Environment and Social Psychology

Digital Teaching Resources Integration and Teaching Quality in Rural Primary Schools in China: A Cultural System Perspective

Juhua Yang

Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, Thailand

Mengtien Chiang

Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i3.4546

Keywords: Rural primary school; Digitalization of Education; Digital teaching resources; Teaching quality

---

Abstract

This study employs a qualitative research design to investigate how digital teaching resource inputs are integrated into teaching quality within the context of rural primary schools, grounded in the social system model. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, including six educational administrators and nine teachers from three rural primary schools in Yunnan, China. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings of the study are threefold. First, although investments in digital teaching resources have increased under top-down policy initiatives, a persistent systemic disconnect between resource adaptability, technical support, and pedagogical practice constrains the effective transformation of these resources into educational utility. Second, the school cultural system is crucial in translating digital resources into teaching quality through shared values, teachers’ sense of belonging, ethnic minority cultural integration, and home–school collaboration. Third, digital teaching resources boost student engagement and classroom interactivity but have limited effects on learning outcomes due to gaps in family support, weak localization, and uneven teacher competence. The enhancement of teaching quality in rural primary schools needs to be advanced synergistically across three dimensions: resource construction, teacher professional development, and cultural ecology, thereby building a holistic educational ecosystem that supports sustainable digital transformation.

---

References

[1]. 1. Lintag, R., Tolentino, J. C. G., Peña, J., Navarro, C., Laxamana, A., Lintag, R., Tolentino, J. C. G., Navarro, C., & Laxamana, A. (2025). Supervisory practices of deans for quality instruction in teacher education institutions in Central Luzon region, Philippines. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 24(10), 794–817. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.38

[2]. 2. Glegola, A., Jentsch, A., Ross, N., König, J., & Kaiser, G. (2024). Task potential in relation to teaching quality and teacher competence in secondary mathematics classrooms. ZDM. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01596-6

[3]. 3. United Nations in China. (n.d.). Quality education (Sustainable Development Goal 4). https://china.un.org/zh/sdgs/4

[4]. 4. Zhao, X. (2025). Research on factors Influencing teaching quality in higher Education based on hierarchical generalized linear models. Statistics and Applications, 14(11), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2025.1411309

[5]. 5. Mahmud, M. M., & Wong, S. F. (2021). Fusing the Jigsaw Method and Microsoft Teams: a promising online pedagogy. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 20(11), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.15

[6]. 6. Hu, S. (2025). Diversified Collaboration and Organizational Learning: Research on the construction of teaching Quality Assurance Mechanism for Sino Foreign Cooperative Education—Taking the case of Sino Russian Engineering Cooperation as an example. Creative Education Studies, 13(10), 465–471. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2025.1310814

[7]. 7. Li, T., & Zhang, L. (2023). China’s policy actions to lead teacher development with evaluation reform. ECNU Review of Education, 7(2), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231210570

[8]. 8. Li, H. (2022). Rural revitalization calls for rural pedagogy. Shanghai Educational Research, 40(12), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.12.005

[9]. 9. Mahmud, M. M., & Wong, S. F. (2021). Fusing the Jigsaw Method and Microsoft Teams: a promising online pedagogy. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 20(11), 272-287. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.15

[10]. 10. Smith, C. D., & Baik, C. (2019). High-impact teaching practices in higher education: a best evidence review. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1696-1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1698539

[11]. 11. Jerry, M., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Blended learning in rural primary ESL classroom: do or don’t. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 20(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.2.9

[12]. 12. Li, L., Valiente, C., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Johns, S. K., Berger, R. H., Thompson, M. S., Southworth, J., Pina, A. A., Hernández, M. M., & Gal-Szabo, D. E. (2022). Longitudinal relations between behavioral engagement and academic achievement: The moderating roles of socio-economic status and early achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 94, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.08.001

[13]. 13. Abualrob, M., & Abualrob, M. (2025). From Reflection to Re-Reflection: CHATGPT and Transformative Learning in Preservice Elementary Science Education. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 24(10), 769–793. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.37

