahtasham, and Z. Muhammad, “AI Threats to Politics, Elections, and Democracy: A Blockchain-Based Deepfake Authenticity Verification Framework,” Blockchains, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 458–481, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3390/blockchains2040020.

[10]. 10.H. M. Šola, F. H. Qureshi, and S. Khawaja, “Human-Centred Design Meets AI-Driven Algorithms: Comparative Analysis of Political Campaign Branding in the Harris–Trump Presidential Campaigns,” Informatics, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 30, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/informatics12010030.

[11]. 11.T. Magara and Y. Zhou, “Internet of Things (IoT) of Smart Homes: Privacy and Security,” J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 2024, no. 1, p. 7716956, 2024, doi: 10.1155/2024/7716956.

[12]. 12.S. Jassim Muhammad Al-Khazraji, “The phenomenon of addiction to electronic shopping in Iraqi society, a sociological study,” Interdiscip. J. Humanit. Media Polit. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.56830/IJHMPS12202401.

[13]. 13.D. Battista and E. Mangone, “Technological Culture and Politics: Artificial Intelligence as the New Frontier of Political Communication,” Societies, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 75, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/soc15040075.

[14]. 14.P. C. López-López, D. Barredo-Ibáñez, and E. Jaráiz-Gulías, “Research on Digital Political Communication: Electoral Campaigns, Disinformation, and Artificial Intelligence,” Societies, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 126, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/soc13050126.

[15]. 15.H. Gil de Zúñiga, M. Goyanes, and T. Durotoye, “A Scholarly Definition of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Advancing AI as a Conceptual Framework in Communication Research,” Polit. Commun., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 317–334, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1080/10584609.2023.2290497.

[16]. 16.P. Savaget, T. Chiarini, and S. Evans, “Empowering political participation through artificial intelligence,” Sci. Public Policy, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 369–380, June 2019, doi: 10.1093/scipol/scy064.

[17]. 17.W. F. Shahid and D. H. Fatima, “Effect of Artificial Intelligence Tools on Political Campaigns and Voting Behavior,” Soc. Sci. Rev. Arch., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 757–772, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.70670/sra.v3i4.1166.

[18]. 18.A. Jungherr, “Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: A Conceptual Framework,” Soc. Media Soc., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 20563051231186353, July 2023, doi: 10.1177/20563051231186353.

[19]. 19.He Jinghua, He Ya, Hu Jie, and Guo Ying, “Intelligent Governance: The AI-Driven New Paradigm of Governmental Adaptive Governance,” J. US-China Public Adm., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.17265/1548-6591/2025.01.001.

[20]. 20.Y. Pi, C. Turkay, and D. Bogiatzis-Gibbons, “Interactive AI and Human Behavior: Challenges and Pathways for AI Governance,” Proc. AAAIACM Conf. AI Ethics Soc., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2016–2029, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1609/aies.v8i3.36692.

[21]. 21.K. Feher, L. Vicsek, and M. Deuze, “Modeling AI Trust for 2050: perspectives from media and info-communication experts,” AI Soc., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 2933–2946, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00146-023-01827-6.

[22]. 22.A. Shahzad and L. Sunawar, “MITIGATING NEGATIVE PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS CPEC THROUGH AI-DRIVEN COMMUNICATION, COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND TRANSPARENCY,” Prior.- Int. Bus. Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–122, June 2024.

[23]. 23.E. Hermann, “Artificial intelligence and mass personalization of communication content—An ethical and literacy perspective,” New Media Soc., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1258–1277, May 2022, doi: 10.1177/14614448211022702.

[24]. 24.J. Newman and M. Mintrom, “Mapping the discourse on evidence-based policy, artificial intelligence, and the ethical practice of policy analysis,” J. Eur. Public Policy, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1839–1859, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2193223.

[25]. 25.Q. Ijaz and D. Z. Mahmood, “EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF AI-DRIVEN SOCIAL MEDIA IN SHAPING POLITICAL BEHAVIOUR AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN LAHORE,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Bull., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1877–1886, Dec. 2024.

[26]. 26.M. Coeckelbergh, “Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence,” AI Ethics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1341–1350, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4.

[27]. 27.M. Muskaan, “Synthetic voice and the philosophy of agency, authenticity, and ethics in AI-mediated speech,” AI Ethics, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 5889–5908, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43681-025-00820-7.

[28]. 28.S. Turper and K. Aarts, “Political Trust and Sophistication: Taking Measurement Seriously,” Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 415–434, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1182-4.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com