Published
2025-07-18
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria N. Cusipag, Ayodele Solomon Oluyinka, Ricardo S. Jimenez, Reian A. Gonzales, Rejoice L. Ferrer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Artificial intelligence: Its implementation in philippine healthcare institutions
Maria N. Cusipag
College of Education, De La Salle Araneta University, City of Malabon, 1475, Metro Manila, Philippines
Ayodele Solomon Oluyinka
CBMA, DLSAU, City of Malabon, 1475, Metro Manila, Philippines; IBA, Baliwag Polytechnic College, City of Baliwag, 3006, Bulacan, Philippines, CBMA, City of Malabon University, Malabon, 1470, Philippines.
Ricardo S. Jimenez
College of Business Studies, Pampanga State University, Bacolor, Pampanga, 2001, Philippines
Reian A. Gonzales
College of Business Administration & Accountancy De La Salle Araneta University, City of Malabon, 1475, Metro Manila, Philippines
Rejoice L. Ferrer
College of Business Administration & Accountancy De La Salle Araneta University, City of Malabon, 1475, Metro Manila, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3611
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); healthcare; human resource functions; personal innovativeness; technological awareness
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining attraction in numerous private and public organizations in the Philippines. It is a technology used in many aspects of human resource functions such as in education institutions. Thus, this study investigated how human resource practitioners in healthcare institutions across two Bulacan towns perceived AI. Two hundred and one electronic survey questionnaires (distributed via Google Forms) were sent to different practitioners in hospitals and clinics. The researchers aimed to investigate how perceived risks and technological awareness affected the participants. They also sought to examine the relationship between human resource functions and AI. The researchers used PLS-SEM for the quantitative research design of the study. Findings showed a significant correlation between AI and personal innovativeness, and between human resource functions and both personal innovativeness and technological awareness. Conversely, no positive relationship was found between human resource practitioners' use of AI and their HR functions. Practitioners were not yet ready to fully implement AI and reap its benefits. Finally, perceived risks significantly affected the relationship between human resource functions and technological awareness. The results strongly suggest that more Philippine health professionals will eventually adopt this technology to streamline its use, reduce errors by practitioners, and improve organizational performance.
References
[1]. 1.Scott D Tagliaferri, Maia Angelova, Xiaohui Zhao, Patrick J Owen, Clint T Miller, Tim Wilkin, and Daniel L Belavy. 2020. Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews. NPJ Digital Medicine (July 2020), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0303-
[2]. 2.Jing Han, Zixing Zhang, Cecilia Mascolo, Elisabeth André, Jianhua Tao, and Ziping Zhao. 2021. Deep learning for mobile mental health: Challenges and recent advances. IEEE Signal Processing Magazin 38, 96-105. DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2021.3099293
[3]. 3.Umara Noreen, Attayah Shafique, Zaheer Ahmed, and Muhammad Ashfaq. 2023. Banking 4.0: Artificial intelligence (AI) in banking industry & consumer’s perspective Sustainability 15(4), (February 2023), 3682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043682
[4]. 4.Tom Nadarzynski, Oliver Miles, Aimee Cowie, and Damien Ridge. 2019. Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study SAGE Journal Digital health 5, (August 2019), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619871808
[5]. 5.C Blease, C Locher, M Leon-Carlyle, and M Doraiswamy. 2020. Artificial intelligence and the future of Psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey Digital Health 6, (October 2020), 2055207620968355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620968355
[6]. 6.Neeraj Tandon, and Rajiv Tandon. 2019. Machine learning in psychiatry- Standards and guidelines Asian Journal of Psychiatry 44, (August 2019), A1-A4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2019.09.009
[7]. 7.John Robert Bautista, Trisha T. C. Lin, and YinLeng Theng. 2024. Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on AI adoption: A qualitative study in the Philippines. BMC Health Services Research 24, 1 (June 2024), Article 11667–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11667-9
[8]. 8.Cash Platform. 2024. Exploring AI’s impact on patient outcomes at Philippine General Hospital. Retrieved June 2025 from https://www.cash-platform.com
[9]. 9.Ken Research. 2024. Philippines health tech market overview. Ken Research. Retrieved June 2024 from https://ken-research-1.ghost.io/philippines-health-tech-market/
[10]. 10.Tellmedico. 2024. Artificial intelligence in Philippine healthcare: Acceptance and accessibility. Tellmedico. Retrieved from https://tellmedico.com/artificial-intelligence-in-philippine-healthcare-acceptance-and-accessibility
[11]. 11.Thomas Grayson. 2021. Human resource management (1st. ed.). Willford Press, New York, NY.