[14]. 14. Witt, T., Klumpp, M., & Beyer, B. (2021). Digital University Teaching and Learning in Management-The Gini from the COVID-19 Bottle and Its Empirical Representations in Germany. Education Sciences, 11(11), Article e5728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110728

[15]. 15. Jerry, M., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Blended learning in rural primary ESL classroom: Do or don’t. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 20(2), 152-173. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.2.9

[16]. 16. Biddle, C., & Azano, A. P. (2016). Constructing and reconstructing the “Rural school problem.” Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 298-325. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x16667700

[17]. 17. Roberts, E., Anderson, B. A., Skerratt, S., & Farrington, J. (2016). A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 372-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.001

[18]. 18. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x

[19]. 19. Wargo, E. S., & Simmons, J. (2021). Technology storylines: A narrative analysis of the rural education research. The Rural Educator, 42(2), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v42i2.1240

[20]. 20. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7

[21]. 21. Ilgaz, G., Eskici, M., & Vural, L. (2019). Which Country is More Effective in Science Teaching? Evidence from PISA 2015 as a Secondary School Assessment Tool. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(2), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2019.52.349.361

[22]. 22. Alrashdan, H., Ajmi, H. R. A., Alnasraween, M. S., & Karra, S. (2022). Efficiency determinants of educational wastage programs. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 9(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i2.3951

[23]. 23. Bardy, T., Holzäpfel, L., Reinhold, F., & Leuders, T. (2024). Mathematics teachers’ multiple perspectives on adaptive tasks: task evaluation and selection as core practices for teaching quality. ZDM, 56(5), 981–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01626-3

[24]. 24. Al-Awidi, H., Abumosa, M., Al-Mughrabi, A., & Alnasraween, M. (2025). Effects of technology-based self-directed learning on Jordanian students’ mathematical cognitive domains assessed by TIMSS. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications an International Journal of the IMA. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hraf013

[25]. 25. Labadze, O. E., Efimov, A. V., Sych, V. V., Petrova, N. F., Lipchanskaya, I. V., & Ivanenko, N. S. (2021). Digitalization of higher education, the crisis of educational culture and Russian economic development. World Journal on Educational Technology Current Issues, 13(4), 1051-1060. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i4.6300

[26]. 26. Alabdullah, N. (2021). Structured input vs. Structured output task’s effects on the acquisition of the English causative forms: Discourse-Level. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 270-292. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.19

[27]. 27. Maunula, M., & Lähdesmäki, S. (2022). Student Teachers’ Perceptions of the Connection between Literacy, Equality and Digitalization. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 4(3), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.392

[28]. 28. López-López, M. C., Romero-López, M. A., & Hinojosa-Pareja, E. F. (2022). School management teams In the face of inclusion: Teachers’ Perspectives. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 19(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751221138875

[29]. 29. Santoro, D. A., & Hazel, J. (2022). Demoralization and remoralization: the power of creating space for teachers’ moral centres. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 29(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.7202/1088376ar

[30]. 30. Huo, Ch. (2025). Research on Teaching Quality Evaluation System of Smart Curriculum based on Outcome-Based Education Concept. Advances in Education, 15(05), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.155782

[31]. 31. Peng, B., Sun, P., Lou, A., Zhang, C., Sun, Y., Peng, J., Sun, X., Tian, X., Pang, R., Zhou, W., & Wang, Q. (2021). Analysis on the existing main problems and countermeasures of rural education. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(4), 405-419. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.04.403

[32]. 32. Wang, D., & Feng, Y. X. (2024). The logical expansion and path design of high-quality education development empowering the modernization of Chinese-style rural governance. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University, 23(03), 53-60.https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-816X.2024.03.004

[33]. 33. Dunekacke, S., Wullschleger, A., Grob, U., Heinze, A., Lindmeier, A., Vogt, F., Geeler, S. K., Leuchter, M., Meier-Wyder, A., Seemann, S., & Opitz, E. M. (2024). Teaching quality in kindergarten: professional development and quality of adaptive learning support enhances mathematical competency. ZDM, 56(5), 923–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01566-y

