Environment and Social Psychology

Educational technology and digital democracy: A case study of social media’s influence on undergraduate political engagement in Nigeria

Olayinka Anthony Ojo

School of Arts and Creative Technologies, University of Greater Manchester, Bolton, BL3 5AB, United Kingdom. ORCID:0000-0003-3209-549X

Bosede Iyiade Edwards

Centre for Instructional Technology & Multimedia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden 11800, Penang, Malaysia. ORCID:0000-0002-6922-311X

Julius Ademola Oyewole

Department of English Language, University of Ilesa, Osun State, Nigeria. ORCID: 0009-0001-9743-2445

Funmilola Ifeoluwa Mayowa

Faulty of Education, University of Ibadan, Ilesa Campus, Osun State, Nigeria

Florence Oluwafisayo Ajayi

Department of Adult Education and Lifelong Learning, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3612

Keywords: Digital impact; political engagement; political participation; social media; undergraduate

---

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of social media on undergraduate students' political participation in Nigeria. Among younger adults, social media has become a tool that is far more than a mainstream educational technology for supporting social learning and out-of-classroom educational connections, it has been playing a huge role in determining or changing the direction of political discourse. However, while social media platforms have become pivotal spaces for political discourse, their role in fostering or hindering meaningful political engagement among undergraduates remains understudied, particularly in how algorithmic curation and echo chambers might either empower or alienate young citizens in digital democratic processes. Specific objectives of the study include determining the usage of social media and the level of political participation of undergraduate students’ within and outside the campus. In addition, the study aims to assess the impact of social media on undergraduate students’ political participation and based on the findings, to propose a social media engagement model for student’s political participation. A descriptive survey research design was adopted for the study. The sample consists of two hundred (200) randomly selected third- and fourth-year undergraduates at a public university in south-west Nigeria. The research instrument was a questionnaire (α=0.889). The collected data were analyzed using percentage, mean, and ANOVA. Findings show that WhatsApp was the social media platform mostly used by students (61.5%). Students’ level of political participation was found to be moderate (mean = 3.0), while the impact of social media on students’ political participation was also moderate (mean = 3.0). there were no significant differences in students' level of political participation within and outside the campus or in the impact of social media on students’ political participation within and outside the campus. Social media continues to represent useful tools for promoting political participation and seamless electoral processes, however, its potential to contribute negatively to algorithmic curation and the creation of echo chambers must be addressed to ensure they are empowering rather than alienating younger adults in the digital democratic processes, thereby promoting better politics, and good governance.

---

References

[1]. 1.Jha, C. K., & Kodila-Tedika, O. (2020). Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(2), 271-290.

[2]. 2.Castells, M. (2020). Space of flows, space of places: Materials for a theory of urbanism in the information age. In The city reader (pp. 240-251). Routledge.

[3]. 3.Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of research methodology. Educreation publishing.

[4]. 4.Rahman, B., & Bunaiya, I. (2022, March). The role of social media in encouraging the political participation of millennials in the 2019 legislative election in Bireuen District. In 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM 2021) (pp. 193-199). Atlantis Press.

[5]. 5.Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2022). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology, 71(4), 1171-1204.

[6]. 6.Xuan, D., Jiang, X., & Fang, Y. (2023). Can globalization and the green economy hedge natural resources? Functions of population growth and financial development in BRICS countries. Resources Policy, 82, 103414.

[7]. 7.Yu, L., & Shek, D. T. L. (2021). Positive youth development attributes and parenting as protective factors against adolescent social networking addiction in Hong Kong. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 9, 649232.

[8]. 8.Vedeld, T., Hofstad, H., Mathur, M., Büker, P., & Stordal, F. (2020). Reaching out? Governing weather and climate services (WCS) for farmers. Environmental science & policy, 104, 208-216.

[9]. 9.Soita, S., & Njoroge, H. (2023). Social Media Influence on Personal Security among the Youth in Nairobi City County, Kenya. East African Journal of Information Technology, 6(1), 1-14.

[10]. 10.Ojo, O. A., Opeloye, B. A. & Olugbade, D. (2024). Social media versus students’ learning outcomes: Insights from a South-West Nigeria University. Journal of Educational Technology and Instruction, 3(1), 29-44.