[12]. 12.Misnal Munir, Amaliyah Amaliyah, and Moses Glorino Pandin. 2020. Human Resource Information System and work stress during COVID-19 pandemic (December 2020), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0469.v1
[13]. 13.Vera L. Cançado, Maraí Vendramine Unimep, and Elizângela de Jesus Oliveira. 2020. Revisiting the Four Faces of Human Resource Management. Navus 10, (August 2020), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22279/navus.2020.v10.p01-14.1251
[14]. 14.Sri Rahayuningsih, Andik Matulessy, Rr. Amanda Pasca Rini, Moses Glorino, and Moses Glorino Rumambo Pandin. 2019. The local government transformation, the big five personality and anxiety (January 2019), DOI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336084504_The_Local_Government _Transformation_The_Big_Five_Personality_And_Anxiety/citations
[15]. 15.Ruby Merlin.P, and Jayam.R. 2018. Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 119 No. 17, 1891-1895. https://acadpubl.eu/hub/2018-119-17/2/153.pdf
[16]. 16.Peter Reilly. 2018. The impact of artificial intelligence on the HR function, Institute for Employment Studies. Institute for Employment Studies (Nov. 2018), 18. https://www.employment-studies.co.uk/resource/impact-artificial-intelligence-hr-function
[17]. 17.Garima Bhardwaj, S Vikram Singh, and Vinay Kumar. 2020). An empirical study of artificial intelligence and its impact on human resource functions. ResearchGate (Jan. 2020), 47-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCAKM46823.2020.9051544
[18]. 18.Varisha Zuhair, Areesha Babar, Rabbiya Ali, Malik Olatunde Oduoye, Zainab Noor, Kitumaini Chris, Inibehe Ime Okon, and Latif Ur Rehman. 2024. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on global health and enhancing healthcare in developing nations. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 15, (Jan. 2024), 21501319241245847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241245847
[19]. 19.Thomas H. Davenport, Abhijit Guha, Dhruv Grewal, and Timna Bressgott. 2019. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 48,1 (Oct. 2019), 24–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
[20]. 20.Ching-Ter Chang, Jeyhun Hajiyev, and Chia-Rong Su. 2017. Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning approach. Comput. Educ vol. 111 (Aug. 2017), 128–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
[21]. 21.Noor Al-Qaysi, Norhisham Mohamad-Nordin, and Mostafa Al-Emran. 2018. A systematic review of social media acceptance from the perspective of educational and information systems theories and models. J. Educ. Comput. Res.57,8 (Dec. 2018), 2085-2109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118817879
[22]. 22.Sungwoo Na, Seunghee Heo, Seungjun Han, Yoonseok Shin, and Youngjin Roh. 2022. Acceptance model of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in construction firms: Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) in combination with the technology–organisation–environment (TOE) framework. Buildings 12,2 (Jan. 2022), Article 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020090.
[23]. 23.Vikas Garg, Shalini Srivastav, and Anubhuti Gupta. 2018. Application of artificial intelligence for sustaining green human resource management. IEEE Xplore Digital Library (Oct. 2018), 113-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACE.2018.8686988
[24]. 24.Dr. Owais Ahmed. 2018. Artificial intelligence in HR. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) 5, 4 (December 2018), 971–978. https://ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR1944797.pdf
[25]. 25.Cristina Trocin, Ingrid Våge Hovland, Patrick Mikalef, and Christian Dremel. 2021. How Artificial Intelligence affords digital innovation: a cross-case analysis of Scandinavian companies. Technological Forecastimg Social Change 173 (August 2021), 121081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121081.
