Published
2026-03-31
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dipela Mmaphuti Percy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
An Afrocentric Perspective on Social Environment and Psychosocial Well-being
Dipela Mmaphuti Percy
University of South Africa, Department of Social Work, 0003, South Africa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i3.4595
Keywords: Afrocentric, Psychology, Well-being, Environment, psychosocial, ubuntu
Abstract
Psychosocial well-being is an important construct in environmental and social psychology; however, dominant constructions are primarily rooted in Western, individualistic approaches that fail to capture the complexity of culturally situated experiences of well-being in Africa. This article seeks to reconceptualise the social environment as a relational, cultural, spiritual, and historical context that shapes psychosocial well-being through an Afrocentric lens. The research is informed by an Afrocentric theory, African-centered psychology, and person-environment approaches. The research design is qualitative and conceptual, and it involves a reflexive thematic analysis of interdisciplinary literature from environmental psychology, social psychology, social work, and African studies. The research findings reveal that psychosocial well-being is constructed as a collective concept, significantly influenced by communal relationships, cultural and spiritual practices, Ubuntu as a moral guide, and the structural legacies of colonialism and socio-economic inequality. The research contributes to theory by extending the person-environment approach through the lens of Afrocentric epistemologies. The research also contributes to practice by offering insights useful to social work and advancing an inclusive understanding of psychosocial well-being through an Afrocentric lens centered on African worldviews.
References
[1]. 1.Myers, L.J. & Speight, S.L. (2010). Reframing mental health and psychological well-being among persons of African descent: Africana/Black psychology meeting the challenges of fractured social and cultural realities. Journal of Pan African Studies, 3(8): 66-82.
[2]. 2.Sokoya, G.O., Muthukrishna, N. & Collings, S.J. (2005). Afrocentric and gendered constructions of psychological well-being in Nigeria: A case study. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 15(1): 31-40.
[3]. 3.Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65: 541-579.
[4]. 4.Myers, L.J. & Speight, S.L. (2010). Reframing mental health and psychological well-being among persons of African descent: Africana/Black psychology meeting the challenges of fractured social and cultural realities. Journal of Pan African Studies, 3(8): 66-82.
[5]. 5.Nsamenang, A.B. (2007). A critical perspective on African psychology. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 17(1-2): 1-19.
[6]. 6.Adams, G., Dobles, I., Gómez, L.H., Kurtiş, T. & Molina, L.E. (2015). Decolonizing psychological science: Introduction to the special thematic section. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1): 213-238.
[7]. 7.Wilson Fadiji, A., Khumalo, I.P. & Zulu, N.T. (2022). Well-being in Africa: Towards an Africa(n) centred positive psychology. In: Embracing well-being in diverse African contexts: Research perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 31-49.
[8]. 8.Nobles, W.W. (2006). Seeking the Sakhu: Foundational writings for an African psychology. Third World Press.
[9]. 9.Stokols, D. (1992). Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: Toward a social ecology of health promotion. American Psychologist, 47(1): 6-22.
[10]. 10.Stokols, D. (2018). Social ecology in the digital age: Solving complex problems in a globalized world. Academic Press.
[11]. 11.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
[12]. 12.Jones, K. (2010). Afrocentricity, homosexual identity integration, and other factors affecting the mental health and psychological well-being of gay Black men. Doctoral dissertation, Walden University.
[13]. 13.Mkhize, N. (2004). Psychology: An African perspective. In: Hook D., Mkhize N., Kiguwa P. & Collins A. (eds.) Critical psychology. University of Cape Town Press. pp. 24-52.
[14]. 14.Letseka, M. (2012). In defence of Ubuntu. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(1): 47-60.
[15]. 15.Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. Doubleday.
[16]. 16.Seedat, M., Duncan, N. & Lazarus, S. (eds.) (2009). Community psychology: Analysis, context and action. Juta.
[17]. 17.Ratele, K. (2017). Liberating masculinities. HSRC Press.
[18]. 18.Dotse, J.E. & Asumeng, M. (2015). Relationship between body image satisfaction and psychological well-being: The impact of Africentric values. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(1): 320-342.
[19]. 19.Theron, L.C. (2016). Toward a culturally and contextually sensitive understanding of resilience: Privileging the voices of Black, South African young people. Journal of Adolescent Research, 31(6): 635-670.
[20]. 20.Decolonising Psychology Collective. (2016). Decolonising psychology: Globalization, social justice, and Indian youth identities. Palgrave Macmillan.
[21]. 21.Ratele, K., Cornell, J., Dlamini, S., Helman, R., Malherbe, N. & Titi, N. (2018). Some basic questions on (African) psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 48(4): 431-440.
[22]. 22.Nwoye, A. (2017). An Africentric theory of human personhood. Psychology in Society, 54: 42-66.
[23]. 23.Freeman, M. & Nkomo, N. (2016). Urbanisation and the erosion of traditional social supports in Southern Africa. Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3): 321-335.