[34]. 34. Wei, Y., Zhou, S., & Liu, Y. (2020). The draw of home: How does teacher’s initial job placement relate to teacher mobility in rural China? PLoS ONE, 15(1), Article e0227137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227137

[35]. 35. Samuelsson, L., & Lindström, N. (2022). Online surveillance and education for digital competence. Athens Journal of Education, 9(4), 545-558. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.9-4-1

[36]. 36. Khafizova, A. A., Galimov, A. M., Kharisova, S. R., Grebenshchikova, L. Y., Yagudina, R. I., & Smirnova, L. M. (2023). The impact of healthcare digitalization on the medical education curricula and programs: Points of convergence and divergence. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article e479. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13768

[37]. 37. Kindei, L., Olena, N., Iryna, B., Yulia, K., & Natalka, K. (2022). The problem of methodological training of future teachers in the digital environment. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(5), 146. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n5p146

[38]. 38. Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Hein, J., Janke, S., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2021). Shifting from face-to-face to online teaching during COVID-19: The role of university faculty achievement goals for attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance for burnout/engagement and student evaluations of teaching quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106677

[39]. 39. Scheerens, J. (2015). Theories on Educational Effectiveness and ineffectiveness. In Springer eBooks .

[40]. 40. Santoro, D. A., & Hazel, J. (2022). Demoralization and remoralization: the power of creating space for teachers’ moral centres. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 29(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.7202/1088376ar

[41]. 41. Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006

[42]. 42. Ligozat, F., & Buyck, Y. (2024). Comparative didactics: Toward a generic model for analyzing content-specific dimensions of teaching quality. European Educational Research Journal, 23(6), 810–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041241257282

[43]. 43. Nartgün, Ş. S., Li̇Mon, İ., & Di̇Lekçi̇, Ü. (2020). The relationship between sustainable leadership and perceived School effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Work Effort. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(1), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.653014

[44]. 44. Turan, S. (2021). Exploring the link between principals visionary leadership and school ettectiven. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 6(14), 589-623. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.320

[45]. 45. Cheng, T., & Li, X. (2024). Sociology of Education in China in the New Era: Review and Prospects (2012-2022). ECNU Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241256359

[46]. 46. Kakoly, I. J., Hoque, M. R., & Hasan, N. (2023). Data-driven diabetes risk factor prediction Using machine learning algorithms with feature selection technique. Sustainability, 15(6), Article e4930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064930

[47]. 47. Ledibane, M., Kaiser, K., & Van Der Walt, M. (2018). Acquiring mathematics as a second language: A theoretical model to illustrate similarities in the acquisition of English as a second language and mathematics. Pythagoras, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v39i1.347

[48]. 48. Muralidharan, K., Shanmugan, K., & Klochkov, Y. (2022). The New Education Policy 2020, Digitalization and Quality of Life in India: Some reflections. Education Sciences, 12(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020075

[49]. 49. Zhang, T., Wang, W., & Yi, L. (2022). Who Teaches in Rural Schools in Underdeveloped Areas? An Investigation Based on a Survey of 5,554 Teachers from 117 Towns in H Province in Wuling Mountains Zone, China. Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 11(1), 1429–1448. https://doi.org/10.15354/bece.22.or060

[50]. 50. Ravet, J., & Mtika, P. (2021). Educational inclusion in resource-constrained contexts: a study of rural primary schools in Cambodia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916104

[51]. 51. Creemers, B. P. M., Stoll, L., & Reezigt, G. (2007). Effective school improvement - Ingredients for success: The results of an international comparative study of best practice case studies. In Springer eBooks .