[26]. 26.PoojaTripathi, Jayanthi Ranjan, and TarunPandeya. 2012. Human Resource Management through AI Approach: An Experimental Study of an Expert System, National Conference on Communication Technologies & its impact on Next Generation Computing, International Journal of Computer Applications, 23-26. https://research.ijcaonline.org/ctngc/number3/ctngc1030.pdf
[27]. 27.David Brougham and Jarrod Haar. 2018. Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization 24, 2 (March 2018), 239–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55
[28]. 28.Samuel Ogbeibu, Jude Emelifeonwu, Vijay Pereira, Raphael Oseghale, James Gaskin, Uthayasankar Sivarajah, and Angappa Gunasekaran. 2023. Demystifying the roles of organisational smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics and algorithms capability: A strategy for green human resource management and environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 33, 2 (June 2023), 369–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3495
[29]. 29.Marcello M. Mariani, Isa Machado, Vittoria Magrelli, and Yogesh K. Dwivedi. 2023. Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions. Technovation 122 (2023), 102623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102623
[30]. 30.Si Shi, Yuhuang Gong, and Dogan Gursoy. 2020. Antecedents of trust and adoption intention toward artificially intelligent recommendation systems in travel planning: A heuristic–systematic model. Journal of Travel Research 60, 8 (Nov. 2020), 1714–1734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520966395
[31]. 31.Ching Sing Chai, Thomas K. F. Chiu, Xingwei Wang, Feng Jiang, and Xiao-Fan Lin. 2023. Modeling Chinese secondary school students’ behavioral intentions to learn artificial intelligence with the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory. Sustainability 15, 1 (Dec. 2022), 605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010605
[32]. 32.Sheshadri Chatterjee, Ranjan Chaudhuri, and Demetris Vrontis. 2022. Examining the impact of adoption of emerging technology and supply chain resilience on firm performance: Moderating role of absorptive capacity and leadership support. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (Jan. 2022), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3134188
[33]. 33.Xiaoqiang Song, Yanhua Cong, Yujie Song, Yuxuan Chen, and Peng Liang. 2022. A bearing fault diagnosis model based on CNN with wide convolution kernels. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 13, 8 (Aug. 2022), 4041–4056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03177-x
[34]. 34.Sarah Bankins. 2021. The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: A decision-making framework. Ethics and Information Technology 23, 4 (Dec. 2021), 841–854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09619-6
[35]. 35.Yujie Liang, Seunghee H. Lee, and Jane E. Workman. 2020. Implementation of artificial intelligence in fashion: Are consumers ready? Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 38, 1 (2020), 3–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X19873437
[36]. 36.Daniel Belanche, Luis V. Casaló, Carlos Flavián, and Jeroen Schepers. 2020. Robots or frontline employees?: Exploring customers’ attributions of responsibility and stability after service failure or success. Journal of Service Management 31, 2 (September 2020), 267–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2019-0156
[37]. 37.Arne De Keyser, Sabine Köcher, Linda Alkire (née Nasr), Charlotte Verbeeck, and Jay Kandampully. 2019. Frontline service technology infusion: Conceptual archetypes and future research directions. Journal of Service Management 30, 1 (Feb. 2019), 156–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-03-2018-0082
[38]. 38.Grzegorz Mazurek and Katarzyna Małagocka. 2019. Perception of privacy and data protection in the context of the development of artificial intelligence. Journal of Management Analytics 6, 4 (Oct. 2019), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2019.1671243
[39]. 39.Maria N. Cusipag, Samuel Oluyinka, Maria T. N. Bernabe, and Francis L. Bognot. 2024. Perceptions toward achieving work-life balance and job satisfaction in online teaching. Multidisciplinary Science Journal 6, 1 (July 2023), Article 2024012. https://doi.org/10.3390/msj6012024012
[40]. 40.Oluyinka Solomon. 2021. Exploring the facets of e-learning acceptance in developing country. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 42 (2021), 854–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2020.12.020
[41]. 41.Joseph F. Hair. 2019. Definition of SmartPLS 3. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com
[42]. 42.Hamed Taherdoost. 2018. Development of an adoption model to assess user acceptance of e-service technology: E-Service Technology Acceptance Model. Behaviour & Information Technology 37, 2 (Feb.2018) 173–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1427793
[43]. 43.Mohammad Aldhein. 2020. Interview versus questionnaire from the perspective of CBE members. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development 8, 2 (Feb. 2020), 21–41. Retrieved Nov. 17, 2020 from https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Interview-versus-Questionnaire-from-the-Perspective-of-CBE-Members.pdf.
[44]. 44.Mudavath Siva Durga Prasad Nayak and Narayan K A. 2019. Strengths and Weakness of Online Surveys. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 24, 5 (May 2019), 31–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/0837- 2405053138
[45]. 45.Megan E. Patrick, Mick P. Couper, Valerie B. Laetz, John E. Schulenberg, Patrick M. O’Malley, Lloyd D. Johnston, and Richard A. Miech. 2018. A Sequential Mixed-Mode Experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the Future Study. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 6, 1 (March 2018), 72–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx020
[46]. 46.Jon A. Krosnick. 2018. Questionnaire design. In The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research, David L. Vannette and Jon A. Krosnick (Eds.). Springer, 439–455. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_32.