[11]. 11.Yuan, D., Rahman, M. K., Issa Gazi, M. A., Rahaman, M. A., Hossain, M. M., & Akter, S. (2021). Analysing of user attitudes toward intention to use social media for learning. Sage Open, 11(4), 21582440211060784.

[12]. 12.Jennings, F. J., Suzuki, V. P., & Hubbard, A. (2021). Social media and democracy: Fostering political deliberation and participation. Western Journal of Communication, 85(2), 147-167.

[13]. 13.Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2021). News literacy, social media behaviors, and skepticism toward information on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 150-166.

[14]. 14.Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Maheshwari, D. (2020). Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101284.

[15]. 15.Alarcón González, F. J. (2021). Young people's political participation: New and old forms in contemporary Spain. Partecipazione e conflitto, 14(2), 914-932.

[16]. 16.Goldfarb, R. E. (2021). The Communication Of Controversy: An Examination of How College Students Engage with Political Debates on Social Media (Doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University).

[17]. 17.Wukich, C. (2021). Government social media engagement strategies and public roles. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(1), 187-215.

[18]. 18.Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2021). Outside the bubble: Social media and political participation in western democracies. Oxford University Press.

[19]. 19.Ruess, C., Hoffmann, C. P., Boulianne, S., & Heger, K. (2023). Online political participation: the evolution of a concept. Information, Communication & Society, 26(8), 1495-1512.

[20]. 20.Auriacombe, C. J., & Sithomola, T. (2020). The use of participatory action research in a participative democracy: In critique of mechanisms for citizen participation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 12(1), 50-65.

[21]. 21.Kura, S. Y. B., Shehu, M., Ladan, M. U., & Africa, Y. (2023). Youth Political Participation in Sokoto: Breaking the Stronghold and Creating Pathways.

[22]. 22.Neyazi, T. A., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Misinformation concerns and online news participation among internet users in India. Social Media+ Society, 7(2), 20563051211009013.

[23]. 23.Uwalaka, T. (2021). The impact of social media in political participation among students in Nigeria. Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(5), 145-154.

[24]. 24.McKay, S., & Tenove, C. (2021). Disinformation as a threat to deliberative democracy. Political research quarterly, 74(3), 703-717.

[25]. 25.Ikporho, A. J., & Nte, T. U. P. (2021). The Internet, Political Information and Citizens’ Amenability to Political mobilization in Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research, 9(3), 102-115.

[26]. 26.Ojeda, C., Bernardi, L. & Landwehr, C. (2023). Depression and the gender gap in political interest. Electoral Studies, 82 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102598.

[27]. 27.Wolak, J. (2014). Candidate Gender and the Political Engagement of Women and Men. American Politics Research, 43(5), 872-896. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X14547228 (Original work published 2015).

[28]. 28.Binstock, R. (2006). Older people and political engagement: from Avid voters to'cooled-out marks'. Generations, 30(4), 24-30.

[29]. 29.Larreguy, H., & Liu, S. X. (2024). When does education increase political participation? Evidence from Senegal. Political Science Research and Methods, 12(2), 354-371.

[30]. 30.Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2021). Digital media and democracy: a systematic review of causal and correlational evidence worldwide. Preprint at SocArXiv https://doi. org/10.31235/osf. io/p3z9v.

[31]. 31.Lim, M. S., Molenaar, A., Brennan, L., Reid, M., & McCaffrey, T. (2022). Young adults’ use of different social media platforms for health information: Insights from web-based conversations. Journal of medical Internet research, 24(1), e23656.

[32]. 32.Intyaswati, D., Maryani, E., Sugiana, D., & Venus, A. (2021). Social media as an information source of political learning in online education. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211023181.

[33]. 33.Lee, S., Nanz, A., & Heiss, R. (2022). Platform-dependent effects of incidental exposure to political news on political knowledge and political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107048.

[34]. 34.Kofi Frimpong, A. N., Li, P., Nyame, G., & Hossin, M. A. (2022). The impact of social media political activists on voting patterns. Political Behavior, 1-54.

[35]. 35.Diaz Ruiz, C., & Nilsson, T. (2023). Disinformation and echo chambers: how disinformation circulates on social media through identity-driven controversies. Journal of public policy & marketing, 42(1), 18-35