[24]. 24.Mignolo, W.D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
[25]. 25.Ratele, K. (2019). The world looks like this from here: Thoughts on African psychology. Wits University Press.
[26]. 26.Asante, M.K. (1991). Afrocentricity. Africa World Press.
[27]. 27.Markus, H.R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2): 224-253.
[28]. 28.Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
[29]. 29.Gray, M., Coates, J. & Yellow Bird, M. (eds.) (2013). Indigenous social work around the world: Towards culturally relevant education and practice. Ashgate.
[30]. 30.Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4): 253-260.
[31]. 31.Rankopo, M.J. & Osei-Hwedie, K. (2011). Globalisation and culturally relevant social work: African perspectives on indigenisation. International Social Work, 54(1): 137-147.
[32]. 32.Metz, T. (2017). Toward an African moral theory. Journal of Political Philosophy, 25(3): 321-341.
[33]. 33.Ewuoso, C. & Hall, S. (2019). Core aspects of Ubuntu: A systematic review. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 12(2): 93-103.
[34]. 34.Christopher, J.C. (2018). Culture and psychotherapy: Toward a relational worldview. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 38(1): 1-17.
[35]. 35.Theron, L.C., Liebenberg, L. & Ungar, M. (2021). Youth resilience and culture in Africa: A scoping review. Transcultural Psychiatry, 58(1): 120-136.
[36]. 36.Sherr, L., Cluver, L., Betancourt, T., Kellerman, S. & Richter, L. (2017). Evidence of impact: Health, psychological and social effects of adult HIV on children. AIDS, 28(Suppl 3): S251-S259.
[37]. 37.Cluver, L., Lachman, J.M., Sherr, L., Wessels, I., Krug, E., Rakotomalala, S., Blight, S., Hillis, S., Bachman, G., Green, O., Butchart, A., Tomlinson, M., Ward, C.L., Doubt, J. & McDonald, K. (2020). Parenting in a time of COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10231): e64.
[38]. 38.Waghid, Y. (2021). On the relevance of an African philosophy of higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(5), 1-3.
[39]. 39.Verduin, F., Smid, G.E., Wind, T.R. & Scholte, W.F. (2018). In search of links between social capital, mental health, and conflict exposure. Social Science & Medicine, 210: 1-9.
[40]. 40.Ng, L.C., Harerimana, B. & Kaiser, B.N. (2021). Evaluating community-based mental health interventions in post-genocide Rwanda. Global Mental Health, 8: e12.
[41]. 41.Bangpan, M., Felix, L., Dickson, K. & Chiumento, A. (2017). The impact of mental health and psychosocial support interventions on people affected by humanitarian emergencies: A systematic review. EPPI-Centre, University College London.
[42]. 42.ICRC. (2020). Mental health and psychosocial support for people affected by armed conflict: Annual report. International Committee of the Red Cross.
[43]. 43.Mugumbate, J. & Nyanguru, A. (2018). Exploring African philosophy: The value of Ubuntu in social work. African Journal of Social Work, 8(1): 14-21.
[44]. 44.Dziwa, C., Nyamaruze, P. & Mawarire, P. (2019). Institutional care versus community-based care for children in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for child well-being. Child & Family Social Work, 24(3): 377-385.
[45]. 45.Asante, M.K. (2003). Afrocentricity: The theory of social change. Revised ed. African American Images.
[46]. 46.Mkabela, Q. (2005). Using the Afrocentric method in researching indigenous African culture. The Qualitative Report, 10(1): 178-189.
[47]. 47.Swartz, L. (1998). Culture and mental health: A Southern African view. Oxford University Press.
[48]. 48.Graham, M.J. (1999). The African-centered worldview: Developing a paradigm for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 29(2): 251-267.
[49]. 49.Asante, M.K. (1980). Afrocentricity: The theory of social change. Amulefi Publishing Company.
[50]. 50.Karenga, M. (2004). Maat, the moral ideal in ancient Egypt: A study in classical African ethics. Routledge.
[51]. 51.Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
[52]. 52.Chilisa, B. (2020). Indigenous research methodologies. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.
[53]. 53.Bulhan, H.A. (1985). Frantz Fanon and the psychology of oppression. Plenum Press.
[54]. 54.Mbiti, J.S. (1969). African religions and philosophy. Heinemann.
[55]. 55.Metz, T. (2011). Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 11(2): 532-559.
[56]. 56.Mkhize, N. (2008). Ubuntu and harmony: An African approach to morality and ethics. In: Nicolson R. (ed.) Persons in community: African ethics in a global culture. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press. pp. 35-44.
[57]. 57.Theron, L. C., & Theron, A. M. (2011, November). Culturally embedded meaning making: An exploration of how young resilient South African adults confront suffering. In 2nd International Making Sense of Suffering Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.
[58]. 58.Swanson, D.M. (2013). Ubuntu, African epistemology and development: Contributions, contradictions, tensions, and possibilities. In: Nsamenang A.B. & Tchombe T.M.S. (eds.) Handbook of African educational theories and practices. Human Development Research Centre. pp. 27-42.