[52]. 52. Pittman, A., Dellarosa, M., Pasque, P., Kim, M., & Smith, S. (2024). Teaching, Learning, and Praxis: A critical inquiry on graduate student research Apprenticeship opportunities in Qualitative research. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(01), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2024.180107

[53]. 53. Li, H., Cui, C., & Jiang, S. (2022). Strategy for improving the football teaching quality by AI and metaverse-empowered in mobile internet environment. Wireless Networks, 30(5), 4343–4352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03000-1

[54]. 54. Nazar, A., & Nasrallah, R. (2024). Uncovering Homeschooling in Lebanon: A Qualitative-Phenomenological Exploration of Homeschooling Realities from Parental and Educational Sector Stakeholders Perspectives. Gulf Education and Social Policy Review (GESPR), 5(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18502/gespr.v5i1.16588

[55]. 55. Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2015). Exploring the mediating effects of trust on principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558577

[56]. 56. Alkar, E., Altintas, I. N., & Kaya, R. D. (2023). A qualitative research study on the professional job satisfaction of secondary school teachers in various fields. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(3), 732-752. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3245

[57]. 57. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[58]. 58. Peña, J. T., & Mendoza, G. A. (2025). Lived experiences of faculty members handling core subjects in the elementary education programme. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 24(10), 478-492. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.22

[59]. 59. Wei, S., & Yin, G. (2024). Optimizing Online Teaching: Total Quality Management in Action for quality assurance measures. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(4), Article e168. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n4p168

[60]. 60. Fajrie, S. U. N., Bamiro, N. B., & Azman, M. N. A. (2023). Teachers and Students Perception of Technology and Sustainable Adoption Framework in the Pedagogical Process: A Systematic review. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 22(12), 162-186. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.9

[61]. 61. Ravet, J., & Mtika, P. (2021). Educational inclusion in resource-constrained contexts: A study of rural primary schools in Cambodia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(1), 16-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916104

[62]. 62. Ikram, M., Kenayathulla, H. B., & Saleem, S. M. U. (2023). Unlocking the potential of technology usage in fostering education quality and students’ satisfaction: a case of Pakistani higher education. Kybernetes, 54(3), 1938-1965. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-03-2023-0452

[63]. 63. Wills, G., & Van Der Berg, S. (2020). Measuring school leadership and management and linkages with literacy: Evidence from rural and township primary schools in South Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 708-731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220915923

[64]. 64. Lyubitskaya, K. A., Jankiewicz, S. V., Knyaginina, N. V., & Petyakina, E. V. (2022). Homeschooling in Russia: Barriers and mechanisms to overcome them. Monitoring Obŝestvennogo Mneniâ: Èkonomičeskie I Socialʹnye Peremeny, 1, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2022.1.1820

[65]. 65. Khemtong, N., Promchom, K., Thumsen, P., & Wechayalak, N. (2024). Digital Leadership Relationships Among School Administrators with the Effectiveness of Academic Work in the New Normal Era. Higher Education Studies, 14(3), Article e38. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n3p38

[66]. 66. AlDhaheri, R. T. (2025). A qualitative exploration of parents’ experiences of homeschooling in the United Arab Emirates: Motivations and challenges. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 24(10), 307-330. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.14

[67]. 67. Wargo, E., & Hoke, I. (2022). Revisiting rural education access. Educational Considerations, 48(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2333

[68]. 68. Rundel, C., & Salemink, K. (2021). Bridging digital inequalities in rural schools in Germany: a geographical lottery? Education Sciences, 11(4), Article e181. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040181

[69]. 69. Kemethofer, D., Helm, C., & Warwas, J. (2022). Does educational leadership enhance instructional quality and student achievement? The case of Austrian primary school leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 28(3), 461-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2021294

[70]. 70. Opria, Ș., & Momanu, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on digital citizenship education for primary school students. Journal of Educational Sciences, 24(1), 47-104. https://doi.org/10.35923/JES.2023.1.06

[71]. 71. Cheng, T., & Li, X. (2024). Sociology of Education in China in the New Era: Review and Prospects . Ecnu Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241256359

[72]. 72. Luo, H., Zuo, M., & Wang, J. (2022). Promise and reality: using ICTs to bridge China’s rural–urban divide in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1125-1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10118-8