[47]. 47.Hamed Taherdoost. 2019. What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Management 8 (March 2019), 1–10. Retrieved from https://elvedit.com/journals/IJARM/archive/volume-08-2019.php.elvedit.com+1elvedit.com+1
[48]. 48.Lucy Shinners, Christina Aggar, Sandra Grace, and Stuart Smith. 2021. Exploring healthcare professionals’ perceptions of artificial intelligence: Validating a questionnaire using the e-Delphi method. Digital Health 7 (March 2021), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221078110
[49]. 49.Naveed Sagheer, Kanwal Iqbal Khan, Sadaf Fahd, Syed Mahmood, Taimoor Rashid, and Hafiz Jamil. 2022. Factors affecting adaptability of cryptocurrency: An application of technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (June 2022), Article 903473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903473
[50]. 50.Shuyuan Mary Ho, Mónica Ocasio-Velázquez, and Cheryl Booth 2017. Trust or consequences? Causal effects of perceived risk and subjective norms on cloud technology adoption. Computers & Security 70 (Sept. 2017), 581–595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.08.004
[51]. 51.Ahmed M. Mutahar, Norzaidi Mohd Daud, T. Ramayah, Osama Isaac, and Adnan H. Aldholay. 2018. The effect of awareness and perceived risk on the technology acceptance model (TAM): mobile banking in Yemen. International Journal of Services and Standards 12, 2 (April 2018), 180–204. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSS.2018.10012980
[52]. 52.Rajasshrie Pillai and Brijesh Sivathanu. 2020. Adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for talent acquisition in IT/ITeS organizations. Benchmarking: An International Journal 27, 9 (Nov. 2020), 2599–2629. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSS.2018.10012980
[53]. 53.Joost de Winter and Dimitra Dodou. 2010. Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 15, 11 (Jan. 2010), 1–12.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7275/bj1p-ts64
[54]. 54.Esezi Isaac Obilor. 2023. Convenience and purposive sampling techniques: Are they the same? International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research 11, 1 (Mar. 2023), 1–7. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/728584078/IJISSER-M-1-2023
[55]. 55.Claes Fornell and David F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 1 (Feb. 1981), 39–50.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[56]. 56.Joseph F. Hair, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19, 2 (April 2011), 139–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
[57]. 57.Joseph F. Hair Jr., Mark Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle, and Stephan P. Gudergan. 2017. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
[58]. 58.Lee J. Cronbach. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 3 (September 1951), 297–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
[59]. 59.Jörg Henseler, Christian M. Ringle, and Rudolf R. Sinkovics. 2009. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing Vol. 20 (August 2009), Rudolf R. Sinkovics and Pervez N. Ghauri (Eds.). Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK, 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
[60]. 60.Jan Henseler, Christian M. Ringle, and Mark Sarstedt. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43, 1 (January 2015), 115–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
[61]. 61.Xiaohong Jia, John Smith, and Michael Lee. 2021. The impact of artificial intelligence on human resource management performance: A competitive advantage perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management 32, 10 (October 2021), 2050–2075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1896976
[62]. 62.Simona Popa, Pedro Soto-Acosta, and David Palacios-Marqués. 2017. The impact of social environment on employee creativity and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research 81 (August 2017), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.005
[63]. 63.Faisal Malik, Muhammad Khan, and Shahid Ali. 2024, April. Elevating the Influence of HR Analytics on Organizational Performance: An Empirical Investigation in Hi-Tech Manufacturing Industry of a Developing Economy. Journal of Contemporary Human Resource Management 15, 2 (April 2024), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040-800501.20241502
[64]. 64.Yanqing Duan, John S. Edwards, and Yogesh K. Dwivedi. 2021. Understanding managers' attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making. Technovation 106 (October 2021), 102312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312
[65]. 65.James Johnson, Alice Smith, and Michael Lee. 2021. The impact of artificial intelligence on human resource management performance: A competitive advantage perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management 32, 10 (May 2021), 2050–2075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1896976
[66]. 66.Michael Haenlein and Andreas Kaplan. 2021. Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 75, 1 (March 2021), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-021-00229-0






